 and we need to try to figure out how to connect to those. So we can use those buildings with inter-community to create new initiatives, and we can use the building to get to those new options right now. Yeah, that's what I was going to say. Yeah, that's what I was going to say. Repeat what she said for the rest of the group. I don't know that anyone can hear what she said other than your table, if there was something to have. Yeah, that's what I was going to say. Actually, that's exactly what I was going to say. Confliction of immigration and social distancing. Who is your spokesperson? I'm an officer, I'm an American and I'm a technical engineer. I promise the Heart City is ready for autonomous vehicles, which is, I think, a key aspect of becoming a smart city. It's one of the big areas that are already growing. We've already seen tests that are running out of this autonomous vehicle. It's here, it's not coming in yet. And we need to be safe on the stage together anyway. So the first aspect we look at was the legal aspect. Today, I think, in Kansas and Missouri, we don't have a lot of legislation around how autonomous vehicles will be managed, how they'll be run, how insurance is going to be managed, whether it's going to be legislation for getting into an accident so the group has the liability for an autonomous vehicle. So I think that's a big area that needs to start being addressed now for managing the move towards autonomous vehicles. Next, we start talking about some of the neighbors and technology around enabling the autonomous vehicles that are coming in the look here. The type of infrastructure that you're going to need to enable the autonomous driving, all the gestural current networks, they're going to need a lot of granular information, localised information. And a lot of that data can't be going from your ICP to a server in California and coming all the way back to Kansas when you need really real time processing the information to manage these autonomous cars. So looking at low latency, local hosting of information is key to being able to allow us to operate safely within the city. Looking at what sort of vehicle providers and pilots are going to be allowed to come and start driving in the city is important. Who are going to be your manufacturer? So who are you going to sign agreements with? How are you actually going to start? So to start making your legislation, you can't just work from the next stage. You probably need a pilot to look at the impact in the city. Look at how it's really working and start to drive all of those other areas. The next area, aside from the good technology, is what are the business drivers of reading events in the city? Surely you've got the technology. Sure, we know everyone's doing it, but how's the city reading in the benefit of this? Is it going to, are the business drivers the economy enables through more efficient businesses or efficient use of our roads? Or are there more direct revenue streams that can be taken from it? Things like the I-70 Technology Improvement Project, which could be looking at sustainable technology or sustainable business drivers that could self-find the improvements and improvements of those type of roads. And the other technology drivers, energy availability and sustainability, what type of energy systems are we going to be using? We've got electric systems, gas power systems, and fuel cells. I don't care if you know already running out there, electric vehicle chargers all throughout the city and it's a good step forward towards that time. But really, before you can see the city going in terms of supporting these technologies and these types of energies, when you're looking at sharing the economy, you may have someone picking up a car and driving in two blocks down. They all admit they're in driven two blocks down, but they also made a car and they picked it up by the next person. And is that part going to have enough energy? How do you take it off the system to recharge it and put it back on the system to be used? I'm sure you might. Then we started talking about some existing projects that are interesting and applicable to this integrated roadway project, which is looking at precast railway and pavement chunks that already have lots of sensors and Wi-Fi availability that can be used to kind of gather data about how to be used and additional connectivity. I mentioned the I-70 road to tomorrow and how that can be used to generate revenue for software sustainability. And the other big area that can help to drive pilots would be Kansas City's applications and the DOT Global Initiative. And if they get on to that, it certainly helps to drive the tech up. And the next thing we started to get is talking about can drive a lot of speculation. But what are the long-term impacts of a move towards automation? I mean, it can go so many different directions and we were talking about 300 years ago if you were talking about the move to the vehicle from a horse. What do you think would have happened to a horse to Kansas City if you drove it to Kansas City? You drove it to Kansas City in your horse today and how would that be taken in? And try to apply the same mindset to electric vehicles in the future. How are all the industry and revenue streams around the current self-driven vehicles things more than just insurance companies that traffic violations finds? Parking management, all of those type of things that exist around the self-driven industry. How do those evolve or do they go away completely in the future of the automotive vehicles? And what are they replaced by one of the new areas of focus in the automotive vehicle? And some of the other benefits like reducing drug driving and DUIs and things like that. And then I'll finish off by just taking the focus for now that we should be doing the steps we should be doing now to make it happen. It's looking at so many automated cars so that you can start to face the end to the cities laying out whether that's laid into whether it's areas that are also going to be used as well. Starting to get the harder projects going so you can start working on the legislation aspects as I'm drafting those bills and figuring out how we can enable it in the city. And then also looking at other industries and all the just cars, things like logistics and trucks and all those and transporting goods and drones and all of those other aspects and all of those cars. So those are the highlights of our topic here. So, we had quite a bit of discussion that something that isn't captured here. Which is, what is the problem with this? Which is, what is this, sir? Which is, what is the problem with the role of autonomous vehicles as long as we're the same bunch of money there are many places that do transportation much better than we do already as friends in New York. So just because we can does mean we should and the question is, where should autonomous vehicles go? And where should we do more prevention in New York? Great, thank you. Thank you very much. All right, stage three, high quotes. So we explored, what did we explore? We explored how the city can promote citizens to build apps or to promote and improve mobility and transit within the city. One thing we noticed at the outset was since there's been a profound mindset, mind shift among the cities, pretty universally from one which maybe 10 years ago cities treated data sets and other information as proprietary software saying it's not available to the public and you have to fight in the screen to get hold of those data sets even if your population was free, better public service and use of public transit. Now it seems every city is throwing its data sets at the people to do whatever they can and will to be able to improve public transit. So I think that's a good step forward and it looks like there's lots of experiments around the world. So we spoke our conceptions down into I guess three categories. One is empowering citizens who are already able have the technical tools to build the apps, what kind of city to do in that context. The other is helping the city empower and encourage those who are not in the tech side to participate in the building of applications and tool sets and other ones taking advantage of those tool sets. And the third category which we didn't really address is how can we encourage corporations to play a significant role in the creation of apps for the public good. But in the first area, power exists is to build apps. I think they're all pretty self-abundant to this point. I think almost every city where it's solved is over to recognize that you need to have cities not serving active amounts and the data sets and let the games begin. Citizens do what they can. Lots of great examples. One particularly good example that Nicaria introduced us to with some club ride with me in Chicago app that was built to help kids who are afraid to travel through potentially dangerous areas to harness social media and GPS to be able to travel with friends across the city. Let's see. There were some talks about cities working to promote citizen technology competency and the use of data sets. It doesn't take much to learn how to use those data sets and build a few scripts to build some interesting apps to change the life within your city or even within your own neighborhood. We didn't take that to the hyper local level very much back there. Most of the apps, the two of objects that are really built for the upwardly mobile, which are white neighborhoods within the city. Some things that we need to do right now are pretty tools to the more general institutions in the city. Let's see. For those citizens who are otherwise not tech savvy, the suggestion was that there should be more ability to allow them to participate in crowdsourcing and information, build the apps and then be populated by those citizens, all the citizens that are both tech savvy and those are not to share information, real-time information about hot holes, about broken lights, real-time information about bus location, et cetera, which in the U.S. is not available. Human sensors, which I think indicates a lot of profound legal and personal data issues, but that's certainly another tool of the city could be experimented to allow for better information of the time data across the city. We didn't really talk about having encourage corporations to play in a more vital role. But then we had a couple of thoughts on that. Maybe I'll talk about projects and protect stuff. A couple of the projects we thought out was, one was a thought that maybe cities could create a real-time, real-space device lands. These device lands would be places where a city and corporations would populate the location with all the devices that anyone could use so that anyone who's building apps in the city can test them across the entire platform, across all the generations of iPhone, across all the generations of Android, across not just smart phone technology, but just the traditional mobile devices, across all the different software built on this phone. So you know everyone in the city who's got a mobile device is able to use the app so that's just the way it's possible. One other thought, sort of every city around the world is trying to do something about it. So I'd say we should convene, perhaps, a global demo day. Oh, I'm done. I didn't know what time. Global demo day. I'll scour and scrape and get the desks and bleeds for all the apps around the world so that no city should have the meaning over all the apps without sharing for the rest of the world. Transit out to get people to work and get students to school and be a nice quick demo and use the app for a time to build a city and over the use and retention of data sets. All right. Thank you, Jonathan. We're going to move right into our next panel. We're done with this. If I can get our next, we've got one more. And I want the three people, Eric, Bob, and Joe, if you want to make your way to the chairs in the front, then we will move right into the next session after we hear from the game forwarder and do a delivery back. John, thank you. Our question was how to be in the rich alternative forms of transportation. The things we've been talking about for the day and a half. It seems to us in our discussion that it all begins with making decisions about what we want to do, what we want to be like as a city. And so that's a policy decision. Why would we even consider alternative forms of transportation? One is that it's clear that the solutions that we've been building and operating really don't work well for everybody, right? And Kansas City is a good example of that. Maybe our traditional transport's OK in the urban core. But what about a length? And what about the connection in north of the river and in Blue Springs, if we sum it, really doesn't work so well. And Hays. Big partner. And Hays. And that's not quite Kansas City. And another reason is closing the equity gap. We're going to talk about today. But when there's a huge economic opportunity in South Overland Park and folks here in the city can access it easily, then does it become a civil rights kind of question or an environmental justice? And is that a basis for a policy shift? Or perhaps it's simply, what do we want to be like in the future? What is the urban form? Do we want to continue to have the kind of urban form that we're all familiar with here in Kansas City? And where do works like sustainability agree and so forth coming to be? It starts with policy. And as technology people, we're not in charge of policy. But how could we affect it? So to follow on with that, the whole Smart Cities initiative is important in policy. Because as Kansas City is showing all of us that there is a way to affect the decision makers and anybody that was at the reception last night. And here's Mayor James, who's a lawyer, knows nothing about technology. But by golly, for whatever reason, he's buying into the technology. So it's our job to bridge the gap from the bunch of good ideas, great concepts that are part of the city's challenge brand application, the whole concept, and turning that into the reality that we need to accomplish the alternative form of transit OK, so much for the art trade. A question we ask ourselves is, what does the public really want and perhaps need? And how do we find that out? Suggestions were to ask the people through various forms of survey, perhaps use social media, social network media to find out more. So that the solutions we come up with are ones that people actually use and take advantage of. Another question is, how do we serve the lower density parts of Kansas City? I would suppose that, I don't know, 15, maybe 20% of the metropolitan areas population is in what we refer to as the urban core, where we have densities and urban fabric that lend themselves to traditional forms of transit. That means that 80% of us are in this part of the city where it doesn't work. How do we change the mindset that allows us to move to these micro-transit kinds of transportation as an example that don't fit into what we know about as institutions? Like all of you, there's labor issues and there's illegal questions and so forth. How do we adapt those good ideas that are out there that may not work the solutions of examples brought up? Uber is fine, right? It's flexible and being demand-based, it really fills a niche. But it's not as inexpensive as transit services are today. So how do we move to underwrite the cost of that so that it is affordable, so that these alternatives are really viable options for people who can't afford to pay me or $10 to provide and so forth? Then finally, as my colleague is up, we really need to do a better job of looking at the transportation system as a whole on individual things. And we're doing that, and we've been doing that using bison, there's a car sharing and dynamic ride sharing that somebody makes here. The connected vehicles, all of that to make our transportation system better, maybe not in one big bang, but stage these things, try prototypes, what works, what are the others and so forth. Not an easy task, but it's certainly an interesting process that we're getting into before we're talking more about it. Rivet, thank you. Thank you all for the great support outs. We're going to move right back into our next effort to reach out. We've been working with the community to see if we can share this with our audience. We have two small cities, four cities that we're in. Eric Rozier, city's chief innovation officer. And so I have to kind of think about the city to be in the data available and in terms of open data. How do you make that data available in a way that can be used for regional apps because data interoperability in the city is really key. Bob Bennett on the other end of the panel is also in the jury, our chief innovation officer here, about six weeks on the job. Something I like about it. And so thinking about internally, city processes, how do you take the project? It's really working on it and offline, but also spread those things throughout the region because from a national and international standpoint, people don't care that much. Innovation is in Kansas City, Missouri, or Kansas City, Kansas, or the next early summit. And Joe Beard has a number of different hats over the past four years. And it is a really unique perspective about regionalism. First is the mayor of Kansas City, Kansas, where he forged a close relationship with Mayor Sly Janes of Kansas City, Missouri on a number of different initiatives that went over to the ACA, which is the regional trans-city authority, and did a lot of work to integrate trans-assistance across jurisdictions, and is now getting ready to take leadership of the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce. So thinking about regionalism from any private sector business perspective. Did all of you see how this shook out the last time, or do I need to go over kind of what we're hoping to do here? Basically, we want to get it back into small groups within 15 minutes. We have a prompt question here, but I'd like you to do, is one, give some initial thoughts on that question, but what we're really trying to do is get to three, four, or five questions that we organize tables around. So this may be one of them, but feel free to throw out other questions. Kerry will record those around regionalism, other people can tweet them at us. You may give them a digital, not sure. Want an email, if you want to raise hands, we'll give you some time for that so that we can get to a list of four or five questions that we then bring into small groups on. So the question, how do we participate in the system that embraces the entire metropolitan area while the municipal county jurisdiction, or some government policy, Eric, would you like to start? Yeah, thank you very much.