 I'm going to talk for a little bit before we get to the infusion between you and the lunch about sea for what it is and where we're aiming in the near future and I hope you will find this interesting and stimulating for your appetite. So for those of you I think that haven't heard about sea for the Center for International Forestry Research Our job is really to put forestry and landscape high on the political agenda and contribute to broader development goals and that's important to come back to that. We are an intergovernmental organisation, our headquarters is in Bogor and it's shown in the picture here. Our job is really about research, capacity building, outreach to bring solid and relevant science to decision makers. It started 20 years ago, that's why we have an unfriendly anniversary of this. We are more or less a product of the Rio meeting in 1992, also known as Stockholm plus 20. Founding sponsors for four countries, Australia, Sweden, Switzerland and the United States and Indonesia did successfully, thankfully, the host sea for headquarters in Bogor. And we also wanted to have a party around here today who is on the picture who at the time, as you can see here, signed the host country agreement with sea for. We have a very important host country partnership last year, President of Indonesia visited sea for just before the Rio plus 20 meeting. Now, why are forests important? This may not be used to many of you but I think it's important to change the perspective a bit. Overall, we can say that sustainable landscape is dependent on forests. Why do I have this slide up? But partly because forests and forestry is often seen as a problem. Deforestation, forest degradation, it's lost biodiversity, it's illegal trade and many other things. So forestry is often a problem at the international level. We want to turn that around and see forestry instead as a positive contribution to the development. This is one example. This is great in Jakarta. You can see it in the outskirts and of course quite a few people live here. According to some statistics, this is now the second largest metropolitan area on the planet, 28 million people. Interestingly, as many of you know, we have fairly safe drinking water in the Great Jakarta region. Why do we have that? It's because of the forest that is on the volcano, outside the open. Where it rains a lot, where water is harvested and rolled to consumers in Jakarta. This is also forest. So forest and the bigger picture looks more or less like this to me. We have what I would call the big five political processes. We have the Millennium Development Goals dealing with poverty. We have the World Food Security summits dealing with food security. We have the Climate Change Convention, which is leading with climate change. We have the Convention on Biological Diversity and we have the newcomer, the Green Economy, since last year. These are the big five that forestry needs to relate to. Through that, we can develop political relevance, positive contributions and not only see forests and forestry as a problem, rather than as opportunities. This, however, is a problem. I took these pictures on a visit to Rial province in August and obviously many of you know what we're looking at. We're looking at fires in the top two pictures. Bottom left picture, we see that these fires have also damaged down the forests. And bottom right, we see that the purpose of all this is to establish conditions. This is a conference on business for environment. So I'll comment this in terms of business. Somebody made this investment and somebody is going to put the poleboard in their value chains. That's the kind of things we're talking about and the kind of things we need to deal with. Not putting anything anywhere, just noting that this is a key issue that we're dealing with. And importantly, forestry and forest is only part of this. This is also about agriculture, this is also about livelihoods, this is also about business and trade and it's about the way to landscape. This is why I'm going to bring the discussion into landscapes. Before we do that, I want you to look at this graph because we need to zoom out a little bit. This is a little bit complicated to read but I'll try to take it one by one. Over the past 50 years or so, we have tripled a lot of things. We have tripled the GDP per capita worldwide. We have tripled the food production, we haven't enough food. We have also tripled the number of people that are not food insecure. And we've also tripled our greenhouse gas emissions. So if you look at those top lines, there's an amazing correlation. But interestingly, the number of food insecure people has stayed the same. And so the connection I want to make here is that we often hear about agriculture in terms of food security. My proposition is that agriculture is important, it's necessary for food security, but it's not sufficient. And obviously there must be other factors that increase food production and improve the economy that causes food insecurity. In other words, let's not make the different political agendas enemies of each other. I'll come back to that in a minute. What we see, in fact, is that political processes are very focused, but they're also fragmented. These are the same big five as I showed you before. The issue we have at least at the international level is that these processes seldom talk to each other. And we need to figure out how can we connect them, how can we develop an agenda a way forward that actually leads to these issues together. We think that this is why we need landscapes. Why do we need landscapes? Well, landscapes are essential for the future we want. Landscapes provide all our food. They provide livelihoods for several billion people worldwide. They host all our terrestrial biological diversity. But they're also where a third of our greenhouse gas emissions happens. So landscapes are essential for the future we want. We have to deal with them, and we have to deal with them as a whole. And the fragmentation of sectors and political processes actually hinder us in dealing with the landscapes. Therefore, we're talking more and more about the landscapes approach to create synergies and manage those failures across sectors, across political processes. And we recognize in this that people on the ground are in charge. It is the people on the ground, their decisions, their aspirations, their ambitions and their investments that will tell us if we move towards sustainable landscapes, sustainable development. Finally, private finance coming back to this conference. Private finance is key for these solutions. I won't expand on that a little bit before I continue. Finance with sustainable landscape, let's try and connect the dots. First of all, there is capital. Investors tell us that there is a founded capital that seek good investment propositions that also contributes to sustainable development. Of course, it needs to be a decent return on development. That's the stopping point. But there is increasing interest and demand for sustainable ventures. Farmers, foresters, producers lack in many instances access to long-term affordable and reliable capital. And it is in fact a major limiting factor for those enterprises. And then thirdly, the public sector, as we know, has a desire to use public funds for the most of the results in the very public goods and sustainable development. So all we have to do is to connect these dots. It's not easy, but we think we have some good approaches to this. We have a discussion for a session in the afternoon in the Vienna session where we can expand further on this. Now, to work with landscapes, one of the issues is complexity. Everybody says that the development is in the details. I say that the details themselves are often the development. We have to find a common language by which we can interest people in landscapes, which we describe what we want to achieve, and what needs to explain to investors what it is that they can expect in return. This needs to be meet our objectives, measures, and describe performances in ways that are easy to understand, that apply to any scale, to a farm as well as to a catchment as well as to a country. We have to be able to apply this common language to any location as to be measurable. And we need to think about what we mean by sustainability. Is sustainability really an absolute achievement? Is there a target? Or can we instead look at sustainability as a direction? We are going in the right direction. Maybe that's easier to contemplate. And at the end of the day, shouldn't sustainable landscapes make an excellent sustainable development goal? We think that by and large we can bring this down to four objectives. This is a lot of discussion. It's really hard work to simplify. Making things more complex is easy. You just add the details and then you continue to model the discussion. But bringing things together and making them more simplified is hard work. We think that four objectives can describe what we want with landscapes. One is to improve livelihoods. One is to sustain ecosystem services. One is to provide sufficient food and non-food products. And one is to make sure we have resource efficiency and low levels of pollution. One more into detail. But these are four objectives that I think I could explain to many people and they would probably agree. We just had the climate change meetings in Warsaw. At those meetings we traditionally had a forest day. See for us together with partners posted a forest day. In parallel there's been an agriculture day run by agriculture organizations and their partners. This year we decided to join forces because if you remember the pictures I showed before, we can't really find the solutions unless we work together across agriculture and forestry. So therefore we organized the first global landscapes forum. We wanted to do that to inform climate change negotiations, agreements and actions and to inform the process on sustainable development goals. We had more than 2,000 participants over two days and the four themes were investment, governance, climate change and food and nutrition. We're now going to watch a short video from this event before I conclude my presentation. So that was some perspectives from the landscapes forum. We're looking forward to what defines our focus and priorities in the post-2015 development agenda, food security aspirations, handling climate change, maintaining biodiversity and green growth with equity. Put all this together and we have to work at the landscape that forestry is an important part of this and we need to work together across sectors. My final point here is an advertisement. I'm going to take all of these issues into a conference that is organized by CIFR Apartments here in Jakarta, we call it Forest Asia, with the sub-type of sustainable landscapes for green growth in ASEAN. There will be a lot more information on this coming up in the next few months but this really follows on the issues I talked about and finding the solutions in the way forward. So again, very much welcome to this lunch. I want to particularly welcome Harid Ariyanda from the Minister of Forestry. As I mentioned by Jamal, our co-founder. I was the normal from the President's Office. I will be from the State Secretariat. And then you will be back down in special advice from the Minister of Research and Technology and all others. Very much welcome to this CIFR 20 year anniversary lunch.