PLEASE EXPAND AND READ THIS DESCRIPTION!
To get the full impact of this video, read my book Impossible: the Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald (specifically Chapter 9 of Volume 1), now available for free in PDF form as part of the $5000 JFK Shell Game Challenge, which is the link above.
This book is a great antidote to the Wikipedia link that YouTube has embedded under my video without my permission. Read chapter 9 of my book, then read the Wikipedia article, and notice how none of the information in that chapter, all part of the evidential record, is not contained in the Wikipedia article. Notice how the evidence that I presented my books completely transforms the nature of the article into a so-called "balanced piece of journalism" into a "hatchet job".
The book is big, so give it at least 2-3 minutes to download, then save it to your hard drive.
The book can also be found at the EVIDENCE link at the top right of the page. There is also a helpful link there on Wikipedia itself, I highly recommend you read it before reading the Wikipedia article.
Also, and this is a very important point, I made numerous comments correcting some errors in the above video, and YouTube has removed those comments, so take a look at the message thread below where similar points were raised.
Now to the main point, the evidence related to the shell casings and the related Challenge. If you want to enter the Challenge, just list your chain of custody sequences in the comments section below, using the following format (example):
CE 543: Day TO Sims TO Drain
Viewers, read the comments section below, and notice only one person (out of over 100,000!!), MrMarco855, submitted a chain of custody sequence, as follows:
CE 543: Day to Sims to Fritz to Dhority to Day to Dhority to Brown to Williams to Washington D.C.. to Belin
CE 544: Day to Sims to Fritz to Dhority to Day to Dhority to Brown to Williams to Washington D. C. to Belin
CE 545: Day to Sims to Fritz to Dhority to Day to Dhority to Fritz to Hosty
No evidence was given for these fantasy sequences, and it's not surprising, since each of them (among numerous other problems) eliminates 3 of the parties that actually were said (according to the official evidence) to have possession of the shells. Can you guess who they are?
The following document may help you in your quest, and also, if you want to win the $5000, it's a document you need to submit (see the 1st page, use whatever format works best for you):
Two sets of shells in play on November 22, 1963? That's what the evidence clearly shows, and that means that the plot to frame Lee Oswald for murder was no afterthought, but rather was initiated within one hour after President Kennedy's assassination. This early initiation of the framing scheme thus points us to the nature and power of the true perpetrators, and the extent of control they had over the DPD and FBI, and the confidence they had that their scheme would not be exposed, which it wasn't, until nearly 50 years after the assassination.
The claim in the paragraph above is no "theory" or "hypothesis", but rather the only interpretation that explains the facts. If you don't believe it, show this video to a professor of evidence at any law school in the country, and ask them about the implications of this evidence for the Case Against Oswald. And while you're at it, ask them about the implications of this evidence for the Warren Commission.
Note: in the above video, I used the phrase "Oswald's rifle." To be more accurate, I should have used the phrase "the rifle that is claimed to be Oswald's", because the evidence no more supports his ownership of the rifle than it connects the rifle to the shells found on the Depository floor.
The link to the photos in the National Archives that are displayed in this video is here:
Incidentally, I have also offered $100,000 to anyone who can refute the conclusions of my book, and as of this date, no one has accepted. When you see the video and read the PDF, you will see why.