 with his Spatial Viewer for iOS and MetaQuest. So I think this came up way back when we were doing Apple Vision Pro stuff and we had been talking about the new Spatial videos and how cool they are and the fact that MetaQuest came out and has support it. So Josh from Softorino, one of the minds behind Walter which is another app we've talked about, great app, emailed us and said, it's not about their apps, it's just a story that he thought might be useful. He said, perhaps this can be interesting for those who have an iPhone, a MetaQuest headset, but no Vision Pro headset. Here's the deal, Apple released Vision Pro and made Spatial videos a thing, then MetaQuest released support for Spatial videos in their latest update, but, and I didn't know this, according to a Reddit post that he linked us to, you could only upload videos from the Quest app using an iPhone 15. So that leaves you in the lurch. What if you wanna share those videos with somebody who doesn't have an iPhone 15 and a MetaQuest, you know, what are you gonna do that? What are you gonna do about that? And to solve this, he says, we helped VR developers create Spatial Viewer, the most straightforward and fastest solution for viewing Spatial videos without a Vision Pro headset. Basically, you install this Spatial Viewer companion app on your iPhone. If you don't have Spatial videos, then you can record them with your iPhone 15 Pro or Pro Max. Then in one tap, you can convert Spatial video and send it to Google Drive. Now you simply open Spatial Viewer on your MetaQuest and the videos will be available there and they're all synced via the cloud through Google Drive. So we'll have the links to the Spatial Viewer apps and the product page and all that sort of stuff, but there you go. Yeah, that's weird that they would make that requirement. I don't know. Well, I think it's because the iPhone 15 can take them, right? Right, sure. And so it has the, I don't know. I agree, this is ridiculous, but it's gotta have something to do with the fact that the iPhone 15 can take them and so it can see them and process them differently, but there's no reason, obviously, that that needs to be a static truth. It's just the format, right? It can read the format, right? Why can't you transfer the bits? Yep, I can try, yep. So Adam, what's the difference? If I send you a video that I've done in Spatial and in just a regular video, I'm assuming you can see them both on your Vision Pro. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. We did run into that issue where it was weird where we had us kind of send it through iCloud where we couldn't send it direct. Oh, right. But I think that was more a file size storage thing, maybe, I don't know. I think what it was trying to do was dumb it down so that it didn't presume you were sending it to someone with a Vision Pro, like if you texted it or something like that. Sure enough, yeah. I think it came through as just a standard video without the Spatial stuff. Well, I guess what I'm asking, if you watch a regular video on the Vision Pro, Vice, a Spatial video that I've taken, is there a difference in what you're seeing? Oh, yeah, I mean, maybe I'm not misunderstanding the question, but obviously a Spatial video has got the Spatial stuff and regular video is just regular video. Yeah, so you don't get the full immersive kind of thing of the Spatial video. The 3D. The 3D. The depth. Yeah, gotcha. Okay.