 Hello, good evening everyone. Thanks very much for joining me. I hope you can all hear me. I'm back on my way from my laptop again. I had some problems with this last week. I hope it's okay this week. It's Monday, what is it? 5th of April 2021. Though it does feel like Sunday, which is bizarre because even though we're all at home, most of us are at home and have been for a long time, somehow back holiday Mondays still feel like Sundays. But it is Monday and I hope that everyone has had a good Easter. I have though working hard, working hard around Hartley Pool, something I'll be continuing to do between now and the elections on the 6th of May and I want to say thanks to everyone for their help. The coming weekend will be a very important one. So if you can, if you can please do join us here. We've started door knocking, very encouraging so far in my Wednesday morning Facebook stream this week. I've got a Facebook stream now every morning, every Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock. I'm going to be talking this Wednesday. I'm going to spend a bit of time responding to things that people have said to me on the doorstep and there have been some interesting things said on the doorstep. So I'll respond to those. I'm going to talk a little bit about what's happened today with the government and lockdown. We've had a briefing and update this afternoon from Boris Johnson. We'll have a look at that. I also wanted to talk to you about something you might not be familiar with, which is the idea of a post-COVID treaty and also I want to talk about racism in Britain and some of the things that have been going on. They never follow on from my Sunday column yesterday and a controversial report that has been published between last week's live stream and this week's saying essentially that economic circumstances, family background, culture, religion and other non-race based matters have a far greater impact on our successor otherwise in British society. It found that there is no evidence, really, of what is called, what is known as but words are thrown around that no one can really explain. You'll be familiar with them. Structural and institutional racism. These two things were invented and invented as a word to keep the race based organisations and race baiters going, to give them oxygen, to give them an enemy to fight against. For a lot of people, if they don't have an enemy, they'll create one. They need to have this enemy. So was born institutional and systemic racism and a report commissioned by the government in response to all the Black Lives Matter chaos last year ordered a report on this and that report has been published left, don't like it, the race baiters don't like it and something you may know that that'll come to us as no surprise to anyone but you might not know that Boris Johnson has also distanced himself from it. He really is just about as weak a so-called conservative as it is possible to find. So we'll have a little look at that. Some of what I've been finding out this week on that issue is absolutely horrifying, absolutely horrifying. Questions also, of course, some already coming in. Let me get this up. Okay, okay, so any questions as usual please do send them in and if you can, if you can do help out with campaigning, not just with myself but with all our brave and wonderful candidates who are standing all over the country, do what you can to help them. I know that people are busy, busy campaigning at the moment. Okay, right let's have a look at coronavirus first and see where we are. So the government have announced this afternoon that we are on track as far as easing the lockdown restrictions are. We will be allowed a little summary from the BBC, UKPM Boris Johnson confirms non-essential retail can reopen on the restaurants, pubs and restaurants are allowed to serve outdoors from the 12th of April. So from next Monday we will have pubs and restaurants but only serving outdoors. Gyms and spas as well as zoos and theme parks can also reopen. Johnson says the public's patience is paying off but warns against complacency in the face of rising cases in mainland Europe. The PM says that the UK is hopeful international travel can resume from the 17th of May but there are difficulties around importing virus variants. One thing I'm very happy about is that hairdressers can open again. I'm really rather pleased about that one. Couple of bits from around the world in the BBC summary this evening, India has recorded its highest number yet of coronavirus infections in a single day with 103,558 confirmed cases and Portugal is entering its second phase of rolling back restrictions with museums, cafe terraces and some schools. Reopening, so from the 12th of April, so from next Monday more businesses will open, indoor settings should be visited alone or with household groups. Outside six people or two households can meet and all shops are allowed to open. Hairdressers, beauty salons and other close contact services can open. Restaurants and pubs are allowed to serve food and alcohol to customers sitting outdoors. Gyms and spas, zoos, theme parks, libraries, community centres can reopen. Members of the same household can take a holiday in England in self-contained accommodation. Weddings attended by up to 15 people can take place. Funerals attended by up to 30 people can take place. Children will be able to attend any indoor children's activity. Care home visitors will increase to two per resident. So quite a lot. Reopening next Monday and then we're on to stage three. Questions coming in. On to stage three then. No earlier than the 17th of May. So that will hopefully be the 17th of May. People can meet in groups of up to 30 outdoors. Six people or two households can meet indoors. Pumps restaurants and other hospitality venues can seat customers indoors. Up to 30 people can attend weddings, remaining outdoor entertainment such as outdoor theatres and cinemas can open. I'm sure we have many of those. Indoor entertainment such as museums, theatres, cinemas and children's play areas can open. Performances and large events can restart but with limits on audience numbers, hotels, hostels and B&Bs can reopen. International leisure travel may resume. Adult indoor group sports and exercises can restart. So that's stage three and that's from the 17th of May. This will take us on to stage four which is no earlier than the 24th of June. So that is the stage at which all limits on social contact will be removed. No legal limits on the number of people who can attend weddings, funerals or other life events. Nightclubs will be allowed to reopen and that's from the 24th of June. So if everything stays on track, if everything stays within the government's plans, we are at present on track to open up to go back to some sort of normal on the 21st of June. But a lot of talk now, the talk that's sort of left now is on the so-called COVID-19 passports and this is something obviously that has huge civil liberties implications. I laughed today when I was reading this about labor complaining in the House of Commons and there's the political game for you right there. Labor complaining about loss of civil liberties. I don't think they realize or remember that free speech is the ultimate civil liberty and nobody has done more than me. The Tories have done no better but nobody has done more than Labour and the left about or to infringe upon that civil liberty but Labour complaining in the House of Commons about loss of civil liberties. Unbelievable. Okay on the COVID-19 passports we're still not clear about what these are going to be, whether or not we're going to have them. How much we will be able to do without proving, there's all these things are reopening fine, but will we be able to use them if we're not vaccinated and how will we show that this is essentially what's meant by COVID-19 passports and just a quick look at what Sky News has to say about this this evening. It says COVID passports will likely become a feature of our lives the government has said following a review into status certification. The government has said a system of certification could have an important role to play about domestically and internationally as a temporary measure. A task force led by cabinet office minister Michael Gove has been reviewing whether COVID status certification could be used to reopen the economy, reduce social contact restrictions and improve safety. Now this is all very pertinent because we're being told that shops are being reopened next Monday. So to whom are they being reopened? That's the question that isn't really being answered. I watched the update from the government this evening and it wasn't answered. Anyway Michael Gove has said that these status certification could be used to reopen the economy, but the economy is reopening next Monday. It says more than 50,000 members of the public have been given a wide range of have given a wide range of opinions. COVID status certification it's not actually easy to say COVID status certification aimed to provide reassurance that an individual is at reduced risk of transmission. This could allow some freedoms to be restored more safely. For example, by allowing mass events to admit more participants, increased passenger numbers and reduced border restrictions for travelers and social distancing rules to be relaxed. COVID passports could demonstrate vaccine status, a recent negative test or proof of natural immunity after having COVID-19. A government review said banning businesses from asking customers for proof of their COVID status to enter would be an unjustified intrusion. As a result it said the right that the government provides a means of easily demonstrating COVID status. Does anyone else not understand this? And said the NHS is currently developing a way of proving this in both digital and non-digital form. I'm reading this directly not leaving out anything. Boris Janssen said no plans have yet been finalised and that there would be no changes to step two of the roadmap on the 12th of April. Asked whether the government would get a vote on the subject the Prime Minister hinted that this could happen. Sky News political editor Beth Rigby said there is a sizeable rebellion brewing. The Lib Dems were opposed and Labour has yet to give its backing. Boris Janssen really does have a fight on his hands. He could even face a defeat on this. A defeat on what? We're not even sure. He's not even telling us what MPs will be voting on. So again there are unanswered questions on this. So the overall view, the overall message from the government this evening was that we are opening next Monday. There is no decision yet made on whether or not people will have to prove their COVID status, how they would have to prove it, what they would need to prove, whether they would need to prove they have had a negative test or whether they would need to prove that they've been vaccinated. All of this remains still up in the air in the at least to the medium and long term. He did say it won't change anything next week. But even reading through it, even reading through it, it's like wading through mud, not quite sure what's going to happen or when these businesses are reopened to whom they will be reopening. Okay so that's as best a summary as I can give on that at the moment. We'll see where we are next Monday. Lots of questions coming in. Thanks very much. I've got to spend at least half of this evening's hour on that. I'll do my best too. Okay what am I talking about when I talk about a post COVID treaty? This is something that was somewhat buried away in the Daily Mail on the 30th of March. You might not have heard about it. You may not hear much about it either, so I thought I would tell you about it. Under the headline, no one recovers until everyone recovers. World needs a post COVID treaty to put nationalism aside and ensure the virus stays defeated. 23 heads of state, including Johnson, Merkel and Macron, declare an open letter. Immediately, Alain Bell's ringing, post COVID treaty to put nationalism aside. It seems to me that just about every issue that comes up in the world, the response is to put nationalism aside. Yet more attacks on the nation-state, on borders and as a consequence, and when you attack nation-states and you attack borders, you are attacking democracy. No global governance can be democratically accountable. From a practical level, it simply wouldn't work. The narrative is, and the globalist bodies love global problems. That's why they are so gung-ho about climate change. Global problem requires global response, means breaking down of national borders means governments coming together under a globalist umbrella, a global umbrella to tackle a global problem. It means further and further erosion of the notion that governments should represent their own citizens within their own borders and act in the best interests of those citizens. It is the erosion of the nation-state. And so COVID is no different and it certainly doesn't come as any surprise to me that this is the response. So reading on, it says Boris Johnson and other world leaders have called for a global treaty in response to COVID, similar to that agreed after the Second World War. Now that rings Alain Bell's again because it is after the Second World War that the nation-state was seen as having been the problem. We've had two world wars in quick succession and after the second one the globalist ideals became centre stage. They became mainstream. We had the birth of the European Coal and Steel body which would go on eventually to become, I think with a lot of changes, but it would eventually go on to morph into the European Union. And many of the people at that stage who were involved in the reshaping of Europe wanted a United States of Europe. They wanted the end of the European nation-state. Nation-states were blamed for wars. And so you had the birth of the United Nations, you had the birth of human rights. Now human rights on the surface sounds like a good thing. What human rights do, of course I break down national borders. If a person from Sierra Leone, for example, has the same rights in the UK as a British citizen, then it is pointless being a British citizen. There's no, and without citizens there is no country. So that rings Alain Bell's for me as well, similar to what happened after the Second World War. What happened after the Second World War was an assault on the nation-state, an assault on democracy, the growth, the birth of globalist bodies and the birth of the notion that migration around the world should take place. And particularly into Europe, because Europeans were developing post-war democracies. And this would never do, because democracy results in decisions and results that the globalist bodies don't like. And in case it goes on, in the face of, here's a term, vaccine nationalism, vaccine nationalism. And clashes between countries, the Prime Minister, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, among others, warned against isolationism. In other words, they warned against sovereign nation-states acting in their own interests. Writing for newspapers across the world, the leaders also urged a new era of solidarity in the face of the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s. The group of 24 world leaders and the head of the World Health Organization called for a new international accord, similar to those agreed after the war, which saw countries work together for the common good. Again, this is all dressed up in language that sounds harmless. What it actually means, though, and as people in Britain and other European and other Western countries are realizing to their cost, what working together for the common good, despite the laudable-sounding language, what it actually means is that our governments will prioritise the interests of people from other countries over and above the interests of the people from this country. And again, the human rights laws come into my mind. Human rights laws will keep a convicted terrorist, a convicted rapist, a convicted murderer, the most violent, the most violent, horrid people from all over the world. Human rights will keep them in this country, despite the threat they pose to the safety of British people because they may face dangers if sent back to their own country. The dangers posed to the British people are completely irrelevant because apparently British people don't have human rights. This is what it means in practice. It means your government cares more about other people than it does about you, and your government will answer not to you, but to international bodies elected by nobody and accountable to nobody. So again, an expansion of all of the same ideas is coming in this post-COVID treaty. So the signatories are Prime Minister of Fiji, Prime Minister of Portugal, President of Romania, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, of course, President of Rwanda, President of Kenya, President of France, Chancellor of Germany, President of the European Council. I love how that's thrown in, as if it's a country. Prime Minister of Greece, President of the Republic of Korea, President of Chile, President of Costa Rica, Prime Minister of Albania, President of South Africa, Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago, Prime Minister of the Netherlands, President of Tunisia, President of Senegal, Prime Minister of Spain, Prime Minister of Norway, President of Serbia, President of Indonesia, President of Ukraine, and of course the Director General of the World Health Organization. The aims are clear to bring countries together, to dispel the temptation of isolationism and nationalism and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and cooperation, namely peace, prosperity, health and security. An agreement should lead to more mutual accountability and shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation within the international system with its rules and norms. It comes in the wake of clashes between countries over vaccine supplies, as some, including the UK, surge ahead with vaccination programmes. The UK may be surging ahead with vaccination programmes. It is looking after, I talked about this a couple of weeks ago, how the EU is falling behind the UK in terms of vaccination and how the EU is quite annoyed about this. They're annoyed because the UK, I mean whatever you think about it, let's pretend we're not talking about vaccines for a moment, whatever it may be. In this instance, the UK is providing for its own people and not for the people of Zimbabwe or Namibia. And so it's unequal, it's not equality that the UK should have vaccines or whatever it might be if we're talking about something else. It's not equality if the UK has it and Namibia doesn't have it. How is that equality? I mean this is steeped, all this language, it's steeped in that open border, internationalist, globalist, anti-nation state, anti-democracy, terror, tyranny, that will continue to be subjected to and which as I said actually results in practice in governments abandoning their own people and prioritising the needs and interests of people from all over the world. More of the same is coming with this post-COVID treaty for the erosion of our nation-states and with it our democracy and with it our government's duty to be concerned about the people of their own countries and not people from all over the world. Okay racism, I mentioned at the start this report that the government commissioned and that has found much to the disgust of the left, much to the disgust of people like Diane Abbott and David Lambie, professional race-spaters, people who make a living out of their skin colour, people who are professional skin colour, that's what they rest on, that is their identity, that is what they are. Obsessed with it, always, always the victim and always blaming someone else. David Lambie even said he wasn't going to talk about this report because it was detrimental to his mental health, always the victim, absolutely always and the people who want to be victims, the people who want to find an excuse, a reason for whatever it is that is wrong in their lives, so if they haven't succeeded at something, the problem isn't them, the problem is racism and if you can't find any surface racism, you know what we used to call racism, actual hatred between people of different skin colours for example, actual act of discrimination, act of disadvantage suffered by people deliberately suffered or imposed upon people because of skin colour, if you can't find any of that and you can't because there are laws in this country that prevent black people being discriminated against, for example, so if you can't find any of that, you've got to make up something else and there's an invisible racism now, it's in the line of what the left talks about now unconscious bias, unconscious bias is when you're not a racist but you are anyway, you just don't know you are, so they find it when it's not there, the actual racism that I mentioned, what we used to think of as racism, hasn't disappeared but for normal people in normal people's lives it's really not that much of an issue anymore and what this report found is that people are not actually being discriminated against, non-white people I should say, are not being discriminated against either by law or in society and for those who want to be victims, because victimhood remember has an exalted status in society today, people are desperate to belong to a victim group, it makes them feel special but it also gives them more importantly, it gives them a reason, an excuse for any of their own failings in life, so when a report concludes that this structural racism, I don't know what it is, either neither do its proponents by the way, or institutional racism isn't actually a reality, those who desperately want to be the victims of racism are very upset indeed about this, so this is from the Daily Mail and this is the part you might not be wholly familiar with, that Boris Johnson doesn't agree with elements of this report, he truly is appalling, this article goes into the views and I've picked this one because she's not speaking only for herself, she's speaking for a lot of other people who have come out with similar responses to this, the racism industry I call it, those who survive on the assumption of the existence of racism in British society, Boris Johnson admits he doesn't agree with elements of landmark race report as Stephen Lawrence's mother says it gives racist the green light and slams authors as not in touch with reality, now a lot of the problems we've got in society today actually happened in the wake of the murder of Stephen Lawrence, a lot of the racial division, you would think that a post-racist society would look for colour blindness, that in order to move towards a colour or a post-racist society we would be looking to move to a colour blind society, the very very opposite was concluded after the investigation and the report, the McPherson inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and how it was handled by police and authorities, it concluded that colour blind policing must be eliminated, that actually colour blind policing was not by extension colour blind, authority colour blind society was not actually what should be aspired to, instead we should take colour into account at every opportunity, it encouraged us and it shaped policing from that moment onwards, it was also the introduction of terms like institutional racism, which again is never really explained in language that we can all understand, but this is the McPherson inquiry, the McPherson report was the birth of all of this and it specifically said that we should not and cannot move towards a colour blind society, that we must instead make colour and make race central to governance to policing and to society more broadly and if you take out as this report has tried to do, if you take that out you push back on the race obsession in society that was encouraged by the McPherson report and those who want to keep racial division alive because they make a living from it or as I said they get their victim status from it are very upset by it, so right goes on, Boris Johnson admits he doesn't agree with elements of a landmark race report as Stephen Lawrence's mother says it gives racist the green light, the document published by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities said geography, family influence, socioeconomic background, culture and religion all affect life chances more than racism, the Prime Minister insisted there are serious issues that our society faces to do with racism and that work needed to be done to fix it but warned the reports findings weren't necessarily aligned with the thoughts of those at number 10, he said this is a very interesting piece of work, I don't say the government is going to agree with everything in it but it has some original and stimulating work in it I think people would need to read and to consider, there are very serious issues that our society faces to do with racism and that we need to address, well he is actually right about that but I bet a few queered that he's not right for the right reasons, there are issues about racism in society that we need to deal with and largely that we need to stop this obsession, this victim status and the anti-white hatred which I go on to in a second, he never talks about that, he never talks about that as an issue of race, there are race problems in this country and they are exacerbated by the very people who are condemning this report, by the very people who don't want a post-racism society, they're the problem, that's the real race problem we face and some of the findings of this report, as I wrote in my Sunday column yesterday, it's actually found that for example in terms of education, non-white kids in many areas or across the board in various elements of education are doing better than white kids yet there's nobody jumping up and down and talking about equality, let me take you to something I said that I found out this week, this was which was horrifying and if Boris Johnson really wants to talk about the issues involving race in society that need to be fixed then he needs to start talking about the race obsession of these groups and the influence that they have in society, the racial division that they are storing up, the tensions that are stored up by groups like Black Lives Matter, the active and open discrimination against white people in the jobs market, those are real issues that he could be talking about and those are the real issues about race that need to be fixed Boris Johnson in our society, however it gets much worse than that, I was genuinely horrified to read this this week and horrifying is in the headline, horrifying guidance says toddlers need to be taught about white, white privilege and systemic racism, gobsmacking new guidance from education bodies including the national education union states that children below the age of six need to recognize racist behaviors and develop anti-racist views and their teachers need to understand about white privilege so that children are stirred onto the right course, the birth to five report claims young minds are brimming with racism, their rampant racial prejudice and misconceptions are in danger of being maintained or these are all quotes by the way from the report or from the guidance that comes from the biggest union, teacher's union in the country, rampant racial prejudice from children under five are in danger of being maintained or reinforced unless addressed by a teacher who has undergone essential practitioner training, the training will enable teachers to teach kids about white privilege systemic racism and how racism affects children and families in early years setting so let's put that into let's let's picture that, so you've got a classroom full of five-year-olds and the teachers banging on about white privilege systemic racism which is of course evil whites again, evil whites trampling all over the perpetual victim which is everyone who isn't white and a little five-year-old white kid is sitting there surrounded by non-white kids and thinking something wrong with me I'm a racist I'm privileged I'm essentially evil I'm a threat to all the little kids who sit around me that aren't white there's something wrong with me because I'm white that is what any white child who was sitting in the room hearing this abuse will be thinking it's the impression that will be imposed upon them we're talking about small children who will be subject to abuse at school because of the color of their skin and I remember and I think I mentioned I might have mentioned this last week I've certainly mentioned it recently about a mother who I did mention last week actually about Ray Honeyford's school and I interviewed her when I was writing my first book and her kid her white kid was in school and was mercilessly bullied for being white she had to take him out of the school and while he was bullied for being white he was called racist by the kids who were bullying him this is a charter for the emotional psychological abuse of white children and it is a charter for non-white children of any description to bully and persecute white children and it is for children under the age of six and this is being put forward by the national education union as guidance I'll read just a little bit more because it's horrifying the report put together by the national day nurseries association the association for the association for professional development in early years as well as the neu counters government guidance that already acknowledges racism needs to be addressed on the play mat this is a Tory government remember while many would argue there was no room for racism teaching at nurseries and schools at all the government's existing guidance insists that alongside learning to count and read five-year-old kids should know some similarities and differences between different religious and cultural communities in this country drawing on their experiences they're five and what has been read in class the chairman of the commons education select committee Robert Halfen responded this is just unacceptable but why are you saying it's unacceptable for you the last quote by the way know some similarities etc it's from the government it's from the government drawing on their experiences they're five years old what experiences that's from the government and the government same government then says that this latest guidance is unacceptable it's if we are in I don't know what we're in Alice I wonder I just don't it's absolutely incredible government goes on to say this dogma and doctrine is totally out of place we have all got to combat racism but this is the wrong way to go about it but you have just I've just read out the government's own guidance on it this is Tory this is so typically Tory say all the right things do right let me help you put it this way the Tories sound like Tories act like Labour that's basically how it works they'll do all the things that Labour does go along with all the PC multicultural rubbish that Labour does and then make a speech to say they're doing the very opposite that's the Tories but this is a genuinely genuinely scandalous and I guarantee you that it will go ahead this will be taught in school we will have little five-year-olds sitting around with their crayons being told that the little white kid in the group is a racist oppressor and is systemically whatever the hell it's going to be responsible for systemic and institutional racism and is privileged this little white kid over here who may come from a family with not two pennies to rub together but they're still privileged and all the non-white kids are all oppressed victims and this poor little kid over here is responsible for it guaranteed it's going to happen so Boris Johnson if you really want to deal with the issues surrounding race that need to be fixed in this country there's your starting point stop this psychological mental abuse of small children in the classroom because of their skin and stop with the white privilege rubbish it's absolute nonsense and actually this report if you read it will show that whites are becoming extremely disadvantaged in this society and the only racial group that can be lawfully discriminated against so there's your race issue Boris Johnson if you want to do something useful which of course you don't but if you if by some miracle you decided to do something useful that might be it okay okay question when do i think Boris Johnson will roll back on full 24th of june reopening blaming a rise in a new covid strain um possible i might it might even be probable that that will happen one thing i and i've been asked this question now a couple of times and i'm going to have to give the same answer i don't know whether we're going to be whether there's going to be a rollback of the progress towards the 24th of june and reopening and getting back to normal i mean as i read out at the start and again i was reading directly it's confusing but i wasn't leaving anything out i'm reading directly there's still no real clarity on how this new freedom we're getting is going to actually work and whether or not we're actually going to be free as in the way we were before i don't think we'll go back to the way we were before possibly ever um what is it likely that the 24th of june will be kicked the ball will be kicked back into the long grass it's very possible it's happened a couple of times in the last year we've come out of lockdown and gone back into lockdown there was i know talk of reintroduction of lockdown in other european countries so it's it's highly possible um we'll just have to wait and see but one thing i do have to add and again i've said this a couple of times in my previous answers on this i don't think that people will go back inside the way we did in the first lockdown the first lockdown it really was bizarre the streets were empty i remember it very well i remember taking the dogs out for a walk it was just nobody around that hasn't happened with this second lockdown people are out and about and again yesterday taking dogs out again um little there's a little town little village near me seaside very beautiful little english seaside town and it was full it was full of people the only thing that looked out of place the only sort of difference was that the shops weren't open and the would have would have incredible waste for small business people that they're not able to take advantage of these people going out so i'm not sure that we will go back in and i think that the government knows that i think uh the idea i think i think that like me i think they know that we're not going to go back in doors in the way that we did the first time they'll have to take that into account with anything that they decide to do i think the big issue now will be on the so-called passports and uh whether or not we whether or not we are actually open open as in we're all free to go about our normal business without having to show some sort of vaccination record or whatever it may be i think that's the big question but the idea of a full on lockdown again i really don't think it will because i don't think we will go back in and i think the government knows it okay what's your thoughts on oh god foreigners entering the uk daily 8 000 foreigners entering the uk daily not including the doberly um i think you probably guess that comes from paul i think you can probably guess what my thoughts are on that nothing stops the open border nothing it doesn't matter what it is no matter what catastrophes we were to face no matter what economic struggles we face in the face of a pandemic where we are all locked in our homes that didn't stop it either nothing whatsoever stops the open border nothing closes the open border because operation change britain beyond all recognition has to keep going forward with full speed regardless regardless of anything that is a priority it's a priority for labour it's a priority for the tories they are no different from each other in this regard in fact they're no different from all the major political leaders in the western world open borders must remain open operation destroy the west as we know it keeps going regardless of the consequences if i were in downing street i think you can probably guess paul this would not be happening if i were in downing street anyone who comes here illegally would send back immediately and if i were in downing street we would stop immigration and put out resources into deporting illegal immigrants that would be instead of operation destroy britain as we know it we'd have operation restore britain and we will do so by removing people first of all first people who should not be here and people who pose a threat to our culture history heritage and way of life they'll be removed instead of prioritizing the dismantlement of britain i would be prioritizing the restoration of britain there's one more article i want to get to before i finish but there is another question is it inevitable that the uk will become an islamic state not if we do something about it but if we don't do something about it then yes i'm not sure about islamic state in the way that we think of an islamic state so if you if you think about for example iran or Saudi Arabia as an islamic state will we wake up one morning and declare sharia to be the law of the land probably not will we sleepwalk into islamic supremacy yes we already are sharia is in many ways already it's not the law of the land it's not formally the law of the land but in many ways we operate according to a sharia orthodoxy that will continue unless it is actively prevented and since last week since i talked about the batley school and the muhammad cartoons last week two more teachers have been suspended from the same school the media has gone pretty quiet on that which tells me that the mob outside are behaving even worse because when muslims behave badly the media goes pretty quiet about it there are still jihadist attacks jihadist violence still going on across the world and the media doesn't mention it so when it is inevitable when a honest description would portray islam in a negative light the media doesn't bother with that honest description so my suspicion is something unpleasant is happening up at that school in batley and and that has forced the media to go quiet but as for our society operating in terms of a what is a de facto sharia state already take some examples uh islamophobia this concept this absurd false fabricated notion that any criticism of islam is somehow prejudice and racist it's not prejudiced it's post judice that's a word should be if you read and study islam and then you object to it that's not prejudice it's knowledge and objection to truth it's not racism because it's not based upon race it's based upon religion but islamophobia is something that our governments treat seriously and that in itself is a nod towards sharia orthodoxy the idea that islam and sharia cannot be criticized is of course a sharia concept itself so our society will take slights or insults towards islam far more seriously and our police and our government and our so-called leaders will take insults to islam more seriously than it does crimes committed by muslims the obvious example are the rape gangs and the fact that we are still allowing these rape gangs to operate with impunity because we don't want to get into a we don't want to be accused of islamophobia or racism is in itself a de facto shariaization of the country is it inevitable we'll become an islamic state no not if we stop it if we don't stop it is it we have to be actively stopped by the way there's all these things have to be actively confronted is it inevitable if we don't actively stop it yes and i think eventually um we'll it will become step by step a society more closely resembling a sharia society we're already resembling a sharia society but if yes in 100 years time for me i i can't give a time but if you were to look at for example some middle eastern some north african countries which are now muslim countries but weren't then yes in the longer term if we don't do anything about it yes it probably is inevitable but only only if we don't do anything about it however in the shorter to medium term we will see a de facto shariaization of our society we are already seeing it we're already living in it okay one more i do want to go to this article never before in the history of the humber bridge has there been calls to close the footpath that's because there used to be around one suicide every few months now it's six per month wow that's that's um that's absolutely incredible and i know i'm aware that the we don't actually know the figures for suicide during this pandemic and this this this really extremely difficult horrible horrible time that we've been living through and a lot of people have felt that there wasn't much point in going on and for a lot of people the restrictions that have been placed on us beyond cruel i heard recently about an elderly couple been married for 70 years and so their 70th anniversary took place during the year that we've been in this madness and they're not able to see each other and they can only see each other through glass at this point i mean this is beyond cruel it really is i i can't i genuinely can't believe that this is the uk in 2021 that we're doing that to elderly people and look i mean i've just read out what we're doing to children as well i don't i sometimes just don't recognize this country to finish this is a story i wanted to show you from the evening standard in where was it three days ago tori mp's and here we go again tori mp's talk like tori's act like labor tori mp's have called for pupils at pimlico academy to be taught a history lesson after they successfully campaigned to have the union jack removed from the school's grounds earlier this week students at the school in central london staged a walkout over uniform rules which they say discriminate against black and muslim people see what this is doing you see what this is doing this race obsession from these groups and these public figures and these mp's which barris johnson doesn't even have the spine to agree with the report that says that this is all nonsense but this is what it's doing it's in our schools kids turning on each other kids finding racism absolutely everywhere and their response to this racism they see everywhere and they see it everywhere because they're told to see it everywhere their response to it is to demand that the union jack be taken down and guess what happens the union jack is taken down the row began after a new uniform policy was ushered in by head teacher daniel smith i think part of his problem is his name is daniel smith which banned her styles that block the view of others what a racist such as afros and he jabs that were too colorful on thursday mr smith said the flag would not be flown outside the school while it undertakes a review into the matter this the head also agreed to look at updating the pshe curriculum and said aspects of the academy's uniform policy had been revised following concerns now here's what happened head teacher wants a uniform policy head teacher said that a there shouldn't be her styles that restrict the view of other pupils you would think this would be a legitimate concern if a kid can't see the blackboard oh yeah my my legs say blackboard can't see the whatever it is this is a concern right so head teacher thinks well this i'm concerned that kids can't see the blackboard therefore i'm going to put in a uniform policy that says you can't have massive head it's not just afros but because it includes afros it is of course racist nothing to do with the fact that kids can't see the blackboard it's racist and guess what happens they walked out the kids walked out because it's racist and he backs down and not only does he back down he agrees to take down the union jack from outside the school as well tori ampes it says have slammed the decision tom randal the mp for gaddling told the times that piblico pupils should go back to the classroom the symbol the flag is a symbol of our national identity it represents all people regardless of their background it should be a uniting symbol and in that sense those in the school who are calling for it to be hauled down have completely misunderstood what it should stand for and perhaps should be back in the classroom to learn something well they won't be learning anything positive about that class or about that flag what they will be learning in class is that whites are privileged whites are oppressors and that the union jack is a symbol of all that that's what they'll be learning so and that they'll be learning it because of the tories the tories have been in government now for some time and they've done absolutely nothing to change the curriculum to rein in the teaching unions who hate this country and the teaching unions who are responsible for teaching the kids this rubbish in the first place the tories have done nothing about any of this all they do is say a few things that sound remotely patriotic and then go back to endorsing quietly or or extending or promoting or sanitizing hard left activities in skirl and beyond it's it's i don't know i genuinely genuinely unless something unless we get rid of these unless we do you know this has got to stop it has got to stop this country is heading for serious serious serious division and a serious identity crisis because if kids in school can demand that the flag be taken down and head teachers are so weak well why wouldn't they be i mean look at the prime minister so weak that they back down cave in immediately crumple immediately it's a bollies charter kids now oh actually you know what the kids now all they have to do is shout races and they'll get absolutely anything and everything they want and that's because that's what they're learning not just at school but by watching politicians by the media promoting every race baiting victim status promoting group in society the police who get down on their knees to black lives matter all of this teaches kids that if they want their own way all they have to do is shout racists okay all right that's it everyone thank you very much for joining me i'll be back on wednesday morning on facebook with um with some responses to some of the things i've heard on the doorstep since i've started canvassing i will tell you though support is very strong and i'm very encouraged and um it's it's been it's been a great great start to canvassing i'm very very pleased about it okay i'll go into that in much more detail on my stream on wednesday monday back next monday here live i'd have seven next thursday i told you we're coming back with the thursday night streams and but they'll be every two weeks until the elections are over they'll have a lot more time on my hands um oh yes the joe has just reminded me to let you to remind you to don't forget the forbidden shop and also um social media youtube a gab and facebook um i'm on facebook now i still think it's a minefield i honestly do i it's wow oh people people just glide around it i find it an absolute minefield anyway um good night everyone enjoy the rest of the long weekend and i'll see you wednesday morning remember to like and share and remember to talk to friends and family about forbidden the bravest party in the country and i just want to give my um good luck best wishes to all the candidates around the country and those supporting them if you can help please please please do help whether that is going out leafleting canvassing or sticking a few quid into the pot please do help um these elections are really important and i'm very very proud of everyone who is standing and everyone who's supporting those who are standing good luck to you all um keep working hard i know you are okay good night everyone enjoy the rest of the weekend take care of yourselves night thank you for watching if you agree with what you hear on forbidden videos remember to like them share them and subscribe to our channel and why not follow us on social media as well the relevant links are below thank you