 I'm just curious if you could comment on the DAO on some of the weekend. I am shocked and surprised that that would be the first question you could bring up. I'm conflicted on the DAO. I've been watching this with great fascination. Mandatory disclosure, I am a DAO token holder. I bought, you know, I'm a whale in DAO spaces. I owned $40 when the DAO token was there. I know it's your DAO, aren't you? So I bought that because as I invest in a number of different cryptocurrencies, because in all of these systems, the best way to learn is to do, right? And in order to do, you have to hold the token. If you want to write an Ethereum contract, you have to have Ether. If you want to use Dash or Monero or Bitcoin or storage coin or whatever, you have to own the token. So I did buy DAO tokens. I also warned people on social media that this is the first one. It's completely untested. And it will probably be extremely risky. I did not expect it to blow up within just four weeks of launch. That was quite fast. But one of the things I said is that the most interesting lessons come not from success, but from failure. If you think of this as a particle physics experiment, the really interesting science happens when you analyze the debris of a fiery explosion. You smash two particles together, create a very big bang, and then you look at what comes shooting out of that collision. Well, we're going to be studying the debris of the fiery collapse of the DAO for years. And it's going to teach us a lot about governance. I think it's important to realize that if you look at this from the perspective of capitalism, you need destruction in order to learn. And one of the things that is unique about all of these systems is we're not talking about them, we're not theoretically analyzing them, we're doing them. And that's the only way to learn. And sometimes that means spectacular problems like this. And I think that's okay as long as you go into it knowing the risks. And really, people should understand the risks before they get involved. Now, how is this going to be resolved? There are no good options at this point. There's a lot of people who suggest that perhaps it should be allowed to fail, that it's a great security bounty for the person who discovered the flaws, and that the investor's caveat emptor knew what they were getting into. Others say that this should precipitate a soft fork followed by a hard fork and other interventions in the Ethereum chain. The idea is appealing. It sets up a terrible precedent that may cause more problems than it solves. I'm not going to take you in a position, because I have the luxury of not being either a miner or one of the Ethereum core developers who has to make this very difficult decision. I'm going to watch with interest, but there are no good options. In the end, though, I don't think this changes the fundamental nature of these things. Smart contracts are fascinating. They will have an enormous impact on law, on commerce, on the Internet of Things, on many other technology fields. The implementation of distributed autonomous organizations, either as investment vehicles, or as new forms of social organization for entrepreneurs, for cooperatives, for any form of governance-based social entity. All of these things are amazing. They will happen again and again, and more of them will blow up spectacularly. We will learn. Even Enron taught us something, if not at least to improve our accounting standards and practices. We have four of the great accounting and management consulting firms here today. Ten years ago, there were five. Sometimes that's the price you pay for innovation.