 My doctor is a role of city in diagnosing appendicitis in ultrasound-negative cases. My main objective is to evaluate the activities of city and identify appendicitis in ultrasound-negative cases to determine the city thickness of normal appendix in Indian population also to assess the effectiveness of city and identify the combination of appendicitis and lastly to identify the alternative diagnosis of fright load content pain which will make appendicitis. Appendix is the most commonest cause of abdominal pain in a patient admitted at the emergency department it may be associated with vomiting, fever, diarrhea but the most common symptom is the pain. The timely diagnosis intervention of acute appendicitis is important due to this great completion like professional city plays an important role in diagnosing appendicitis in ultrasound-negative patients and equiputal cases also. Thus it will reduce the perforation rate and negative appendicitis rate. Other members of appendicitis who are included in the center of appendicitis write distal ureter calculus, illusical flipping and pulitis. Material, I have taken U.S.C. men's at least 300 U.S.C. machine and G.E. volumetric acid U.S.C. machine and C. men's at one jointed slice city scan machine. Methodology, patient who were admitted in the facility were included in the study. Time period, I have taken one year and the sample size is 200 and the study is purely hospital based occupational study. Anatomy, it is a blind and integral structure from posterior spectra of the cecum and into the U.C. exemption called vomifone appendicitis. The length varies from 7.5 to 10 centimeter. The appendicitis base lies in the constant position and is formed by the confines of the trineoclonal. The base lies somewhere in the microneus font. The free and outer tip of appendicitis is variable in the position. The different locations of appendicitis sometimes used for sedative imaging diagnosis in U.S.C. These are the various position of appendicitis. This is the retrosycle level of the sub-cycle pelvic free and posterior. Most common position of appendicitis based in the U.S.C. is the retrosycle. But it is most likely in the city, as it is a cross-sectional modality. Visualization of appendicitis in U.S.C. We are able to see that it is non-compressible if restart volumetric tube. Its diameter is more than 6.7 and not longitudinal. Also, its diameter is more than 6.7. These are the advantages of U.S.C. First, it is an operator-dependent modality. Second, it is a steel-based modality. Thirdly, if we talk about obese patients and the patients who are previously unknown surgery, we are not able to give a good gradient compression. It is as it is required in the appendicitis patient to rule out appendicitis, where it is present or absent. And it is this modality is inferior to the city, and it has low relative predictive value. The criteria of diagnosing appendicitis in the city include primary and secondary primal include thickened and distant appendicitis with more than 6.7. Neural thinning enhancement, more thinning of appendicitis more than 2.9. Very appendicitis-evaluable appendicitis, secondary diagnostic criteria include appendicordic, very appendicitis-evaluable appendicitis, small mobile obstruction, very simple information target applications, pose and track, inflammatory thinning of appendicitis, presence of air interlumina or astralumina. CT protocol include that the examination were performed on human 128-slide CT scan machine. Abdominal babies were taken and the contrast material was used was used as omnipere 350. Oral arterial lumina study phase were taken. The contrast material was injected when the oral aspect of the albinochipital went through 80 gauze, cannula at low rate of 4 ml. This 154-year-old male present with the histochemalpene since last 4 days. And histochemalpene also present. USD showed right-to-work quadrant pain, tenderness, stroke tenderness. CT showed that it is 7-8 mm with very appendicitis-evaluable appendicitis. And it is, we are able to see the retrosical position of appendicitis. It is usable in the USD. Phase 2. An ideal overcombing with vagabond plane for 5 days with no evidence of tumor vomiting. USD showed stroke tenderness. USD showed 7.5 mm with very appendicitis-evaluable appendicitis. USD 35-year-old right-to-work quadrant pain. It is an on and off-wind machine. Presenting since last 3 months. USD showed gracious abdomen and stroke tenderness. On CT, it is showed 11.2 mm diameter of appendicitis with no fetish tendon and no evidence of volunars. Phase 4. 30-year-old female present with a severe abdomen pain and abdomen distinctions since last 4 days. USD showed bobble like this type of fluid field bobble like this type of fluid field bobble. With no evidence and no evidence of vestibular existing bobble also. But when I followed this CT, CT showed appendicitis. Appendiculitis is around to bolshek like lesion. Appendiculate. And this is appendicular abscess entirely. If we talk about statistical analysis. Statistical analysis. Majority of cases. Majority of cases I have reported in age group 22. More than 25. Majority of cases are reported in 20 to 24. Age group that is 91. And if we talk about male to female predominance. I have reported majority of appendicitis patient in the male. So we can say that it is a male predominance. In contest with appendicitis. And presenting abdomen pain is presenting in all cases almost all cases at least 200. And the least most common symptom is the painful maturation that is. That is constipation. The duration of duration of pain. If we talk about the duration of pain. I have reported more than more. I have reported 22 cases. Of duration more than eight hours. Less than four hours. I have reported 56 cases. And in between four to eight hours. We have reported two cases. In writing closer. I have reported less than four hours. Four to eight hours. And more than four to eight hours. All those three. We've known this in 34 cases. The general input that is 53. Normal 130. On city we have found the request equal. That is my job to do this. That is 145. I have reported. Maximum cases I have reported diameter. Which have a diameter less than six seven. That is 112. The report is equal. But it's running with more enhancement. Our present in 77 cases are presented going to be. A valuable professional abscess. I have reported six cases. Which have a professional abscess. And. And. This is our absent. With professional abscess. Conclusion. The city after study. Analysis. That out of 200 patients in the city. Population. We tried to work out. And when. And 77 patients. The. Is based on city. Based on this study. City finding open to the diameter. More than 60. Of the. And decided. This spring to the country. It is a poor. Having more accurate role in. The discussion about. 200 cases. We tried to work out. And it was. Submitted. To the incident. Out of 200. We are majority belong to the. 224 years. H2. For 25 years. H2. Appendicitis is somewhat more common. In the mail. There is no relationship. Between the. And the. In our city. 25 cases. In our city. 25 cases. Was diagnosed with appendicitis. And has. Appendicitis diameter. More than 78. The most common. The most common. Appendicitis was presented. The. Which were found in the. In the. Of. Patient. Therefore diagnosis. On the. With the use of the city. Thus coming to the conclusion. Is the prime. Of the choice. Thereby prompting the. Diagnosis. Treatment. And reducing the unnecessary. Complication.