 Once upon a time, there was an university student who went to her class every morning. Every day, professors repeat one sentence in one way or another. Do not use Wikipedia because it's not a reliable source and anyone can edit on it. As time passed, our student was used to that idea and as a result, she refused to benefit from Wikipedia and all the free knowledge provided by the encyclopedia. Several months later, there was a weekly workshop held in her faculty and organized in the Scientific Association. Our learning student decided to attend the event, motivated by the idea of participating in the event and not by the subject itself. First, she went to the primary session on day one, then she attended the next session in the next week. Everything changed and she was obsessed with a single idea, creating her first article on Wikipedia. With the help of an old editor on Arabic Wikipedia, our student managed to write her first article. It took a lot of time, effort and countless edits. At that time, there were two questions floating in the mind of that student. How can she, as a reader, ignore all efforts and judge Wikipedia? Why does not she, instead of criticizing the encyclopedia, try to improve its content? This student is standing before you today. Dunya Dumyot, an Egyptian 21-year-old student studying medicine, editor at Arabic Wikipedia and founder of the Wikipedia Editor Project. In this project, we believe that creating one article can change one's judgment. And this is the title of my talk today. I do believe that every new idea has a lot of challenges and obstacles when it first comes to life. And Wikipedia Editor Project is no exception. We had a dozen of challenges when the project started and we were expecting to have many as a project is still evolving over time. When I started this project, we had to fight to change a deep-rooted idea in the Arabic community. Wikipedia is an unreliable resource because anyone can edit them. We had to fight to prove that this is the natural property of any Wikipedia and the burden of verifying information is on the reader, even if a dozen references are added to an article. The reader has to always check whether the information is coherent with the sources or not. Another interesting challenge is how to expand. It's critical not to be too exclusive so the project is strangled and not to extend fast so that it gets lost. This has to be implemented in every stage of the project. In the beginning, we invited closed networks exclusively. Thus, the participants were only friends. Then the project extended to in both colleagues and my faculty. After that, it covered the whole university and went further to communicate with the students in other universities and govern rates all over Egypt. Furthermore, participants of different ages from different Arab countries can now be part of our project. An online project has its advantages and disadvantages. As for the advantages, the project is not limited to Egypt. Easily, we can reach all our countries and include participants with no age barrier. Additionally, organizing online events in the pre-COVID era made the project have much experience to hold events during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, participants are rarely rewarded. Currently, only online certificates are possible unless a local sponsor of the event is found. Funding is a major challenge. Unfortunately, due to local laws, it's not possible to receive any kind of grant from foreign organizations. Thus, local solutions are needed for raising funding. We hope to find a sustainable answer to keep the Arab community in Egypt intact. My first edit on Wikipedia was on 21st February 2019 and the project's first contribution on Wikipedia was on 18th October in the same year. We focused on changing how people see Wikipedia. We did encourage participants to address Wikipedia as editors, not just readers. We were able to organize two editions of the project. The first edition was held from October 2019 to March 2020. Nine participants created 45 articles and uploaded 15 photos on Wikimedia Commons. The second edition was held from 1st July to 19th August 2020. 12 participants created 95 articles and uploaded more than 100 photos on Wikimedia Commons. We also organized events in response to local, regional, and global occasions. And here are some of our activities. We organized an editathon celebrating the Day of Arbic Language, which was held online on 18th December 2020 and lasted for a week. 15 participants created 50 articles. We were a co-organizer Wikipedia 20 Per Day in Egypt, which was held physically on 15th January 2021. 15 participants created 27 articles. We organized the Archaeological Size Documentation Editathon, which started 21st January 2021 and lasted for two weeks. It was a collaboration with the Faculty of Art Archaeology Department. 14 students added more than 180,000 files to create articles or improve existing ones. We have the local editathon on the Healthy Environment from 23rd April to 13th 2021 as a part of Wiki for Human Rights Campaign, which resulted in 39 articles created by 18 participants. We were a co-organizer in Wikigub Egypt 2020 and 2021. In 2020, there were 80 participants who created 101 articles and in 2021, there were 42 participants who created more than 500 articles. With a one and a half year, more than 170 contributors from different Arab countries participated in the Wikipedian Editor Project and added more than 850 articles to Arabic Wikipedia. The third edition of the project is running now. During August, we are focusing on creating and improving articles on Wikipedia, teaching participants how to upload photos on Wikimedia Commons and how to create new items in Wikidata for articles created. Voice recording for Arabic poetry, which is available on Wikisource, is objective is to provide audible versions on Wikimedia Commons. To all Wikibedia readers, huge efforts were exerted by many volunteers to improve Wikipedia and sister projects. Don't judge a book by its cover. Instead, go and start your first article. If you don't have time to help, then at least show appreciation and don't misestimate the contributions of others. To Wikipedia dinosaurs, also known as old editors, when you have a new idea to help others, don't hesitate to begin with that. Just start and you'll find a lot of support from people around. It's your mission to make Wikipedia and sister projects seen in the right way. Just one article. Can it change one's judgment on Wikipedia? And you are the one who must help newcomers do that.