 It's the same as what you're doing now. So the idea is just that you shout out your ideas and do this custom. Sorry about the recording. Anybody watching is more of a discussion thing. Basically, only if you need to provide some ideas beforehand. Well, if we have nothing to discuss anymore, then keep going. So, this is actually one of my... That's a good point, actually. Yeah, so we are actually there when we came here first. Anybody from earlier? No? Sorry if you'll submit a request. We re-issued. We replanted through it. It looked like a basin. Yeah. It's just... I always get lost when people call me therapist. It's so good. It's so good. I would actually be happy to have some time until then without wanting to reply to that. But I don't want to do it myself. It's just insane, effective crap. It's obviously more than it's done and it's good that they're offering systems. So, yes. Yes. And it's a lot bigger away. You will be quite different. If that means that you should pack it for September or something. Well, at least that should start. At least that should start packing. I don't need to. Do you remember how long ago, how basically, we spent power? What was called that power? Powering. So, for two people one, shut down ideas first, do some slides, then shout ideas, don't get involved in a lot of everything. That's exactly what people talk about. Issues of stuff that needs to be done. So, for two people. Well, remove packages. And actually, that is one of them. Yeah. Oh, yeah. So, we need to be involved here. Is there any objections? I mean, please. More dead than something that's very dead. So, I mean, we've made extensive efforts. So, we do have two of you, right? So, do you mind not having to just move? So, it wasn't your fault. You didn't get to do it. Yeah. So, will we do it? No. I can do it, actually. The follow-up question is, why? Yeah. It would be really nice if the 19-year-olds, currently, we are missing the 19-year-olds or aren't we? Maybe we should, don't we? That actually seems to be good. So, it would be nice. I think the more mandatory it is for the 19-year-olds to make an agreement. Yeah. You know, if you're on a one-day frame, it's a problem. I don't know anything about it. It's uncharitable. Yeah. It would be nice to make a agreement. I think that in the past, in the past, we tried to contact, but not ever. Maybe they just can't, because they have to put something forward and maintain it forward. That's the main thing. We tried to ignore it. So, at least, we should have a discussion when they do it now, and then we settle on it. We think it's pretty good. No problem. So, if we're going to spark for it, do you have any doubt? I probably don't have any doubt, because we have some design problems. We need to extend somehow that sort of corporate infrastructure. And then, when we are ready, we'll ask for the steam engine for sure. No, but I know it's actually a bit hard in these days to get an excellent spark. Do you doubt what happens when you have one? I've lost it. I'm still in the department. Okay, sorry. I know there are some questions about the development of metal in doubt of the production system. The company provides some access to the machine, but the entire case is waiting. So, if you look at the situation, you have some kind of critical goal and it's not available. So, I've lost a lot of people. Okay, sorry. But, do you see people somehow who do the best on the farm? Have they got some access to 25 or maybe something new? I don't know if you can ask. Oh, yeah. I don't know. I have to admit that three months ago, I was just a little after that. But yeah, it's key space. Yeah, it's key space. Yeah. But all the lines, for example, the furniture, all the styles, the workings. And when I've been called, I'm always losing a little bit of time to think what styles should I use. I'm doing a lot less in GB today, if it's my question. Yeah. I'm not that fond of, I really would like to be able to have a line because why the term in is a screen space. It's a question of time. But we're also going to find a history problem. I'm like functional. I I could tell what is. Like you're assuming that there's actually some kind of test of all the factors and they answer that. That's a long insight. You know, when I was in making all those changes, obviously, both the first one and the third one can also like name space, brand space, artist space, I tried to make it possible. That's how it first started. That's also what it was. I don't know what it was. But I don't know. I don't know the last one. But what was going on in the code kind of this story. What What we know is that they have a style checker that must pass on any new cooking exam in Trump. So all of that code, the curious authors, it's fine if you ever touch any cocktail updates, but if you're having any code that you'll know that we give you some style. if anyone in the people is actually like that. And I can see a gender. That's true. And one is, see, you and I just went saying, should we manage an effect looper backing to boundaries? It's kind of depending on the outside of the looper. Yes. We really should. Hang on, yeah. Yeah, that's... I'm mixing stuff up. Yeah, that's the only question. I actually don't know who they can get, because it seems to sound so friendly. I'm sort of using mercurial, but I can kind of see the way that they decide on this, but it's not in mercurial space. Yeah, so to be honest, I'm only a bit far behind some people who live next to them. Because I don't really have that conversion and I don't really feel the value of this stuff. And I can have some greater time. I can actually move and create culture that is kind of a history show. So if we could move to the kit, then we would have to do an inversion. Okay? Your job. So that doesn't... You have to get a sausage. You have to get a sausage. Oh, yes, okay. You have to read and have the kit master read somewhere, right? Yes. So that's about the possibilities. For example, so that they would know who was talking to the software. So it's very helpful for the other IGNB, ex-dares, can you see how it's here? So if you know why it's here, so that's it. Okay. Would anybody have a problem in principle if you move away from the conversion? Oh! I actually don't have any single point of failure at the repo. I'll pack it up every couple of weeks, but I don't like that. So where is it hosted now? It's hosted in... It's hosted by Cambridge by a company called Mythic Peace, which stands to the address for that kind of company. I guess they have places in Cambridge that offer something like that. Okay. Good day, how was the kit? It's a bit personal, I think. My version of it. Yeah. So the idea is just somebody should do it. Yes. And then, so people do it because you have to come down to the unit or something like that. So you can do that without using all the history, right? Yeah, so the only problem I see is do we want to merge the two models into one kit? Then I want to know how to order it, please. Well, I mean, if you might want to do something else because you have two separate sets of models to deal with, you have to think is it this tree or that tree or is it Mythic Peace because I like to change the word. So you want a way that you can actually have just beg for by itself without having to jump around. And I can actually speak to the organizational mechanism of having separate approaches. So all of them want to talk about different approaches. And to some extent, this has benefited us a lot because people are using clarifying clay and high backs just by themselves in lots of good applications. So in some ways it's not here and in some ways it's very beneficial until you want to see it. I think in this case I don't think it would be too much of a nightmare to have from being in this same tree to make live backs commands in the new make file that just spit out like this. So one of the features of this case is that they also need to spell like this. That's that's the big reason I would like just now to find the two co-eds of this case. Yes, yes, yes, okay. Yeah, I'm going to talk to Lisa too next over in the open rooms. Just You can. Go ahead. The only other part of it is we have one thing there that probably has to be doing releases. Yeah. Based on all of its subversion that love us. Yeah. Would you apply that if we move to the gate there? I would. I'm not really into subversions being great in the CVS if you remember. I can see that you can't move on and I'm going to I don't know how to use it I'm going to use one zero. Yeah. It's okay. I'm going to just see that I'm just going to use a long way in the future but if we're people we're going to do that I'm not going to do that. First of all the sanity check is moving into a different plan. If we move to the gate is there something else that we have to do in another year? I don't always it's I think the conversion will take some time especially if you want to make one big kid you're most worried about you're going to access maybe all of these three I've done in the past one. So once the conversion is done I think it will take some time to kind of defense the person who is doing the conversion and I thought it was important to look at the information and the information and the vehicles and the website and also I can go on the next slide. No. Yeah. How was the problem on the website? If you correct anything do you want to start making it? Yeah, I hope so. Hope. Do you have any questions? Yes. If you push is that the right word? Push directly to the gate and what's that we get back then? So I think because they didn't have a word or anything. If you do that you might be going to a similar conversion but in that you need something like Mons it's one channeling the other and then at some point it's switched or you would just say Friday we stop we use the new one we have something like that so for what we use the plan or the suggestion to do all that it's all free to check if you don't discuss yourself a bit and then you can go on. This is a patient approach we realize of the world of some life we realize we have a place where we solve the device of the plan of that way Oh, I'm certainly one of the ones to make more to pick up is that the first word in the end so far that we're going to pick up those names and pick up all of the news and all of the advertising and the field is going to get up and then it's actually for the press to try to get you to also look in the eye and it's the field things that we've invented and our development It was including a little bit of help to know where the actual loads are and how they're going to change the way this works I mean, I know the first word I know is a lot of kids know well, first because we have some sort of time to make use of that and except for I know it was very it was also very if it's going to float you can have time small but but whose source are you talking about? yeah people very nice people I am my birthday project it's kind of funny because it used to be the side news people and then they worked with Red Hat and now all these people that maintain source work I think Red Hat still pays for the hardware that says we'll make a we have to now that's my thing I'm not sure but I think there's a lot of things that you'll be able to see and see how hardware is going to that's why management really this is really for the brand of those people so maybe the licensing question an interesting topic at all sure sure so I think we want to take a look at this don't just practically just like you are only asking to have the library exception you suggest the TGPL but without the library exception it's a little unusual for libraries to be GPL usually in GPL end your programs and you to take libraries and BSDM or something or help it so what does the discussion on that happen I'm not a lawyer nor do I I'm not a lawyer I would like to know what the library exception would actually make all the people scared about using English for commercial activities less scared what's the library exception I don't even understand that I just know that it means that the TGPL but if you look at it just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just just So, you know, you might have a little license in the exception, you know, if you go to a place that you're at and find out about, except they do. And I also think that way, especially where they're at, you know, they put the different types of process or something. Yeah, we have a lot of really weird ideas on how to firewall ourselves in the GPL. So, our current approach is, we have the C part of highback, which step into the back so it provides a nicer interface than the rest of the arts. And so that's GPL, because it's pretty common in the statically against the new CPL. But then we thought highbacks itself is sort of becoming this abstract idea of something that can service requests for IR. And then one of the things that it knows how to call out, too, is livebacks together. And there's this translation between the livebacks structs, which under some interpretations are GPL, and then the highbacks classes. The highbacks classes are limitations of these, but how much intellectual nonsense are probably from one to the other. Yeah, that's right. So, I would say things, honestly, I think it's from you, that's what we are. And secondly, I don't think this is the problem. My actual movie and what would be played 100 times, you know, in the last few years. So, do you think it's going to be about 70% of the world? Yeah, hopefully there's some day also. So, but I think what you kind of want is a way to enter IR as data and then have different programs that relate the data and those different programs are even not sort of things. So, maybe it's also just structuring the programs that come up with a different representation. But I would say there's lots of projects and things like that. So, as you presented, we're seeing what you're saying about the controversy that you're saying and what you're saying also. So, are you happy with the license? Yes. I mean, you need to go through all of it. It's not all my kids. Like, me, fish, young, how many of you have contributed to that project? Sure, we have quite a few of them. Yes, they have all of us. Yes. So, of course, something like this is, is that the idea that you would be able to to, for example, go out and take part in some of the circumstances. I don't know. You're not going to be able to do that. So, are you going to be able to do that? I don't know. So, we need to do that thing for the person themselves. I actually don't know what it means. I mean, you don't have to make decisions for yourself. No. At least, conservancy is more a way to keep your essence somewhere. You're expecting by you. It's what the essence are. We define it. Also, it just is. You can't collect money for that. But you could also, I actually would like to be able to speak to myself under some umbrella organization like that. Yes, that's part of the process. If you know somebody, you can read any of the comments. But there are more organizations like that. It would be nice because I know they also know this because of that. And you can ask them as a member of the project. And they have legal stuff. Actually, somebody is responsible for it. A technical point of view. This is another different question. As far as release changes, do we want to take the call back? Do we need to do a 3-12 release? I think it would be nice for at least for Fedora and Rael. I take a lot of other distributions. So it would really be good for the distributions. Because I can't listen to Wooten for example. And either the Pets, but it wasn't a release. All the year. The red group that were at the same time. Yeah. It wasn't two line Pets. Yeah. But as soon as there was a release name for the organization, I think it's nice to have a 4-2 release system. So you're saying 3-12 is better than this? Yeah. It's also more interesting. I think ideally we have a yearly release and one for maybe two or three weeks. Yes. Try to send 4-3 for a 4-2 release system. Do that. Maybe one or two days a week from now. We're trying to deal with it. So that needs to be done in a 3-12 release. Cool. Yeah. Can I look at your patches? I don't know what to say. Yeah. So a few weeks ago, the detectives thought that there was a fast and fast release. And so it's back to me. It's just a few minutes. It's a fairly fast release. And after that one, it's in time. So it's only been three weeks ago. It had a really bad effect. The bad interaction is a simple frequency scaling. And according to my recent evaluation on medium range and low relapse, or medium range and low relapse at first, I don't see this interaction in the world. And so that's fine. So I thought it was a very simple yes. No. Really? I thought it was. That's crazy. I was running my house. Yes. I run my house a lot. And it has been really bad. It's been really bad. But I'm glad that's fine. Let me make a sense. But it was a significant fast release ago. And I don't think this is a case anymore. So my suggestion is to switch to try. Try is if the ticket skipper, the ticket of words, the music on the white automatically fall back to the pilot skipper. I can't get nervous about that. You really have to balance this data. Because no, I don't want to do something like that. It's going to be a thing. But I don't think it's like that. So couldn't we just configure it so that it's set to yes or no? And no on macOS? Well, anyway, so this is a micro discussion. But I think we should change it. What should we do about macOS for? It's kind of working less and less. I kind of don't have time to fix it. And I feel bad that it took me so long to do this. It was already active. Which seems to be in the rest of the data. It's kind of in part with the pilot skipper. So as far as I know, we've been using it for over 6 days. And I've been using it for over 7 days. And macOS, so I don't have any phone, never used it. Since 5 days, obviously. So I don't call this thing. The link is on the code name. I'm not sure if you've heard of it. I don't know what it is. I don't know what it is. I feel like there's pain in the heart. In fact, I think a lot of what I would like to see. I see that we have an e-mail for the pizza. Then we have to see to change the value of 3 steps. 5 or yes. You have to set up to compact the e-links by 20. The 3DSD, I'm not sure if we try or not to integrate them. We have to see just to stay in any world. We have to see both of the e-links. We have to see both of the e-links. I don't know if she's really compacting it. You know what I'm saying? Well, we have to find a way to do it. I don't know if I can find a way. So you have to find a way. Okay. I also would be happy to give you a follow-up on this. I'm not sure if we can do it or not. I'm not sure if we can do it or not. What's your thoughts on the combination of the e-links and the e-links? Oh, sorry. No, yes. I'm not sure. It doesn't bother me. I don't use it. I kind of feel somehow I have to reach it in papers. It kind of doesn't really work well enough to run large programs on that one. You know, we're damaging our reputation. So I think it's not that great. Yeah. I just don't know. It doesn't work that great. Well, it could just background my thoughts on the, you know, if you put the computer down, I could think a few of these is back and now I'm pretty sure it works. Yeah. I think I have a way to go out there. Yeah. I'm not sure. Probably because that's the last piece, right? How it feels. Yeah. Forks. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. Forks. Forks of the idea. I have a better understanding of what it tastes like working in the city. Mm. Finally, Yeah. Forks of the idea. Forks of the idea. And I understand that. I understand that the cancer shock is the reason we need it. OK. I've never used it at all. It was sort of a white song scene. It was a white song song. It's a good way to read it. You read those books, don't you? Yes. You start them to work. Really? Yes. Yes. It's a very, very black color. Oh. I was talking to the machine. If you're going to read those books, what kind of environment would it be? You could be learning three or four things. Yeah. Yeah. Good. I'm going to help you. I have one of your sisters called. My sister called. How'd she cope with it? Oh, yes. By the Mario. Oh, that's a great one. OK. The random comment is not as random as it seems. Is there anything you'd be interested in trying to read or even mention shadow memory so that we no longer have this crazy hat where it's all at the bottom of the address space? Because if we did that, then we could get rid of the less-than-the-adress space manager, which is a whole bunch of idiotic complexity that I really didn't like. The whole point of the address space manager is to try to get all the mappings of the bottom of the address space so that the manager works. And I'd love to get rid of myself. And I think that also that has a really bad effect on my thoughts for some reason might be wrong. So if anybody wants to take it as a project to try to act out with me, I should definitely do it. Maybe you should just point this out. Yeah. You guys are back there. You will get rid of the space manager. Oh, yeah. Yeah. We've also made some effort on parallelization as well. Yeah. I'm not following the idea. I'm not following the idea. I just pointed this out. It would be an architectural cleanup, structural cleanup that would be really cool to do if you could do it without losing control of the space. And tossing to the top of the line is the niche impacts to our project. OK. So you basically mean having a project for a local estate or a KLS? I know you believe someone believes that. They don't have the storage. No. I mean, I know what that means. So what's it like to tell what we should do? The way I envision it is just you have them having a method that you with the area of reference life that's the callback that is give me a little storage block. And there is just a top level of effects for a little storage block struck, which is the user knows that they may not allocate a block of that size and have a separate one for each standard in terms of that. So that, I mean, that sounds harmless, but I would ask you, how would you actually enforce this narrative? Yeah, so two years down the line, somebody who's not really aware of this mechanism has several variable effects that have all become fun threads again. Is there some automatic way of avoiding this? How do we avoid this? How do we avoid this? How do we set course for the right game? What number? To set course for a game of the right game in the root screen block. Can you describe this to me? That's not right. You can just see it says there's an island level variable. Any which one level variable is a very little storage block. Other than that, given that you probably like to just write a simple script which takes the effects off so instead of are there any little variables other than this, this, this, what this might respond to, that's a great plan. Cool. So one of the things on today would be access, but I don't know why we set feet on this. So one of the things that I just think would be is if this is a real performance security, it's concerning one deal, run the best single thread environments as fast as you could. It could also just be a pre-process or a pre-processed flag that so all accesses to the global will go through map evaluation and the single thread version which evaluates to a global, this is the structure which is a single global variable, but on multi-thread integration it's effective. You see the credit just cost and no break for vacuum. That's all. Confidential, journal based. I don't like how this compilation is an easy and possible program yes, but I mean, maybe it's not expensive because how many people are suspecting? Oh, why? It's like, I actually tried doing this, see if I can not include in my hashtag there's so many. But on top of that, there's also the allocation of an assignment. Yeah, it's like That has to be thread. Every thread I can say has to have this 5 megabyte buffer before it is. I mean, you could just think that in a block but there's basically nothing in a block. I mean, I need to evaluate the actual performance of Dex in this memory allocation, what it looks like to have for example, we'll call that for how the client program is specified. I'm doing my own management now. Oh, that's definitely a big problem. Is it out of place? Yeah, this I mean, this is something that I could stick on as a side project at some point down the road. Yeah, I mean, looking at the capability. I don't know, it's given that there seems to be some degree of support that you can show that it's not professional performance that needs to be confident enough to try to throw some weight to it. It will be definitely almost out of place. I think it's definitely possible for there to be a compiled live that just says that it only now, and we're going to make all of ours to have one version of the TLS struct that's just in global memory. So, who has actually the master list of all this stuff? I need to give you some rules. So, everybody in this you have seen the the top in fact, what you have explained which is not by the spark actually. In software as a kind of new option to make shape over the the user's history of the user itself. You should bring the best players to this to be able to do that. And that was then the thing that got to the range and I think that's a cool point which is it's messy once you start to work with people on this. We have a whole chapter about this. Do you agree? Do you agree with what you were saying? The thing is my objective is to be inside or these ideas taken by the results. You get the difficulties. You have two points as a factor than what you have. What does that do? Well, we are with a point of higher critiques other than the then just to arise the other is first choked out possibly electrified. Then you can work with the version of the user and you can work with the other players. If the point is going to symbol then the versions are the same. But if they point to other bots then the results are going to point to bots and find as if this doesn't happen all the time. The action which is the basis of which can be So does everybody have a time now? Anyone? Yes. It's just a point of question. What is the status of the x-men support? I mean, if there is interest or not because bot lanes support symbols there is no x-men support but they support x-men 4.5 right? No, there is no support for it. There is no system support. Yes, of course. There is some support in the power ring but it's x-men 4.5 I'm asking this because I have created a patch for x-men 4.6 and started on x-men 4.7 I don't know if there is any input or so you assume that there is management but there is no management. We just thought people used to send us send patches and sometimes we merged them and I had no idea what they did but they didn't bring all the files so they went in. Yes, there is interest as long as it doesn't work. That's right. You mean who wrote it? Who who who made it? They came from a guy called Eric Campbell is that right? Yes, I can see it. Your patches are in the back but what is here? I am using the symbol it's just a minor correction for x-men 4.6.5 and notice that there are some problems also there is another edge for the symbol and it's just a minor correction. You have introduced a bug in Maxia to follow these patches but I think that's the best information for the problem. Yes, I know that and then from the developers you are actually easy to integrate and I promise I will be the accelerator of this store in my life and I will be able to put it in the next slide. Put another task in it. I am just asking because he is here with me and my friend again so this is the absolute of the individual and that whole chase and that kind of Are you still happy to mix my thing? Yes, you are looking kind of unhappy. No, I am just thinking and I am just complaining that I don't have something inside to lose. I don't care if you keep that with me and Roger but I am fine. So, anybody else that matches that they think the project has been applied because Max is the game? Yes, that's a big question. So, because you have just the old model Yeah. You don't get a thing like this. Are you very involved in the scale of that? Well, maybe we might have to change the scale. Yeah. Oh, yes. I have to tell you honestly, I am not into this. I would say that you are I think it is a different program as well as you see. Yeah, okay. Richard, I can summarize my saying I am actually a long sequence of a long basic plot, a long sequence of structures and the first part came from one by the source code and the next part came from a different source code. Do you have a range of sources that you already use the source code line? There will be a deal of unwind from the basic plot starting from some place to start with the basic plot in the standard standards. And the program that goes past is invisible transition. It is an interesting thing to be involved in my calls like the developer asks how do you take it into account as this code because that was when we face people's team lines of code there was no exit. So the cache state was not compatible with it. That is why I have to use this code. I would say I am not happy with doing this in practice. I think you are going to present a different plan which is that you use the online information to find regions where all the unwind rules are the same. So if you then unwind from here and then you unwind one way back to your unwind starting with a different place there has been the same unwind region and you know you just use the same standards. That is what I thought very much and I would be happy with that. If you want to answer the question in the back I would not say it is like anything I am sorry I am being too much responsible. This was waiting some way I stand this one because it was still in the code but I am sitting in the back for example I am taking general if I don't spot it make more noise. Well there is one action which is before word control then when one was disabled on the ceiling on any part of the world we need to place that open and close and close and this is something that I have already I try to find pull an item in this tree whatever one thing is not TXT let's make the tree yeah I hope about that usually issues can not reach that one or even down because the disabled all of that regular you know you need to reverse reverse an action but when I change those in reality in the world because there are parts that are there for us yes you are right I look at it every now and again like this thing a couple of months into it which is not good it would have to be useful to have somebody here have to monitor the bug situation kind of a great deal of information over these times here yeah I I'll need to go after the bugs when you go after the bugs before I release it then I will kind of yeah but maybe we should do that how much of that money can we bring in can we get red hats pay for somebody's a bit of somebody's money and keep people's money and we need more people we need more people to actually do this stuff yeah yeah I don't know the first one things I I it is sometimes I don't know maybe I need to find our solution but the most kind of funny idea was that easy tasks who type of people who are kind of interested in that often in a year I'm thinking about all the tasks presentation by itself nobody so maybe I am bad at showing what easy tasks are or that's not the way to do it probably we need community manager community manager so yeah so people want to do that people want to be released people want to put that character it's not full no no no okay I will work with the rest of the system rest of the system this is cause I I think this is called that yeah I mentioned that one I still make it a little cleaner just send some patches do nothing else then rename a function like new uname to just uname etc so in one moment the whole system table will be just generated yeah let's give it a little extra it was on and it was just went a lot easier than it used to be it is kind of funny because this is called you imagine that the information is somewhere out there because I work with it or the system but I want some people to look at it as praise and support your program everybody does their own thing it was kind of if it wasn't 5 it would have been we must because we will take it as 5 and this we will close it all because we will do it close it down and discussions I think I have one question I think it was discussed in my last about any when we look at all those system problems a lot of them are just copied files from one architecture to another just because this one looks like this 64 grids this one looks like this for 52 grids and some are in general some are copied and yes for a lot of architecture there was just a copy of the previous things like this one and a lot of factor values and when it is a lot of different so some people for example some people it looks terrible it looks differently and a lot of them factorize some things alone I think they factorize the copy the copy enemy that one I don't know what is my question I don't know I don't know I don't know but it's like some factorize and I don't know I don't know so yes you have batched of factorize and I will take your longest okay but basically what we said when I looked there was what it was like Because, like, maybe sixty-four can't go for twenty-two people, I don't know why it's better stuff. Yeah, I don't know. There are a lot of issues. There are a lot of issues. There are a lot of issues. There are a lot of issues.