 What's going on everybody and welcome into the week 12 edition of the fan dual Monday night football Q&A show here We're gonna talk best bets as we always do We're gonna talk about the single game slates and we're going to help you guys win this money I'm Ryan Williams your host for this evening day. Whatever however you are watching this on the YouTube channel We appreciate you guys coming in YouTube Facebook, Twitch would have you Ryan Williams You can find me on Twitter at Ryan Alexander underscore W joined by my co-host here Jim Sonnis You can find him on Twitter at Jim Sonnis senior writer and analyst for number fire and fan dual Jim How are we doing today my friend? I'm doing good Ryan But also like a tiny bit nervous because I really want to see ox to play well here Not because like betting or anything for tonight, but because looking forward to next week's main slate for DFS There aren't a lot of like great games and if we can get like Good Russ tonight that's gonna make it be one more good game next week because they're facing off With the 49ers so I I really do want them to play well here because I want access I want to be able to justify to myself using Tyler Lockett using DK Metcalf using Russ because Russ is super low salary in the main slate next week too So I want to be able to justify doing that so I'm a little bit nervous because The past two weeks haven't given me a lot of confidence that'll actually happen. So a little nervous. How are you doing today? Yeah, well, this could be the birth of of let Russ cook 2.0 season I mean, he's he's really struggled as of late. We'll talk about it as we get into this late That would be fun. I could utilize a decent Main slate here going into week 13 after the week 12 main slate my goodness that probably I was just going through my Roto tracker for the year. Oh, no going through everything my ROI was like man Actually, I've kind of ran decently well compared comparatively as I've been feeling on these Monday shows with you And then last week happens and I'm like, I don't even want to I don't even want to upload my seat CSV because that was brutal. Yeah, yeah I mean it really was and like the number of players I use them assuming that you use yesterday to who are now Gonna be on IR is Offsetting like Deandre Swiss probably not gonna play this week Darren Waller might witness this week for Thanksgiving We have bats and then there's of course Christian McCaffrey Miles Sanders might miss time though It's not that he might be okay to Dalvin is potentially going IR like these were my core plays These are the guys I leaned on the most so not usually a good sign when there are a lot of NBC sports edge blurbs about Players you used the previous day on a Monday, right? And it's one of those things where you know as as disappointed as I was about the slate and just how I ran It was one of those things on the week where you look back and it's like, okay I was on some spots that I felt good about and I would go back to right and it's just you needed to have like five Or six guys that were must-haves yesterday. You had to have Joe mix and Leonard for net Elijah Mitchell Trying to think of the wide receivers who popped off and had good games I mean, you know, we're guys like Kendrick born and Adam Thielen. Well, right. Yeah. Yeah, I don't feel in from the good game environment I guess you know people are on him, but yeah Kendrick born having a big day Some of these other names of people I was going through this morning I mean Tom Brady letting down just Justin Herbert getting there against Denver in a weird game Yeah, so it's like, you know, we you're gonna run into those weeks So, you know Thanksgiving slate was pretty decent was happy about that. We it's you know We put it in the book. We close it up and we move on to the next week But before we do that, Jim, we got to finish off week 12 strong here And we do have the Washington football team taking on the Seattle Seahawks got a good game ahead of us here as we should think Shout out to Mike Mingo in the chat here coming in on Facebook asking about the sleepers Mike We will not disappoint We will talk about sleepers as we always do here as you have to talk about sleepers compared to, you know A game like this Jim and we can just talk about the overall state of the slate where we have Pretty much, you know two teams Concentrated offenses. We know where the ball is gonna go We're getting some people back off of injury and all of those players are priced up to where they should be Which you know, you always love to see that because it makes it that much more fun to build these lineups But it's gonna be tough to get a rust stack in with both Lock it in mech half having to play a player on the other side and one of those players You know, you're gonna one exposure to McLaurin or Gibson So we do have to go down and look for some of these sleepers that Mike might be Wanting us to touch on or refer to Jim. How are you feeling about the slate in general? I mean you hit the nail in the head Like that's exactly what it is where we know where the ball is going which is good for a full slate But it is detrimental for a slate like this because you're trying to predict who will be the guy who Has a random touchdown like a lot of slates if you get like a you know one catch Three yards and a touchdown. That's not gonna mean you're optimal for the first single-game slate because there will be five guys Who get you double-digit points? We're probably not gonna like we will probably have you know guys get double digits But will we be able to get to all them most likely not so you're digging into Some really gross options trying to identify Who is going to be the guy who actually goes off here? So to me? I think that what this does honestly is It increases my interest in the kickers because those are guys Who are going to have chances for points who have lower salaries and kickers are always in play for single-game DFS? But I think my interest level in them is higher for this than usual just because the guys around them Have really rough rules Adam Humphries probably you know One to three targets this week courtesy annuals on a pitch count, you know, it'll play but he's on a pitch count You've got Ricky seals Jones who is doubtful Jadie McKissick is actually okay like that But that's also $9,500. So to me you're looking down here and trying to I say okay Who is the guy who will do? Literally anything who can get me for targets, and I think Gerald Evans kind of stand out there But like overall there aren't just there aren't a lot of guys down here who I can actually like tolerate for tonight Yeah, that's that's that's a good point Jim. I didn't really kind of think about that I mean I was already kind of building lineups as we were coming in to the fold here and kind of pre-show talking things through And Gerald Everett, I mean this guy's mispriced for his kind of role in this offense Which kind of feels weird to say but like if I can get a guy with his target share at 7,500 I mean that's pretty much like I don't want to say a lock button play because I made a lineup that I love That does not include him. Okay, right now It actually includes D. Estridge for Just all intents and purposes to be transparent with that but but yeah Gerald Everett is probably one of my favorite plays here when you're just looking at you know Washington football team being a pass funnel. You can't get to both lock it in Metcalf comfortably So who's the next guy that you can pretty much trust to have some share there? Especially when I get into the red zone and that's Gerald Everett. Yeah And I think that we've seen Pete Carroll saying hey We have to get Gerald Everett the football still that's a good thing too, you know It's not like a squeaky wheel narrative. It's not like Gerald Everett saying like hey get me the ball It's just kind of like you know, they have been getting the ball and Pete Carroll said that They want to he's had some yardage shoes. I think that's a good thing as well So I think that Everett's kind of the no-brainer, but I also think that that's going to lead to his being Pretty popular for tonight. I'm looking at number fires projections They don't have as high of a projection forever as I would have expected It's still the highest among guys below $9,500 though So I would expect Everett to be on a healthy number of roster. So then you decide, okay Do I go what I think is the most logical route never it or do I go what you were talking about going to the Eskridge Someone like that and deviating there I think the options if we're looking through like guys you could consider down there John Bates with Ricky seals Jones being doubtful and Logan Thomas on a pitch count He'll be activated for tonight, but he's on the pitch count John Bates You could consider it $6,500. I would say D. Eskridge is a guy I was looking into earlier on okay with that then also Freddie Swain because I'd expect Eskridge's role to expand he ran six routes last week but I think that number will increase tonight because They drafted him for a reason getting further removed from that concussion stuff He's finally out of the practice again that means I think his role will expand But Freddie Swain is probably still gonna play so I think to me the consideration set of guys who are lower salaried should get some volume are Everett obviously, but then Eskridge Swain Maybe John Bates are the main guys. I would think to potentially get some volume there Yeah, no that that's interesting there, especially with the Logan Thomas news coming back because I do think he'll garner Some significant not significant, but some significant enough ownership where Bates does become a solid tournament play Because the chances of you know, just name recognition. Oh, we get Logan Thomas back Oh, he's on a pitch count But oh, what if the coaches are lying and we know coaches lie and he could go out there and do it all but still keeping You know John Bates's ownership Somewhat somewhat limited so I think that makes for an interesting play I do kind of want to touch on any there The guys not cheap but like you know the running back situation here for Seattle where we don't have Travis Homer We don't have Rashad penny. So it's gonna be a two-headed backfield with DJ Dallas and Alex Collins Alex Collins. You're looking at paying 11,000 he's priced up, you know right underneath Antonio Gibson So pretty much you got all the studs that you do want to play in this game and then him But then you got DJ Dallas down at 9500 if you can talk yourself into a game script where Seattle is down or right You know Washington gets up early I think DJ Dallas makes for an excellent play with the targets that he's seeing in Alex Collins hasn't been seeing any Right, and I think that's the key way to think about it is how do you think the game unfolds? If you think that Seattle gets the lead it's probably gonna be more Alex Collins just because like last week when they had Penny and Homer act is this will expand his role will expand from what it was last week Due to the injuries you mentioned ten carries there whereas Dallas had four But as you said, you know Dallas had a couple targets as they got down in that game So I think that that's the right right way to view it if you think that Washington leads in this game DJ Dallas's role expands and he's $9,500. So that's a good thing in terms of like trying to Expect him to exceed his salary Whereas if you think that Seattle takes a lead that makes Collins more attractive now the issue I run into is that Collins is 11,000 and hasn't shown any Yardage upside this year. I know again with Penny being out with Homer being out that does Increase his yardage expectation, but like that's that Pittsburgh game hasn't done a whole lot. So, yeah, I Think he's over salaried, but I also don't know like where else I go So that's a tough thing for me is like I think he's over salaried But he also is like kind of the last guy before we get to a fall off So I think they're both options, which is I think kind of what you were saying as well Where you know, you can definitely be okay with the other guy depending on the way you think the game plays out but I think that like Collins especially is over salary that doesn't mean I won't use him But it means that I don't want to and I'm not prioritizing him. I'd rather you know, if I'm okay Getting up to Gibson getting up to Lockett Metcalfe, etc. I'm okay using those guys and skipping over that second tier Where the two Seattle backs are Yeah, no, I totally agree with you I mean, I haven't decided, you know rough week So I haven't decided how much exposure I'm going to have on this on this slate, especially after, you know once again trusting Lamar stacks on a single game slate and being disappointed last night in the Sunday night football game But in playing this game, you know, kind of reserve the the $7 five-inch rematch I just love getting into those right pools kind of limited and I don't have a team with Alex Collins on it You know, and that's just kind of when you're gonna five max I kind of just do a roster block and tell a story with those five teams And I just don't see a way where Seattle is handedly getting up in this game and giving him the touches that you would want out of that back I mean since Russ has been back He's only had ten carries and either of those games So that's not enough for me to bank on and then you're looking at like you said Jim look at the salaries I mean Antonio Gibson. Okay, this guy's had 19 and 24 in the past two games at home You know kind of in a favorable the game script when you're talking about the spread just being one of Seattle in Seattle Hasn't really shown us the offensive explosion yet. If this is a neutral game or Washington gets up to a lead They're feeding this guy and just for a thousand dollars more I'm gonna you know be able to trust Antonio Gibson a lot more than Alex Collins And we've seen Washington lean fully into the ground game the past two weeks They have been trying to establish it which honestly like why not? I mean like no nothing against Taylor Heineke, but like he's not a guy. You really want to like sling it a lot with So like Antonio Gibson $12,000 the passing game work will don't expect it to be there Like just don't like don't let's not go down that road again. I'm not gonna Let's not bring up the best ball tab on Fandall I don't want to know what how much I had because it was too much But like even without that at $12,000. I think that he is Relative to salary the best running back in this in this This game by a decent margin. I would also say that honestly and you can correct me if you think I'm wrong here I think McKissick might be above DJ Dallas and Alex Collins too Just because I can feel so good about him actually having some sort of like yardage upside So actually I think my two favorite backs in this game relative to salary are the two Washington guys and Gibson and McKissick Yeah, no and I actually I do have one of my five teams that actually does have McKissick and Gibson both I mean because this is just such a favorable matchup for running backs, Jim You know, you're looking at Seattle on the ground. They're giving up, you know, the what is it the second most? Yeah, second most Fandall points per game to opposing backs just just in general to running backs They've allowed the most receiving yards to running backs. They've allowed, you know Somewhere in the top, you know top 15 and yards allowed on the ground But as far as attempts go you're looking at them being in the top 10 is seeing ground attempts So like in any game script both of these guys can kind of hit and pop off and you know, like I said, you know We kind of know for for Washington and we can talk about the ancillary pieces here But it's like, you know, I want Gibson I want McLaurin and then in any other game script that I can talk myself into if if I'm not playing Gibson I think McKissick can be in there because the matchup on the Seattle side is so favorable for us if you stack them up appropriately So, um, yeah, I like getting to both of those guys And I think having both in the same lineup is really fun because we talk about ways to be different on single game slates because like you do It to be different even in like a five max tournaments You'd be a little bit different You don't have to be as like as exotic as you would if it's like a 150 max tournament but like you still have to get a little bit weird and We've seen situations where both those guys have been fine this year like last week Gibson had 95 yards McKissick at 50 50 on a full slate is not getting the job done But on this slate where we don't have a lot of lower salary guys with production and where McKissick salary is 95 I could very easily see a situation where both Gibson and McKissick are in profitable lineups So yeah, I actually I'm on board of that We talked last week for Thanksgiving about putting a Zeke and Pollard in the same lineup I think the same thought process applies here. That was for a full slate. That was a three game slate This is a single game slate. So to me, I'm very much on board of that I think that that is a a fun way to view things. It'll be unique It's kind of fun and honestly like it's not it's not absurd. You are being different without being stupid That's always what I want for a single game DFS slate Absolutely and just to be able to do so on one lineup I mean, that's the fun thing about the three maxes the five maxes, right? Is that you get exposure to different scenarios without, you know, having to do the 150 max If that's not your cup of tea or even the 20 could be overwhelming for some people So I just wanted to throw that out there that that was something that I'm looking at Okay, Jim, so let's overview this here from the top and of just Tell me or talk to me about how you're feeling Lock it versus Metcalf because I do think that people need to make a choice It is going to be tough to jam in both which most people the first inclination is what you want to do. You have Terry McClourn who's priced above both of them Lock it for for all intents and purposes This guy is seeing like all of the props and everything that I've seen on lock it has him Going having a better game than DK Metcalf But yet we have lock it at 12 5 and then we have Metcalf at 13 5 So what's your view on these two guys in general as a whole? So I think that like if I'm looking at For a flex position not the MVP position. I think I think lock it's a better option just because like He gets he's been getting good volume in the two games with Russ back He's had four deep targets in both games and went over 100 last week I think that the we've seen the production be there. So for a like a just a one-off flex position I think that lock it grades up better For MVP if I'm considering one of those guys there and I think they're both in play for MVP I think that's where I want to go Metcalf because not only does he does does he get the deep volume 34 for this year But he also gets a lot of red zone work. He's at 39 percent of the team's targets inside the red zone this year So if you're looking for a guy who's gonna Blow stuff up like just go nuts. I think that's more Metcalf lock. I can do that too. I think but I think it's more Metcalf so To answer your question in a long way I would say I prefer lock it as a one-off or like if I'm stacking him with ross with ross's MVP But if I'm gonna put one of these guys at MVP, I prefer Metcalf over lock and what are your thoughts on that? Yes, so I'm glad that you said that because my thoughts are completely the opposite Perfect. I love it And and maybe and and I'm hoping well, you know, let's let's be transparent, right? So let's do this with the caveat got Tyler lock it in some home leagues that I'm Eating him to have a big game on I need loving what he's been doing since Russell Wilson has been back where Tyler lock it looked dead in the water with gino smith. I mean, it was just like a foregone conclusion He was not looking his way at all Metcalf was the guy who was scoring the touchdowns every week and lock it was the ancillary piece and now that we have Russell back healthy. I mean we have seen Huge boom explosion weeks from Tyler lock it in the past with this guy at the helm And you're talking about, you know, this is a favorable matchup for both of them I think the field will definitely You know the the scariest thing about DK mech half is missing out on the mech half game, right? Because it does happen. It feels like it happens on prime time It happens a lot But these Tyler lock it like blow up games like the week two game against Tennessee puts up 27 He had the three touchdown game last year, I believe In one of those matchups and and they did play Washington last year and both of them did struggle But this defense is totally different So if they're able to get loose and like you said a get right spot for them going into the main slate I mean we could have that exposure game I'm willing to take a bet on lock it and vagus is telling me that I should you know Lean lock it slightly over over mech half and I just feel like the field has a hard time doing so Which is why I want to have more MVP exposure than the field might and I think the other thing too that that works in your favor Is that lock its salary is lower? And I think that we have a tendency to use The highest salary guy at MVP. So that's why you know, I've got the default up here It's got russet MVP because the rest of the highest salary guy I think our default is to go with the guy With the higher salary So that means that more people would put lock it or a mech half at MVP and lock So I think that that that your thought process of fewer people will go here does make a lot of sense. So I I'm still sticking with mech half, but I think that your thought process there is is correct And we should be thinking about things that way Definitely. No, I think it's it's it's definitely one because I'm I'm apt to say that the optimal is going to have one of these guys in it if we you know Played out the slate in a vacuum here. Um, so getting that decision right is going to be key Um, regardless if it's in the flex or and or the MVP spot I think that you know, they're definitely going to be in the lineup So the one that you choose is the one you're going to want to make sure you get right Shout out to everybody who's joining us in on the chat. We got it's mr. Jackie moon joining us on twitch We appreciate that man. He's saying ola and saying mech half a lock for 150 yards and two touchdowns. Hey, you know, it's mr. Jackie moon If you love that then go ahead and bet that plus 800 for mech half to score twice Tonight and we do know he like neither one of these guys have boom weeks So if you're feeling if you're feeling uh, frisky and want to get on the fandom sports book Go ahead and lock that bed in and be able to reap the benefits there Shout out to ryan vinnett who's joining us in on facebook asking about mechistic or gibson ryan I think we kind of touched on that just as far as you want to kind of dictate your lineup on how you see the game going If you see that Washington's gonna have to you know, have a have a hard time keeping a pace if seattle's able to exploit Their defensive woes then maybe mechistic is the way to go I think that if you see washington being, you know favorable here, seattle's a little bit slow We have seen seattle be slow in the past, you know It takes a while for rust to get the wd 40 and get the get the shoulder greased up So, you know gibson could be your play there. I do think the matchup is is great for both of them We talked about putting them both into a lineup as well too ryan So, um, if you're you know, just let your lineup dictate Which direction you're going to go there and you should be fine And it's mr. Jackie moon coming back in and saying screw it He's going to go with 100 yards to touchdowns for each that'd be a nice payday. Hey, that would definitely help And and if that happens jim, you can uh, you can kiss those exposures to seattle on the main slate next week Goodbye because that ownership is going to be unbelievable if people trying to jam it in We need to be good, but not too good. You're right. We need to make that caveat like be good But not the point where it makes it be Russ is at 20 and lock in mecca for a 30 percent a piece like well, let's be good, but not quite that good Yes, and shout out to if that does happen shout out to anybody who did find a way to jam them both in And get that right with russet mvp there. Um, because it is slim pickings. Yeah, I see you you're working it out jim So you got 92 five. I mean if you kind of You know, maybe you take the kicker from Washington side and figure out what you can do from there Or even, you know, we can talk about some of these ancillary pieces too. So we got 10 000 left there So yeah, that's like dj dallas. I guess or maybe mckissick Yeah, um If you know if it's really an onslaught there and he's the only one who's on the field getting going I guess it is it is more palatable than I originally thought but that it is tough to like Fade a guy like mclore and just with his target share on the team and speaking of which jim Before we get into kind of some of these best vets and talk about the fan dual sports book side of things What is your read on the past catchers here from Washington? We kind of touched on logan thomas versus John baits there a little bit, but what are your what's your read on these guys? Like I think her to samuel and correct me if i'm wrong I haven't seen anything as of late, but there was talk last week of him possibly being activated for this game I know we saw logan thomas get activated. I'm not sure. I mean again I would expect him to be on a pitch count too, but that would just be another wrench in the system This guy de andre carter speaking of 10 000 left in salary He comes in at 10 000 on this late and he's been a guy who has been hot as of late I believe three touchdowns in three straight games For him has kind of just you know, I mean hey somebody's got to pick up the pieces where terry mclore and doesn't have any Any realm so without ricky seals jones? To catch passes and adam humphrey's banged up. Can we trust any of these other ancillary pieces for washington? Yeah, I think that like if I had to guess the way people will play things here is that they will be Tolerant of samuel on a pitch count because His salary is 8 000 So I would guess that he will catch some catch some eyes for tonight. So maybe that would increase the Allure around someone like whoopsies around de andre carter because he's higher salaried Uh, he's not as big of a name as kurta samuel We're not talking about him as much because we're talking about samuel coming into this game so I would say that carter actually does have some appeal in that sense where you're avoiding the Samuel pitch count and stuff like that and likely increased popularity I think honestly though like i'm okay being underway on everyone in this passing offense just because of how run heavy they've been and instead funneling my usage toward You know, uh, antonio gibson jadie mckissick to take advantage of that and mckissick does get a ding down too With the run heavy nature, but I still think that he's in play just because the way he gets used in this passing game. So I think to me I'm i'm okay being a bit lower on mcclouran. I think I prefer meccaf and lock it over him right now just because the salary is higher Um, maybe people will be afraid of guessing between those two whereas they know mcclouran will be the guy So I think to me I would rank mcclouran behind lock it in meccaf and I think I'd rank the running backs above the past catchers on washington just because I think this game should be competitive enough where they can be run heavy still And that pushes me away from them just because I think the salary on mcclouran is pretty high Relative to those guys and I I don't really want to guess with the Samuel carter etc etc type guys Yeah, mcclouran's the tough one because you know, he they played in this last year. They did play Um, I I couldn't remember. Uh, I didn't have it written down who the quarterback was if that was a Fitzpatrick or Heinecky game, uh, but he did see 12 targets in that matchup seven for 77 Against seattle. Um, has seen double digit targets. Um, You know in a lot of games this this year already and the red zone targets I mean this guy has 10 next closest is deandre carter with five then you got adam humphries who might not even play with three So, you know, it does feel like he is getting volume and that is you know getting to him and mcclouran is is one that I like Lineups that I like to build and we can actually I'm fine with sharing this I actually had the lineup with tyler locket at mvp. You can play rust you can play mcclouran and and Gibson and then that's where the de estrus play came from because I had a salary pretty much for him So, you know, it's like you know, what what's that story tell? Okay, so locket is having you know one of his big games where he's having multi touchdown So they need to keep it close who are the two guys who could keep it close mcclouran and and gibson and then just hope for the punt Wide receiver that you get you can take escridge. You can take swain um and and make it work So that that's kind of where I want to go. I don't want to guess You know on these other ancillary pieces and the other thing jim too is that you know Let's let's just rewind it back to the Thanksgiving slate, right? So if you remember recall first touchdown in that game goes to josh reynolds, right? Who was a deep sleeper on the Thanksgiving slate? I saw him catching some steam early on thursday morning throughout the week and he goes and gets that first touchdown But you didn't really need him on that short game slate and granted There were you know two other games to kind of bounce it out, but it's like, okay if john bates, you know Catches a touchdown. What else is he doing or like will disley? Let's say will disley catches a touchdown for cheap, you know, maybe that pays off and that's enough But you know, maybe you know, it's it's not depending on how your lineups go So I'd be fine on missing on one of these ancillary pieces catching a touchdown If I can build correctly. Well, that's what I was focusing on mckissick's yardage too because You know, what do you do if they score with mckissick? It's probably like 11 Fandall points at least because he gets a 50 yards and a touchdown Whereas like with baits like you were talking about like it's six and a half or so, you know You get six points for a touchdown half point for a catch I want to know what they do if they score whereas like these upper tier guys It's a lot better outlook like mckissick. I think with everett same thing because the yardage will be there too That's why I want to focus on those guys versus guessing elsewhere on guys who Even if you're right, you may not be quote unquote, right, right Correct. Correct. Yeah, this will be this will be a fun game And I know we're kind of coming up against the clock here guys So we appreciate everybody who's joining in appreciate those questions coming in real quickly jim before we sign off Are there anything on on the is there anything on the fandall sports book that you'd be looking to place a bet on? Just for the people props line anything like that I think my favorite number that I like right now is the taylor heinecky under passing yards 242 and a half to me is a pretty big number with how aggressive they've been In trying to run the football recently and again, I think they'll be able to hear just because of The game script setting up that way Number fire projects in the 233.03 242.5. I think that's That's like it's a decent number, but I want the under there. So to me. I think that's the way I want to play things I don't want to guess on how effective effective gibson is I don't want to guess on distribution between him and and mckissick I think the best route for taking that angle is by taking the under on heinecky at 242.5 Awesome. Yeah, I think I I definitely like that and my lineups will like that as well Of course, you know, I'm talking about taylor locket. So I've been looking at his props there You know for him to catch an anytime touchdown. We're looking at plus 140 So meccaf having better odds and the running backs as well mccloren as well too So I like that and then you're looking at the receive the player receptions Meccaf and locket are both plus money actually meccaf plus 126 at five and a half Locket at plus 108 at five and a half. So, you know, if you have a lean on either one of those players It's plus money on them mccloren also plus money at five and a half as well too So, you know, very interesting that we have a good good lines and good receiving totals for all three of those guys But the receptions they're not thinking of there So maybe both teams lean on the run and it's a low scoring affair Lower scoring than we could expect especially with the island game guys That's going to do it for us here Monday night football fan dual fantasy q&a show We appreciate everybody coming in facebook twitch youtube speaking of the youtube channel Make sure you're subscribed like follow the channel even hit that little bell there That's where you'll get the notifications every time we go live with all of our content It'll be awesome for you to see and guys make sure you're following Jim Sonnis on twitter at Jim Sonnis this guy's doing great work there to get you guys prepared for the slate for your Redraft teams everything under the sun. Um, it's been great chatting with him all year along My name is ryan williams you can find me on twitter at ryan Alexander underscore w and we'll catch you Next time on the fan dual fantasy q&a show on monday until then guys get this money. Have a good one. Peace You