 So JEE mains 25th January shift 2, I've just got my hands on this paper and I can say that I'm much happier by looking at this paper than I was when I looked at 24th January shift 1. By the way, if you haven't watched my shift 1 analysis video for January 24th, then the link is in the description, you can take a look at it right now. You see, this paper at least wants you to think a little bit and it's living up to the JEE standard even though it is still very easy. It is at least a JEE paper and to learn the 24th January shift 1 was very low level. Anyway, they normalize the marks based on the shift so it doesn't make a difference in terms of ranking really. But a few of these questions and quite a few of these questions are not blind formula substitutions. They do ask you to at least follow a certain procedure for example draw the SVD or conserve momentum, conserve energy. Some of these questions require you to conserve momentum in a situation that is not where you wouldn't necessarily remember that momentum had to be conserved. For example, momentum conservation used in nuclear physics, that is one of the questions. Let's start with the similarities between 24th January shift 1 and 25th January shift 2. We have a question on an object that is placed at a distance equal to the radius of earth. There is a distance of the object from the surface of the earth and now it is taken to a height of twice the radius of the earth from the surface of the earth and it is asking the change in potential energy. Again, MGNH will not do the trick whether you take G effective or not. You have to choose the actual default potential energy question. We had a similar situation in the previous video. Apart from that, we have a few questions on modern physics. There is one dimensional analysis question and one nuclear physics question. Same areas are focused again. So I think this is the pattern that we will see throughout the main series where you will get one question from dimensional analysis definitely. So that is four marks you need to ensure for yourself. Another similarity is that power factor and quality factor. One of this is going to be asked in every paper it seems if this trend is going to be followed which it need not be. But I am seeing a question on power factor or quality factor of an RLC circuit so far in every single paper. The first question in this video which may not be the first in your question paper is a wire of a certain resistance is drawn, is redrawn to increase its length five times. Now the important thing here is the volume of the wire remains constant. If you have done enough work or if you have enough analytical power then there is something you will directly see. But it is not straightforward. It is not just a formula substitution. So I appreciate that these kind of questions are here in the paper for one. The twelfth question in my paper is an inclined plate question where there is a friction involved. So he is asking the minimum force required to push the block up the inclined is twice the minimum force required to slide the block down the inclined. And he is asking the value of coefficient of friction between block and inclined. You have to plot two FVDs and then write down some equations and then you can eliminate unknowns to get the answer. But it is appreciable that at least some question requires you to do some work. Thirteen question again is a dimension analysis like you saw in the last paper. Fourteenth question is on surface tension and the question that requires you to think a big drop is divided into thousand identical droplets. The surface energy of the big drop is Ui and the total surface energy of the thousand droplets is Uf. That is asking Ui by Uf. So this is a standard question really but at least there is something to do here that does not involve a direct formula substitution. Question sixteen is when a stationary nucleus breaks into two bottom nuclei and the velocities are in the ratio three is to two. Find the radius of their nuclear sizes. So first of all you are supposed to conserve momentum which will give you the ratio of the velocity. The ratio of the masses of the nuclei given this velocity ratio. And then you are supposed to use the fact that radius is proportional to the cube root of the mass number and that will give you. So this is an interesting question. It involves conservation of momentum in the chapter that does not necessarily involve that in any question. There is one easy question on the definition of thermodynamic processes. There is a standard resistor series parallel question which we saw in the previous paper also. Again this is a pattern that seems to be repeating. So to pressure on those questions which you are writing. There is an optics formula question directly and induced EMF formula question. And there is a question where a capacitor of a certain capacitance is now modified by sliding in dielectric through the plates. But the dielectric occupies only half the volume between the plates. It's between one plate and half. The remaining half is still air. So this is a question where you have to take the effective capacitance by considering two capacitors side by side with one plate overlapping. So if you have been this kind of question before, this should be easy for you. But it's fine to include different means. Another situation is standard collisions question. This is like the equivalent of FBD questions in NLM. So it's not really a formula substitution but it is a standard procedure of question solving in NLM. Overall there are quite a few questions that you need to write stuff down and not just substitute it formula. One or two questions are good. There is a question on electromagnetism. Where he's asking you boss law, MPS law, paradise law and the magnetism laws law. These four laws in integral form you have to match. The left column is the name, the right column is the law and it's integral form. This is like if you have seen the chapter of electromagnetism you should be able to do this. But I feel good by looking at this question. So this is the summary of this paper. Quite a few similarities, few corner chapters that are not usually covered. They are repeating in all the papers. So pressure from units and dimensions definitely. And on power factor and quality factor of LCR circuits. This is going to probably appear in all future papers. That is going to take on this paper and similarities with the previous one.