 enormous vocabulary. Allow me to play devil's advocate. Isn't censored through privately owned? So if it's private private property, they can, oh this argument came up, make make their own rules right. Even if it says, here's the thing, here's the thing. This this this has come up enormous vocabulary. By the way, this this discussion has been in play and it's already settled, right? Because there's lots of, basically we're in the in in in the times where, believe it or not, this is the teenager chicho would really look at adult chicho and go, you're about to quote Ronald Reagan, which is crazy. But I'm also quoting Wolland, I'm quoting Chris Hedges, I'm quoting everyone that's and will everyone that's ever talked about fascism, right? We in the Western world are living in fascist states. Definition of fascism, meaning things there are there's private companies, but they control the government and vice versa. They're on the board of directors of each other and stuff like this, censored to stop becoming a private company when they started politically cancelling and censoring political speech, right? When they were getting payouts from government, bailouts from government, right? Getting government funding, getting government advertising money. For example, CBC, right in Canada gets a shit load of its money from the Canadian government and you couldn't hear anything that opposed the Canadian government's point of view. Lots of CBC reporters quit, have quit over the last three years to go on substack, create channels on censored to rumble, odyssey, all of it should not as much, but rumble for sure, right? So in all these companies where they say they're private, they're not really private anymore. This is a full on within a fascist regime in the Western world. There's no doubt about it now, right? By the way, the difference between fascism and communism is in fascism, it's private corporations that are ruling over us through government enforcing laws, mandates and all this jazz, right? In communism the state owns it all, right? But it's the same effect, right? Just or same means consolidating more power, they just go about it a little differently and many times they're overlapping their deeds, right? Committing genocides, right? Annihilating a certain thought process, right? So no, you can't say, because censored to used to be anyway, the soapbox, the public place where people spoke and they started censoring even senators, right? They're censoring senators, but not senators from that are necessarily saying what they disagree with, what censor to disagree with, but they were censoring people put, what do you call it, public servants that only belong to a certain party or certain group, right? Because they come on and say, oh, promoting violence, but then hey, wait a second, there's a lot of people on one side that were promoting a lot of fucking violence in the United States over the last few years and they were amplified, right? So no, this whole debatable, if it's private or public or whatever, it's done. It's already done, okay? It's already done. And also, by the way, I am against the censorship. I'm against censorship, free speech all the way. And gang, do not forget, do not forget this little message here. Ridiculously important. Free Assange, free Assange, free Assange. Julian Assange is a publisher and journalist that has been crucified for trying to be transparent in accountability of capitalist power to humanity, something that we desperately need in our societies. If attack on Julian Assange was not allowed to happen or humanity stood up to resist it, if WikiLeaks was allowed to perform as public duty to reveal corruption, war crimes, crimes against humanity, right? I can guarantee you we would not be facing what we are right now.