 OK, so thank you very much, everybody. I was hoping to, I was expecting to have 55 Europeans in the audience trying to understand what Brexit is, but we are some of us. Are you European? Yeah. OK. So OK. So I'll start with two just preliminary comment. One is about the issue for clarity, you know, lacking clarity and we want to have it clear. And I think that is a very dangerous request because when there is clarity, there is no hope. So it's better to remain muddled and to have the thing running all over again than to have a certain closure. The second thing I would say a bit more provocative or negatively is that although I'm sure that all British people here are very much against Brexit and leaving and all that, I still think that the archaeological community in Britain has participated in a sort of spirit or mindset in the UK over the past 15 years that is fully compatible or parallel with the notion of leading independent, localism, challenging of expertise, quite a range of aspects that have been there. And I also, if I can refer to my, I published a couple of papers on Brexit and I will talk to them again. In one of them, I indeed singled out both Edwin, Olivier, and John Scofffield for precisely duplicating the idea that we don't need the experts because we are all in it together as a factor that resonates with this sort of decision-making. OK. So what I want to do then is three parts of the talk. If there is a civil language to Brexit, yes, if you can find something like this. And then I will talk more specifically about a monument you all know, which is Stonehenge. And hence the flying pigs, I don't know if you could make the pun from Pink Floyd to what's it, Mattingly? You know, Mattingly, we'll get you there, the colleague from there. And then again, issues about global Britain and there also. But we know each other, I'll be asking questions because I think that also what we have from Mark, we are on the wrong track because we are personalizing what is deeply political and ideological issues. So personally, we are all friends and we like each other, but that's not the point. So I'll get to this in here. This is just, it's the same page, yes? So you have a Roman, a Roman golden emperor who lasted three weeks, not an emperor because that's why the coin is very rare, yes? Ultra rare Roman coin because the guy was only three weeks emperor. And he happened to be on the same page as another guy who was only, it's a bit more. But they had to send long hair. Yes. Okay, so again, this is more for the European audience because you probably know this lack of information, official lack of information because the DCMS is trying to find out, the Ministry of Culture is trying to find out how do you know what's going on because we don't know ourselves, but how do you tell us, in my audience, what is going on? Well, there are a couple of interesting things. How do you rate the risk of a potential error? Just asking a question like this is not very confidence building, yes? How catastrophic are things going to be? In the spirit that Kenny is, of course, the big promoter of, the spirit of Keshavarz. So you ask questions all over the place, but sometimes when you ask questions that are so confidence draining, it's not the good idea, perhaps. So the silver lining, the first I think I wrote about this is what the silver lining, of course, number one is the salary increase because if you can get the Dutch archaeologists to work on the HS2, which this has been postponed for seven years, so it's another crisis, but that's a, if you want to get the Dutch, you need to pay them proper salary because they have to pass an administrative threshold. So that is going to mean, of course, that local British archaeologists are also going to have to finish that sum and they will be very happy about this, won't they? The shovel bombs to receive a nice salary like this. So there might be, because of this barrier for visa, there might be, yes, let's dream, no? I mean, summer's night dream, there might be an increase in raising the salary of the archaeologists thanks to Brexit. And the second silver lining, of course, is, and again, I'm speaking to non, where are you from? Croatia. Croatia? Yeah. Good. Are you a British? Irish. Irish, okay. I beg your pardon. So yeah, Irish, we'll be very happy because also the issue of funding, you mentioned the success, all right? So when you look at it from the less successful, it looks as if people who write grants and have offices helping them at university to write the grants. And then they write in language, English, which is their mother tongue, where they can be sexy and Casper, they'll explain how in three years with an intermediary conference, any website at the end, they have solved the problem of X, Y, Z. They're very successful at it. And so successful indeed, that's what I'll go back to. So successful, but this is again, it's a market to publish this, you see anything, so successful indeed that I've, so far, I see a concern in the UK, which tops up Netherlands number two, France and Germany. So more in the UK than in the Netherlands. So I can't believe that there are more right intelligent people, three times more, maybe there are in the British eyes. So there must be other type of explanation. So it's either because it's, are we being, I'm away from the microphone, so either it's because it's the club gamble and Graham Barker and who sit in the commission in HS5 and then decide and arbitrate who gets the projects, or because then you have a lot in the UK of non-UK based people who apply, okay? Bright students from Germany, from Italy, from Croatia, who come to the UK, do a PhD and get on with it. So that's the one mitigating factor because in Netherlands, 95% of people who see grant would be actually Dutch. Like was in France, like was in Germany. There would be local people who see that. And in the UK, these are international people as well, Italian, the Greeks, et cetera. So that's a good point. But what it means for us now, it's very good news. So the guys who've scooped all the money are not going to be around and the playing field will be a little bit more level, okay? That's the silver lining number two and I think this is probably the only one, yeah. Also on this, there's already information from Mr. Alok Shamra, an international, have a look, be aware of EU discrimination again, British students. So the atmosphere is so poisonous that you have official instructions to look out for how if Europe is mistreating you in some ways. And I've just been advocating how to mistreat the British because they won't be here to apply for the funding. Okay, so the flying pigs, of course, are being floored animals. And these reenactment off and these multi isotope analysis that shows that pigs have flown from all over the British out to Stonehenge to be roasted. By, so, I don't know this person and I can't obviously judge the quality of the isotopic research. That's not my thing. We can ask a Christian, Christian St. because he's now deep into science. But of course, the point is that this is a narrative that helps to construct Stonehenge as the birthplace, as the cradle or the construction place of the post-Brexit Britain. Okay, this is the place Stonehenge where we started. We, the autonomous, the British English entity started there, okay, because of this gathering and coming on for a big Sunday roast at the scale of the island. And that creates some sort of coherence that overlooks the fact, we'll come back in a minute, that these actually were built by Belgians, Belgian and Neolithic, who came to build Stonehenge. Okay, so, and this is from the paper that published in antiquity. So this is from the Sun, the Sun News paper. It allowed us, surprisingly, to reproduce in antiquity in December. The font page of the Sun, which there was a moment, Great Britain, Great Betrayal, just what we had yesterday. Yes, the Rest in Peace Democracy. If you saw the, I don't know if you read the Daily Mail, but the Daily Mail's title for yesterday was Rest in Peace Democracy because these guys from the Heart of Commons have kept Boris Johnson from his plans and that's the death of democracy, okay. So likewise here, there was a moment, it was in June, June 2018. And the icons of Britain, yes. So we're all Brits here, or more or less. You recognize, you know, Swiss fires and the age of the normal and this thing and the double-decker and the mini-miler and et cetera and fishing ships and Stonehenge. Stonehenge is also part of this, very much part of this narrative and this is from the BBC, Stonehenge with the Peace. No more flying because they are Russian. And this construction of an iconic birthplace, which is ours. So, and very much, and this is the, the Intervaq, yeah, Neolithic Brexit. Okay, if you've seen this. And what is interesting when you do the screenshot, please have a screenshot, okay, have a screenshot. English-speaking jobs in Paris, and anyone who wants to come to Paris for English-speaking jobs, that's an ad. It's very funny to catch the screenshots of newspapers together with one other ad, okay. So that's the story and then the next one is even nicer, no, it's wonderful. So Stonehenge, when I speak about Stonehenge, because Stonehenge, as you know, is a rumble of bulldozers about to build a tunnel or I don't know if it's going, we don't know. But the clear project, this is some of the, so it's not called, Stonehenge is called A3 or A3, any way to lay it down so you're not supposed to know that it actually, so this is the way I decide and this is the project of the tunnel with some details here. And what is very rewarding is that, of course, there's a tender, called for tender, and this called for tender is published by the European Union as well called for tender. So you can have here, in Spanish, and this was for the Spanish audience here, and you have the Reino Lido, Bristol, the Tarahumata Construction, the two languages, the Karela, okay, and in other type of languages. And this is the best, information variants, information about the European Union funds. This is for you, Irish, yeah? You ready? Yeah. Yeah, okay. So, in Polish, there are no Polish archaeologists in the audience. Informacja Fundach Unii Europejskie, okay? Zamienie dotaci projekty program finanzor, finanzor wego z rutko Unii Europejskie. That's the question, are there funding from the European Union? The answer is nie, okay? No funding from the European Union for this particular project. Nevertheless, nevertheless, another, you can take a photograph, another fake news, it's written in Turkish, fake news. Now the EU are demanding custody of Stonehenge as part of a new Brexit deal because Stonehenge was built by a culture engineer, as far as in the Neolithic, right? So, this particular myth has been canceled because the EU said precisely that it's not going to be involving this. Yes, I'm approaching my last point. So the third part, so this was Stonehenge, and now I want to move to the, I've tried to be diplomatic because borders require diplomacy, that's part. The idea of crossing borders and crossing borders are new with new agendas or new will or new emotional load, which is also an ideological, it's complicated. So, I strongly recommend you take care of this book or other books about European, there's a long history that is, in fact, one can begin this history with a crusade of going to find a relics, okay? The Holy Land, et cetera. And certainly Medieval times and Renaissance and afterwards the first colonial expansion in others of Europeans going abroad. It's a complicated story with many different types of motivations. And in this book that we edited as part, it was part of the ACE project, if you remember, the Archaeology for the Europe. We did avoid, Marc, the question was not that we can work together as individuals because we can. The question is whether we can recognize that our position as individual is within a particular setting in institutional, political, financial, economic, and therefore a cultural, and therefore we are part of this context when we interact with each other, okay? And of course, when there is the project of global Britain globalizing, it's not necessarily interacting between the Dutch or the Belgian and the Brits. It's also across the world in the reaches of empire. So how are we going to get that? And I think that we should think, those who want to accomplish an agenda of globalization should really read the, you know, do some serious critical history to understand the story of a soft diplomacy of what in French is called a very nice word, the shining, yes? With Nicholson, Jack Nicholson, the shining with the fact it's Riccato, yes? The idea that there is a civilization emanating from France and touches all over the world. So each country has different construction of its presence, okay? And here, this is my last slide. Suddenly, you remember you had a foreign secretary. And this foreign secretary wrote this little word for the international report of the Heritage Alliance of which you are members. I know, I imagine. Yeah, okay, so you'll have to think twice or four times when you're about to try to strike limiting relations when the agenda is precisely your own in protecting and promoting the best of our heritage, crucially important, not only for the proud sense of, not only for the proud sense of identities to regain from our collective heritage, but also for the magnetic representation of our country's opposite, right? So how are you going to magnify the un-magnifiable presence at the moment of Britain on this? It's complicated and I urge, again, to, I think, move away from the well-established personal intellectual affinities to recognize the cultural, political dimensions of it in order to make the most possible, okay? Thank you very much.