 I have a statement here about the budget as you know it's been on the floor of the Congress of the House. There's a little saying, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. In the case of the congressional budget and appropriations process, it hasn't ever been fixed enough to be broken. The day we've witnessed the efforts by the House Democrats to meet the Graham-Rudman Hollings targets, but it's just business as usual, cuts in defense that potentially threaten our national security and passing the budget of the American taxpayers to pay for their excesses. It's time for Congress to admit that the process hasn't worked. It's time for something that's enforceable, credible, and reliable. And I call on the Congress to recognize their process for what it is, out of control, and ready to be fixed. And we should work together to meet that goal. But at least one thing they voted today, we really don't see it, but we voted on that so-called budget that came out of the Committee of the House. Well, I'm pleased to say that 173 Republican House members have total number plus 19 Democrats voted against that budget. They lost to the year 3190, but please, turn down what we have here. Mr. President, you have said in the past in the subject of a budget summit that you were waiting till you saw what the other side had to offer and have some indication of that, just how do you want to work together with the Democrats now? Well, I heard them in the debate yesterday on the floor as it was covered by the news, saying that they had submitted a budget that we hadn't, with the procedures that a practical president presents to the budget, which I had done. But they were complaining because the Democratic Senate is no budget of its own. I think this indicates that they need to be budgeted. The Democrats now hold a budget summit now and get down to business. They're not accepting our budget as a budget. Can it be done without taxes or without a tax increase, sir? Certainly it can. You'll make the leaders now that you're a judge. The defense family now going to have to be in this process. The proposal on I.M. has been discussed in Geneva already. There are some details of the story around the incident that have never been, which, again, which they have agreed on. Well, we'll surely carry any new message on SDI. I think the issue is spying, too, in Moscow. Many questions on that subject. And I say I'm sorry, but I think