 All right, great question here. Somebody saw a social media guru, Gary Vaynerchuk. Actually, I do respect him as well. Gary Vee, he's commonly known as. And Gary Vee has been, apparently, I haven't seen this one, but I can imagine he does. He's been encouraging his audience to use chat GPT to make social media posts. And I assume it's because, well, it's faster. You don't have to do so much work, and then therefore you can pump out a lot more content. And it's not what I've been encouraging people to do because it's not, it's, the problem I have with that is not that at the time of this recording, chat GPT is not connected to the internet. It, the chat GPT's knowledge ends at about the middle of 2021. Yeah, they had the training data only up until 2021. By the time somebody watched this, it's already connected to the internet because that's coming. The internet connected chat GPT is coming in the next few months. But right now, even if it's, okay, even if it is, let's assume that you now have a version of chat GPT or other AI smart, good writer that's connected to the internet. Is it a good idea to use it to create social media posts? So here's my take on that. Because so many other people are doing it, there's going to be an AI generic voice out there. It's gonna be, I mean, you already see it. I mean, in fact, I see this a lot. I see someone's posts and then I see a comment below as was that chat GPT written? Because you can kind of tell, I mean, the more you use chat GPT, the more you get what the voice is. It's a particular, can someone describe it below? What's the voice? How would you call it? It's just professional and it uses certain words a lot. Like, I don't know, I find it quite interesting. It actually has a particular vocabulary it uses often. So you're going to see a lot of that on the internet. It's gonna become boring. I mean, yes, certain articles are gonna be something that's interesting for the reader. And even if it's generic voice, it's fine, you know? But you know how you read some journalists and some authors, like let's say journalists, right? Because news is a commodity, right? News, you wanna see the reporting about some world event. Well, which news, which journalists you wanna read it from? Because if it's just a generic journalist, you're like, oh, I got the information. But when there's a particular journalist that has a voice, like, when I say voice, I also mean their way of framing the situation. You enjoy reading that journalist more. It's just, you trust that journalist, right? Because they share your values, yes. But they also have a unique take on it that you just enjoy. And maybe their voicing and their phrasing is different from other generic journalists. Same thing with chat GBT. So in fact, you know what's interesting? It's going to be, ironically, even easier to stand out in the future because why? This is scary, but it's true. People will become lazier. I already feel that within myself to be honest with you. I'm like, well, when my clients ask me a question, I'm like, did you ask chat GBT yet? Because they could probably give you a better answer, right? But their answer will be very bland sounding, not the George Cow, you know, mistakes and the awkwardness and the contrarianism or whatever you see me. And the spirituality and the whatever, whatever. It's different from GBT. So I think that this is high time for you to lean more into your quirkiness. Lean more into your weirdness or your mistakes and your vulnerability and everything. Like lean more into your personality. Like, okay, when you, when nobody else is, when you're journaling by yourself, that's an interesting voice, right? When you journal by, no one else is reading your journal. Notice, what is that voice? Lean into that. And ironically, you could probably do that with chat GBT. You could journal on chat GBT and says, can you describe what this voice is? I'm trying to figure out how do I describe this voice? What is this style? Or another way of doing this, when you're writing to a close friend or a family member, maybe even text messages or whatever or email. Like, what's that voice? Or when you are, but in terms of video, let's say, when you're talking in an animated way to a close friend who you totally trust, they're not gonna judge you. They're not gonna judge how you look, everything. They love you just as you are. They've known you, that's why they're your friend. They like who you are, they just like everything. When you're talking in an animated way or in a very deep way with them, what is that way? Start noticing that and lean more into that for your writings and for your videos because that is going to be better than chat GBT in the style and in the voicing. Yeah, maybe your ideas won't be as smart or reasonable as chat GBT, but more and more, that's not gonna matter. I mean, not that it won't matter, truth always matters, but more and more people will be bored by generic truth, okay? They will say, truth I can easily find, I will GBT it. They won't be Googling it or binging it. They'll be GBT it or chat it. I'm gonna AI it, find the truth to filter out what are the facts, that's easy. But I want to get a human's unique and engaging take on it. So that bottom line, I understand why Gary Vee might be saying this because he has a lot of aspiring creators and millions actually of aspiring creators in this audience. And he has been preaching for the longest time quantity of content. You got to put out and he was like, I put out 30 pieces of content a day. I mean, it's something ridiculous like that because he has so many different platforms and he has a team, right? But even when he was doing it himself, he did like three pieces of content a day or something crazy or five pieces. And he was very prolific and that's partly why he's so famous. But now AI is gonna be so much more prolific than any of us. So we need to, so it's not about being prolific anymore because it's impossible. It's impossible. What are you gonna compete with? There's no way. But it's just like when you look for that one journalist or author or video maker like, oh, their video is out for the week or oh, their article's out this week, you lean in, it doesn't matter how many other emails you have in your inbox. Oh, so and so wrote about that. I wanna read that, right? Or even once a month, there are certain authors. I'm like, when are they gonna come out? And then I'll go, oh, three times a year they come out with something. I'm reading it for sure. Like there's no, there's no point. I prioritize that over the 30 emails I've just gotten the last, you know, half an hour. So prolific is not going to be, is not gonna be a strength anymore. It's going to be human quality is what is going to be really unique and interesting. So I would say chat GBT, you can, when you, if you use it for social media, it's not to churn out more blog posts because that's, you can't compete because AI is gonna be doing it faster than you. You're having to type something and then paste it and copy. That's, no, that's not, that's a losing game. What you can use chat GBT for is to overcome blocks to say, I want to talk about this. I wanna write about this. And I just need some ideas to get started. As a human, you are not so good at ideation compared to robots, but you're good at evaluation. You're good at feeling, sensing into, did I like that idea or not? Something, no, I don't really like that idea, but it's give me 10 ideas and I'll tell you which ones I like and don't like and why. When you'd have zero ideas, chat GBT will save you an hour or two of like, well, chat GBT is gonna be 10, and those 10 ideas might be very generic. And then you can go, ah, I see what the mainstream generic thoughts are and I can be a contrarian to that or I can make it more deeper. I can make it more nuanced. I can make it more human. So chat GBT is, to me, it's like a foil, F-O-I-L, meaning it's something for me to bounce off of, right? Like if I have, to be able to jump higher, I need to be able to bounce from something, right? If I'm in the water, I can't jump, right? But if I'm on a hard surface, I can jump higher. Chat GBT for me is kind of like that hard surface. It allows me to go, what's the mainstream thought? Good, I'm gonna take off from there. So I hope this is helpful. It's for adiation. And then if you are like questioning your logic, it's a reasoning engine to say, okay, I've just written this article. What are two or three major holes or reasoning gaps you see in this article? Because I want to be credible. Yes, I'm human and I make mistakes, but I still don't wanna miss the major red flag. Chat GBT helps you with that red flag. You're like, why didn't you see? Chat GBT is like, well, obviously you should address this and then you could decide whether or not to, because you could say, well, that's for another article. Or yeah, that's a good idea. Let me write a little bit about that. So I hope this is helpful. Yeah, I'll just say one more thing. Chat GBT is way more concise than me. It's trying to save its tokens. It's trying to save its computing resources called tokens. So ironically, with human rambling, that's actually going to be more entertaining in the future than GPT-concise truth. So anyway, I just wanted to say that.