 Rhaid, yn gweithio, yn cael ei ffynnu'r Cyngorol a'r Cestor Cynull yn gyfnodol. Mae'n dwi wedi'u'n gweithio'r hyn o'r cyfrifio gyda'r newid yma'n mynd i'r cyfrifio'r cyfrifio. Dwi'n dwy'n dweud y maen nhw'n cyfrifio'r cyfrifio'n cyfrifio'r cyfrifio'n cyfrifio. Mae'r cyfrifio yma'r cyfrifio'n cyfrifio'n cyfrifio'n cyfrifio'n cyfrifio'n cyfrifio'n cyfrifio. ac i gyfnodd mynd i'n teillon ni, graf iawn y P7 TW, TW, rwy'n loed yn gyfryd i'w Tyger Wood, rwy'n awydig yn y bydd trafod darmar. Mae erbyn yn dweud sy'n fysg, mae'r dweud yn dweud i'r wyf. Mae'r dweud ar gyfer ar y cyflogaeth yma, mae'n gweld yn hanesio iawn. Fe hynny'n i chi, mae'n dod i'r hawdd yng ngorffordd ac mae'r llwy Majesty Hand Lloon ac mae'r haf, yna'r dafyn nhw, rwy'nbod, ei hollwch yn dweud yn gwybyd. Felly, o minority fel'ch cyfnod i'r ffwrdd ychydig, ryw pwysig yn dweud i'r reffordd blaenau yn y bufynol, mae'n gweithio'r rhai bod'r hyn am i ddim yn gallu ei gwneud beth o phanol, ac mae'n meddwl nad yn fawr i'n bwyllfa'n gweithio, rwy'n ei fyddio'n maen nhw, Ond y cwysig yw'r cwysig yn eu gwneud yn gweithio mewn gwirioneddau. Felly, dw i'n gwneud y P70 Always PCY, dyna rhoi'n gweld ar yr un ddechrau'r llwyta cymdeithasau sy'n meddwl. Felly, iawn am y cyfnodd a ddau'r llunydd ar y cyfnodd. Roeddwn ni wedi bod y gwbwyrau sy'n ddweud ydym yn eu contasig arfer. A oedd ni'r cyfnodd o'r cyfnodd yn gwneud o'r aon ni. Ond roeddwn ni mwg i'r cyfnodd gan y celfnodd o'r hyn. Ac o'r cyfnodd o'r cyfnodd i'r cyfnodd. Rhaid, mae o'r cyfnodd yn mynd yn flwyddyn deoliad yng nghyrchu sy'n iawn i gwneud y cyfnodd sydd yn gwneud deoliad.wn i'r dwylo gyda'r ysgawdd yn olygu'n cyfweld o ddoch. Mae'r dweud fel yw'r ystyried yn y gwahanol ac mae'r ymdwyll ychydig gwaith o edrych yn y proses ac mae'n dweud yw'r amser i'r wneud. Y gwaith ymddydd, mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio yn y clwb. Felly mae'r 16 gweithio ar y P7TW. Mae'r ysgawdd ym 13 gweithio ar y llwyddiant. Mae'r ydych chi'n erbyn gwneud oherwydd yma i'r cyfrif iawn. mae'n ddau'r ffordd i'r bodnig i'r petr o'r lleol. Mae'n ddweud i'r bodnig iawn, ac yn falch i'r cyfnod, mae'n ychydig i'r cronio hwnnw i'r cronio satyn, mae'n gyfrifio i'r meidliadau. Mae'n dechrau o'r lleol, mae'n cael ei gweithio. Mae'r ffordd yn ymgyrchol iawn. Mae'r ffordd yn ymgyrchol iawn. Mae'n ddau'r lleol o'r llwch ac mae'n gweithio. ond ar ei ddefnyddio eich frydd yn rhywbeth sydd. Yr wych yn awr, ac mae'n frem gennym yn gweithio'r newid. Ac mae'n ôl yn gwneud yn ystod yn ei wfawr amgylchur a'r cyd-rwythio sydd, mae'n cyfnod eich gweithio i'ch cymryd o'r wybodaeth, ond mae'n mynd i'r rai gael i'w gwlaethau rhywbeth. Mae unrhyw gweithio yr ystod yn ei gweithio, ond mae maen nhw wedi ddim yn ysgrifennu cynt yma, nad oedd yn gweithio yn gweithio, maen nhw'n credu i ddweud mewn gwybod i'r ddechrau, ac mae'rmateb oherwydd i ddim yn cael eu cyfnodiol ac mae'n ei gynnig i ddim yn ymwneud o'r gweithiau yma i gael y cyflwymoniaeth absoluta'r cyllidau. Yn ymddir ymdyn nhw'n ddechrau yn ymwyaf o'r bobl, ac mae'n ymwneud i ddweud ymwneud ymwneud, ac yn ymwneud ymwneud yw'r camera arall, mae'r tyfn y'r angol o'n ei wneud ymdyn nhw'n ddweud ymwneud ymwneud. ac i gefnwyr gwybod yn gweld, ac mwyn yn hwn i ymwyl gwybod i'r video Llyfrin Gwlyry. Yn rhai gwybod iawn, rwy'n gwybod i ddigoni'r gwestiynau a gwybod i gael ddataf. Mewn gwybod ei mewn gwirionedd yn diogel yn eu bod ganeth i gweithio Gwliad Hw. Rwy'n gyfrifwyr tro i Gwliad Hw. Mae amser yn y dda. Felly rwy'n gobyl ni'n gwybod i'r gwaith o'r g criminal ac mae hyn yn mynd i eich gwaithllur rhywbeth. ac eu bod yn ystod ym mwynhau i chi'n ddweud yn y byw. Rydyn ni'n gwneud nhw'n beth o lyfodol. Ond yn y gallwch chi'n gweithio, wrth gwrs rydyn ni'n mynd i gynnwysu yn Skytrak. Dyna'r rydyn ni'n amser ym mwynhau i'n maen nhw, ac rydyn ni'n rydyn ni'n mynd i'n mynd i'n gweithio. Mae'n rhaid i'r ffeidio i'r hyn yn ymgyrch. Rydyn ni'n gallu'n ddweud o hynny'n gwneud. Mae bugs yn dweud y gwaith ar gwaith yma. Roeddwch chi'n rwyf yn ymwneud i gael, mae'r gwaith yn dweud hynny yn ei ddalig fel hynny yn gyfan. Roeddwn ni'n rai ddatblygu gyda chymellodd hyn. Mae'n dweud hynny yn gweithio yr aelod, neu yma'n llwydd fel hynny yn gweithio'n nadu. Mae hynny yn gweithio'n llwydd rydw i ddych chi. Mae'n dweud eich 50 oes y ac 155 oes yn ei ddrifonu. Yn y gallwch chi'n wedi'u mirydd ystod, I will look at these images, this very much this height to end. I'm not sure whether I like it or not. It's kind of very compact as an eye. But that kind of... It is very noticeable, very different that height to end. But it's sort of...Right, it's very much a sharp. There's no rounded edge to it. It's very much a sharp top line. And, I don't know, I'm not sure about that. It's very compact as you have seen but whatsoever. Behind the ball. And, it has gonna appeal to very few players I don't think. A dy'n cael ei gwynhau ond rihon, ond drwy'n digon goரwch hefyd. Fy hollwch hefyd yw gweld. Felly mae'r blynyddian wedi gweld, genny'n gwinell yn cael ei rhwyntu. Nid yw'r cerddol na'r ganodw, rydyn nhw'n blynydd a dyf yn cael nifer o'r byd. Yr ysgol ei wedi gweld i, yw allwn mwy ffordd sy'n gweld ar gyfer. A Gweithio'r Eiddiadau'r gallai beth. Onw'r eitem i na ddych chi'n rheswk yn ychynol. Ac rwy'n ei gwybod iawn, a'i gwybod i'r rôl o'r cyfeirio'r llwythau o'r llwythau, rwy'n ei gwybod i'n go angen a'r rai'r rhaglion cyffrifolwyr. Ond wedi bod, mae'r cyffrifolwyr gyrwyr yn ei gwybod i'r llwythau, rwy'n ei gwybod i'r cyfeirio'r llwythau, rwy'n ei gwybod i'r cyffrifolwyr, ond y cyffrifolwyr sydd wedi bod yn cael ei gwybod. Rwy'n ei gwybod i'r cyffrifolwyr yn ei gwybod. Let's try one more. Both decent balls there. The one thing I'd say that I did have an issue with the blueprint time was the feel. Forged clubs and ping, I've still not seen anything from them that really produces a really soft feel. Last ball. That's really decent balls there, really good. Swinging quite good this morning, quite likely the idea is head to head with this club this morning. It wouldn't be one for another day. I'm going to get some numbers on that in terms of data. It's only 7 iron vs 7 iron today. We'll be using a seed SD02 ball. We'll see what data we collect on this one. And then I'm going to switch over and start getting exactly the same. I'll give you my opinion on this iron from tailor made in conjunction with Tiger Woods. Okay, let's start off in terms of head to head visuals. I'm going to throw two pitches up for you now. Let's have some feedback. What do you think? If you're picking one of those off the shelf, which would it be? For me, the tailor made iron wins by an absolute mild skill. I'm a sucker for a bit of a high chrome finish, so maybe straight away, but I love the mill grooves on the bottom, on the sole of these as well. Again, seeing that in the mill grind wedges as well, which I'm a big fan of. I think the contrast between the chrome and the matte finish on the face, I always like the way that frames up all that address. Again, that top line is something that's thin. It seems thinner on the blueprints, but for me this is a much more classic looking iron and fits every remit of an old style of blade. Once again, and I am in the boat quite good today, surprisingly easy is the wrong word, isn't it? It's just that when I first seen these clubs a few months ago at the YouTube golf day, and my mate Lewis decided in front of an audience to pass me the three iron of this to hit, which you can imagine the look that I gave him. But I was quite surprised, and yes, astonishingly, I hit it, and I hit it all right. That was what got me intrigued with these things when the Seven Iron Demo Club came in here. I really wanted to have another bash with these because, yes, they are, like I said, you tell me what they are. It's so nice as well in terms of ball flight. It's very, very similar, 35 degrees loft, sorry, on the Tiger Woods model, so a degree weaker. Again, really high towering ball flight. They're nice. These are nice. There's no two ways of bar it. If you can find a middle of these on a consistent basis. And again, I'd like to hit a few kind of, and I sound a bit cocky here, but I'd like to see a few offsends their hits and see what happens because the balls at the middle are absolutely pure, yes, impressed. Anyway, I'll carry on hitting some golf balls. I'll switch over to some range balls in a minute. I'm going to switch over to some SD-02s from C or collect some data, and then I'll give you my opinion in terms of head to head. But for another time being, at this stage from your perspective, would you go into a shop and try either of those? Are they on your agenda at all? And if you had to pick one of these right now, which one would it be? I think this one is pretty straightforward to be honest with you. I'm going to go straight into numbers and I'll pop them up on screen for you now. In individual shots, I'll show you the summary of both and I'll show you the dispersion of both. Let's start off with the blueprint iron, shall we? So, a clubhead speed on average of 81 miles an hour, 112 ball speed, 64 spin, 154 carry. Pretty much exactly where you'd want it to be on every number, I would suggest. Simple as that, really. Let's throw up the same numbers for the Tiger Woods iron and again, one degree weaker in loft. Right, so 80.6 slightly slower on clubhead speed average, 112.8 but produced a slightly faster ball speed, 653 spin, which again was almost identical and 154 in terms of carry. Now, interesting things there really for me and I'll throw up on it in front of you now the dispersion chart. Interesting on the numbers really, 35 degree loft and yet the distances were very, very similar in terms of that one degree difference. If anything, slightly quicker ball speed out of the weaker lofted iron, which was again slightly strange and again from the slightly slower swing speed, maybe we just found a little bit more of the centre on the tail of made iron. I don't know, but there's a slight contradiction there in perhaps what you would have expected if you read through those numbers it's what I would have done anyway. But I think there's virtually nothing to split these two irons really. One major thing for me is the difference and that's the feel. I still, and I mentioned it in the thing, I don't know how ping, ping for me can't produce a high quality forged iron yet. I think the ping, the forge wedges that they produce were the same, they've still got a hard feel. They're not the soft feel and sound that you'd expect from forged and in the P70Ws they've done exactly that. It is butter soft. For me, the Tiger Woods iron is a classic blade, a classic traditional blade and if you're looking for that, I don't think you can go too far wrong with them to be perfectly honest with you. The price on both of these is very, very high. I think you're looking at between $17, $18 for the blueprint and maybe just a little bit more for the P70W so we're talking high end in terms of price but like I said, they're both very traditional in terms of their profile. Better feel, for me the winner is the tailor made product. Better feel, better looking and overall just ticks a few more boxes and I was able to hit the three iron on the other occasion as well but nothing to split them really and they're more being tested in your opinion and the biggest opinion I think really or the biggest thing I've took from it is the surprise really of how I was able to hit them and I was relatively comfortable with them and got some decent performance. I think that's probably the biggest shock. Certainly not like a blade of old in terms of forgiveness. Anyway, as ever, thank you for watching. Comments down below and let's hope the sunshine comes out in the UK and I can get doing some on course testing with these very, very soon. Right, see you later.