 Twitter to ramp up censorship of misinformation about the Ukraine War. Twitter has published what it calls a crisis misinformation policy, announcing that it will be actively reducing the visibility of content found to be false, which pertains to situations of armed conflict, public health emergencies, and large-scale natural disasters. If you've been paying attention to the dramatic escalations in online censorship we've been seeing in 2022, it will not surprise you to learn that the Ukraine War is the first crisis to which this new censorship policy will be applied. Twitter says it won't amplify or recommend content found to violate its new policy, and will also attach warning labels to individual tweets and even hide offending content behind a warning label, and disable the retweet function on particularly naughty posts. The problem here is of course the question of how to impartially establish whether something is objectively false, without it turning into at best a flawed system guided by fallible human biases and perceptual filters, and at worst a powerful institution shutting down unauthorized speech. Twitter says it formed its new policy with input from unnamed global experts and human rights organizations, and will be reinforcing it with the help of conflict monitoring groups, humanitarian organizations, open source investigators, journalists, and more. This will come as no comfort to anyone who's familiar with the history of propaganda peddling that can be found in every single one of those respective categories. Twitter lists the following examples of the kind of content that will be found in violation of its crisis misinformation policy. False coverage or event reporting, or information that miscategorizes conditions on the ground as a conflict evolves. False allegations regarding use of force, incursions on territorial sovereignty, or around the use of weapons.atively false or misleading allegations of war crimes or mass atrocities against specific populations. False information regarding international community response, sanctions, defensive actions, or humanitarian operations. When Jack Dorsey resigned as Twitter CEO last November, I noted the warning signs we were seeing that his replacement, Parag Agraval, supported the use of measures which make unauthorized content much less visible than authorized content without eliminating the unauthorized content altogether. There's a lot of content out there, Agraval said in a 2020 interview. A lot of tweets out there. Not all of it gets attention. Some subset of it gets attention. And so increasingly our role is moving towards how we recommend content, and that sort of is a struggle that we're working through in terms of how we make sure these recommendations systems that we're building, how we direct people's attention, is leading to a healthy public conversation that is most participatory. This agenda to direct people's attention toward healthy public conversation by controlling how content is recommended to viewers, echoes the censorship by algorithm tactics we've been seeing employed by Facebook, Google, and by Google-owned YouTube. Google has been hiding dissident media in its search results for years, and in 2020 the CEO of Google's parent company, Alphabet, admitted to algorithmically throttling world socialist website. Last year the CEO of YouTube acknowledged that the platform uses algorithms to elevate authoritative sources while suppressing borderline content not considered authoritative. Facebook spokeswoman Laurence Vinson said in 2018 that if the platform's fact checkers, including the state-funded establishment narrative management firm Atlantic Council, rule that a Facebook user has been posting false news, moderators will quote, dramatically reduce the distribution of all their page-level or domain-level content on Facebook. Twitter has generally been the most reluctant of the major platforms to exercise censorship on behalf of the empire, which is what has made it a better source of ideas and information than any other major platform. But now we're seeing the most pernicious form of online censorship, censorship by manipulation of content visibility, take hold there as well. Censorship by visibility manipulation is the most destructive form of online censorship that exists because its consequences are both so much more far-reaching and so much less attention grabbing than the controversial act of banning users from platforms or removing their posts. It's a kind of censorship that people don't even know is happening, and it's happening all over the place. It is deeply disturbing that Silicon Valley mega-corporations have simply accepted that it is their job to help the U.S. win a propaganda war against Russia, and how everyone's just going along with that like it's fine and normal. Our ability to share ideas and information on the platforms where most people congregate is being increasingly restricted, not on the basis of whether a speech is harmful or even whether it is true, but on the basis of whether it helps or hinders the U.S. propaganda operation against Russia. Silicon Valley censorship with the Ukraine war is an unprecedented escalation because they are not pretending to be doing it to protect people from a virus or to safeguard elections or defend the public good in any way. It's literally just, well we can't have people thinking wrong thoughts about a war, without even really explaining why that's important in any coherent and sensical fashion. There's no longer any pretense that the internet is being censored to protect the public interest. It's just open censorship of information about a war, solely because they take it as a given that it's their job to control the things people think and say about that war. They're coming right out and saying yes, we are the platforms you come to in order to share ideas and information with your fellow humans, and yes, we are agents of the U.S. Empire. This is a dramatic escalation. All this public hand-ringing about misinformation and disinformation is itself disinformation. They're not worried about the spread of disinformation. They're worried about the spread of information. Your rulers are not concerned that you'll start learning false things about COVID or the war in Ukraine. They are worried you'll start learning true things about your rulers. That's what all this fuss is really about. They are locking down our minds and sanitizing our information ecosystem for the protection of the Empire. I will keep saying this and saying this for as long as I am able. We've got to wake up and stop these bastards before it's too late.