 So, Moto, you wrote, if I'm not mistaken, back in 2017, the most worrying aspect of the Trump administration is its protectionist stance. Is that still the case? Do you still feel that way? And what about his criticism of the car companies in Japan invading the United States and the threat to implode tariffs on the car companies and that sort of thing? Before just to answer your question, we have to distinguish two things. One thing is the result of the Mr. Trump's action, we are just observing what we are doing now here. But at the same time, there must be a reason why Mr. Trump was elected as president. So we have to thinking about why he was elected and he is doing this kind of business. And that is very much related to what I talked, the dilemma among three things, one is globalization and national sovereignty and democracy. Now when we have more globalization, probably we were in what we call the hyper-globalization in the last 20 years, and there's a lot of pressure for democracy to change. And that is what often people call the populism. So actually Japan was very much used to very severe trade negotiations with the United States for many years. So we know how we should just respond to this. You've adapted to Trump? You've adopted Donald? No, no, just the United States in general. My point is, so Mr. Trump may be populism stage one. And there must be maybe populism in stage two. As long as just globalization is continuing, there's always pressure for democracy to be eroded by populism. So we have already just heard the name of the Elizabeth Warren. I don't know whether she's going to be the next president or not. But the important thing is whether Mr. Trump is continuing or maybe we have some other very leftist, maybe Democrat or whatever. And then we still have to just prepare for the, we have to work on the populism. And another thing I want to emphasize is when you are facing that kind of protectionism, the negotiation is often not just go ahead rather than defending your previous position. Now when Mr. Trump became president, Japan and other Asian Pacific countries were already almost finishing the negotiation, TPP, Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. They are fortunate Mr. Trump just decided or mentioned the United States is getting out of the TPP. So our purpose is very obvious. One is how we can survive the TPP. And second, how can we deal with the United States? That is exactly the reason why Japan had a bilateral negotiation with the United States. And in order to just have a... You would prefer to have a bilateral conversation than a multilateral conversation with the framework of the TPP? Well, it is necessary, a bilateral conversation is necessary to survive. I mean, like the TPP for us to just finish even without the United States, we need some kind of implicit agreement of the United States for us to continue the negotiation. And the TPP result is actually giving some kind of discriminatory treatment against the United States because other TPP members enjoy declining telephone beef. But that may be a very good weapon for us to just have a deal with the United States that giving us a very similar type of telephone reduction may just have incentive for the United States not to raise the telephone in the car. So it is not just for looking, it's more the defending. But that is a very important part of the United Nations when you're facing protectionism. But it has to be a bilateral... I mean, you're working bilaterally rather than through any kind of an international organization. So it's a little bit difficult for other countries to have the same kind of bilateral relationship as that.