 I think the evolution of discussion of women, of feminism, of women's rights, of all of that, is to, right now, is that to diversify how different cultures and different countries and different communities experience that within their own lives. So there's an evolution of how we handle the topic of women's rights. Before we had defined it together, mostly as a Western concept, and then we go to other parts of the world and try to apply this Western concept into that. And right now, it's not backfiring, but it's evolving. It's evolving into new meaning. So for example, if I'm using Muslim women as an example. Many Muslim women in America and overseas are wearing the headscarf as an expression of their freedom of expression, not as an oppression at all, actually. So they're saying the same applies to us. If you want, if we fought so hard to have women wear whatever she wears, and before it was revealing part of it, the same applies to us of wearing whatever we wear, and that could be covering ourselves from head to toe. But that interpretation may not be seen as women's rights. It's actually seen still as an oppression of women. But we have to evolve that discussion in a cultural application of women's rights. Sometimes in the name of respect of other culture, we can be patronizing. Or even more conservative than the culture itself. So I don't mean that way. But I do mean that when the women are defining it in their own way, we need to hear how they are defining it. So what Mount Holyoke can do, and everybody else can do, and I think it is doing actually, is now the exercise of not only less, the exercise of not only learning what women's rights is, but the exercise and the learning of how do we hear and define that from other people's perspective as an evolution for that concept.