 I think it was interesting and good to see that across the board, there was a semi-consensus that the leading role for the United States in all the conflicts of the world to play a role is indispensable. And that role is not about the U.S. going and fixing those problems, but helping others on the ground to co-lead on those issues, enabling others in economic terms, in development terms and military terms to own these problems and fix those problems. And I was also heartened to see that even those who are from the military background, the general saying that it is not a military solution, it's the other, it's the peace-building, it's the diplomatic effort that needs to be invested in. I was heartened also to hear that actually they're saying that it's the State Department, it's the NGOs that need to be supported and it's exactly that kind of role that will be perceived as less hostile by other actors in those conflicts. So the more funding and support are put in those efforts, diplomatic and social programming and NGO efforts, I think will be much welcome in the conflict zones.