 So there are people within the Linux community that claim that most Linux distributions are quote pointless. Is that the case? Pointless for whom? Who are we speaking for, right? If you say a distribution is pointless for yourself, it's your own personal opinion and your own personal use case. Yes, there are a lot of distributions, for example, that I would consider pointless for me. I have no use for them, but you can't generally speaking just say that a whole bunch of Linux distributions are pointless because you can't speak for everyone. You can speak for yourself and that's fine when you do so, but if you make a general blanket statement that you know 90% of the Linux distributions out there are quote pointless, you know, that's that's condescending, that's arrogant, you're speaking for everyone when you that's really not your place. For one thing, what about all the distro maintainers out there? Now these guys, I'm assuming they actually enjoy maintaining their Linux distributions. They probably use their Linux distributions that they're maintaining, right? So is it pointless for them? Obviously not. If people enjoy working on a project and maintaining a project and actually using a piece of free and open source software, whatever it is, then it's not pointless. At least not pointless for them. And again, I think it's very arrogant and I think it's kind of conceited to tell these people that their work on these free and open source software projects is pointless. Distros, they do matter. Peace guys.