 Good morning and now we spoke to Mr. Samaseko earlier just now, another former member of the Preparatory Committee or PREPCOM. He was very pleased with the way things have gone. Obviously, we had a successful conclusion yesterday. How was your experience within PREPCOM? The big international meetings are usually prepared during the PREPCOMs and in reality the PREPCOM process is the one of decision-making process. The conferences themselves, there are more celebration and place of meetings. So therefore PREPCOM is really the place where all the decisions are sort of negotiated and pre-decided before the arrival of ministers who just seal them in the solemn atmosphere during the conference. Were there any particular areas that were difficult to overcome? No, it depends on the issue. The United Nations system in general practice so-called consensus method which entails lengthy negotiations until you find the solution that more or less satisfies everybody or in equal way do not satisfy everybody. That is the right balance. So sometimes, and this is what I remember from the second PREPCOM of the second phase of Tunis summit, that two delegations who were really negotiating the one particular question at the end of negotiations both came to me and said we are equally happy with the result. So that means that diplomatic negotiations arrived to a right conclusion when two rival opinions sort of found themselves in the final outcome. And can you tell us what those issues were? No, that particular was on internet governance which was 2005, the first time an international community came together and discussed the internet governance issues. Of course, internet at that time was completely different, we were talking about several hundred million users, so today we're talking about three billion, at that time we're talking about basic access, broadband was not even the term I think at that time was not invented yet. And so nevertheless, already at that time the issue of internet governance was very much on the top of the agenda of many policy makers and that was a very, very interesting experience. And did the speed of change make your job difficult as priorities were changing as the technology was changing? Not at the moment or not at that moment, the issues we addressed in 2005 particularly on internet governance area were mostly linked to management of critical internet resources. Today governments and the internet users are more concerned about different issues and the internet infrastructure development which was also a big topic in 2005, today is gradually moving on the second sort of row but issues related to actual use of internet forcefully come forefront and keeps policy makers really busy. Now as someone intimately involved in the WSIS process and also as an ambassador for your country, Latvia, what themes, which priorities would you like to see in next year's conference 2015? I think we need to take a fairly balanced approach because we need to speak about developmental aspect of use of ICTs but equally we need to speak about freedom expression because we certainly see that with the evolution of technology there is increasing attempts to impose limitations to the free flow of information and freedom expression online. So we equally need to maybe pay more attention to societal effects of the technology and understand how this technology impacts not only individuals, humans but how they impact societies and what kind of transformation societies go through with this technological evolution and most importantly we are all this is going. Ambassador, thank you very much for being with us this morning.