 In the end, I am also going to give you a speak about what our response is to do for the next major regions to rapidly be performed as far as I am going to do essentially just around the region. Everybody, why do we need it? When I asked my next member, what the member mentioned is that it is going to use some variety of network hardware, even virtual memory. It is a part of my server hardware, from desktop hardware to mobile hardware. That's nice, but actually it really needs network memory. There is already an API to be used in general to configure the app in the hobby. Most network hardware down to the top of the network where you can use it to configure the apps and forms. I think it is that we need that there are APIs and it really needs to do all this. We see that as part of the problem, not the solution, but the solution to do one thing. I think it is that we need that there are APIs and it really needs to do all this. We see that as part of the problem, not the solution, but the solution to do one thing. I think it is that we care about the details of the underlying order of the press. Once this is done, there is a very nice comment. They don't really want to care about the details, like what model of modern media we have, or what part of the model we want to be used by the media solution. What we are wondering is that we are applying it up for the user, so that they just care about this. We provide a demo service that provides consistent access to whatever networking solutions the user has. We provide this DPA API that other groups can build on. There are a lot of requirements that they build on top of this. We also, on the server, we can provide a client with this opportunity that provides an interface to the functionality we offer. What we also do is that we, in our picture, the network configuration is really, let's say we need to change this and we need to react to what you just said. When we get out of the reach of a Wi-Fi access point, we might want to build down the configuration for the private network to the real world. I am going to move the route to another approximation that you know about the world, that still works. Or we want to apply a certain configuration when we need to replace it in a network cable. So, of course, that's what we need to do. We sort of glue these things together and apart from the data interface, we provide for the problems to build them. There is nothing wrong with that. We do provide something called the Defectory interface where the user could just copy in their shopping, and they run when some network change happens. In an important way, you can have a separate script that runs when you go into a VPN with some particular action or when you say this one is from a live line. No matter what the actual hardware or the actual connection is, we provide it as long as we need it. So, yeah, this is what it looks like in the desktop environment to use this overall. Yeah, see, it's sort of similar to the switch design that we use live. This is what the user typically wants to see when they manage their network on a desktop. So, where do we stand at? At 5.2, we are very close to the release. We haven't done a major release in over one year. We've done that minor release in the last year, and those minor releases are actually not that minor. We back-forwarded a lot of functionality to be in the stable branch. So, like, most of the stuff we put on is already here to the user. But what we wouldn't do is in the stable branch, we wouldn't do any major re-factories or major changes. So, what happened in the branch that we released? Anything in numbers is not probably coming this way, quite highly because of almost a three-valve release. So, what do you really think? What's the name of the piece? The short answer is a lot. And the long answer is actually a lot. It's the stuff that nothing can be changed. Nothing can't go beyond what's in there, because something's already made 42 months ago. So, let me just quickly talk about the pile. So, what we're serious about is getting things away from our vendor's chain, because people like to run a programmer in terms of the main scenarios and a lot of these scenarios, you hope doing as minimal installation as possible. There's going to be a lot of resources such as memory, but also the dependency that we're writing. We didn't actually improve the memory construction significantly in 1.2. We have some things planned for 1.4. We didn't manage to do that, but what we did is that we fabricated some of the dependencies. You can see that for legal processes, we actually decided to use the system-based library so that we don't need to drag in an extra controller. For the awesome management, we also followed it to system-based. There's more of these things to come, like the stuff that's taking a lot of care of the system-based, but we're going to be distributed away from that. We also, the DPSG, I think it's remarkable that it was a huge, huge re-hectoring. Those of you who are familiar with the deal, know that the deal already provides a D-Bus library for some time. The D-Bus network manager pre-dates this library by many years, so we weren't really able to use it, but now we use it a little bit. We have the whole D-Bus network to use it so we could integrate it. You can see that. It's quite nice because it implements some nice stuff that D-Bus provides, which is the object manager that makes the network manager more simple or robust in many ways. Also more maintainable because that's the case when you're using more and more of the interface. We've also implemented a Wi-Fi area. The wind will be This is a feature contributed by Kamiqo, who actually does forms with the drive of the network manager. Anyone here has a Google phone where those are essentially network manager forms. So improving Wi-Fi as well. W is something you can do a little bit better in managing the Wi-Fi and the scan list, so we instead of using our own testing for the drive which the network driver has to do at least a little bit to provide some knowledge as well. If I do a little bit more at CLI, we have some very nice improvements there. I don't want to use changes there. We probably don't use it. We aren't really doing any new changes in the network manager world because it's a major project. It's sort of stable for most users. So we were doing incremental improvements making the both more maintainable so you can download any small attachments. But a lot of the colors are actually my favorite. If you're using CLI, then you'll get to use these three quick games. And if you're not using CLI quick games, then there's a problem with this. It's a really big match, especially for those who are looking for performance lines. I think there's a lot of the offers here to use are exactly in that crowd that when you're running into a Wi-Fi that's here, you can do that in my command line. So we're going to use CLI, just do an CLI, and connect the name of the network in your app. We're doing some improvements in the VPN program, so you probably know the network manager integrates with virtually any VPN that's used. We have the planning architecture, so we make that a set of planning which is sort of a most popular VPN, which is open VPN, the IPv6, IPv6 base, the identity panels, we do support the system of the people and the network manager to be open connected. But there's also some community maintenance VPN plans, such as a paneling to SSH, or IOTI, which does the VPN for a panel or a VPN in case you're in a particular role-style environment, you can use that. But the VPN plugins they are, for instance, and the long D-pass for this system, it used to be difficult to make the plugins connect to more than one VPN at the same time. We fix this now, so you can run more instances of VPN connection at the same time, which is pretty sort of nice, but I was more I'm not sure if the read is probably not the any more influence there are that we are all there, there's a in the new Wi-Fi client that we are now running on the the Mac network fundamentalization for now it's more for gaming for network, you can see it from from tracking after you actually associated the Wi-Fi to make ever issues, we're probably going to even further run on this in 1.4 what exactly we cannot read by the audience won't be here randomly because it will drive the network operators but it seems like there's a way to to to make sure that when you're going to the time that you're going to have a stable when you're moving from the other one to the other one, the last one we're doing something like it's already for the IP address, if you might if you might note that the whole part of the IP address is derived from your Mac address and that worries the people who care about the call tracking so for 1.2 we implemented RxE 7 Q1.2 which introduces a way to use both part for each network and when you move to another network essentially there's a graphic cache of certain strings that identify the network the subnet the Wi-Fi, the IP or the network manager the identifier of the configuration of the network has a secret key so it's not ready for anyone to use which possible to try we're thinking about we're talking about this for the Mac address it's not possible to try to connect to different networks but still maintain some security when you return to the network you do the same just when you get out of the city you mostly bring small improvements but sometimes the small improvement really matters for the people who care about privacy this is the thing that we see is why we're improving not a little feature is that we support creating many more types of the virtual devices that work for the servers for the servers you may know that we already covered all the typical network devices that we'll be able to do freebies and delas and fonts and things I don't know if you're just taking on that so the network manager is the server you'll be able to do delas on the internet and freebies and you'll be able to take your life and so yes this is the right approach to the right scams we're now going to welcome you to be very close to the release we've already done the first beta which is SkaterComplete.com if you're building anything in the network manager and I want to say let's make use of the new feature to be very good to have one too it's already it's already SkaterComplete.com we process our network actually and we do have a really good actually so we are very confident that nothing really important will break you can already already build on it if there are any test of the offers here we might be interested in the features in that network you can try it you can finish stuff with it for some time already you can do the so you can also dig it out already dig guys if you have a good job of keeping the network manager up to date as soon as we release the signal they will be quickly taking to the hospital and some will be assessing their offer if you can do that you can try out and up to date network manager as well I don't think we're going to find a way for the next getting network manager what's next as for the next release of network manager we should like to tell you sometime this year as well we think don't plan to spend an hour where you're doing awesome so we're doing something like a development process and it just must be as big as possible we'll be doing integration if we don't have any place yet so that we get more confidence in our our code base but there's a couple of teachers who already are considering for the next year so what you see is this you probably can have the question mark at the end of the each of these entries finally decided yet for network manager now we're going to do the your pieces on this this also is my last slide and after that we're also very open to suggestions about what would you like to see the next new release so we'd like to hear from you so what could be what are our priorities is to make network manager more more secure I think it would be a long way to do it make use of some features he provides to the network manager and we we'd like to reconsider some architecture and just make it more secure the key question we'd like to include the experience when you're using the smart chat with a certificate or you're not here in your desktop so that you can forward the the case as well and not actually copy the certificates or in files we use today we can start to improve for the users using the certifications by file or and recently I recently passed from my community I do remember a few days ago with the of what we were doing for some time already it's probably cooler because we could actually send it separately to the VPN connection from the actual network connection you have you can make sure that it's your desktop code aside from the VPN you can use the VPN connection which is nice for users who really care about privacy or you can do the reverse like you could isolate the VPN funnel into a separate space and maybe move your shell or web browser so that you could only use for your the rest of your just use your ordinary network connection so I think it's probably the most important thing we could do for the next generation to be excited about this that's where my whole time and if you have any questions there are a couple of more network manager developers so if I'm not able to answer what you're trying to say so we're going to go to anything with a hotspot named space where none of the applications are bothered by DNS lives that you get from the hotspot and after the hotspot the application is finished and only then all the network applications become aware of this event thank you very much we were actually there's a group of people that would like to get better DNS support in the September 24, 25 and the isolation of the hotspot like there is really necessary for their machinery to work so we like the network developers are actually not currently doing anything about it what would be the impact on the networking the network work problem the multiple VPNs being supported by network managers sounds awesome the only thing I'm concerned about is how does network manager handle conflicting IP space for any of this well in that case, why do I actually look away that's why I figured that's because I would love to have her set up on that but I don't know if she would know what to do so I can't get this up for my mom she probably wouldn't be about it which is fine but I probably would rather not be called a VPN it's not that it would be a representative like on a level where you can see well we're actually pretty clever about making routes but you obviously can't well you can't have a few routes to the same network the same network it's different to the network interpreter it's a problem that we don't want to have but we actually keep track of the routes that should be on the interpreter internally so when you have a lot of them use the same routes then the first one means you activate the second one and then you disable the first one then the next one gets the route if the difficulty doesn't end up in the statements where there will be no routes probably as well but you can't be about it so my question is for one of the the next version I think the mainstay supports some stream testing what's the plan actually for the user to specify which application to be in which connection is there some plan for that, some GUI or something or there's no real plan about anything yet so we need to figure this out obviously the first thing we'll do is to have API get to the connection that we already explored and then API do an information throughout how to do a how to do the destination so there's probably to have some API do some of the applications in the we've got some process to be most of the we're not even yet as a drawing table so my question is according to IPv6 sharing planning the next version 1.4 and to the extent of that is there some plan for like having IPv6 services while the host that will be sharing the connection will have only IPv4 so this kind of like and quite a result of it IPv6 and then IPv4 will have some kind of transition so after like when you were really not considering any types of really not that many plans for the next major years but it is the sort of thing we'd like to do so after the renovation I'm very likely to at least do the journey so thank you for that and as for moving to the system well it makes makes a better management but the things would be the whole the whole the whole sector really it's not our business we have to do that as for other things it's more like we are carrying lots of various things because there are some pretty amazing things like let's say the DHCP plan we do currently use DHCP but we do we would like to just not do it anymore because DHCP really does not it's about life as we get so the comparable size but it's just the DHCP plan so network is a system that already fixes by doing their own DHCP implementation which is considerably less crazy and life history starts down so a very main effect is that we don't really get to use it to run this because we have the same functionality with much less what happens if you are running system D it doesn't actually actually depend on the system D route and the library that runs independently of system D I put a whole same platform where we run system D and we we we have two what we need so we need to provide life in system D and we also enjoy our system and we we are the the the the the the the the microphone the the the the the the the the the the the the the D the the the the distribute the the use How much is it? It's bigger. It's a bit bigger. I don't know if you have any problems with the left side. What? It's smaller here. Or here? Yes. It's the same. It should be here. Great. Bye. Great. We have year 2016. I'm sorry, but the camera is using X-Lander. It's from year 80. It's working. It's working. It's working. It's working. Great. It's good. And here a bit more. It's a bit bigger. No, it's a bit bigger. It's a bit bigger. It's a bit bigger. It's a bit bigger. Yes, it's larger. It'sJus9. It's a smines store. It's a shop. It's quiet much bigger. Of course. It's very small. Its bigger here. It's bigger here. Compared to the real line box. Here is a special sticker. Lion's. If there are any other places where it's better to go, then it's better to go. We have a presenter, if you want to use it. Probably not. It works as a laser indicator, if you don't put a 2 meter button. But it was necessary to put a 2 meter button. It was necessary to put a 2 meter button. I don't even know. No, no, no, no. I don't know. Let me ask you about the print. Do you have a signature in mind? I have a signature in mind. But I have a signature in mind. I have a signature in mind. So they have a signature in mind. So they have a signature in mind. I don't know if it's going to happen again, but it's going to happen again, what do you think? No, I don't think so. Do you have enough time? No. You have 43 seconds, but who can answer it? Yes. Theoretically, you can take more time. I thought it was the first round, and I have only one question. If someone from our team said that they would not answer the question, then we would have answered it in the first round. Can you give us some examples of that? Does it work? Yes. I will need to answer this one. This one? Yes, yes, yes. I've already tried it before the team, but I don't know what to say about it. I'd like to ask you to explain a bit more about it. I don't know how to say it. It's not a good idea to say it like that. But if you want to come to another person, you can just say it. I can also say it like that.