 So, sticking with the government theme, we're going to talk about government reference architecture now. And to do that, it's a pleasure to introduce Juan Pablo Revello, who is the chief solutions architect at Agisic, which is the agency for e-government and information society in Uruguay. As a computer engineer, Juan specialized in information systems and data management technology. And as Agisic's chief solutions architect, he leads a team of architects and who are responsible for the enterprise architecture of the Uruguayan e-government platform. So it's a big job and hopefully a big warm welcome for Juan Pablo Revello. Welcome Juan. Hello to everyone. Thank you Steve for the introduction and the presentation. I want to talk about our experience and our work with enterprise architecture, especially with our framework. I think you have my slide over there. Juan, before you get started, can you turn up your volume a bit? It's quite quiet Juan. If you can get closer to the microphone or speak a bit louder, that would work. And you can control the slide. So if you click on the slide deck with your cursor, you'll then be able to move the slides yourself by using the up and down arrows to the left of the slides. Thank you. Can you listen to me now? It's better. It's a little bit better. Obviously attendees can turn up their volume, but if you could speak a bit louder, that would be helpful. Thank you. Okay, I will speak louder because the volume is at the top. So I don't know what's happening. I'll move on. There you go. Okay, the agenda for my presentation is first a brief introduction to digital to set the context and the development of the country in digital services. Then how we started with enterprise architecture with the digital services architecture. Then the integrated development architecture will be built. And the architecture community we developed for the, for the government and finally the next steps. Okay, I have a short video here, but I will show you the link in the chat so you can watch it later after my presentation. So we avoid problems with the audience. The main concept of the video provides a global leader in the use of digital technologies that has become a regional and global benchmark of digital and global warming in transparency and democracy. We raise some members of digital nations, a group of the most advanced digital countries. The nations is a collaborative network of the worst in the digital world with a common goal of increasing digital technology to improve citizen life. As I think provides, you know, the digital services services that make life easier for its system. And one of the most advanced and the Italian society in digital development. For some 10 years of digital government, we have positioned itself at the forefront as a regional and global benchmark in digital development. These are demonstrated by the characters and also by the experiences that have been taken as an example and model, such as the digital inclusion of children and old adults with their own computer and tablets. Life stock traceability, digital services, digital make a record from the digital signature for entire population. It's about using technology as a means to guarantee the digital rights of digital citizens. So you can check out the video after I finish my presentation. That was a nice summary of our development. Okay. One of the main goals is how we started with the infrastructure in particular with the application. Is that the at the end of the previous moment term in 2020 was that all public services should be available online. Usually, after many South American countries, each public organization has a different maturity level and development and knowledge of the use of IT. So we have some organizations with well-built and solid ideas. And in the other hand, we have a lot of organizations that only have an IT department for near a home or domestic support. So when we started, we didn't know even how many digital services we had in the government. We can convince that to carry out this initiative efficiently and optimally, it was necessary to have a different approach to digitize one by one. So we began to model the different types of digital services, finding patterns by category and share assets. So the objectives we said were that we need to have an integrated vision. We need to order the cows, find a common language between IT and business and between public and private organizations. We want to take the next step from interoperability to integration and promote an efficient use of digital services in the government. At this point, we started to study the enterprise architecture framework. We select the TOGAF standard for establish an architecture that guides public organizations in the framework of technology infrastructure, databases, applications, and the use of information systems. This architecture was built based on TOGAF standard, allowing a unified view of the architectures of the technological solutions that support the digital services. To clarify this framework, this digital services architecture, I will give you some samples of the definitions of solutions for each of the minds. Starting with business minds, we want to align the objectives of the organization with the purpose of the digital services. Not all the digital services have a main purpose for IT. So we want to have this alignment. We want to specify the standard for mining the services with DBM notation, 2.0, and talking about information systems or application and data domain. We promote the adoption of a different solutions and we should arise solutions for the entire government, like a single-time non-government solution that gives one user for all public organization. We realized that a lot of digital services must have a payment gateway, so we did one, an accessibility solution that makes transparency for citizens that allow the user to know the steps of their services. We also built a unique digital service catalog. Going to the technological domain, we already have a suite of technological solutions, such as a technical and labor interoperability framework, a private optical network called UI that connects all the private agencies, an involvement cloud where we bring software as a service, platform as a service, and infrastructure as a service. We have two more domains to the framework that ties with the performance, and especially in security, when for the adoption of digital signature and digital identity, the development of the digital services, and try to convince all the partners of personal data protection that will have some many laws about this topic, but we want to convince from this domain for the public organization. At some point, we built the framework for digital service architecture that allow us to have an overview of all the government, like one enterprise, and we realized that was really a success for the main goal that we have to achieve. So, we want to generalize the experience, and we built an executable framework called the integrated development architecture, like a standard tailoring, the top standard tailoring. We have a limited framework to the general principles and two crosscutting domains that are security and performance. We want to apply the framework in other strategic domains, and to be a reference for polarization to build their own architectures. The content of the framework is first a general architecture vision, then the label framework inside the general principles, and we have reference model for each domain, including the new ones, security and performance, and for each model, we have directives, recommendations, guidance, best practices, standards, and problems. About the new domains, first of all, security, we already have a cybersecurity framework, and it was a good way for interact with other domains. And in performance, we want to promote the measurement of results and performance for the different domains and different goals of each organization. In this slide, we can see the complete vision of the framework. In the left side, we have integrated development architecture, which is the last tailoring with the reference models and the continuing development and the representatives. On the right side, we have the integrated reference architecture, like we call this a strategic domain architecture. We have the digital service reference architecture that we already talked about. We have another about the special data reference architecture and the e-health reference architecture. We now are working in building and education reference architecture. And we want to talk about the e-health reference architecture that provides an overview of how the e-health national record platform is developed. We have the digital ecosystem and the model for each framework domain with its necessary specifications to be part of the platform. We have integrated to allow a new hospital or health institution in the country to understand how the e-health national record solution works and to see what team they have to develop to be part of the ecosystem. Having the health reference architecture was an advantage last year when we had to create the COVID application for the availability of the infected people. We have an application with the old hospital and private institutions through the e-health platform. And finally, in the bottom, we have the different public organizations that build their own reference architecture based on the e-government architecture framework. Along with the repository, we have the Knowledge Center. The Knowledge Center is a public wiki where we document and share all our work. We have now two Knowledge Centers, one for the for interoperability, another for enterprise architecture, where is all the documents about the integrated e-government architecture framework. We also have the building blocks. Here we have a new concept of building blocks that are the data building blocks. We call data building blocks, such as vocabularies, metadata, referential data, and open data. Open data is an independent initiative in the country and we link to this building block to have a complete vision of the data organization. The architecture building blocks have the integrated architectures, architectures pattern, and IT reference architecture. And in the solution building blocks, we have a solution that the agency brings as a service and the public software initiative that already exists. But we also link for this, for the bureaucracy, for the domain, and to how the complete vision. About the continuous, we want to improve the process of contraction of the reference architectures. We receive feedback about the repository and the framework itself and the different interoperability reference architectures. We work on architecture evolution cycles and help the public organization with some first steps guidelines, like answering the typical question, how do we start? OK, about the community. In the past, we have run some workshops, webinars, and training courses on enterprise architecture, and especially about the work standard. We see attendees motivated by the initiative and felt that they could apply the knowledge in the organization, but then we saw that the issue didn't work. This also felt distant of us to ask for help or some guidance. So we realized that the real value was in the discussion and knowledge sharing that we can have within the government. And we have this kind of discussion in the workshops and the webinars, but then we lost. So we want to build a direct channel with our colleagues in this way. The last year we created the architecture community inside the government. We've had three meetings with people from 10 different political sessions. And this year we are going to have monthly meetings where we discuss different topics. Fortunately, we find new collaborators and new speakers and references in our public agency. And we find space to engage more people with this topic. And finally, our next steps are work with more integrated reference architecture. As I said before, we are working with education reference architecture. We want to have a similar to the health national records reference architecture. And we also are working with digital documents, administrative management that are legal process inside the government like digital files or digital notification for citizens and business. We also want to adopt a shell meteorologies in the enterprise architecture development. We want to match these two different words that we are working to. I'm very glad to listen to the previous presentations about a child and digital website. We have the enterprise architecture. And in the other side, we have the left circles and the school to change and the scum meteorologies that we are applying in the project. And we think they can be combined to get a better result of the world. The tool of the enterprise architecture can be used to have a complete vision of the organization and to analyze the impact of it. And into the mind of new solutions or requirements. And then an assignment that can be used to execute approaches to achieve the target architecture with a better time to market solution and user center that in our case are the citizens. Luckily, the open book has published that you have a draft of the project framework standard that we are studying and trying to learn from it. So, this is our experience. I will quickly, we don't relate with our agenda. Thank you very much Juan. Thank you very much indeed. That's a, it's a quite a project that's going on there and good to see the progress so far. And that'd be interesting at some point to hear to hear how it goes along the way as well. So, and so a big virtual round of applause. Please fuck one.