 We've been talking about this account of this what counts as sufficient evidence according to Clifford and Something that you know when you looked at here. We thought that well, okay, so these beliefs You know that these conditions for sufficient evidence that come to the uniformity nature of the common human experience These work really well for the physical sciences and for mathematics They don't work well for ethical theory for any religious issues for political issues for metaphysics for epistemology Doesn't work for a lot of other sorts of fields There's wide wide disagreement and a lot of these different fields. Okay, even sometimes about basic issues. All right Well, you know, maybe so much the worse for these other fields Right and Clifford's account works really well for mathematics of science Maybe those are really the only justified beliefs that we have You know The mathematics and science are kind of a hallmark of what it means to have a good theory. Okay. Well So that's the question I give I give to you then These conditions work really well for mathematics science all these other fields have these you know this wide Disagreement here. Well, that maybe all the other fields are just bunkers So here's the question are the beliefs in mathematics and science Are these either the only justified beliefs you have or the most justified beliefs you have So, you know, I mean you have the beliefs of mathematics. Are these the ones That are the standard are they the best justified beliefs that you have