 Hello from ITU in Geneva, where I'm very pleased to be joined by Audreus Percauskas, who works on audiovisual and media policy at the European Commission. Audreus, thanks for joining us. Thank you for inviting me. We are at a workshop on the future of TV for Europe. Of course, the media landscape has changed very considerably. How do regulators deal with these changes? What is the work that you've been discussing today from the European Commission? At the Commission, we try to keep a close eye on the way TV landscape is developing. The instrument we're in charge of, which is the Visual Media Services Directive, is evolving constantly too. We just completed the latest revision of a directive. This revision was provoked by fundamental changes in the media market. In particular, the fact that, first of all, on-demand services gained prominence. They are more and more watched by users, especially young people, and also video-sharing platforms emerge. In other words, we have major gateways to audiovisual content, where you would find not the content produced professionally, but content produced by users and distributed to you by these platforms. This was the reason for the recent reform. How does it accommodate the new forms of media consumption, also in relation to consumer protection? One thing to underline is that since these new players have a particular role they do not necessarily produce content themselves, but often they take content created by a user. We don't have editorial responsibility for the content. We thought what would be the most important values that we need to protect and how we should ensure those protections. First of all, when it comes to the values to be protected. The Commission fought and the Council and the Parliament in the European Union agreed that protection of children is one of such core values. Secondly, protection from illegal content and harmful content is equally very important. Finally, we thought it was important to continue our tradition of regulating commercial communications or, in other words, advertising. Now, coming to the instruments, how we ensure that those values continue to be protected in this different world. It's through several means. It's by making sure that platforms give users the possibility to flag if they see problematic content. It's by making sure that users can signal to platform that certain content is inappropriate. In other words, it's also by enabling users to complain to the platform itself that something is going wrong. It's also by making sure that venues can complain to state authorities if things are not settled. Another topic that we, ITU and the European Commission, both work on is the accessibility of AV media to people with disabilities. How have you addressed that in your new framework, in your new directive? It's an excellent question because right now in this IT workshop on the future of television I just realized how important the topic is. Well, I knew that it is important. But numerically it turns out that in Europe around 60% of all people need some kind of help with consumption of media content. I think this is huge and it's only likely to increase with population getting older. So in the European Union, again in the revised to the visual media services directive, we put a strong emphasis on accessibility compared to the previous text. And the obligation on member states and providers is to make a tangible progress towards making accessibility a reality in Europe. So in other words, at the European level, at the level of regulation, we state the objective and we then identify some means how the objective should be achieved. So we encourage, for example, media service providers to put in place so-called accessibility plans in which we would explain how exactly we will go about this task. And then, of course, there would be periodic reporting from the provider to the member state and then from member state to the European Commission. And what I found is that here in IT also, lots of detailed work is going on on accessibility issues. So people from different industry groups, they get together and they think hard what kind of technologies could help accessibility to become reality and how it could be deployed on internet and broadcasting and so on. So these things are very complementary policy and regulatory work and actual technical work at ITU. Excellent. Andreas, thank you very much. Thank you.