 Journalistic responsibility vanishes when reporting on U.S. targeted nations. Two false news reports have gone viral in recent hours due to sloppy sourcing and journalistic malpractice. As usual, they both featured bogus claims about U.S. targeted nations, in this case Russia and Iran. An article in Responsible Statecraft titled, How a Lightly Sourced AP Story Almost Set Off World War 3 details how the propaganda multiplier news agency published a one-source, one-sentence report claiming that Russia had launched a deadly missile strike at NATO member Poland, despite evidence having already come to light by that point that the missile had probably come from Ukraine. This set off calls for the implementation of a NATO Article 5 response, meaning hot warfare between NATO and Russia in retaliation for a Russian attack on one of the alliance members. Mainstream news reports circulated the narrative that Poland had been struck by a Russian-made missile, which is at best a highly misleading framing of the fact that the inadvertent strike came from a Soviet-era surface-to-air missile system still used by Ukraine, a former Soviet state. Headlines from the largest and most influential U.S. news outlets like The New York Times, CNN, and NBC all repeated the misleading Russian-made framing, as did AP's own correction in its false report that Poland was struck by Russia. All current evidence indicates that Poland was accidentally hit by one of those missiles while Ukraine was defending itself from Russian missile strikes. President Biden said it's unlikely that the missile which killed two Poles came from Russia, while Polish President Andrzej Duda and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg both said it looks like it was an accidental strike from Ukrainian air defenses. Russia says its own missile strikes have been no closer than 35 kilometers from the Polish border. The only party still adamantly insisting that the strike did come from Russia is Ukraine, leading an exasperated diplomat from a NATO country to anonymously tell financial times, this is getting ridiculous. The Ukrainians are destroying our confidence in them. Nobody is blaming Ukraine and they are openly lying. This is more destructive than the missile. It is very sleazy for AP to continue to protect the anonymity of the US official who fed them a lie of such immense significance and potential consequence. They should tell the world who it was who initiated that lie so we can demand explanations and accountability. Another false story that went extremely viral was one that Newsweek had been forced to extensively revise and correct. That was initially titled, Iran Votes to Execute Protesters Says Rebels Need a Hard Lesson, but is now titled, Iran Parliament Chants Death to Seditionists in Protest Punishment Call. The latest correction notice now reads, the article and headline were updated to remove the reference to the Iranian parliament voting for death sentences. A majority of the parliament supported a letter to the judiciary calling for harsh punishments of protesters which could include the death penalty. Moon of Alabama explains how the Newsweek piece was the springboard that launched the viral false claim that the Iranian government had just sentenced 15,000 protesters to death, which was circulated by countless politicians, pundits and celebrities throughout social media. This claim has been debunked by mainstream outlets like NBC News, who explains that there has been no evidence that 15,000 protesters have been sentenced to death. Two protesters have been sentenced to death as of Tuesday, although they can appeal according to state news agencies. An article by The Cradle titled Fact Check, Iran Has Not Sentenced 15,000 Protesters to Death, explains that the Iranian parliament actually just signed a letter urging the Iranian judiciary to issue harsher sentences upon protesters who have been demonstrating against Tehran. Those sentences can include the death penalty as noted above, but up to this point have more often entailed prison sentences of 5 to 10 years. The Cradle also notes that even the 15,000 figure is suspect, as its sole source is an American organization funded by the US government's National Endowment for Democracy. Further muddying the waters, the figure of 15,000 protesters detained by Iranian authorities originates from the Human Rights Activists News Agency. US-based HRANA is the media arm of the Human Rights Activists in Iran, HRAI, a group that receives funding from the National Endowment for Democracy, NED, a CIA soft power that has for decades funded regime change efforts across the globe. Indeed, it's public knowledge that NED is funded directly by the US government, and that according to its own co-founder was set up to do overtly what the CIA used to do covertly. It's possible that the 15,000 figure could be more or less accurate, and it's possible that a great many more Iranian protesters will be sentenced to death for their actions, but reporting such possibilities as a currently established fact is plainly journalistic malpractice. In April of this year, Newsweek published an article titled, Russian's raped 11-year-old boy forced mom to watch Ukraine official. In May of this year, Newsweek published an article titled, Ukraine official fired over handling of Russian sexual assault claims. It was the same official. Newsweek made no mention of the fact that its source for its sexual assault story had just been fired for disseminating unevidenced claims about sexual assault. To this day, its April report contains no updates or corrections. Contrast this complete dereliction of journalistic responsibility with Newsweek's extreme caution when one of its reporters tried to report on the OPCW scandal, which disrupted the US government's narrative about an alleged chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government. Reporter Tarek Haddad was forbidden by his superiors to write about the many leaks coming out exposing malfeasance in the Duma investigation by the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons on the basis that NED-funded Bellingcat had disputed the leaks and that other respectable outlets had not reported on them. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has published numerous articles documenting what Adam Johnson calls the North Korea Law of Journalism which holds that editorial standards are inversely proportional to a country's enemy status. In other words, the more disfavorably a foreign government is viewed by the US Empire, the lower the editorial standards for reporting claims about them. Because Russia and Iran are both viewed as enemies of Washington, Western news media often feel comfortable just publishing any old claim about them as fact, regardless of sourcing or evidence. We saw this highlighted during the Insanity of Russia Gate where mainstream news outlet after mainstream news outlet was caught publishing unevidenced conspiratorial hogwash that it was often, though not even always, forced to retract. This was possible because when it comes to implicating Russia, the evidentiary standards for reporting on something are much lower than they would be for implicating a government that is held in favor by the US government. And this is the case because the Western mainstream media are the propaganda services of the US centralized empire. They do not exist to tell people the truth. They exist to manipulate the public into hating the official enemies of the empire and into consenting to foreign policy agendas that they would not otherwise consent to. Imperial propagandists lower their editorial standards when reporting on official enemies not because they are bad at their job, but because they are very good at their job. It's just that their job isn't what we've been told.