 G'day mate, 40 here. Got some pretty disturbing news on Twitter. All right, official say official say, so you better take it seriously. Surging Twitter anti-semitism unites fringe encourages violence. Who says this? Officials say. So you know that they're interested, pragmatic, non-ideological, just seeing reality for what it is. Online comments often lead to real-world actions social media experts warn. Okay, and what's the evidence for this? I'm really looking forward to seeing the evidence for this. Current and former federal officials. Whoa. Current and former federal officials say, what do you have to do to become an official? Like what sort of credentials do you need? A surge in hate speech and disinformation. All right, both completely subjective categories. There's no objective definition of hate speech that would not include the Bible, for example. Disinformation in the eye of the observer. Disinformation about Jews and Twitter is uniting and popularizing some of the same extremists who have helped push people to engage in violent protests, including the January 6, 2021 attack on Congress. Well, the January 6 protestors didn't kill anyone. So you have the Black Lives Matter protests, which were responsible for thousands and thousands of murders, extra murders in the United States. So I'm just curious. Is a surge in hate speech about white people and disinformation about police? Did that unite and popularize the same extremists who would go on to murder thousands of people in the United States? So officials are predicting that Twitter will contribute to more violence in the months ahead. So what do you think is going to cause the most violence in the months ahead? Right wing disinformation about Jews and online hate speech or the effects of Black Lives Matter and its elite allies who push, you know, burger's claims about structural racism in police force. So citing the proliferation of extreme content. So if it wasn't on Twitter, would people really have that part of the time finding it? Cleaning support for genocide or Nazis by celebrities with white followings? So Kanye West, right? As a Christian says he has to love everyone, including Hitler and Nazis, right? Really that's support for genocidal Nazis because he's taking the Christian approach that you need to love everyone. And the reemergence of QAnon, proselytizers and white nationalists. So can you look at the well over 10,000 people who've been murdered by Black Lives Matter, the massive increase in traffic deaths and pedestrian deaths that have been spurred by Black Lives Matter because police have dialed back on law enforcement. And then how many people are being killed by QAnon? Like a dozen, a few dozen? I mean it seems like 1,000, every 1,000 deaths on the Black Lives Matter side, you have like one death on the QAnon side. Okay, since billionaire entrepreneur, so billionaire, you know he's a bad guy, Elon Musk or Twitter, he slashed more than half the start, including most of the people who make judgment calls about what counts as impermissible slurs against religious or ethnic groups. Very scary, I wonder what officials say. So even before mass takeover, some Twitter users were encouraging confrontations with transgender people, meaning they weren't going along with how these transgender activists wanted to be addressed. And so that is that is bad, right? You don't support someone's change in identity and you're doing violence to them. This is not tolerance as just allowing this as tolerance as in you must support their new identity. And others who were falsely depicted as groomers. Okay, so all sorts of non-racists get falsely depicted as racist all the time, right? There are a lot of slurs that we throw around, it's just inherent part of the human condition. We think that we come up with nasty names for people, groomers. Like I want to take back the term grooming so that it needs something good. Like grooming used to mean good things, like how do you think I look so amazing this morning? Because I am well groomed, right? I would like to think that all my years in charm school, right? All my years in seventh-adventure school and public school, they groomed me to be the online sensation that I am today. Speaking to you from Kujia, Australia with seven live viewers. And I was groomed, but it was a good kind of grooming. It wasn't a bad kind of grooming. We need to take back the term grooming and groomers to mean people who do good things, right? Who educate, who inspire, who guide, right? Who help, you know, bring out the inherent goodness in every individual. Let's take back the term grooming. Let's make it a positive term. Okay, the new wave of anti-Semitism has reached millions of people. It's brought new followers and helped galvanize the broader coalition of fringe figures. So I suspect that this broader coalition of fringe figures is going to self-destruct all on its own. The fine anti-Semitism. How many actual anti-Semitic violent hate crimes are being committed? It's weird how they try to conflate the spreading conspiracy theories with violence. I'm not buying it. Absolutely. I totally agree with you, Alexander. And how come? There's no single category even of anti- Gentileism, right? For just as many proportionally Jews fear and have negative feelings towards non-Jews as non-Jews have towards Jews. But officials say, okay, we got our first official here, Denver Riggleman. I had a former Air Force intelligence officer and later served as a Republican member of Congress. Then was on the staff of the House Committee investigating the January 6th attack. Okay, so distinguished man, like credentials I don't have, Air Force intelligence officer, Republican congressman on the staff of the January 6th committee. Okay, let's call him an official. This type of escalation and hate and dehumanization, the hatred of the Jewish population is really a directed target. Violence is inevitable. Yeah, but if you allow people to drive cars, right, if you allow people to own knives, you know, violence is inevitable. The question is, what is the correlation between hate speech and online disinformation against Jews and violence directed at Jews? Is it a high correlation or a low correlation? Are there other things that correlate more highly? And I suspect this is very low correlation. There have been nasty words flung around for thousands of years and only on occasion do they lead to actual violence. They only lead to actual violence when there are profound conflicts of interest between groups. All right, there's one official. Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday warned that domestic terrorists were maintaining a visible presence online. So what constitutes a domestic terrorist? Like, I would think that if you cross out my terrorist, they had committed violent actions. But I suspect when they talk about violent domestic terrorists, these are people haven't actually committed any violent crimes. In attempts to motivate supporters to conduct attacks, I think the whole Kanye West, Nick Fuentes, Milo phenomenon will probably turn more normies against anti-Semitism than toward them because it just looks so ridiculous. Really, he, Kanye, in a full face mask, appearing on Alex Jones, I don't think those people are going to think that's absolutely ridiculous. Okay, so Department of Homeland Security was their increased risk for racial and religious minorities and gays and transgender people as well as government institutions. Well, the greatest risk they face is the increase in risk of violence unleashed by Black Lives Matter and the increase in traffic accidents, traffic deaths, pedestrian deaths, again unleashed by Black Lives Matter and elite wars against policing. So, at least it backed off. People would behave worse, more people die. Recent incidents have highlighted the enduring threat to faith-based communities including the Jewish community. Yeah, I have been in Jewish life pretty intensely for 29 years and there are very few faith-based institutes in Jewish life. I don't see any evidence and I don't think people are really talking about radical extreme ideas. Somehow, it looks in real life violence and it may very well at times, but what's the correlation compared to the enormous amount of violence that's being unleashed by Black Lives Matter and the whole deep, loose policing movement, the whole movement to let people out of prison? We know who commits the vast majority of violent crimes if we just kept these people locked up in prison until they're past age 40. All right? They're not going to go out there and commit a whole lot of new crimes. So yeah, where are these faith-based communities in Jewish life? And even if it does, it's constitutionally protected. This DHS bulletin made clear that online and offline conduct often reinforce each other in a cycle of escalation. Doesn't make that clear? Why does a bulletin, released by DHS bureaucrats, make clear this connection? I've got news for you. Just because a government department releases a report does not mean it's true. It doesn't mean it's accurate. It doesn't mean it's wise. It doesn't mean it correlates with reality. It just means that a government bureaucracy released the report. There's absolutely no inherent connection between a government bureaucracy releasing a report and truth. Sometimes they coincide, sometimes they don't. Where is this clear evidence that online and offline conduct reinforce each other in a cycle of escalation? In recent shootings at the Colorado Gate Bar drew praise online. Yeah, how and where do we draw the line when it comes to what we call this? Yeah, when you're directly calling for criminal behavior, then I think our legal system does a pretty good job at generally speaking of what constitutes incitement. So I'm happy with the law as it is written. So the recent shooting at the Colorado Gate Bar was done by someone who considers himself an up-binary. So a member of that community. They weren't radicalized haters by what's going on in Twitter. So DHS says the recent shooting in the Colorado Gate Bar drew praise online, encouraging potential conflict strikes. So Black Lives Matter goes mostly peaceful protests, 93% peaceful protests. Do you think they also stimulate more protests? Just seems to go towards minority report territory, persecuting people for anything even happens as the chat. But what about, you know, all the Black Lives Matter rhetoric and protests and criminal behavior? It seems pretty evident that these things drew praise online and encourage other similar behavior. New Jersey man was arrested last month after publishing an online manifesto for attacks on synagogues. And a second man was caught with a gun out to tweeting about plans to shoot up a synagogue and die. Okay, but is this correlating to Elon Musk taking on the Twitter? That just because it happened at the same time, all right, correlation there doesn't mean causation. The idea that there's a difference between online chatter and real-world harm is disabused by a decade of research. Okay, where is that research? This is Julia Cayenne. I know that she's just a relentless left winger. A security business founder and former assistant DHS secretary. Open expression on Twitter re-socializes the hate and rid society of the shaming that ought to occur regarding antisemitism. No, I didn't automatically dismiss this. I just want to know the evidence for it because in my reading of the literature, the evidence for this is rather slender. Most alarming to Joel Finkelstein. Okay, here's another official. He's a co-founder of the non-profit Network Contagion Research Institute. He's been the unification elevation of voices a little heard since the capital attack. So are they really unified? Really, like who's unified? I mean, we're talking about incredibly anti-social people. Like, I'm highly suspicious of claims that all these anti-social people on the extremes are being unified. Where's the evidence that there's unity? Like, these people can't hang together for more than a few weeks, generally speaking. That just makes me sense that his NGO, Network Contagion Research, the speech there, persecuting is not supported the way anti-white and a Christian rhetoric is. Yeah, so you can trash Christians and white people all day long and get very little playback for doing that. So it seems like most non-governmental organizations, like the Network Contagion Research Institute, are captured by the left. And so all these officials, they seem highly partisan. People want to create shooter profiles, identify red flags and rest monitor people for pre-crime, like go after the people terrorizing Chicago. Yeah, that's a good point. Okay, I lost my stream there, but we're back. All right, the National Contagion Research Institute, right, highly unbiased institute, I assume. He's been tracking various indicators that show anti-Semitism is on the rise, including fast-mortifying Twitter references to the New World Order, a bogus theory that features cosmopolitan elites, sometimes explicitly Jews, wrecking institutions and values of multiple nations to exert more control. So sometimes New World Order references are anti-Jewish, frequently they're not. I'm not a believer in the New World Order. I'm not scared by the New World Order. It just doesn't seem like a terribly impressive theory to me. Does it help, buddy? How? It's really going to lead to a multiplication in violent crime. Okay, Joel Finkelstein says, he's seldom seen anything as dramatic as what happened when the rapper-producer Kanye West came back to Twitter and posted clips from an appearance on the Internet show of bankrupt fabulous Alex Jones, where he said, there are a lot of things that I love about him. Yeah, this is unique. Kanye West has been doing the last few weeks. It is unique, it is dramatic, it is compelling, but more in a train crash kind of way than in the way that this is going to be shaping hearts and minds. What kind of normie is going to look at Kanye West trajectory over the past six weeks and say, oh yeah, I want that in my life? It's not thus that Yee said something to his 32 million followers on Twitter that even most Nazis keep themselves. It was that he let the band Alex Jones, the racist Nick Fuentes, tweet from his account, and he gained followers since proclaiming on Twitter he was going death con three on Jewish people. Okay, just because you get followers and attention doesn't mean people support you. Is a train of rank quality to what Kanye West is doing? It's good to use a finally speaking up for themselves. They should remember they vastly outnumbered white blood thirsty Christians. So I was listening to J. F. R. B. He says that Kanye West is blowing up his finances so he doesn't have to send so much money to his ex-wife Kim Kardashian. So it's not uncommon when men after getting into a war settlement they're not too happy with that they decide to blow up their finances. So just because Kanye has gotten a lot of attention doesn't mean that people are going to buy into what he's selling. All right, if a naked man read by right now I look up and wonder what the heck's going on but I would not be persuaded to follow him. I would not be more likely to get naked myself. I would not start running around stark raving naked. I think the reason the mainstream media is comfortable mentioning Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes names because they have no social media there's no easy way to follow them. Kanye is using anti-semitism to popularize a long list of actors who have been censored for a long time. Trolls are climbing over the walls to start new accounts. This is a bonanza. Okay, even when Nick Fuentes was being censored and shut down by all the mainstream forms of social media he still had over 80,000 live viewers on election night at least he did in 2018. So people who wanted Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones, Milo content were able to access it. Yeah, their reach was probably restricted somewhat and these pigeons are really making a racket. I'm trying to produce a very respectable show here and these pigeons are making it hard for me to keep pumping out this high quality content with such supreme audio visual quality. Bloody hell. So very scary all these officials saying we've got surging anti-semitism. So researchers said that Elon Musk is not going enough to counter hate speech. What the heck? My phone is going haywire. So many of these activist groups are mad because all the people they used to have a direct line to at Twitter and they long have a direct line to it because they've been laid off. So Elon Musk has just slashed the trust and safety team. The average boomer or zoomer who only knows how to use apps and see Nick Fuentes names has no way of seeing his side of the story. Is it that hard to find Nick Fuentes content? So these NGOs saying they're getting fewer responses to their complaints. Anti-defamation League said the proportion of tweets it reports that lead to a suspension fall by half. I think that's a good thing. I'm not really thrilled that an ethnic lobby like the Anti-defamation League gets to decide social media policies for billions of people around the world. So Finkelstein says his group has stopped reporting anything to Twitter because all of his contacts at Twitter are gone. So these officials say racism and anti-semitism work to draw attention. Yeah there are a lot. You can you can release a sex tape and that will draw attention. But if Glyde Medley finally released his back catalogue of sex tapes, celebrity sex tapes, he would get a tremendous amount of attention. I'm not sure it would lead to people following his behavior or following his political views or social views. There are a ton of ways to get attention. It doesn't necessarily mean that people are going to follow you. So the pigeons here are very bold, very bold indeed. They just come right up to you. They have no fear, no shame. It's so safe here in Australia like even the even the birds, even the animals feel safe. So extreme views get engagement from supporters, critics. Right that's true. The more intense, the more emotional content you put out online, the more interaction you'll get. But this comes with an enormous price. So extreme views get engagement from supporters and profit. Yeah there's an element of that. It also leads to people burning out really quickly. Not a lot of people have managed to sustain themselves. Australia is now the kind of urban population that we have here in the States. Yeah it's just so remarkably safe and I'm looking around they can't quite put my finger on it. Like how is Sydney like so different from Los Angeles? I just can't quite put my finger on what's doing it. So they're concerned, the officials are concerned that extremism gets engagement and reap gets profits. Yeah it also burns out. Like you can release a sex tape and you might be have to make some money from it but it'll come with an enormous price to your long-term welfare. And so political, cultural, religious extremism too. It can get the tension but it's going to come with an enormous price to your long-term welfare. So Andrew Anglin apparently is backed and Twitter's software is recommending that people following him. Does controversy create cash? It can at times but it's not so simple. It's not like a one-to-one correlation. Like I've had more in my share of controversy in my time but it hasn't really led to a windfall of cash. And there was one other article here that I wanted to show. It is Xi Jinping. He's going on a charm offensive. So why is the dictator of China going on a charm? A more pragmatic Xi Jinping launches a global charm offensive for China. Why is he doing that? Because the way he's been doing things hasn't worked. China's in trouble. China's falling apart. There's widespread hatred for China by other countries. The Chinese people increasingly loathe Xi and the Chinese Communist Party. So here's the Washington Post article. More pragmatic. It's just a pragmatic guy now. Xi Jinping launches a global charm offensive for China. So for three years he stayed close to during COVID. Now he's been on a global charm offensive. He's met formerly with 26 heads of state because he's in trouble. Like all these signs every day there's like some new sign, new indicator that China's in a bit of bother. So Xi is facing a wave of internal dissent not seen since Tiananmen Square. Triggered by his zero COVID policies. He has been a terrible leader of China the past few years. And just makes terrible decisions. The people hate him. Yeah, Putin more secure than Xi says the chat. So you have protesters rallying in Beijing last week declaring we don't want a dictatorship. Police are knocking on people's doors detaining them for attending demonstrations. And Xi keeps meeting with heads of states of other nations. So Xi has changed from the combative wolf warrior style, right, which is how he's operated for years. So he's working to repair strained ties and improved a damaged international image. In other words, China is low. China is hated inside China and outside China. And China is in increasingly desperate financial position. Increasingly desperate internal security position, increasingly desperate economic position, increasingly desperate trade vulnerabilities, increasingly desperate technological challenges, right. So every day new signs that China is in trouble. The world is changing. China is changing. So there's one professor. Thank you so much professor. So Xi diplomacy. I also think there's resistance in the government in China to Xi's military bustering. Yeah, would any of us be shocked if you were assassinated, killed, overthrown in a coup in the next few weeks, few months? All right. United States is increasingly cracking down on China, restricting the flow of technology to China. Xi is suffering problems with legitimacy at home. He's got rising domestic turmoil. And he made, seems when you dialogue with liberals, it is never ending unwinnable battle of proving that you're not racist. Yeah, this is what Ronnie Goodman points out in his conservative claims of cultural oppression. So Kanye's saying, yeah, I'm those things. So what? You've been ingested. It's an advanced response. Yeah, obviously, if you play on the liberal playing field, it's going to be very hard to win. If you continually doing battle on the enemies playing field, it doesn't usually work so well. So Xi met for three hours with Biden. He's just traveling around the world, right? He's trying to ease tensions. Why do people want to ease tensions because the tension is not working out in their favor? Because they're afraid of the trajectory that they're on in China and Xi Jinping should be very afraid. Now, I'm not back in Australia permanently. I plan to be back in Los Angeles at the end of January. So during COVID, Chinese officials hit back aggressively against criticism of the country's role in the pandemic against the suppression of the Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities has cracked down on pro-democracy demonstrators in Hong Kong. It's escalating threats towards Taiwan in support of Russia during the President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine. So that was the bellicose Chinese response. Is anti-Semitism bad? I haven't encountered any. No, it's not bad. So there have been occasional outbreaks, a little bit here, a little bit there, but over the past 25 years, things have been pretty good for the Jews in Australia. I mean, they've been, I've never been to Iraq. So Australia, I'd say in 1918, someone described Australia as the place in the world least influenced by Jews. So quite say 1930, like Australia had was a country with like only the 30th most Jews in the world. Now it's in the top 10 for Jews in the world. A lot of Jews came during the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s. So there are about 100,000 identifying Jews in Australia, about 200,000 overall. So they're about 0.5 of the Australian population. The community has tended to be insular. Jewish leaders here in Australia have not tended to speak out on political issues. Jews don't dominate discourse in Australia like they do in America. There isn't a big Jewish intellectual movement. There aren't publications equivalent to commentary magazine here. So if you looked at, say, the most influential Australians, Jews would probably comprise about 5%. But when it comes to the richest Australians, then Jews may be as high as 50%, depending on how you calculate it. But Jews have mainly excelled in Australia in the realm of business, particularly Jews of Hungarian origins. Billionaires are probably about half Jewish, but a community much more insular. I've always thought of Australia as having a large ethnic Irish and Spanish population. Yeah, you also have lots of Italians, Greeks, Lebanese, Turks, and Asians. So the country was originally primarily English and still strongly Anglo-Saxon. But the Jewish community here doesn't speak out as much as in America, not as influential as they are in America. They keep quieter. They're very well organized, clearly harmonious between themselves in Australia. So I welcomed a German Chancellor to Beijing called for the two countries to seek common ground in the time of change in chaos. So if you're going out there seeking common ground with other people, it's because you need it. Brazil is a large Jewish community in Rio, but they're very under the radar. Yeah, the Jewish community in Australia largely plays under that radar. If I ever have facial hair again, I may be nervous. I don't have a strong opinion on it. So Xi Jinping is no longer the Wolf Warrior. He's trying to leave behind him his bitter, angry, sharp warrior diplomacy because China is losing the global PR game, it's losing alliances, it's losing friends. And so also Xi is trying to strengthen his hand at home by showing how well they can get on with other nations because he's now facing, yeah, look out ladies, the topless streamer is prowling Australia, the Dutson bad son. Yeah, about to go for a dip in the water, mate. In American June, the times I like my community did not be as political in part because the politics are liberal and I am not liberal. So Australian Jewish politics pretty much down the center. So there isn't a hard left domination of Australian Jewish life as there is in America. So yeah, Xi is trying to strengthen his hold on power by filling Chinese social media and lose with images of him meeting with other world leaders. They're trying to glorify Xi Jinping, show a grandiose return of China and Xi Jinping to the world stage, that China is back as Xi Jinping is back and stronger. But in reality, both China and Xi Jinping are in a lot of trouble. And so people tend to get very charming when they get into a lot of trouble. Yeah, I don't think he's going to do such a great job hanging on. So he's backing way off on the confrontation that we did go after Justin Trudeau. That was a widely shared media where Xi Jinping goes after Justin Trudeau. That was pretty funny. But with pretty much everyone else, Xi Jinping is trying to make nice. Okay, it's time for me to jump in the ocean, swim about, dive into the waves. Talk to you later. Bye, bye.