 I want to change the world. Let's give her attention. I think you're going to use that. I'm going to take this off. Let's give her a applause. I have a question about what you are going to say. Thank you for putting it into that perspective. I'm here to say thank you. When I started thinking about it, I had 10 minutes to talk about what was my reason for standing out in front of the UN. I realized I'm here to say thank you to this community and to a lot of people who have helped me so I can help others. I can change the world together with you and then I can spread the world. And I wanted to show one of the projects that wouldn't have been possible without the support of this community because it's one of the ways we are doing that and we can replicate it and help more. The reason why we want to change the world is because there is that exercise when you ask people why, why, why, why, why. And usually with improvises you get to, I want to change the world. And the third, you don't need to do that. We want to change and make better. I think that speaks to all of us in here. So I want to start by asking you, have you heard of OpenSpace, AI and OpenSpace? Thank you. So if you have heard of OpenSpace, can you raise your hand? If you have attended OpenSpace anyway, if OpenSpace has helped you, can you cheer? OpenSpace is inside it as a project to support this community during the lockdown and it more than you, so much more, it's a training place, it's a peer learning circle. It's a community, it's a group of superheroes, it's whatever we want to make it. So I stumbled into this community. I wanted to join the AIM but I didn't know how and then I went to one of OpenSpace and I never met. And I don't believe you don't know, I'm going to ask, we will orient you and make you even more part of this community than you already are. So what was the journey that I had? I'm training scientists to be more open and to be more present in society and I was tasked with finding a competition that would get more young scientists interested into talking about their research. And you know all those competitions that three minutes, this is in three minutes, failab, pitching competitions, I have a problem with them because you think as a jury member that you are making a very good decision because you have criteria but what happens is it has a lot of biases. There are others who's next, who's more natural speaker and so on. So I said, okay, it's very difficult to get biases out. So let's embrace the biases and make it an unjust and difficult competition and see what happens. So we create things of science and I create things of science in the sense of I'm making this decision. I want to receive this project and develop it and I've been a recipient. It has been created and handed to me with you and the people who have accepted this challenge which is a competition for young scientists to get more into the public eye. What it is, it's a competition. Young scientists, university cities, they go and some of them are face-to-face, some of them are online. It started online, it works for both. It's a day of training. After that day of eight hour training, there is a competition where they compete against each other and the ones who are the two left in the competition are qualified to attend the final that happens like a month later in the practice of city. So they all come and have this training, a second training for the 16 of them. What is the game of science and what is the game of science? It's an elimination competition. It's like Stanley Cup. Basically it's exactly like Stanley Cup because the ideal number is 16. It's 16 scientists. It's exactly like Stanley Cup but they compete speaking. So it's competitive speaking competition. And one is eliminated. One is eliminated in each round. Now the scary part, why it's called games of science like games of thrones is because the first round they are allowed to speak for 15 seconds. So you have 16 people, two of them on stage and the jury has to decide after each one of them has spoken for 15 seconds they have to decide who goes next to the next round when they speak for 30 seconds. And then the eight people go to four and they speak for 90 seconds and only the two finalists get three minutes. So it's horrible. It's like trying to make, to select who is going to attend to become part of the national football team by watching the cover of kids run around the drain for like 15 minutes. It doesn't tell you a note. But on the other hand someone told me, someone who went to this competition was very good and was eliminated. The first person who got eliminated told me you know what I realize? In real life if you don't gather their interest capture their attention in the first seconds they are not going to listen to you for 30 seconds three minutes or three hours. So it was a very useful insight. And I got it from playing games in open space where you listen for 30 or 60 seconds and then you reflect in 30. You cut it more. And the training doesn't work like that. The training trains them to think that starting with all the details and making to what's essential in that one. So I lost my space, my train of thought. In order to make it interesting I came to this space and I asked how can we make that work for people? So they don't feel like they have lost after the first 15 seconds. And it was Erica who suggested we do the same thing that we do when we play home paper season. If someone beats you, basically you become his biggest or her biggest supporter. So by the end of the competition each of the finalists has behind them half of the team and they support and they give feedback and they have a break when they get feedback and support and so it keeps you engaged. So that's a specific insight that came out. But then imagine being a jury. How do you decide? How do you put that weight on your shoulders? And something that I've also learned here from Kat Hoppe, the power of good questions. You know I don't have a list of criteria for the jury members. I have one question. Who do I want to hear from more? And with this question basically it's not about who the research is how worthy I had someone who I had once, a guy who was using an additional intelligence to assess the impact of COVID on lungs. And someone who was researching how to make the structures look prettier for glass buildings. And the guy who was studying how to make the structures look prettier, which is less worthy, let's be honest. It's like yeah you can take better pictures, better selfies if the structure is not so bad. He won despite, because the other guy said, I use artificial intelligence to assess how big the damage is. That was clear. I didn't need to hear more. It didn't make it compelling to work like that. So what I'm showing you is that has happened in here and that has helped. The team from Prague taught me the best exercise to open it for people who have never done it. Because they have never done it. They are researchers, people who have gone through college, master degree, and now they are doctoral students, postdoctoral students. They have focused on the research. We do hello, goodbye, hello, the game if you want. They will show it to you. It's perfect. It's easy. You just say hello to people watching them in the eye. But it's crazy as well. And they got used to that. So what has happened is that with the support of this community, the training has turned into a joyful experience for all those involved. It was fun and funny. And I said yesterday that what I saw looking at the pictures is that people were more engaged and they look happy when they were playing games than when they were doing things that were like, oh, talking. They like being part of this community and they are still part of this community. What I'm doing is I'm working with the people who have gone through this as trainers and I'm training them and I want the next step and the problem that I'm struggling with is what is next? Because all of them are like, yes, I get it. I love it. What are we doing? And I have a community of more than 100 people who are ready and willing to do more. And that has happened to this inclusive way of addressing issues based on the things that we are doing. It's not applied improvisation. It's this community. And I've got a lot of insights. I've got a lot of ideas. I've developed a lot of things. I try things on in this community because it's generous and these people who go through this kind of experience, it's extremely competitive. They learn something else. They learn the power of being together and working together. And that's something that I've got from here. We never work alone. That's one of the key things that we know from working in this environment from doing open space. It's something that's so powerful. And the other thing that is an organizing thing we have is we have a clear focus on the experience that people are having while they are doing it. It's not for the journey. It's not for the audience. It's for the people going through that. So before going away, I want to thank you all and invite you to support me more in that. And I have one more ask for you. I have postcards to people who have taken part in that. If you want to send a message to them, I can share them and you can post them as well. And this is the terror animal who has been with us and he has his own Facebook page.