 We talked last week about the Packers trying to get Aaron Jones more work in the passing game and it happened again this week. He led the team with seven targets, that is his most since Devonte Adams injury, in return I should say. Two of those targets for Jones were deep, which is wild for a running back and one was in the red zone. If we look at the two games since they said they wanted to get Jones a ball more, he has 22% of the team's targets, which is significant. He played 58% of the snaps and that's the same where he was last week and I think that that means we can put more trust in his role going forward. In those two games, Jones has averaged 13.5 carries and 6.5 targets per game. That would work out to be 26.5 adjust opportunities per game. Not a huge number, but it's a lot better than he was. I would say we've got to keep expectations and check for Jones, but the arrow continues to be slightly up on him as a DFS play. What would you view his role being going forward given what we've seen in the past two games? I mean, the deep targets are like something, but I mean... But he got those before too, it's just going back to that. Yeah, I mean, I just struggle with Aaron Jones because I never trust it. No matter what I see, I don't trust that any increase in usage is going to stick. But it's not like he has terrible usage to begin with. The offense can move the ball. This week was really strange. I was still up on Aaron Rodgers and Devonte Adams. I thought that they would move the ball better, but they kind of didn't. So for Aaron Jones... They just kind of gave up. Yeah, it was like... I mean, that's a risk when you're facing such a bad team, but they just gave up. I'm not tilting or anything. That's not what this is, but I think Aaron Jones, honestly about the same as I have been, is that wrong? Well, I mean, the targets are very different than they were. So I think that it should be different on him. You can still be below consensus, but I think you should be higher on him than you were. I guess that's kind of where I am below consensus, probably. I think that's fine. What price are you thinking then? So they're at home against Chicago next week. If you give me 13 carries and seven targets against Chicago at home, I would probably put that around, I would say like 75 or 72. So let's go 75, I think. Okay, would you project him for seven targets or do you think that's the high end of his outcome? Maybe like five and a half. I think that his workload, like increased passing game work is legitimate. It's probably not what it's been the past two games, but I would say it's legit. Maybe that's where we're differing, but I mean, I still- I mean, they said they were gonna do it and they did it. Yeah. Like I think that makes it more legit. Yeah, absolutely. I just, I struggle with Aaron Jones and I always will no matter what. It's just one of those biases that I have. So I'd still put him at like, I think the lower end of what you said, 72. Okay, he is 78, same what he was this week. That's fine, I'll still use him. Cash games? No. No, no, no, no, no, no. Okay, well, you're buying into the passing game usage, the optics, so I'm just asking. No, no. He's still got a 60% snap rate. Like there are still flaws in his game, but the ceiling is still there. And so I'm still gonna use them in tournaments. I'm not gonna go there in cash games though. I think that's the thing for me. He's not a cat, like any back who's not a cash game option, but it still has like paths to upside is just they're all in the same bucket for me. Okay, that's fair. He would be in that bucket for me. I just like those guys more than you do it sounds like.