 This conference will now be recorded. In starting this spring slash summer to City Department of Works, we hired Dorner, Incorporated out of Green Bay, to construct the Indiana Avenue project from 17th to 24th. Last year, the county did this section for Indiana. They did it from Taylor Drive to 24th Street, so we want to finish up our last section this year. It's from 17th to 24th. This project was scheduled for 2024 because Taylor Drive was supposed to get done by the county this year, from Erie Avenue all the way to Union Avenue. But the county project, they're getting federal funding, and their funding got pushed back from 2023 to 2024. Therefore, we moved our project from 2024 to 2023. These projects are so close to each other, proximity that you can't do at the same time. It'll be a detour at night there. So that's how we ended up here. If you look at your capital improvements, that was approved this last year. This project was scheduled for 2024. It's coming up a year. It'll finish up that quarter. It'll be just like the rest of it is now, bike trail, lighting. It's going to be all of me going down the one lane. We had a public informational meeting several weeks ago, which went over very well with the neighbors. We had a big turnout. And the vids came in favorable, so that's why we're here to get it approved. I will say that the residents of the area are very excited about it. They're looking forward to it. You always have to live through the pain to get the nice project, but it's in the NF news. It's got some real rough spots on it. It's been bad for a couple of years now. And just to add to this, several projects that supposed to get done in 2023, you got pushed back to 2024, but it just made sense to move this one forward. How does this affect the budget for this year? It doesn't, not really. No, that's why we had to eliminate a couple of questions. I shouldn't say eliminate. We just pushed back like south 11th Street. Okay. It's supposed to do from Indiana to Union. And also Lincoln Avenue. We're going to do like from First Street to Sixth Street. We just moved those back to 2024. Okay. No. The projects that are being pushed back, is that going to cause any issues? What were the people in those areas really pushing for that? Is that something that we have a lot of safety or any issues there? No. It's just, it's, Is what it is? Yeah. It's, we have more and more work than we are able to do within our budget, sad with, you know, even the time that we have during the construction season. So, it's just another unfortunate year where it gets delayed and it's a rough road and not the best condition. But it's been that way for several, for some time already. It's not pleasant, but that's the nature of this type of work. It's, we need to be flexible. Sometimes utility work brings other projects to the forefront and prioritizes. So, there's always, there's always some, some opportunity to adjust. And again, we've, we've pretty been pretty upfront with this. I know Ryan's been very communicative in his staff with the engineering department about the projects in the way. Actually, originally, what it was first proposed, it was originally slated for this year. And then it got pushed back because of the tail-to-drive thing. And so, and then now it got shifted because of the tail-to-drive thing again. So, it's kind of, it's been on the radar for a long time. Will the traffic be able to, will it, will you do one side of the street or you're going to fully block it, close it from 24 to 17? Well, we'll keep it open to, so it'll be open to local traffic. So, in other words, sometimes there's other driveways on there, but for the most part it's going to be, it's going to be shut down. It is going to be shut down. There's, there's businesses on there that we know we have to provide access to. Yeah. The dental, and then you have frankies and that. So, there'll be access and detours for those, those businesses. And when you close them down the bus route, just re-loops, or how does that work? Yeah, they'll have to, right, they'll be looping around. They'll just re-looping around. Right. So, when I was reading the document, I didn't even recall 300 pages. I was going through that. There was a gas station that was there. It has all the contamination and everything. Is that, is that going to be any of a, are we going to have to really go into that street? Are we looking? There's, there's, there's always the potential for contaminated soil. Let's say that leached into the right-of-way and into the union. Right. And if that's the case, it's part of the contract. There's probably some provisions that we will work with the contractor. So, we would be responsible for it, even though that came from, you know, that property was sold four times. Right. So, what we'll do is, we take care of it as part of the project, but then we also, then we'll look for the responsible party. Right. And then go back to them for the additional cost of managing that contaminated soil, provided that there's someone within the chain of custody that we can go back to and identify. I don't know, I don't think it was these around anymore. No, that one wasn't, that one was. According to that document, it was, although the one on 21st was the one on 22nd was. Okay. There's two gas stations that way. Yes. You're correct. There was two gas stations. Yeah. So, plus we try to get ahead of that a little bit. We did, we did a lot of work there. So, I picked up on something. Can you miss it like David mentioned? Yeah. But you try to get ahead of it a little bit. Given that they're that old and that, that far removed, the soil does to somewhat natural attenuate this, some of the contaminants, and then it manages some of it itself. So, for instance, we just did the repair at Erie and 14th. We suspected there to be a lot of contaminant. And it was just very minimal, surprisingly. That was four gas stations, all on that, on every corner, you know, one on every corner. David? Yeah. This will be a really good project. It'll finish that corridor all the way from Kola all the way down there. Yeah, it'll be nice. We're done for a long, long time. And all the, all the, besides streets going up there, we'll all be coming two ways, temporarily. Right. So, they'll be, it'll be so that, because we're all, we're all coming one way, and they'll go back to one way, once the street's done, but they'll be right two, two ways, so that the residents don't have to go to Indiana. And then keep off of there. So, any other questions? For motion. I move to accept the resolution. Second. Seconded. Any other discussion? All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Chair votes aye. That is approved. Okay. Number seven, resolution number 159-2223, March 20th, 2023. Resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to enter into a lease with Lakeshore United FC for use and management of the books and property. I'm going to take a lead on this one. Okay. Mr. Chair, I'm going to recuse myself from this discussion, as I'm a board member of the, the soccer Lakeshore United group. So, I'm going to see you after the meeting. We are asking that the committee approve the resolution of authorizing the lease. This is step one of a multi-year, multi-phase process to develop and manage the books and property for multi-sport recreational purposes. We have Chris and Joe here from LUFC, and I'm sure they would like to speak also and are available to answer questions. Sure. So, with regard to the lease, Attorney Majeris and I have been working on getting a draft lease put together. It's attached to your resolution. It's relatively straightforward. It's a multi-year lease, five years initially with renewable periods for a 10-year period. Was it 15? I forget. I think we did 10 with, who pulled it up. I should have that memory, shouldn't I? I should too, but I don't. It's like reading 300 pages of a, I just don't remember. But that being said, it's really an opportunity for us to have enough time to make developments, to fundraise, to do the things we need to do, to get the infrastructure put in, to get the structures put in, the athletic fields put in, and various other matters as we go forward. So, we think it's a great proposal. We're excited about it. We're glad to be tenants again. And we're looking forward to being good stewards of that property as we go forward. Five-year term, 10 years of auto-renew on one-year cycles. And then this, I'm assuming, this does have all openings for the possibility of a structure being put on that. Yeah, we drafted this intentionally to allow for other agreements to be put into place as we have a firmer picture of what the development's going to look like. Okay, okay. Any thoughts on how that's going so far, and how that we kind of brought that forward? I think we're still waiting for the feasibility study to be made public. Yeah, that's not brought back to the group, either to our group or to the bigger group that was put together to start that study. My initial understanding, I don't know if any of you had a chance to read the Sheboygan Press story this week. Dan Hine had commented from the town of Sheboygan that the feasibility study was site-specific. I don't understand it to be site-specific, but a draft is out there floating around extensively for the purpose of probably figuring out whether a cash flow is regardless of site. So without having seen that, I think that's where they're at in that process. I believe in that article it said something like within the next two weeks that he was going to be able to find out on that. That is my understanding as well. Another question there. Are you in any ways associated with the football league? Is that at one time, years ago, they were also going to be part of the Boots and Property, were there's going to be football fields on there or not? Right, we don't have any direct affiliation with Sheboygan Youth Football. We had been initially in discussions with Sheboygan Youth Football for possibly subletting or having opportunities out there to rent space, maybe seasonally, but we don't have any specific affiliation with them, but that being said, the facility is envisioned to be multi-sport, so it would certainly include them in any plans or any program. Well, originally that's what I thought was going to be two football fields and then some of the soccer fields. I mean, so I mean, a number of years ago, so. Yeah, that's correct. Is there any, is there any softball or baseball coming into that, or is it just going to be strictly football? I think that phase one development is primarily going to be soccer fields and soccer facilities. I've not had any conversations with other organizations about exploring, you know, developing specific to those sports, but in all of the conversations I've been a part of, it's been just generally understood that it's open to all users. Yeah, and if anyone approached us, that would be kind of how we did and we wanted to make sure the former lease and then this lease was open to being able to work with other sports to do other things. There are, you know, depending on how we were approached or who approached, there are options when it comes to like we installed Turf, how you would configure that to bring in other organizations if they had an interest in order to make the facility not only just from a user standpoint but from a cash flow and from a usability standpoint, depending on who would be interested in that. And then obviously with the the other project, the building project, how that fell, that could impact some things as well, but all along have said that regardless of any other sites need to continue to utilize this site and continue to develop this site both with Outdoor and whatever, because if you remember our original, had a dome on it in one of the phases that continues to be a need. Those needs haven't changed since the first lease. We've actually increased our membership significantly even through COVID. And I think that there the opportunity to do something indoor has to happen in what's in regardless of what goes on elsewhere. Currently what do, how many fields are involved with what we have planned? I think what's been developed now there's four full-size fields and three other fields. You know, but that's it's a start. And you know, with the with the fields that we have with SASD, we will probably continue we will continue with those as well just with how much our needs have grown. And then if you throw in any other sports there's there's there's there's quite a bit of fields to balance. City driving range Yeah. Anything as possible as Chris mentioned we're open to all of that. I don't think we've been directly approached by anybody with regard to other sports but certainly those things nothing we've done on the south side. All of those things have been on our radar. And field needs baseball softball. I see they've really dropped. There is no real use no scheduled use of Kiwanis anymore hasn't been for several years. There's no schedule use Roosevelt anymore hasn't been for several years. There's been talk of trying to do something with Roosevelt for some youth baseball softball, but so that that that area has really dropped off. I don't know if with this being because there's some sacrosity some of those facilities that with this being open that is up to continue to be used for helps correct so and I'm sorry soccer in both rec and this club has been a big user of the park and the school system so providing them some area of their own would alleviate the schools alleviate our parks to do some more things. Thank you. Is the space open to the public? I'm new to this project. Is it someone that kids can play in there? I believe it will be right now. I don't think it's set up for people and there's no parking. There's no restrooms, those kind of things, but this we would envision this like any other park. Still a public park. 100%. For a motion that makes a second. Any other discussion? All in favor? Aye. Opposed? That is approved. Okay, next meeting April 11, 2020. We have an exhaustive agenda. I'm looking for a motion to adjourn. Second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? That is right.