Loading...

Shasta County Supervisor District 3 Debate

195 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Apr 26, 2012

http://www.CaliforniaDebates.com
Quick Link Index
00:05 Introductions Fred Ryness
01:15 Patrick Henry Jones
02:24 Pam Giacomini
First Round--Question
03:50 Fred to Patrick Are you familiar with the Burney Hat Creek Basin project?
05:23 Patrick to Pam-What is your response to the Memorandum of Understanding for the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan?
07:15 Patrick rebuts Pam's answer--They want our water!
07:16 Fred puts in his 2 cents-agrees with Pam on this subject of "regional water management".
09:33 Pam asks Patrick about how will we pay for water projects without grant money? Patrick answers about the strings attached to the grant money.
11:20 Pam rebuts --wants to be involved with the process--saving the ratepayers a lot of money.
12:12 Fred asks Patrick about using the windmill money to fund the jail.
13:52 Fred rebuts "we don't need the jail" let's rehab the inmates.
15:06 Patrick to Pam--Did you support the TANK movement or not?
15:38 Patrick explains what TANK was and how he worked to defeat the project.
16:37 Pam asks Fred How would you make a difference in the planning and building department?
17:42 Pam agrees that the process needs to be made better.
18:42 Fred asks Pam what is your position on the Hat Creek expansion project?
19:20 Fred rebuts and adds his own opinion-the windmill project is NOT a good thing.
21:15 Patrick to Pam What is you opinion on the tax sharing issue between the city and the county?
21:56 Patrick responds "I have a plan" here it is.....
23:30 Pam asks Patrick about the land strategy?
23:50 Pam explains what the land strategy is.
25:28 Fred agrees with Pam about Burney needing jobs.
26:49 Fred to Pam Are you aware of the disappearance of the porcupine?
26:35 Fred talks about his article he wrote to the Record Searchlight about how the porcupine is gone.
29:35 Patrick to Pam-Do you support or oppose the Churn Creek Shopping Center?
31:20 Patrick responds and describes how bad the traffic would be if the shopping center is built as it is planned now.
33:49 Pam to Patrick-- Were there government funds used to complete the Oasis Rd?
36:34 Pam rebuts Patrick's description of the Oasis rd vs. Hawkins project
37:57 Fred to Patrick-Who are your campaign contributors?
41:00 Fred responds and empathizes with Mr. Anselmo's plight.
43:00 Patrick to Pam-Will you turn down your retirement benefits if elected?
45:20 Pam asks Patrick-what experience have you had at the State level?
46:50 Pam rebuts-Eastern Shasta county is what is important
47:57 Fred to Patrick-Do you think the high density housing project is a good idea?
48:38 Patrick to Pam What can you tell us about your position on RABA?
49:00 Patrick expounds on the money spent on RABA
50:32 Pam to Patrick Do you think they should accept the grant for the new jail? And how will we be able to staff it?
52:08 Pam rebuts Patrick on the jail issue.
53:07 Fred to Pam-What is your preference between the Library or the Trails project?
54:39 Fred responds--I think we need both projects funded
55:23 Patrick to Pam Do you support coordination or co-operation?
56:51 Patrick says "That is an example of cooperation NOT coordination"
58:54 Pam to Patrick we cooperate with the US Forest Service and have a good relationship with them.
1:00:16 Fred sides with Patrick on the issue of coordination
1:02:03 Pam to Patrick How do you view development on Williamson Act land?
1:02:58 Pam rebuts on the Williamson act issue
Closing Statements
1:04:06 Patrick
1:05:57 Pam

Loading...

When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...