 Hello, I welcome you all once again to my channel Xora Education and I am Dr. Rashmi Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Assistant Sanna Galsali College, University of Palahava. And now it is I am discussing the topics of philosophy, educational philosophy in which today I am going to discuss a very important topic that is Netflix, that is Pratruthiva. As usual the lecture will be in bilingual mode and it will be useful to you all certainly. So, let's start. First of all, naturalism. Pratruthiva is that vision which is very interesting, very interesting to you all and it has a lot of emphasis on education. It is a very popular teaching method, a way of teaching naturalism. So, naturalism as a philosophy of education was developed in the 18th century. It is based on the assumption that nature represents the wholeness of reality. Like the name of its naturalism means that everything is based on nature. Nature is everything according to this vision. So, what was the meaning of this? The meaning of this was that nature is the manifestation of the beauty of reality. It means that nature is the beauty of reality. Nature is the beauty of reality. Nature itself is a total system that contains and explains all existence including human beings and human nature. It is said that nature is complete in itself, which has nothing to do with human nature. It means that nature is the ultimate truth. Naturalism denies the existence of anything beyond nature, behind nature other than nature such as supernaturalism. It is said that this nature is a vision that it denies the existence of anything beyond nature. It means that there is nothing beyond nature. That is why supernatural power and God's existence do not accept naturalists. Naturalism is a doctrine which separates nature from God. According to naturalism, only nature is everything, nothing is before and beyond it. According to nature, nature is everything and there is nothing beyond nature. Nature is everything. The first and most important concept of naturalism is that nature is everything. Nature is a total system. Nature has nothing beyond nature. Let us start from here. Since we have talked about philosophy, we know that we have to know its epistemology, exeology and metaphysics. According to naturalism, what is epistemology? What is the knowledge for nature? In terms of epistemology and theory of knowledge, naturalism highlights the value of scientific knowledge. That is, the characteristics of nature are that of scientific knowledge. Francis Bacon emphasizes the inductive method for acquiring the scientific knowledge through specific observation, accumulation and gentrification. Francis Bacon, a naturalist, said that there is an inductive method. He said that this method should be used. He emphasized this method and highlighted it. He said that scientific knowledge is obtained through special observation, accumulation and gentrification. This means that science and scientific knowledge are given to the naturalist. He also lays emphasis on the empirical and experimental knowledge. You also know that science is the experiment and experimental knowledge related. This means that the empirical knowledge is given to the naturalist and experimental knowledge. This means that the scientific knowledge is given to the naturalist. Naturalists also lay stress on sensory training. Sensors are the gateways to learning. This means that the senses are the gateways to learning. The gateways are who are going. This means that the chalk is thrown, the sensory training is thrown, because it is Throwing away the senses. Therefore, sensory training is also given to naturalists. They give stress to the participants as to who they want to be supports. According to the specialists of the naturalist, which is mainly imposed on human beings, The root of the root is not the same. The root is not the same. The root is not the same. Instinct, drives and impulses need to be expressed rather than repressed. They say that the root of the root is the naturalist. According to them there is no absolute good or evil in the bud. Ethics, truth, knowledge, and philosophy are theoretical, rational and rational. They say that absolute good or evil is not in the world. All of this are bad or good. He says that according to human needs, the values of life are created by the human need. That is, according to the benefit of the Manufi, our main objective is the survival. And what great progress has been made? So, everyone knows that Rousseau is the largest name in the form of a naturalist. The great name associated with naturalism are Gyan Jax Rousseau, Pestilogy, Herbert Spencer and Rabindranath. Rabindranath has also talked a lot about naturalism. So, on education, what does the practice say about education? Naturalism as a philosophy of education has exercised great influence on the ethereal practice of education. That is, on the basis of education, on the basis of education, on the basis of naturalism. The cry is all external restraint and it condemns all necessary formalities. He says that the naturalism says that any type of drug does not stop, any type of formality does not stop in the practice. In the naturalistic system of education, there is no place for classrooms, textbooks, timetables, curriculum, formal lessons or examinations. He says that if you want to learn from the practice, if you want to make your education according to the practice, then there is no need for words, no need for books, no need for timetables, no need for any particle, no need for formal lessons or examinations. That is, no need for formalities. The nature has to play the role of equating children with their natural environment. And what is the role of education? That the child is aware of his nature. This is our role. External discipline is all together out of place. There is no such discipline as if you want to get out of the classroom, you will get any kind of punishment in the exam. There is no punishment or any kind of punishment. We will impose something on you from outside. The only discipline is the discipline of natural consequences. There are many short reports saying that the discipline of natural consequences means that you should be punished with practical consequences. There is a very common example of this which is quoted again and again. The child is told not to play matches, matches, matches, matches, matches, matches. They say that he doesn't believe it and he doesn't do it. And when he gets hurt or gets hurt, he never gets hurt or gets hurt for a long time. I mean, he says that you should let him discipline himself and when he gets his punishment, he will get his own punishment. He says that you can't always let him discipline himself with the help of natural consequences. But he still believes in naturalism. Naturalism believes that formal education is in mention of society which is artificial. The way that Prakriti Badi believes that formal education is because society has named it artificial and it shouldn't be artificial. Good education can be possible only through direct contact with nature. He says that you can get good education only when you are in direct contact with Prakriti. What does naturalism say about organizational education? I mean, how should education be done? He says that naturalism attaches less importance to the existence of a formal school. This has been said in the text book because it hinders the natural development of children. He says that it keeps children away from formal schooling and textbooks because it stops their natural development. For example, we have talked about the roots once. If you remember or if you want to listen to the video again, since the roots are naturalist, all the roots are natural based on naturalism. As he said, everything is good as it comes from the hands of the author of nature. But everything degenerates in the hands of man. He says that everything that we get from Prakriti is good for us. And everything that goes in the hands of a human is bad for us. He says that the more you get from Prakriti, the better it is for you. According to him, nature is the only pure clean and enombling influence. He says that the nature that we get from human society is thoroughly corrupt. He only knows that the human being's wealth is corrupt. What do we say in today's times? Therefore, man should be free from the bondage of society. He says that society is corrupt, so don't give it to the person. Don't give it to the society. And you should be able to live in the state of nature. You should live in the state of nature, in the nature of nature. Human nature is essentially good and it must be given full list of opportunities for free development in a free atmosphere. He says that the nature of man is good. There is no problem in that. But when it comes in front of society, it gets messed up. So, let it be free of the nature. The school to the naturalist is no way different from the home. They are saying that the naturalists who believe in Prakriti, they say that the students should be like home. For example, Frobel named them Kindergarten, the children's father. According to the professor, he says that there should be no difference between the students. He says that there should be no difference between the children's home and the school. It means that the school should be like home. Tagore also believes that education given in natural surroundings develops intimately with the world. Tagore says that he studies it in natural surroundings. Nature to him is the focus where the interest and aspirations of human beings meet. He says that what is Prakriti for him? He says that his aspirations and aspirations meet. It is therefore essential not only to know nature, but to live in nature. That is why Prakriti does not just need to know, it is necessary to live in Prakriti. Naturalism also believes in the principle of individual differences, which means that every time there is a unique capacity to acquire knowledge and also the pace of learning is unique. Prakriti Badi also believes in the principle of individual differences between the children. He believes that every child has a unique capacity to acquire knowledge and that he can learn according to his own speciality. So, the school should have respect for personal diversity and cater to the varied and different interests of the child. It is said that the student should respect the child's uniqueness and deal with it according to the differences between the children. Naturalism advocates such methods of teaching which offer the kind of an opportunity for self-education, self-expression, creative activity and integrated growth in the atmosphere of unrestrained freedom. He says that what Prakriti Badi does is to give them the power to do what they want to do which he himself can do his own teaching, he himself can do his own teaching, he can do his own creative activity and don't put any pressure on his freedom. Don't let him down. According to Prakriti Badi what should be done is that he says that the study of science is dealing with nature. In other words, the science deals with nature, we should teach them like physics, chemistry, biology, zoology, botanism, etc. They also give importance to the study of language and mathematics and the language and the fiction of Gharid is also mentioned but they are ignoring the spiritualism because they don't believe in supernatural history but they have included the spiritualism because they want that the development of the person, the child, the whole development, the harmonious development, the whole development, the spiritualism should also come. In the same way, naturalists don't give the place to the spiritualism. What has been said about the negative education? When we discussed the negative education, we also told you that the negative education means that we should distance ourselves from the society. He says that back to the nature, that is Prakriti's old lotto. He says that he defines negative education as one that tends to perfect the audience that are the instruments of knowledge before giving them this knowledge directly. He says that the senses are the gateways of the study. That is, the knowledge of the person, the senses, the instrument of knowledge, if they are perfect, they will learn themselves. The child should be left free to develop his body and senses. The child should be left free to develop his body and senses. He attaches great importance to sensory training. For naturalists, genuine education is based on the laws of readiness and needs of human beings. We know that the laws of learning are the laws of readiness. That is, Tattpartakanyam. They are saying that when the child is ready to learn, then he will be able to learn it, so that he can teach it unnecessarily. According to them, child's nature, interest, and needs provide the basis of curriculum. They are saying that Prakriti's old lotto will decide what will be the basis of the path of knowledge. According to the methods of teaching naturalists, learning by doing, learning from the experience, learning from the game, and after a lot of methods of teaching naturalism, they will be influenced by the light. For example, the observation method, learning from the practice, the experimental method, learning from the use, learning from the game, learning from the heuristic method, learning from the search itself. It is a very good method. It is said that if we come, then what we do is that we took a 45-minute period. And the child has gone completely to that class, he has gone completely to that class, he has completely started to study, until then the bell rings, and he has to go to another class. So is it possible that as soon as the bell rings and we close the copy and open the second copy, then we immediately switch over to that new subject? It does not happen like this, but still we do this in our own way. The Darden method says that the child should study until his task is over, then when the task is over, then go to another class. This is an innovative method. It is a very big and successful season. It is not easy to apply it. It is very difficult, but still we should know. And in the Montessori method, you know to learn from the game. Then the role of the teacher. According to the nature, according to the naturalist, the teacher is the observer and facilitator of the child's development, rather than a giver of information, ideas, ideals and will power or a mold or factor. He says that the role of the teacher is only played here and the child has to be treated. Not that you have to give him a thought or an idea or something like that. In the words of Ross, the teacher in a naturalistic setup is only a setter of these things. It is a flyer of materials and opportunities, a provider of an ideal environment, a creator of conditions under which natural development takes place. The teacher is only a non-intrefering observer. He says that the nature is set up. The teacher says that you have to set up a state. You have to provide only material, you have to provide opportunities to the child. You have to give him an ideal environment. You have to create such ideas so that his natural development can be done without any interference. For Ross, the teacher first of all is a person who is completely in tune with the nature. Ross says that the teacher is like that in the nature of nature. He has a profound faith in the original goodness of human nature. He says that the nature of human nature is also the nature of naturalism. He says that he understands the goodness of human nature. He believes that human beings have their own time table for learning. So, Ross says that he is directive. Now, in an organized education according to the immediate stages of development. He says that when the child is ready, he will learn. He says that he will learn when the child is ready. The stages of growth and development does not force him to learn but rather encourages learning by stimulating him to explore and to grow by his interactions with the environment. He says that you should not force him to learn, but rather to interact with the environment according to his readiness and his stage of development. Merits are our demerits. Merits are very common. Development of child psychology, same-faces, important contribution in the field of methods of teaching. Opposition to repression in the field of education. Child centered education has done a lot of work. He has told us a lot of methods. He has taught us a lot of things. Do not interfere with the child. Let him do it according to him. But demerits are also there. For example, you cannot give so much freedom to the child. There is an individual difference. Discipline by natural consequences can happen to them. It cannot happen to them. It cannot happen to them. How long do you have to deal with it? Less importance of teachers. Less importance of teachers. And more emphasis on the present needs. He says that naturalism is not for the future. He says that what you have can happen in the future. He says that what you have is revolutionary. You can say that idealism is revolutionary. Philosophy is there. There is a lot of emphasis on education. There is a lot of impact. In short, it was very big. There are many forms of naturalism in it. But in general, you can be told this much in such a short time. This is the principle. You keep understanding it. Thank you and don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel. It's the only education I have time.