 Good afternoon to everybody. And thank you to your organizer for accepting my paper. I'm a Roman archaeologist. Actually, I arrived in Rome several years ago. And now I am excavating Rome in the historical city center. And I'm also a tour guide. So after more than 10 years of residence in town, I started asking myself, how does the touristic ticketing managing system of the entire archaeological environment heritage is seen, or perceived, and used by our institution? Well, I entered Autodalcaios. And at the end of my research that I already spoiler so that you can at least follow a little bit, is there are two different concepts and ideas in town. I, first of all, started listed. I dealt only with sites and museums in town, archaeological museum and sites. And I listed more than 220 sites and museums, just in the town of Rome. Now, even including the surrounding, this side, the one which is Ostia, which is a big archaeological park. It used to be the harbor of the city of Rome. It's within the municipality of Rome. So it's part of the city itself. Out of these 222 sites, I started checking the ownership according related to the management of the site. The heritage in Italy is entirely preserved by the Thailand state, of course. Then the management can be still carried out by the state, but it can be also given to other institutions. We had a broad reformation of the state offices in charge of the preservation and management of Italy. And now in Rome, we have eight state offices in charge of the management of different sites, plus the municipality of Rome, in charge of almost the half of these 2020 sites, which are still belonging to the stable run by the municipality. So it's rather complicated and crumbled. Once I decided to list all the sites, I also realized that there isn't a common idea on which is the minimum in listing all the sites. So for instance, I have seven archaeological parks which are under the same ticket, each one of these. But within this archaeological park, you have a broad amount of different specific archaeological building sites or whatever. Conversely, the municipality of Rome lists each every single building as a different place to be visited. In total, out of just 220 sites, we have seven parks, as I told. We have more than 48 sites, which means many buildings of different phases. Then we have 100 specific buildings, temples, civic places, squares, whatever. And 31 urban elements, the walls, the aqueducts, all those places that you don't specifically need to exhibit because they are already apparent and you don't even need to assess to be able to see them. Out of this, I decided to check whether they were opened or not. And luckily, we have more than two-thirds of the sites which are open. 36% of those open, it means 79 places. But I will be really short, don't worry. 49 sites are open after calling the institution. And then either you have a private little association coming for a little amount of money to open the site for you or the state calls a guardian who is coming to open to you. And 66 are those sites which are always closed, either because they are under renovation, because they are not safe, because the state decided, and some of the time, luckily they even stated, they decided that they are not meant to be open to the public. They are not meaningful, whatever. Out of this 138 sites which are always open, I finally end up to check the cost of the tickets. Half of them, 63 of 138 are for free. So 228, 220 are the visitable sites in Rome. 138 are always open, 63 are always free to everybody. Just the rest, which is 59 sites, are places where you need to pay a ticket if you want to enter. And the tickets never exceed 50 euros. Now I'm talking of adult tickets. I went yesterday to Casa Batlo. It was 28.50 euros. And that's a house, so it's not a park, it's not a site, it's a single building. The archaeological park of the Colosseum cost 12 euros. I'm not saying that. The Colosseum has a right strategy on just giving you two different elements to compare. And at this point, there's something which strikes me a lot. I already very briefly told you that there were two different ways in listing for the state buildings and for the municipal ones. At this point, the strategies of these two institutions, one in Rome, totally disagreed. And goes one for global and the other one for local. The state tries to be totally democratic with two kinds of tickets. One for the adult, half for the young, between 18 and 26, and for free under the king. This is the only policy, plus a study for free to everybody, to everybody. No matter where you come from, how long you stay in town, which is your aim or whatever. The cost of the ticket of the state never exceeds 14 euros. There is just one site, Fantange's Castle, which costs 14 euros. And this visit is every year by 1.2 million euros. The Colosseum is 12 euros and is visited by 7 million people. The Pantheon, which is a Roman temple converted in a Christian church and now is both a church and a monument, is visited every year by 9 million people, is for free, and we are just debating whether to enter a ticket of 2 euros. And people are disagreeing. Municipality has a totally different strategy. Ticket for visitors, external, ticket for residents. Ticket for visitors are a little bit higher than the state of tickets. So the museums and the sites in charge of the municipality can reach 15 euros. But we are talking of no more than 7 museums, because the rest of the archaeological sites and the municipality are for free. The most visited municipal sites are the Berlin museums. They cost 15 euros per unit. They might cost 13 euros for me, and they're for free, one standard here. Montes is a Roman resident. They are visited by 430,000 people a year. Another site under the municipality, which is visited every year by 70,000 people, is for free. In Yagos happens, there are two different cities and two different strategies. Two different cities enter that the most visited sites, most visited all around the economy, are in the specific city center of Rome, which is totally globalized. The rest of the sites in the territory around the most of the time are for free, if not even closed. And they don't reach none of those numbers that you can reach in the city center of Rome. Two different strategies, and in India, two different cities, those still inside the city center. I found interesting to talk about this issue in this specific section, exactly because now results in terms of the solution, that global and local are working in a same environment, and we're not talking about every little place, but one of the most logically visited and populated sites in the world. Thank you.