 Further, talking about resolving the ethical issues, in this module we are going to look the informal resolution of ethical violation as a subcategory. When psychologists face ethical violation by other psychologists, they should attempt to resolve the issue by bringing it to the attention of that individual and if an informal resolution appears, like informally someone is understanding in that situation how to resolve it and the intervention does not violate any confidentiality right that may be involved, so we should follow that situation. If an informal resolution occurs then it is fine, otherwise if it cannot be informal, if a dispute arises, then we should formally resolve it, where the confidentiality may be broken, where we may have to use a certain kind of deception, so there we need to see that specifically we have formally resolved that issue or we have formally resolved it. The first priority should be the informal resolution. Then cooperating with ethics committee, psychologists should cooperate in ethics investigation aga kisi situation mein koi ethical investigation ho rahi hai, so this is first and foremost responsibility of an individual to be available to that committee, proceedings and resulting requirements of APA or any affiliated psychological association jaisi PPA hai, VPA hai, ICP hai, tise bhi aap belong katne, to ethical situations ki jab koi conflict arise utata hai to one need to be available to those bodies jaha par bojah kar apne is ethical dilemma ko resolve kar sake, in doing so they may address any confidentiality issues, failure to cooperate it itself on ethical violation agar hum kisi bhi committee ke saamne present hotne hai aur kisi case ke baare mein koi discussion katne hai, maa confidentiality breach hone ka thoda sa issue hota hai, lakin waha par co-operation karna bhi boh zaroori hai because if the matter is grave enough and one need to be represented a true situation, to wahi yeh boh zaroori hai, mentioning about some recent cases where young women is beheaded wahapar kuch therapy institutions ke upar yeh question aaya, ke they have given certain kind of certification to the murderer that he is a certified therapist and he can give counseling and therapy to different people. Now iss situation ki andar, the first question goes to that therapy institution jino ne certification di thi, and they have to be open to the other people ke unki certifications kya hain, unke modules kya hain aur jo individual hain aayad usko koi jo hain wo certification dii gayi thi, yeh nahi dii gayi thi. So iss situation me confidentiality jo hain wo breach karne patti hai jab koi matter sensitive aur grave hota hai. However, making a request for deferment of education of an ethics complaint pending the outcome of legislation does not alone constitute non-cooperation. Sometimes agar koi institution jiste koi sawal puhcha gaya hai, kisi law agency ki tara f say aur wo kuch time gain karna chaatne hain to prepare their answer, wo non-cooperation nahi hooga, but if they completely avoid being presenting themselves to that certain authority that will come under non-compliance. Then improper complaints is another ethical issues will need to be resolved. Psychologists should not file or encouraging the file of ethic complaints that are made with reckless disregard or willful ignorance of the fact that would dis-approve the allegation. Kani iss trah ki cheezon ko collect karke kisi par allegation nahi laga nahi chahiye jo ke pari toh par hi dis-approve ho chahiye. Kani iss trah ke facts gather kiye jaayin jiski basis ke upar aap kush bhi proof na kar seke. So if a person is going to say someone an ethical agar aap yeh kere hain ki kisi ki degree-fake hai, if you are claiming ke iss ko therapy ka diploma jo iss nahi liya hai, that is fake enough. So you should have certain proof. Other than agar hain kisi bhi a respectable individual ko ye falsify things claim kar hain hain hain aur hum usse proof nahi kar sak rahe, toh wo it self jo individual object kar hain, wo uske liye aap bohot bidi complaint ban jaatiye. That he is an unethical person who is objecting other persons. So psychologists should be very careful while you know indicating someone as being mal-practiced japta kunge paas complete proof na ho. Another thing is unfair discrimination against complaints and respondents. Psychologists should not deny person's employment, admissions to academic and other programs or promotions based solely upon their having made or being the subject of an ethical complaint. Let's say agar ek individual ki koi ethical complaint nahi hai, uske basis pe aap japta koi case discuss nahi hojata, japta koi result proof nahi hojata ki promotion nahi roki jaa sakti, uske appredation nahi roki jaa sakti, ki employment nahi roki jaa sakti, kisi certain institution me koi kaam karne se nahi roka jaa sakta, because yeh sab cheeze yeh, yeh complaints jis vakta koi complaint arrech hui, wo proof nahi hui, toh us vakta koi individual jo hai, he is considered to be innocent aur wo apni practice juh hai, apna kaam juh hai, apni work pace, apna admission usko sustain rak sakta hai.