 Dobro vsi, sem Francesco Rivanti, je prikratnico v PISA. Protožite, da se vse pomembnimo vsega vsega vživljenja v italii, in vsega v enko občasnih projekte, na kvalitativni in kvalitativne analizi. Zato v moj imednje je naredil na vlitečnih, se boje vsega lahko izvijati, nekaj z vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega. Volečenih je zvisne, da je od zelo zelo početne, ker je zelo, da se predstavljali. Sprav se je izvanje in zelo si tako všeč in in in do rečenih, koli se je vsechačenih rečenih, če tudi iz toga postavljenja, in zelo je vsečenih, narediti se izrečenih. V Italiji je zelo, da vsečenih je začen, as a group of people who are fascinated about archaeology and they want to be involved. This idea lays at the root of the regulation and the promotion of the involvement of volunteers, and I believe that we need to focus more on understanding the possibilities of interaction in their meaning. So, let's see, okay. Let's see the three examples of participation of volunteers in archaeology in my research. My three case studies are Mastachukoli Romana, Pojo del Molino in Vignale, and they are three roman sites located in Tuscany. Pojo del Molino in Vignale are archaeological excavations. I'm going archaeological excavation while Mastachukoli Romana is a small archaeological area recently excavated in different kontekst in different ways. All of them organizes outreach activities from guided tours to theatrical performances, sportive events, and so on. And this stakeholder analysis recently conducted shows that different kinds of volunteers have an interest in each site. Probably the most common way of involving volunteers in archaeology is excavation. At Pojo del Molino, most of the volunteers who participate in the project are provided by the American NGO Earthwatch. They pay for experiencing a period with archaeologists, supporting them in non-technical operations related to excavation. They usually choose to come to Pojo del Molino for learning the basics of archaeology, and since they are not Italian speakers, supporting outreach activities as guided tours would be very difficult. They only take part in non-technical operations related to excavation. According to the field director, one limitation to the program concerns the recent ordinance of the ministry that prohibited the involvement of volunteers in excavation, in technical operations related to excavation. The second example shows a different situation. At Vignale volunteers are the members of local associations and single persons. They spend their spare time supporting archaeological outreach with the aim of promoting the project with investigating their local history. Without their help for the archaeologists it would be impossible to set up any complex outreach activity. For example, the last year Giuseppe, that is the man here in this photo, took the initiative and planned an event on two consecutive days. Giuseppe is a resident of Follonica, a small city near the excavation. This event was organized as a conference in the city hall of Isontown, Follonica, and a guided tour at the archaeological site the day after. His target were the members of the Universitat de la Liberata, a special university for elder people. Archeologists were glad to extend their public to this new segment, only reachable with the help of Giuseppe, and Giuseppe was proud to make people aware of this excavation conducted in their territory. The last example refers to another way of conceiving volunteering. At Masachukkoli, since the end of excavations seven years ago to summer 2017, the small archaeological area has been managed by the local archaeological society Gruppo Archeologico Massarorese, from now on GAM. GAM is mainly composed of local people who are very passionate in taking care of and in promoting the archaeological area. For them it was like a second house. They used to organize many original initiatives with the help of a scientific director. In the focus group conducted with some members they stressed their affection to the area and as you can notice from the word of Gino, they emphasized their work as a team. Each member has his own role and starting from his expertise contributed to the organization of the event. So verping back to these examples, we can notice that volunteers are single persons, each one with distinctive interests in and attitudes to archaeology. The historical value, the capability of the site to convey a relation to the past is common to all the interviewees in the three case studies. Moreover, at Poggio del Molino, American volunteers wants to learn the basics of archaeology, emphasizing an educational and academic value. However, at Masaciukoli Romana and Vignale volunteers are based in the territory and they have the chance to support and propose outreach activities. This interaction is directed at announcing the social value, defined as the capability of the site to provide a place for social gatherings and the cultural value, though the capability of the site to build affiliation in the present. We agree that all volunteers take the initiative of doing something and as reported in the interviews, they have a plurality of interest. This is the core of their participation in archaeology. Engaging themselves in activities tailored on their interests, they start a personal meaning making process and at the end they will have a story to tell. This story probably would be not relevant for the archaeologists but will be the memory of the experience for volunteers. Last week I was with archaeology at the Roman site and thank you very much for your attention.