 What my bill basically says is that if the Public Service Commission finds that the region is economically distressed as defined by federal law, then the PSE cannot allow any return on investment that exceeds six percent profit. Because under the law you can't say they're not entitled to a profit, but I think that there is a substantial case that can be made that if you have an area that is in an economically distressed situation where you have a lot of people out of work, where you've had a lot of people having to leave the region, and a large number of people on fixed income, it is unconscionable for an investor-owned utility to be able to recover a net point seven percent or ten percent profit where many people are struggling to even make ends meet. We're looking for every way we can. I know we just, through the Public Service Commission's work just a few weeks ago, they, with the tax reform that came out of Washington, we were able to reduce by over four percent. I know people don't think that this last bill, they had a four percent reduction, but it would have actually been four percent higher. But this bill will give an even greater reduction, and we just simply have to get power bills under control there within a region. It's just a it's a sad time when people are placed in that situation to decide whether to pay for electricity or to pay for food.