Upload

Loading...

Part 10 Richard Gage's Blueprint for Truth Rebuttal (Not Debunked):: Sulfidized Steel

1,090

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Uploaded on Jul 7, 2011

Part 10 of my rebuttal of Richard Gage's 9/11 Blueprint for Truth (not debunked) investigates the 9/11 mystery FEMA Appendix C report of sulfidized steel in the WTC debris. Could it have only come from 4500-degree thermates as Gage claims, or could it have come from burning gypsum or sulfur dioxide from environmental sources?

I have personally emailed Jonathan Barnett, who put out the origional report on sulfidized steel, and he confirms that in no way does he believe this anomaly could have been caused by controlled demolition!

Rebuttals of Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth and Experts Speak Out

Continuing this video series at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYja1f...

Links and further debate at http://911theories.org/ChrisMohr Discussion welcome at
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.ph...

All Comments

Comments are disabled for this video.
to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...