 Felly, mae'n gweithio i ddweud o'r strategiaeth dimensiol. Felly, mae'n gweithio i ddweud o'r next item of business, sy'n mynd i'r mynd i ddweud o'r motion 8037 o'r Name of Maggie Chapman o'r behalf o'r Sgwtters Parlymentary Corporate Body o'r Appointment of Members of the Standards Commission for Scotland. Felly, mae'n gweithio i ddweud o'r motion. Felly, mae'n gweithio i ddweud o'r motion o'r Name of the Corporate Body Appointment Panel o'r Name of the Parliament to agree to the appointment of Helen Donaldson and Ann Marie O'Hara as members of the Standards Commission for Scotland. The Standards Commission is part of the ethical standards framework in Scotland and its role is to encourage high ethical standards in public life by promoting and enforcing the codes of conduct to councillors and members of devolved public bodies. It issues guidance to councils and public bodies and adjudicates on alleged contraventions of the codes referred to it by the commissioner for ethical standards in public life in Scotland. The commission has a convener and four members, all of whom are part-time. After the usual recruitment process, we have two people we wish to nominate as members of the commission. Helen Donaldson has had a long and successful career in education initially as an English teacher then moving into more strategic roles in Aberdeenshire. As head of education and inclusion in Aberdeen City, she had wide-ranging responsibilities working closely with local councillors, outside agencies and officers from across the council. Ann Marie O'Hara has recently retired from her post as the chief executive officer of an Edinburgh-based charity in social enterprise, providing affordable space for the third sector. Ms O'Hara has worked in various property, charity and grant giving roles. She was head of the capital team at the Big Lottery Fund and led the property planning, projects and European funding team at the National Trust for Scotland. I am sure that the Parliament will want to wish them both very well and every success in their new roles. In closing, I want to thank the outgoing members, Mike McCormack, who demitted office on 31 January, and Tricia Stewart, who will demit office on 31 March and to wish them both very well for their futures. Presiding Officer, I move the motion in my name. The question on this motion will be put at decision time. The next item of business is consideration of business motion 8064 in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau setting out a business programme. I call on George Adam to move the motion. Thank you Presiding Officer and moved. I call on Neil Bibby to speak to and move amendment 8064.1. Thank you Presiding Officer. Last week, Scottish Labour formally requested two statements from the Cabinet Secretary for Health, and I made that request again at the bureau on Tuesday, but to no avail. We are therefore proposing an amendment to the business motion to add two important statements on our NHS next week. The first relates to national treatment centres which are subject to delays and cost overruns. Five of the 10 treatment centres are delayed and we understand the costs of the Livington Centre alone. They have gone up from £71 million to £184 million. 770,000 people in Scotland—that is around one in seven Scots— are now on NHS waiting lists. Waiting lists are costing patients their health and costing taxpayers money too. Those centres are an important part of the solution. We therefore need a statement on those delays and cost overruns as a matter of urgency. The other statement requires on NHS Tayside. The health secretary promised over a year ago that he would advertise and recruit consultant oncologists, but that still has not happened. Women with suspected breast cancer are still having to travel outwith the region. That is not acceptable. Those are not the only issues affecting our NHS. Today we also learned that ICU beds at air hospital have been removed as well. That is despite HUM's abusive promise in just two months ago that they would be retained. The health secretary has apparently said that he is happy to answer specific questions on those matters. That begs the question why we would not have statements to Parliament then. That would provide the appropriate forum for HUM's abusive to answer those questions. I also understand the health secretary has suggested that he is happy to meet with members to discuss those matters, but at least one of our members has been struggling to get time in his diary. It is clear that HUM's abusive seems preoccupied with running his own leadership campaign than running Scotland's NHS. We believe that this Parliament and the people of Scotland should hear from the health secretary on these important matters. There is a day job to be getting on with, and HUM's abusive needs to get on with his about the amendment in my name. I call on George Adam to respond on behalf of the parliamentary bureau. Thank you, Presiding Officer. The Scottish Government regularly updates Parliament on the national treatment centres. Most recently, in December, four national treatment centres will open this year, providing significant additional protected capacity. The programme is a huge investment in front-line planned care infrastructure, and over the next five years will provide the single biggest increase in planned care capacity ever created in NHS Scotland. The Scottish Government remains committed to delivering the programme, and there is no further update that wants a statement at this time. The Scottish Government will continue to work with NHS Tayside and other partners across health and social care to address financial pressures and to take forward reform to deliver improved, sustainable services. On both issues, as always, I encourage members to lodge specific questions via the normal routes available to them, and ministers will, of course, be happy to answer. Thank you. The first question is the amendment 8064.1 in the name of Neil Bibby, which seeks to amend motion 8064 in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau setting out a business programme. Be agreed. Are we all agreed? Yes. The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote, and there will be a short suspension to allow members to access digital voting.