 And we're going to start with this new concept that I didn't know existed, called the non-man. And I have to say I encountered this for the first time on Twitter a couple of days ago, maybe it was yesterday, maybe it was a couple of days ago, June 12th, so two days ago. Saw some tweets about this and I dismissed it because I figured this can't be right. So this is too crazy. This is, I don't know, and I noticed that Jackie Rollins tweeted this and it tweeted about this and I was like, no, no, she must be caught up in something that's just crazy and untrue. There was no link. There was just a screenshot of something. So I just dismissed it and moved on. But then today, you know, I found the actual story on the website of John Hopkins University where this is supposed to be taken from. It is now being taken down and a disclaimer has been put into stead. But this is what appeared two days ago. This is the LGBTQ glossary, LGBTQ glossary. And the first item that appears is lesbian in parentheses, social orientation. I can't even do it. And this is, this is, this is explanation for lesbian, a non-man attracted to non-men. And it says, well, past definitions refer to lesbian as a woman who is emotionally, romantically and or sexually attracted to other women. This updated definition includes non-binary people who may also identify with the label. So you're a non-man lesbian, okay? But then, okay, so I see it non-binary. You want to be inclusive. You want to make sure you cover everybody. It's not, you know, so I guess you want to include the lesbian trans, but okay, I get that. But then why is it that the next item is gay man? And gay man is not defined as a non-woman. It's defined as a man who is a mostly romantically, sexually, affectionately or relationally attracted to other men or who identifies as a member of a gay community. It's a little weird. At times, gay is used to afford all people, regardless of gender, who have their primary sexual or romantic attraction to people of the same gender. Gay is an adjective not a noun. It is, he is a gay man. Why is man treated differently than woman who, you can't even say the word, I guess, can't even out of it? You know, this is insane. A non-man attracted to non-man. I mean, this is why at the very end of the day, you know, I talked about this on the show yesterday, I can't take woke seriously because, I mean, 99% of Americans look at this and say, huh, this is stupid. So a couple of tweets, one by Riel Scaracella, she says, why is a lesbian a non-man but a gay person isn't a non-woman? It's a misogyny, she says. And then JK Wollins, JK Wollins tweets, she says, man, no definition needed. It's obvious what a man is, non-man, formerly known as woman, a being definable only by reference to the male, an absence, a vacuum where there's no male-ness. You gotta admire JK Wollins. I mean, not only does she have the courage, but she's a good writer. And that's exactly right. I mean, what? Women are gone. Men, non-men. That's how it's divided. I mean, talk about, and I like this, non-man, a being definable only by reference to the male, an absence, a vacuum where there's no man-ness, and of course, what it's referring to is what was formerly known as women. So anyway, that was on Twitter yesterday. John Hopkins has pulled that definition from its website. If you go to the glossary, the LGBTQ glossary now is empty with a statement from John Hopkins where it says, it strives to create a campus culture that is inclusive and welcoming for all gender identities, sexual orientations, experiences, and viewpoints. And we committed to ensuring the glossary serves the introduction to a range of identities and terms that are used in LGBT community, non-attended to serve as a definitive answer of how all people understand to use the terms. But you know, and then they said the definitions were not reviewed or approved by ODI, I'm not sure what ODI stands for, ODI, some entity within John Hopkins. The definitions were not reviewed or approved by ODI leadership and the language in question has been removed pending review. I wonder if after they do a review, we will get the word woman back in the LGBTQ glossary or if it's now established fact that under LGBTQ ideology, there is no such thing as a woman. There is, is non-men, men in the absence of men. I mean, what do you, what do you, what do you even do? I mean, the alternative is this or Christianity is you get the sense that that's it. Oh, I gotta get kudos to the writer, the writer of the essay that I critiqued yesterday over the, over the woke or Christianity and I encourage those of you who haven't watched that episode to watch it. I think I make some good points there and I think it's interesting. Anyway, the author, the author whose name is Evan Wiggs actually tweeted to his credit tweeted my discussion of his, you know, of my discussion of his essay, he tweets, we definitely disagree on a lot, but I'm honored to have my argument taken seriously by the head of the Iron Man Institute, any, any links to my things. So kudos to, to Wiggs, I've actually suggested that maybe next time I'm in London, we could do a debate on it. And then he also tweeted, thank you for taking my argument seriously, unlike many people who have disagreed so far. So yeah, it would be, it would be actually pretty cool if we could, if we could actually have a debate over this. All right, let's see. So yeah, that, that was yesterday's show. Encourage you all, those of you who haven't listened to it yet to go listen to it. Thank you for listening or watching the Iran book show. If you'd like to support the show, we make it as easy as possible for you to trade with me. You get value from listening, you get value from watching, show your appreciation. You can do that by going to youronbrookshow.com slash support, by going to Patreon, subscribe star, locals, and just making a appropriate contribution on any one of those, any one of those channels. Also, if you'd like to see the Iran book show grow, please consider sharing our content and of course subscribe. Press that little bell button right down there on YouTube so that you get an announcement when we go live. And for those of you who are already subscribers and those of you who are already supporters of the show, thank you. I very much appreciate it.