 I mean, some people even say, I'm doing open source because I'm buying Red Hat, which doesn't really make a lot of sense. But well, look, baseline doing open source means having a project that is under an open source license. So an Apache license, a GPL license, really any of the licenses that are approved under the open source definition that is maintained by the open source initiative. That said, as you mentioned, most of the times it doesn't just take throwing some code out there in GitHub. A, to build a community. B, to actually solve critically strategic problems for an industry, like sort of looking at doing here between Fianos and the Digital Dollar Project and Hyperledger. And so I think it's not by chance that most of the critical components of the internet, like Linux, Kubernetes, Node.js, are actually not only open source, but they're openly governed under third party non-profit entities like the Linux Foundation, or Fianos, or Hyperledger. Because otherwise, generally, open source just in GitHub falls critically short when you have political and really strategic interests around the project and commercial interests around the project. So I'm a big fan of promoting open governance, not for every single open source project, but for the type of projects where you have competitors in different constituencies collaborating amongst each other. I don't know what you guys think. I might add that if we think about the alternative, so you have vendor software, platform-created software. It's incumbent upon them to gather a wide range of industry input to build the right thing. And then it's done in a deeply proprietary manner behind closed doors. And that business model is to then generate a massive amount of trust in that it's highly effective, safe, secure code. Alternatively, for certainly the utility or common applications that support the entirety of financial services or other industries, there's a really appealing alternative in open source, which is because everyone can see the open source code, the quality of that code is provably better, generally. And this is coming from someone who helps develop software. There's a Linux port. It's an order of magnitude, fewer bugs per line of code in open source because everyone can see it. And by definition, and I think that's phenomenal, and then therefore that ability to address security, the cost advantages of having multiple parties engage with it is all incredibly compelling. So this notion of developing, recognizing our common needs and then being able to get a community rallied around building quality code to address those needs just is, I think, more and more critical.