 Now, I'm happy to give the floor to Philippe Baptiste, who has been now, as I said, the boss of the Kness for about six, eight months. And so during those six, eight months, I remember our first conversation, you had already some quite precise ideas, but I am sure that you have learned a lot in those months. So how do you answer today my simple question? Thank you very much, first of all, I would like to say that I am going to re-formulate your question. Finally, your question is why is there so much crowd around Mars this year? Because if we look closely, the mayor of Paris, he does not like cars, but maybe she likes rockets. I will stay on Mars. But of course, there is the sound of the Aup, of the Emirates, which is a very, very beautiful success. But there is also the Chinese sound, which happened a few days later. There is perseverance, of course, the American rover, on which I must say that we are very, very proud to have taken the camera, the head of perseverance. And then there are still many other missions that are going to happen. It could have been Mars, but we could have also said, why is the traffic in low orbit in the space double every two years? Or why are most of the agencies of supervision are telling us that in a few years, in about 15 years, we will have something like 3,000 or 4,000 billion dollars per year of business around the space. No. What is happening today around the space? So I think there are ... why do people go into space today? I would like to say the first challenge that remains a challenge, which is a challenge that has been there for a very long time. It is about sovereignty, about defense, and also about simply showing the technological capacities of a country, of power challenges, in fact, of the whole nation. It was very true at the time of the Cold War between the Russians and the Americans. And it seems quite clear that today this great rivalry is redone with new actors, but still remaining on the same foundations. That's the first reason. The second reason that seems extremely important to me, perhaps that we see less directly, is today the issues around the climate. You know that today, if we do not have the space, we are not able to understand and measure the evolution of the climate. More than half of the old indicators that allow us to follow the climatic indicators and understand that it is the health of our planet, come directly from satellite observations. And so that's still a challenge, which is also a major challenge. The truth is that it's not that that explains the explosion of a number of missions, etc. But it's still a major challenge, and I wanted to call it that. And then the last challenge, which is a challenge that is really new, it's a new challenge that takes a considerable amount of time. It's the issues around technological scientific innovation, but above all, the issues of business that are going on behind, with all the costs of the economy, which are being stormed by the space sector, and economic issues that are absolutely colossal behind it. And that's what makes us a whole group of factors that need to attract activity for the nations towards the space. But we have to try to understand, despite everything, what happened, why did we fall into this new world where attractivity is much stronger? As often, reasons are still technological order reasons. And what we see is that we had a multiplicity of great developments in the sector, the arrival of digital with methods of development. So not only the digital to model, to reduce the time of development to go faster, but also of the 3D printing and also of the low-cost techniques that come not only from digital actors, but also from the world of the traditional industrial world, and all of that, the miniaturization of the components, and all of that, what did it do? It really lowered the costs in the space world, not in all sectors, but in a certain number of key sectors in the space world, and by lowering the costs, you will actually fall barriers of entry that must first block the access of a certain number of countries or a certain number of economic actors to enter the space field. Today, you are a private company, you can enter the great space competition by launching a few nanosatellites for a few million euros, maybe a few hundred thousand euros tomorrow, where the costs have dropped considerably. So, I say that, and just to make the balance immediately with this great enthusiasm, let's not forget that today, at the moment, I would say approximately 90% of the space loans are public loans. We all talk about a lot of specifics, of course, which is an actor who is passionate, who is extraordinary, who has benefited from subsidies and contracts from the American government, who are absolutely considerable, from tens or billions of dollars during the last few years. So, it's both a business that is taking off and taking a considerable amount and which is still very large today, obviously on public finances. So, it still allows us to see something that is still very interesting. We saw a very bipolar world at the beginning, with Russia and the Americans. Europe is a place, not in all sectors. For example, we have never looked at the volubility, but on the launchers, we have been very present. The first private actor in fact, on the launchers world with the Marian program. And then, of course, our champions in the satellite world, Airbus and Thales are still two absolutely extraordinary actors, absolutely extraordinary European actors in the sector and who are the best in a number of satellite technologies. And then, Europe has taken its place. And then, we see that, progressively, China has entered the game. One of them has become a major actor. And, of course, I'm going to go to other countries. Israel is also a program that is quite interesting. Of course, the Emirates. But also, we see many other actors who are entering. And so, we clearly enter a world which is both multipolar, with a lot of emerging actors. At the same time, despite everything, access to the launchers, which is still a decisive element of sovereignty for a certain number of states. And so, it's still a key angel. I think that Europe is very, very attached to having a launchers program, which is a launchers program that guarantees access to space. I'll come back to it in a few moments after the launchers' questions. But, there you go. And with still poles that are drawn. And then, a competition that is going up in power at an absolutely incredible speed between the United States and then the other, China. With, behind, Europe and Russia which support the different programs directly or indirectly. This competition is organized a lot around the moon and Mars. My personal naivety is to regret that somewhere to go to Mars, maybe we could think about going all together. I will keep this naivety in its corner. But I always think of the example of CERN that I quote abundantly. It's the CERN, it's this big center that allows you to work, we discovered the X-axis, that allows you to work on the very high energy physics. And it's a center that is really... Its motto, its motto, is peace by science. It's the fact of being able to put... I'm not saying I don't want to sin by naivety. I can clearly see the distance that it can have in the space world. And finally, this example is touching and still deserves to be recalled. The last point that I wanted to mention is the Europe in all this. What are we doing today and what do we want to become tomorrow in this world of space, which is a multi-purpose world? First of all, we deeply believe in the importance of space for all the reasons I mentioned. Access to space, the questions of defence, the questions of sovereignty, the questions of observation of the Earth and climate, the scientific questions that are absolutely key. Europe is a great country of science and we will continue to have very ambitious programs on a certain number of sounds or instruments that allow us to understand the universe or the physical framework. And then also a program of the launcher which is particularly important. We have today a launcher which is a range of the launcher between Vega and Ariane, Ariane 5 which is soon Ariane 6 in a few months. So in 2022, we have our first launch of Ariane 6 which is a launcher that will allow us to put the France and Europe in the world competition of launches with, I hope, I wish, always touch wood when we talk about the world of launchers because a launcher is still a very, very complicated instrument that works at the border of the laws of physics. We are never at the brink, so the first launches that will arrive soon and then Ariane 6 will benefit, of course, from the experience of the Ariane program in terms of robustness and reliability and then with groups that are much lower than Ariane 5 and who will, and I think it's important to say it, who will be in the market. Of course, we have a great competition with SpaceX who continues and who organizes. And of course, we will continue to invest. We will work on technological breaks that we don't have today and that absolutely need to be developed, to be reusable. This is something we are going to work on. Next to that, we are also going to work a lot. We have already done a lot. The CNES has really been a engine for that. Not only by working with our big prime, as I mentioned before, but also by working on the new actors on the new space, on all these young companies who are about to be born at the border between digital digital and space. And so it's the ability to develop small satellite constellations that will be able to observe the Earth, that will be able to make IoT, to make telecoms, for very, very low costs. And that's really a major challenge for all our countries because it's directly useful for the citizens, whether it's in your GPS to guide you or for tomorrow to know when you will have to set up your field or to be able to monitor your fishing activities when you are a fisherman. All these activities, all these satellite data, they are absolutely good. So I think we are at a kind of border where the world is shifting towards, where the world of space is moving, not completely shifting, because the truth is that we will continue when we do science. It will always be a very classic role, I believe. But in any case, on many, many other sectors, we are shifting into a world where the company will really have a major role and a motor role, and where the States will rather pass commands rather realized as they did previously. That's the first point. A world that is still, despite everything, a world that opens up and with several actors, with many actors around the table of space, and where you will have to build alliances. And of course, France has always been very open, precisely, to this type of alliance and to work with, with partners that are numerous and sometimes very diverse. So it's a passionate world that is still opening up to us and we really change it. So thank you very much. So we can switch back a little bit to English. Sure. But I would like to ask you another very simple, I like simple questions, you know. So a number of times you mentioned European space policy or politics. Can we, so can we really speak of a European space policy? Well, at least there is a European ambition on space. That's very true. There is also a set of regulations on how you build space programs, how you make them real. And space policy, yes, I think there is a true ambition from the European Commission today. And especially, Commissaire Breton is really deeply involved into this policy. He believes that... He is French. Sorry? He is French. I think so, yes, yeah, he's French. But I think it's... But in France and Germany, are we exactly along the same lines? Well, depending on the topics, it's very true that, well, Germany is very ambitious on space. It's true, I think that it's public. They are very ambitious on space. So there is a kind of course of internal competition within Europe. This has always been the case between Italy, Germany and France. And it has to be for the very good of Europe. I really think that there is room for that. I think that we don't have to compete on very, very expensive programs like heavy launchers. It does not mean that it don't have to be competitive, but I think that we have to organize competition because they are very, very costly. So let's not be crazy and let's not compete directly in between our European nations. But for instance, on smaller launchers or on several different kind of technology for satellites, competition is already there. It's strong and it's for the best. Because I mean, so typically having this kind of competition is good for our traditional industry.