 Yes, the question for all three of you really is, before we get into the Slido Q&A is, that's of learning from other jurisdictions and learning from other countries. And, you know, there's obviously some aspects of what you might see in another country are really applicable in your own situation. But then it's always the kind of 5% differences which make that kind of just applying what you've done elsewhere really kind of complicated. I wonder if you have any general reflections on that point. First of all, either Stephanie Stacey or Stefan, if you are still unmuted, you may want to take that. I think it's very specific to where you operate. Trying to find like a one-size-fits-all solution because technology, you know, is so expensive to make and then trying to apply that somewhere else. Very difficult if you go into a like campaign level operation. Like what you just presented is the trying to come up with like boundaries and a database that keeps them. I think my society, you also have like a project that has like boundaries and you can manage them or something like that. And that is super helpful. And I think that can be redeployed a lot. But as soon as you go further and like try to like get the data in, yeah, either you have to scrape it, you have to get it somewhere else, you have to FY it maybe. And that is all very specific. So, you know, you can't run a civic tech project from a different country basically, right? That's not possible. Yeah, we okay, we tried and we Yeah, I'll just sorry to interrupt. I'll just I'll just echo that. We one of the hardest things that we've encountered is learning about local legislative district data from other countries. We've had a couple expansions recently. We started covering about the 54 largest cities in Canada. And we learned of some wacky things that had gone on with like merged local districts, and a couple jurisdictions that we weren't familiar with. And we took on an expansion in Mexico a few years ago. And, you know, first of all, you have to have folks on the team that speak those languages. And that can help you dive through, you know, constitutions and local referendums and just things that are hard to understand when you're not there locally. Yeah, just I'm just going to paste in a blog. Some of you may have seen from Democracy Club here in the UK, the 4,314 times when post codes aren't good enough because you are the ways that different jurisdictional boundaries kind of overlap and just all the kind of craziness flows from that. And it's that without that kind of fund foundational infrastructure, it's very difficult to build other kind of services on top of it. You know, that's what's been behind government digital service in the UK and other countries and all those kind of initiatives. And so we've got a couple of quite a few specific questions, some for Stefan, some for Cicero as well. And so Stefan Top, question on slide, I don't know if you've seen it, but has this project had any effect on food safety reports been more easily public available by default? You covered some of that in the presentation, but just anything you want to add on that, yes. So the food safety reports are generally not public in Germany. They are made public if the fine for the report is above a certain threshold like 300 euros, then they have to be published. And they are published on like some weird portal somewhere and they only publish for like two months or something. And so every time I go to a portal, there's never anything there. So it's a bit suspicious. I'm not quite sure if I'm always at wrong point in time. But we just hope to change the legislation as such. And the idea is also to standardize these tests. Denmark has like one system, you have this report card, it has a smiley system. In Germany, every district is free to come up with their own kind of a way to formalize that report, which makes them not comparable, which makes the publishing them difficult because then the consumer actually can't tell what is good, what is bad, which one is better between these two. So standardization is definitely a problem. And I think, but we started a conversation here and we kind of for started it, right? Because suddenly, you know, we make these reports public and they're already like more than 2000, 3000 are online already. And they're sometimes handwritten and whatnot. So we show like how broken the system is right now. And we hope to kickstart a conversation about and making them standardized and also making them public by default. And just one very quick one, how do you go about classifying the authority reactions? Is that entirely manual semi automated combination? So we looked at the top authorities manually, we looked at their responses. And then we take like snippets from the responses, and then we make them into regular expressions, you know, you know, machine learning, you know, AI, right? And then we just try to find these snippets in other responses and like mesh them a bit. It's nothing fancy. And I think it shouldn't be at that point, you know, we're not trying to create like a foi robot or something, we have to understand like the consequences that are in there. And also, we want to know about things that are different and not try to keep the like treat them the same way as other things we want to see what's developing and then possibly also just pick up the phone and call the authority and ask, Hey, what are you doing there? And because that is sometimes more helpful than the canned response. Yeah, definitely. So a couple of questions for Stephanie and Stacey. So Mika, Ceefee was asking how many of the 519,000 US elected officials do you currently have and how much do you charge for access to the data? Yeah, that's a great question. So we currently cover about 360 of the largest cities and counties in the United States and then another little over 50 in Canada. So we have total coverage of about 45,000 elected officials that extends to all of the different countries that we maintain data for. And in terms of how we charge for it, so there are a few different ways that people can access the data. We have an API. We have a district matching application which allows people to just upload a spreadsheet of addresses and get those matched. They're all priced differently, but our pricing is completely transparent on our website and we offer discounts for all nonprofits that want to use the data. And finally, as I mentioned, we have a free tool that any individual can use. It's also on the website to look up their address and find all the elected officials that represent that location if we maintain that data. And we've committed to never charging individuals to find that information. And lastly, I'll say we've worked with a number of students and academics and other organizations that just did not have the funds to pay for the data. We've been happy to share some of that data with them for free. And we also try to have partnerships that can help people access even more. So one organization that people might be familiar with is called TechSoup. And through a donation program, a nonprofit can receive up to 5,000 API credits, which is good for some smaller and medium-sized nonprofits for a full year for just $30. So when we say we try to make it reasonable and affordable, we really do. Knowing that we need to continue to have some funding to operate the service, we still try to prioritize nonprofits and efforts that are going to be most impactful to people. Fantastic. And then another, maybe not so brief, but a question from Alex Blandford about what interactions have you had with legislators, sorry, and are they interested in helping to sort of improve the government process as a result? Yeah, I'll start off, but I'll turn this one over to Stacey also. So we have had a number of interactions with legislators. I think the main takeaway is that they're super busy, and while in many cases care about their constituents contacting them, they don't have as much bandwidth to figure out how that's going to happen. And they all have opinions about ways in which they want folks to contact them, and they might all be different. So yeah, I'll let Stacey answer some of that question as well. Yeah, we attend a conference every year of state legislators in the United States, and we try to pull them if we can to get a sense, because a lot of nonprofits do ask us like, what's the best way to communicate with our legislators? And they're very busy. And so the most common responses don't do it. Often like tongue-in-cheek, they're joking, of course, they want to speak with their constituents. They're often overwhelmed. They're very annoyed by form letters that have had a lot of upraise in the resistance age and form email letters as well. They want to hear real problems and have dialogue, if possible, with their constituents, and they kind of want to clear out the clutter of just mass emails and letters. One common and surprising answer we heard this year was about what's texting and Facebook, surprisingly. And this was heard from a lot of rural legislators, and they, I mean, good on them for sharing their personal cell phone number with their constituents. But they found that this like through Facebook and texting was the most like direct form of communication, and they were able to answer on the go, which is very surprising and like impressive. We actually wrote up kind of a summary of our findings from this past year's conference, and I'm happy to show that link out to that sort of summary. But yeah, I think overall we haven't had like mass action to like make this data more like available or standardized as that might have been where the question was heading. But we've had good interactions with understanding better how they like to be contacted. Excellent. And I just want to find a question for Stefan. And this is something we often come up against with, what do they know and other FOI services is your when you get lawyers involved is very expensive. And you're the legal aspect you're actually being prepared to go to court as part of the campaign seemed like a core part of what you're trying to do is I mean, how in earth do you fund that and what type of additional risks does that present for you individually and as an organization and so on. Yeah, so most of the time we win the cases we go to quote for and then we actually get some money back. Problem is that lawyers, they charge a bit more than the usual amount you get back, especially for like fringe topics like FOI unfortunately. And that's why we also hired our own lawyer now for organization and who can like, you know, who's in cheaper overall than just hiring some some law firm here and there. We recycled through a couple of law firms in order to get like an impression of what the situation is like. I mean, we do have donation funding. Our supporters are quite happy that we do these lawsuits because they we can show that they actually move the conversation forward and we can open up parts of the government that were closed before just through a lawsuit. So it's we can show that it's worth it. And so they support us through that. And we also have foundation funding. And it's apparently also convincing to them that our strategic litigation part is well worth it. Fantastic. Thank you. And congratulations on using a pun for the name of the campaign. I'm a strong believer that puns are the basis of any successful civic tech initiatives. So it's always good to see. Amazingly, it worked in both German and English. Listen, thank you so much, guys. Stefan, Stephanie, Stacey, two great presentations. Thank you for the questions. Thank you for turning up today. It's really, really very appreciated.