 Mike, what are you doing to create a ecosystem of groupies over at the Government Printing Office? Yeah, interesting. The Government Printing Office, I think I would view our role as an enabler and I think Ray's comments and thank you for those are really amplify and put a light on that. It's a year of anniversaries. It's kind of fascinating. 75 years in July for the federal register, a week from tomorrow will mark the 150th anniversary of the joint resolution that created the Government Printing Office. So we are entering our 150th year or we're in our 150th year. And the Government Printing Office for the 150 years has been all about transparency when you think about it. We've been put in place by Congress to make government information and publications readily available and accessible. And in partnership with the Depository Library Program, we fulfill that mission to allow the information to be easily accessed and paper form the library community preserved it. And the library community also provide versioning so you know which version you were getting access to. So even back 150 years ago, the cornerstones of what we're talking about here today were really put in place. It's just that the technology has moved forward and fortunately for the federal government having an agency like the Government Printing Office, we have evolved I think fairly well to continue to meet those needs. Six years ago, we started working on the federal digital system, FDCIS, and it was essentially a re-engineering of the Government Printing Office. Even though the Government Printing Office today is still 23 or 2400 employees, a majority of which are tasked with the trade work of doing the daily printing of our newspapers, the federal register and the congressional record. And as Ray said, the presses can't stop. For 75 years, we haven't missed a federal register and we've only, on a few occasions, have missed our deadline with Congress to deliver the congressional record. And it was only missing by an hour or two, but they still get a little cranky about that when that happens, even though they might be the cause. But the work that we do and the work that we've done throughout the transformation with the federal digital system has put a repository in place that's both what we view as a world-class access repository with enhanced search tools, but it's also the foundation of a preservation repository as well so that the publications in digital form will be preserved in perpetuity, the life of the Republic, so that they can be accessible now as well as in the future. Something that we learned as we were transforming the agency and migrating data from the GPO access system into the FDCS system, there were versions of publications in GPO access that we could not read. They were in there in old Adobe formats that we really had to go and scrounge around and get the tools to allow us to actually read our data so that we could migrate it into a system that could then be managed properly. I talk about it as the difference between an information storage system and an information management system. What we had was an information storage system and what we have now is an information management system. But the work isn't done. You know, we've made great progress in putting XML data online last year for the federal register this year for the Code of Federal Regulations. Majority of the bills are in XML format today and that's just the beginning. Many of the tools that the federal government uses to compose data are still a bit dated. The congressional record is composed as well as the federal register is composed for printing with a tool that is now 40 years old and is in desperate need of replacement so that we can actually compose in XML rather than compose in something else and convert it to XML. Other challenges that I see are really, it was mentioned earlier this morning, the need for standards. We've done a nice job, I think, with the regulatory information with the federal register and Code of Federal Regulations so that there's some standards in place, almost de facto standards that we have been able to create so that it's easy to link things together and list of sections affected, et cetera. But when you start crossing different branches of government and talk about the need for standards, they're desperately needed for us to be able to continue to reference and link this data together and something that we just need to continue to push. The transformation of data today that's in electronic form to be put into a form that it can actually be managed is a huge challenge. A third of the investment that we've made in our federal digital system over the last five years was spent on migrating data. That's a lot of investment. We've spent over $40 million on our federal digital system and over a third of that was data migration. It's something that is many times forgotten, but it's a huge part of the challenge. So a couple standards with the cost of migration and you'll start seeing what the real value proposition is or the benefit of having some standards so that this transformation process won't have to be done in the future consuming a lot of resources. And then the third challenge that I really see is the retrospective material. I think that was discussed this morning as well and it's more than just scanning. Scanning the data is the easy part. It's taking the scan data and then parsing it and structuring it in a way that is consistent with a standard or a schema so that it can be used and moved in the future is the challenge to be able to do that. But there's a lot of material that really needs to be put into electronic form so that it can also be referenced and linked. So GPO has still a lot of work to do and I think the role that we see is an enabler. An enabler in a way that we've seen today with the examples and I think it is again just the tip of the iceberg. Well-structured data and well-managed data of government information is going to enable applications we can't even dream of today. That's gonna be very powerful and that's what GPO has been focused on lately and will continue to focus on for quite some time. Thank you. Great, thank you Michael.