 Thank you Helen. Gretten Healy is my name, I'm involved in energy policy background in the European Parliament many years ago and I'm involved in the wind sector. Double-ed in commissioner, you're very welcome. If I might direct two questions to you briefly. One is the market change that you're speaking about, particularly the electric, the software as you call it. The current market design that we're implementing, the renewable sector would find that it's difficult. The network codes are difficult because they require a 24-hour notice plus balancing responsibility which is very, very difficult for any variable renewable energy. So we would hope that in the redesign some thought would be given to how we can optimise the performance of very renewable energies in the new market. So you might indicate what changes you have in mind and the timing and the second point is the new state aid guidelines that were introduced by the commission last year are extremely restrictive to the supports that the minister can offer to renewable energy in a context where we have still half a trillion dollars of fossil fuel subsidies, something similar to nuclear and all the external costs. So we just wonder why if we're going to go this road we're offering so many constraints to the development of support mechanisms for renewables. Jacquiam. Brendan. Just one second. The mic is coming to you, I think. To the commissioner. Brendan McGrath from GeoElectric. We've been successful as a PCI project for energy storage, for compressed air energy storage. And you've mentioned in your address where you see PCI as being key to integration across Europe. We also talk about innovation and where innovation comes from. 95% of the companies awarded support to the first PCI grant for studies and for works were supporting either state or semi-state companies. Only 5% of SMEs were successful in terms of attracting support. Fortunately, we were one of those. But I would suggest that account needs to be taken of where innovation comes from. Generally speaking, it comes from SMEs rather than from state or semi-state companies. And I think a recalibration needs to be made in relation to how those judgments are made in terms of who gets support and who doesn't get support. And I would suggest that there should be some mechanism that favours SMEs to a certain extent in terms of getting through the various different hurdles that are required to get support at a European level. It's quite understandable that in terms of interconnections and so forth that as a first cut that they would get a lot of support. But there needs to be a clearer message sent out to SMEs in relation to the type of support they will get in creating this new future. Thank you. Please, just in front of you there. Focus on questions, please, given the shortage of time. Thank you. My name is Paula Barn and I'm a member of Windeware Ireland which is an alliance of community groups calling for the reform of this government's unsustainable energy policy. Minister White, despite the evidence that wind energy is incapable of reducing our CO2 emissions in any meaningful way your government has persisted in the rollout of massive industrial wind farms and pylons across this country. The SEAI have said that we save about 2.6% of our overall CO2 emissions and that we will save less at the more intermittent and non-synchronous wind we put on the system. In our opinion, these abysmal savings do not justify the massive social, environmental and economic costs The cynical blocking of the wind turbine planning guidelines by this government is leading to a lot of cynicism among the Irish people you've talked about as citizen engagement here. Also I would feel that your government are forcing communities into the courts to defend what you should be defending to analyse what you should be analysing and to count what you should be counting in order to protect our precious and irreplaceable landscape and if I could just finally say the IEEA which has hosted, I would like to thank them very much what I hope will be a very interesting day. However you do hold a lot of responsibility for the energy policy and the rollout of these wind farms. So my question is if the IEEA members are genuine about this process and really care about this country I would ask have you become so glamourised by your own power and connections that you do not engage with the reality of this situation. Are you an elitist old boys network existing in a bubble of groupthink? I would ask you please to come out of that and engage because if you do not the cynicism is growing and you cannot bring people along with this process of developing renewables and greening our energy future if you do not listen and I think that would be a terrible shame. Thank you. Right. To those three questions and comments please Vice President. Thank you very much and thank you for excellent Slovak pronunciation. I'm not sure I would be able to do it in Gaelics. I really appreciate it in Gaelic. The best I can say is Slonsha. It's also very useful. Thank you very much for your questions concerning the electricity market redesign. I think one of the reasons why we feel very strongly that we need to change the pattern in the fact that we have over the past years accumulated a lot of problems in that field. Mostly they are related to the better integration of renewables into the outside power generation mix. Exactly as you said, the more renewables you have, the better balancing mechanisms you need in some countries. They are very much developing the possibility of capacity mechanisms, capacity markets and of course because the energy is very strong competence of the member states. So you see such a different developments across the EU member states leading to totally different price structures. So therefore I think that what we need is to really create one frame with of course as much respect as it would be possible for the national specificities just to allow our operators to work on one market and to give our also consumers I would say a little bit more converging or harmonise choice to compare who is offering what at what price and to do it in much more transparent way than we have it today. So the electricity market redesign would be focused on how to better integrate the renewables. How to make sure that we would be supporting the needed types of regional cooperation. How you can work better with your neighbours on different aspects of electricity market including the balancing, including capacity mechanisms so we can kind of share the assets. We have to have as I heard it once said all the toys in one garden that we can actually share it much much better and how to do it in a cost efficient way. Because I mean when you read through the documents or the positions of the European leaders from one side you see very strong commitment to the decarbonisation and to the renewables from other side. We also feel the more and more reflections that many of these technologies are becoming more mature. That they are able to compete on the electricity or energy markets on their own and therefore the notion of cost effectiveness is much more present in this field. We shoot to those guidelines for the state date for the field of renewables. We also feel that we need to have another look at them because clearly the situation is developing very very rapidly and this is what we would like to put on the table next year. If I may ask you for one thing I think you had very successful consultation process to the Alexis paper and we would welcome the same because we opened public consultations on how this electricity market should be. It's still open until the eighth of October. We try to collect as many ideas as possible so when we start our impact assessments and our legislative drafting next year that we really would have the views coming from all the member states to make sure that we are doing the right thing and we are legislating in an appropriate manner. And concerning the support for SMEs I totally agree with you that usually you see the disruptive technologies, new approaches and innovation coming from SMEs. What we would like to change and improve in this commission is that actually we are creating special conditions how the SMEs could benefit from the EU financial support better than in the past. So for example under the YUNCA investment plan there is a special part which is devoted to the energy efficiency which is clearly aimed at SMEs taking part in it. Next year we would like to add the financial instrument which would be called smart financing for smart buildings where we would like to kind of promote and create such a positive way of energy efficiency across our member states because we know how much mayors local authorities like this project, how much should they benefit if the schools, hospitals or even residential areas are refurbished, are put on energy efficiency path which brings a lot of savings to the municipalities or to the household. So that's one possibility. Second directly aimed at innovation is that we adopted this week new set plan, set its abbreviation which stands for strategy for energy technologies. But again we would like to streamline the paperwork, highlight what we see as a key enabling technologies for this energy transition and where the SMEs should also find the support for their work. And the last instrument I would highlight is called cost-made means again that support for SMEs which are interpreting in the field of innovation. So we'll be very happy to provide you with more precise information how to approach these new instruments and where to get the support so we will get all the necessary information. And hopefully the results when the next building round would be much more to the favour of the SMEs. Thank you Vice President. Thank you very much. In relation to the question respect of wind and onshore wind I understand the concern that's been raised and I think that it is the case that the planning code has to balance the issue of amenity and concerns over noise for example in shadow flicker. With the requirements of our energy policy and in particular our renewable energy policy. So I think that does that there is a balancing act because it doesn't come as any surprise to anybody to know I think in this country no less than elsewhere that there are tensions in that regard. And I think that we can and should seek to address those concerns and to make sure that they are properly addressed in the planning code. But I would respectfully disagree with the proposition that our renewable energy policy in particular as it applies to wind which is the issue that it's unsustainable. I would respectfully disagree with that. I think that the evidence demonstrates that we have made great strides in relation to renewable production of electricity in relation to the use of onshore wind. I think it has been cost efficient. I think when you look at what the portfolio of renewables needs to be wind onshore offshore solar biomass all of the new opportunities that are there. I think that it is still inescapable that onshore wind will be a significant element of that portfolio based on what I've my assessment and I didn't come into this job as an expert with any particular agenda at all. But based on my own dispassionate assessment of what we have achieved to date which has been considerable and what we can go on to achieve. But we won't do it just with onshore wind. We also have got to look at many of the new technologies and we're out for consultation at the moment on our new refit offering which we intend to put in place next year. I know it's a controversial issue and a difficult issue and I am sensitive to that. I will just say though at the risk of irritating people that I was in Denmark last week and in Denmark which has a landmass almost precisely half of ours. They have 5000 and I accept the population densities are different. They have 5000 turbines installed. In this country with double the landmass we have 1450. I'm not saying we need 10,000. Don't quote me or suggest that I'm saying that. I just tried to put a bit of perspective into the discussion. But yes there needs to be sensitivity but we also need to progress our renewable energy offering our policy and what we do and this has got to move and progress and that can be done I believe consistent with an enlightened and a sensitive planning code as well. I have to apologise to those who wanted to ask questions. We've simply run out of time. You will have an opportunity now over the coffee break. So on your behalf if I may thank Vice President Chef Sjovic and Minister Alex White please.