 Rwy'n rhaid o'r ddwayf, rwy'n rhaid i'w dwyw ddigwydd y gallwn y dyma'r ystyried i fynd i ddweud yn bwrth ac oedd syniadol yn llwyddeddfidio, ac efallai mae'n amser fod yn ei ddweud, ac rwy'n rhaid i fynd i'n caethойwch cyflon diddygiadol mewn gofnidol, a'u adrodd hynny'n gweithio fwy gyrion yr hynny'n ffordd iawn. Yndod, rwy'n rhaid i fynd i'w amser hynny'n ffordd iawn, ..y'r ystafell yn fawr cyfwyr gyda'r byddwch yn ymweld y newydd. I'n olygu 15 ymlaen o'ch bod yn ymweld. Yn ymweld. Yma yw y digital. Yn y ffroedd yma sy'n rhoi'r cyfwyr yma yw'r cyfwyr yn ymddwch cyfwyr cymdeithasol. Yna fyddwn ni'n gweithio ar y digital. Yn ymweld yma yw'r bod yn ymweld yma yw'r ymweld yma yw'r ymweld yw'r ymweld... ..ty painting. Yr old filirio of IT and communications on systems where we saw is being replaced with a new framing of what digital means for our clients but also for our own staff. So we have two skills networks, mine and another one that runs globally, that currently has about 1800, maybe 2000 people organised across the 11,000 Arab staff iawn i'r ddawn o'r gefnogi ar gyfer gyd-fifaradau yma fearsu hynny, a'r dd [♪gwiaethwyr mewn ddadau gwiaethr â'r dd !fifaradau rhaigellu ar gyfer gyda gwiaethwyr o'r dd !fifaradau yma. These are quite interesting times right now, we are in as a firm. What I was going to talk about, nd y timing was quite good because nobody saw the slides before, but then sort of picked up on that. This report here was something we did with Dan in Melbourne about urban informatics, and I think his new picture on the cloud no longer being a cloud sitting above the city, a gwneud o'r amgylcheddol yn y sylwyr o'r sydd, yn y sylwyr iddo yn teimlo. Rwy'n golygu i'r gwneud o'r unrhyw ar draws. Rwy'n gweithio chi'n oedd unrhyw yng nghyrch o'r perthyn a'r hanes. Nicolau, yn gweithio i'r gwneud o'r hyn, yn ymgylcheddol. Felly yn gweithio i'r perthyn rhaid. Mae yn diolch. Mae'n gweithio i'r tynnu am ystyried ar y cyfnod sy'n gwneud o'r cyfnod ac y cyfnod yn gwneud ar gweithio cyfwyr â'r cyfwyr. Fy'r gysylltu, rwy'n mynd i'r hollu'n gweithio'n gweithio'r bydd yma a'r gweithio'n gweithio. A llwyafio cyfwyr o'r cyd-gweithio gyda'r gweithio ac rwy'n weithio'n gweithio'n gweithio ar gyfer y gweithio, yn mwy o'r gweithio'r gweithiau a'r gweithio'r cyffredinol o'r buith ac yn y ddweud o'r cyffredinol a'r gweithio. Felly yn ei gael o'n ddod, it's probably 70 or 80% okay what the findings of that report were. Then some interesting projects and as a much longer, I don't wanna go through that, and then government picked this up and that is either the beginning or the end of innovation isn't it. So the previous chairman of GE said that, he said, oh we've got 100 Nobel prizes and 100 awards and 100 patents every week registered around the world, Felly we know we are on an old trend when the White House calls us in and asks us for a meeting about a trend. I don't think that's the case here actually. I think these were genuine attempts by UK government and we see it internationally too to understand both the scale of the opportunity, which I come to in a second, and the second one their role. I think they are no longer saying this might or might not happen, smart city, dumb city, don't really care. Ond yna y dylai'r economiaeth digitaliaid yn ddweud yn dweud yn ddweud yn gofyn ac, o'r dyfodol o'r UK, youn i'r ddweud yn ddweud yn ddweud yn y Cyfaint UK. Rwy'n deud yn ymgyrch. Os ydych yn Rhywbeth Dimbulbyn yn ddweud yw... Mae'n ddweud. Mae'r ddweud yn ddweud yng Nghaerffordd. Fydden i'r ddydd y dyma o'r cyflawn, ychydig yng Nghaerffordd yma, i ddim yn unrhyw unrhyw unrhyw unrhyw for digital Cymru, ond rwyf yn Gwyrddon gyda'r cyfan, a rwyf yn bethau rwyf am gweithio'r gweithio'r BBC. Gawdaeth'n gofyn ymddangos, nid ydych chi wnaeth y dyfyn nhw'n rwyf. Rwyf yn gweithio, nid ydych yn gweithio, ond mae'n gweithio'r 40 bilion ysgol. ystod o'r ffrwyr ffordd i Llyfrgell, i'w amgyrchau cyfrwyr o'r ffordd i Llyfrgell i'w dda i'r Unedig? Felly, yn ddych yn ffynol, sy'n gweld i'n 300,000 ysgol yn y cyfnodol yma o London, yn ddych yn ffynol 300,000 ysgol yn ffynol, sy'n byw'r hynny o'n i'r ffynol o'r 150,000 ysgol yn y cyfrwyr. A yna'n gweithio'n gweld i'r ystyried ffyrdd, i'r tych oes o'r stegol a'r cyfrwyr cwyrm, across the industry or across the spectrum and cities now that people are saying digital and tech is a core part of the future of the city and we know how it works, it is relatively straightforward. You're just going to have this new layer of instrumentation and digitalization. You create data where dentures are no longer in the cloud but in the streets, on the lampposts, in parking spaces, in building management systems everywhere. We're just trialling here about a hundred sensors and one of the new Texas instruments once is humidity, location, it measures everything. Most law, quite simple, $20 today, $10 next year, $5 the year after, at that point that technology will be embedded in anything that is connected. At that point we'll either use power or ethernet or other network technologies to make it easy to connect and we'll have an unbelievable and unbelievable digital layer being available to do something with. What we then will see is a change not just at a hardware level or when we had IP coming in at a telecoms level, we see innovation happening from the instrumentation, the sensing where the payload is generated through new operational and IOT layers, through IT, completely new platforms emerging right now, developing analytics and visualization business that didn't exist yesterday to a whole raft of presentation layers that will target both operational efficiencies and the experience of users and citizens. It's the innovation across the entire stack that is so exciting and I think that is a reason why right now people are still over-imagining the next 12 months. So this will not all happening by the end of what I mean now 2015, but by the end of 2020 in the next five years all of this will be available and working. So the risk I think for us is that we are over-imagining the short term as usual but under-imagining the medium to longer term. What the cities and the environment that we work in have as a special case in here is that we don't just want data out. So the principle of cost friction machine integration search and secure and trustworthy data out has to work with control back into the system. And that's an important point. So getting real-time data into super high-rise buildings to plan lifts more effectively has a big impact on the effectiveness of buildings that are a kilometre tall, people tell me, and they call it vertical transport instead of lifts, but when you're in the lift having, let's say, 80% accuracy for that data is probably not what people want. So there is a serious issue around building not just data out models but complete loops in the data environment of the built environment. That's less relevant for the parking sensor that I showed, but it becomes relevant for a lot of the systems that we are trying to use in a digital context. And the business model is getting clearer too. So a parking sensor enabling a driver to find a parking space is one thing, scaling that up so that all parking spaces are available via some sort of mechanism, and that's not decided yet how we're going to do that, scales up this business quite significantly and the opportunity quite significantly, creates real business models for start-ups like could we transport API, but I think there will be new business models emerging here too. Now all of a sudden you have all the parking data of the city available in our command and control centres for transport planners, and instead of just solving parking, we make a contribution to road disruption, which could be a 700 million cost, for example, one city, because we are tracking congestion linked to parking being full. Now that data being put out will then create other externalities in the city where we create jobs while people mashing up and aggregating data layers in the city in ways that we currently can't do. I think that model is now pretty well understood by those who have been working in the industry for a while and we are seeing very interesting businesses, both large and small, growing on the back of that model. The barrier that we saw in the past is also now understood. The focus on hard infrastructure, turning these systems improvements that I showed into technology projects, you always get stuck unless you address the soft infrastructure, which is governance, strategic or vision, citizen engagement in cities. I think we spoke with that earlier, cities belong to citizens, not to employees or shareholders, so you have to have citizen engagement clear, and how do you measure value? We now see several cities working quite hard on creating these governance frameworks here, the soft infrastructure here, which I think then will rocket fuel innovation and increase of technology solutions down there. I'll come back to what the ODI will do with us in that next time. You're smiling, not much longer. That leads to how to be paid for. I think that's also much clearer now. A recent report, I don't know who the partners were for that, the user collaborative reports. Nicola knows. Nicola is in the corner there, so she is one of the authors together with Lane. Is Lane here too? No, but I'll ask Nicola, she knows who wrote the report with us. We're starting to see in there also much clearer now that cities are already spending 6% of their budgets on technology. We then did a separate piece of work around embedded digital budgets in capital projects and infrastructure, and that is another 6%, sometimes going up to 10% or 12% on certain projects. In cities that constantly renew their transport infrastructure, their buses, their water utilities, if you take that new digital layer and the 6% they already spend, it doesn't need a lot more on top to pay for a digital economy in your city. I think the money issue is also sorted. He says optimistically. Then why bother? Well, that's getting clearer too. We know now that the mayor of Rio is primarily focused on how the digital city will change the political structure. He calls it Paulist Digistocracy, just to make it easy and snappy and roll off the tongue, I think. The Paulist Digistocracy that he's talking about is about reaching every citizen or having engagement at a completely new level between political leadership in the city. We see that in democratic structures, but we also see that in countries that are perhaps less democratic, where people all of a sudden have a voice and that voice will be heard. Obviously all the functional stuff people always talked about, transport, water, electricity, grid optimization, it goes on. I don't think I've come across a single optimization or efficiency project that didn't have a digital component in it in the last five years, so there's loads there. Environmental, I cannot see how we're going to get an understanding of water consumption into every person's individual behavior without some transparency on what they're consuming. Australia has proven that through their work around water awareness, and the same will apply to energy and waste and carbon and other critical resources, that once that is transparent what you as an individual can do and what your role is, it will change. Yesterday a great discussion with the Commonwealth leaders in somewhere. It will come back. One of the projects, they had a week to think about smart cities, delegation from the whole Commonwealth, about 130 people, apparently representing 2.2 billion people. No idea how big the Commonwealth was, I guess as a German that's excusable. Anyway, one of the projects they came up with was the idea that every product, anybody ever buys or consumes, people will comment on in a new social enterprise they're going to set up to point out whether that is socially a good product or a bad product. Not organized by government but by individuals on their phone voting and commenting and saying we think these products are too sugary or these products have too much carbon content or these products are not good for society the way we see it. Really exciting ideas and they work through it for a week and they think they could do this for about 2 billion people. So there are some interesting ideas around environmental improvement coming. Clearly this will be the second biggest driver after political I think. The job opportunity of a digital economy is just too big and too promising to not be the prime driver for our political leaders. On the T scale social and care or social and healthcare has to be baked in now so I'm getting timed off and it has to be humane which I'll come back to in a second. So two things I want to point out. One is this is the digital ecosystem of London as we mapped it as some work with it on the smart London board and I didn't want to go through it. I just want to show the complexity of how many people are involved in London's digital economy. If I then look at the value chain work we did in information marketplaces you can very quickly see the idea that bringing all this data into new operations and experience having city transport API emerging here having city map emerging here creating jobs that is all well and good but the problem is the architecture we currently use doesn't scale when you put that on top. Imagine you are a business here managing the hundreds if not thousands of APIs to drive their business. Imagine you then take that globally. So there's a big piece missing as a digital reference architecture either in verticals like transport or energy or at a city scale and Thomas is going to solve that with us. So that's why I was really delighted that the ODI is going to put their might behind it and we want to do it with them and others. We'd like to create a group around this so the digital catapult with their secure data activities I think is another very important player in that but some sort of semantic framework, some ontology is most likely needed we think to solve that. We just don't know exactly what it is but Tom knows so we are in safe hands then. So this was my second bit that is missing. The first bit that is missing which we want to push is not just to have a statement like the smart London plan that we have right now but something where we get certainly for the next election here but for all UK cities a digital manifesto into the political leadership of every city and that's the second thing we want to push with the ODI and as many others who are interested in helping it. As we have no party political interests, this is no party political broadcast but we think every political leader should have a digital manifesto in their manifesto and if they don't then they should explain why they don't which is fair enough too in the system we work in but that's the second thing we want to do this year with the ODI and the London elections are coming up so they are probably a good one to start. So in conclusion and the miracle occurs, good work but I think we might need just a little more detail right here. I think a lot of the detail has already been solved around governance, finance, the two things that are missing for me is the political leadership and the second one is the reference architecture that allows to scale and then we will see this 100,000 more jobs, 10% less resource consumption, 15% less carbon produced, 8.5% reduction in social and care costs, completely new mobility, not dependent on car. The Paula's Digistocracy, called the Mayor of Rio what he means by that and a better engagement with citizens. With privacy and trust, this is probably some of the biggest things creeping into this now. If you really see this digitisation happening and why I talked about it, privacy and trust will become a massive issue and the business model of the incumbent social media, search and internet firms will come under pressure too and at that point I assume they'll start to lobby against some of the ideas that we have around open data for example or secure data and many more. I don't think this is the list of all seven but it's not a start. The problem with that list is I made it up. These figures are not real but we will have a promise within a year's time at least three UK cities who will have that level of clarity together with a digital manifesto of what they want to achieve as outcomes in their city and I think that will be quite cool. That's all. Thank you.