 I don't follow online streamers, but I do admire some who engage in political discussions and Hassan Bikar is one of them. Since the Palestinian crisis escalated, I have been actively participating in discussions on his videos and his socio-political analysis of Western responses. When he made a video criticizing P.S. Morgan for allegedly using his platform to promote Israeli media narratives, I knew he would be a guest on the uncensored show. Here's the video I'll describe by P.S. Morgan himself. One of the names Hassan Abbey, his analysis of the Israel Hamas war, has taken a highly critical stance towards Israel and Western media and he's been calling me out for my coverage. Because he only cares about Israeli citizens, he does not care about Palestinians as human beings, that's why it's apples to oranges. It's like one side is a human, the other side is a barbaric monster child. While I was in the process of getting ready for the stream, Israel enacted one of the singular worst strikes they have done thus far and an Israeli air strike hit the Al Ahli hospital. In Gaza City, where thousands of civilians were seeking medical treatment and shelter from the relentless bombing campaign. Assalamu alaikum guys, please like and share this video so that others can watch it. Subscribe to stay connected for future content. Hassan Starnes, during the interview effectively challenged the hype surrounding Zionism. He highlighted the fact that women and children are suffering in the ongoing crisis in court for peace and the ceasefire to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. Hassan himself has raised over one million US dollars for the people of Gaza, really amazing mate. Sorry, I said the evidence is increasingly pointing to this not being an Israeli airstrike and that is expert evidence from people who have no skin in the game at all. Yes, well, I don't know which expert you're talking about because I think channel four did a pretty good job. As a matter of fact, I would say channel four did probably the best job so far in analyzing everything that the IDF has said. But the reason why I believed and I still do believe that the likelihood is that this was an Israeli bombing campaign wasn't only because of the singular verifiable video, the phone video from the balcony that had all of the markings of an airstrike, the fact that the Israeli Air Force was enacting a bombing campaign in the region at the time, according to the Al Jazeera live streaming footage that everyone is using, but doesn't understand the fact that the digital media person for the IDF immediately came out and said that this was actually an airstrike that hit a Hamas target and that he was sad that there were casualties at the end of the day, but this this was a Hamas target and celebrated it. And more importantly, I guess the fact that this hospital had been bombed by Israel. This hospital had been bombed by Israel on Saturday. 22 hospitals have as a matter of fact been bombed by Israel since this last saga in the occupation. And this hospital had been bombed directly by Israel where the cancer ward was destroyed. Israel has been bombing all of these hospitals. Israel has been calling all of these hospitals to evacuate over and over and over again. The medical professionals at the hospital had been called by the Israeli government the day prior and everyone on the ground assumes that this is an Israeli airstrike. They are the ones who experienced the situation. So when you have every single, can I just finish this? If you watched the BBC account of all this last night by their Verify unit, which was specifically set up by the BBC to be completely dispassionate in these investigations, and they reached a pretty clear conclusion based on circumstantial evidence, I'll make that clear, that this would not have been an Israeli airstrike, including for example the size of the crater, which bears no relation to the size of craters normally left by Israel. So look, my point is neither of us know for sure, but you took to your airwaves immediately because actually your, I wouldn't even say unconscious bias, your admitted propagandist bias on your part was that you wanted that to be an Israeli airstrike, it suited your narrative, and I would say that that in itself, in its way, I wanted it to be an Israeli airstrike. It's being a stenographer, well you know, you accuse me of being a stenographer, I try and be fair and get to the truth. In your case, I don't think you try to do that. I think you appeal to your audience, appeal to your base, and you don't really care whether the facts are there or not. This is entirely unfair because you just said circumstantial evidence favors that this was not an Israeli airstrike. I gave you all of the circumstantial evidence that it does favor that this is an Israeli airstrike. The reason why, however, circumstantial evidence is not enough, and the one thing that I will concede to, because when more information did come out, and no, I do not mean when Israel said that they did not bomb this hospital and it was actually Hamas, and then they turned around and went, never mind, it's not Hamas, it's actually Islamic Jihad, and then they said we have more evidence coming out in a couple hours, and then the evidence came out, and it turns out it sounded like the phone conversations that they were able to intercept supposedly sounded like by experts at the very least to be completely false. Yesterday, Al Jazeera released a video that I edited and posted on this channel. Based on the evidence presented, the reason is strong possibility that the missile that devastated the hospital, the Baptist Arab hospital, and reportedly resulted in 500 casualties originated from Israeli forces operating in the vicinity at the time. To be honest, I agree with Hassan that a forensic expert and other investigators should be dispatched to the hospital to determine who was truly responsible for the tragic incident. And the question then, if you assume that they are able to defend themselves as any free democratic country, then the question becomes, Hassan, let me ask you this, then becomes a question of how can they defend themselves? If their mission now is to get rid of Hamas, a terror organization that's committed one of the worst acts of terror ever seen, if that is their stated aim, then what they are doing is consistent with that, isn't it? No. Here's why this is actually an abject failure, and this is not just my perspective on the matter. I'm just a dumb idiot with a Twitch stream who is live reacting to the news and trying to make sense of everything as it's ongoing. I usually have a policy of not covering breaking news, and sometimes that policy is violated. But ultimately, I am not held up by the same journalistic standards, even though I think I do a much better job than most other news outlets in general. So let me just say this really quickly. You said Israel has a right to defend itself. Absolutely zero people think that this is a ridiculous statement. However, how Israel is defending itself is collective punishment. Now collective punishment in the form of depriving 2.2 million people of electricity, collective punishment in the form of depriving them of water, of food, collective punishment in the form of 51 people dying in the West Bank, where there is no Hamas in the West Bank, and yet 51 people have died because in the West Bank, settlers that are occupying Palestinian territory in violation of the international law, settlers who are doing an act of colonial terrorism, and this is not my statement on it, this is international law, that are doing horrifying things by simply just existing there and maintaining the presence with an occupying force in the form of IDF, who was ritualistically humiliating Palestinians in a structure that B'tselem, an Israeli organization, calls the permit regime, where every waking moment of Palestinians' lives in the West Bank are absolute hell, where they have no legal recourse. 51 Palestinians have died, and that was before the Ramallah protest that happened last night, and the Israeli forces were opening up with live fire on protesters last night, so who knows what that death toll has become. This is all a product of Israel being an apartheid state. This is a violent apartheid state. There is no way to be a peaceful apartheid state. Hassan spoke the unvarnished truth. Israel needs to reassess its approach and behave in a manner befitting the civilized nation it claims to be. A civilized country adheres to international law and the rules of engagement. In its pursuit of self-defense, a rational and civilized nation targets its adversaries while safeguarding innocent lives and property. Reducing a community or city to rubble is not a proportionate response to a threat. This video needs to reach a wider audience, so please like and share it with your family and friends. If you haven't already, hit the subscribe button. See you in our next update.