<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><transcript><text start="0.6" dur="8.2">x264 quick sync video nvnc vce</text><text start="5.92" dur="5.839">there is no shortage of ways to</text><text start="8.8" dur="5.839">transform your screen into a video</text><text start="11.759" dur="5.841">stream visible to potentially millions</text><text start="14.639" dur="7.681">of people around the world</text><text start="17.6" dur="8.08">for the mad ballers among us a second pc</text><text start="22.32" dur="7.039">dedicated to that task is the undisputed</text><text start="25.68" dur="6.08">king of performance and quality</text><text start="29.359" dur="6.001">but how do the rest of us get our</text><text start="31.76" dur="4.88">streams going without crossing them up</text><text start="35.36" dur="5.359">amd</text><text start="36.64" dur="5.759">claims to have the best solution</text><text start="40.719" dur="4.921">but do they</text><text start="42.399" dur="6.081">welcome to a new episode of</text><text start="45.64" dur="7.81">manufacturers say</text><text start="48.48" dur="4.97">[Music]</text><text start="56.879" dur="5.601">browse privately and securely with</text><text start="59.6" dur="5.04">tunnelbear the simple vpn app try</text><text start="62.48" dur="4.319">tunnelbear for free at the link in the</text><text start="64.64" dur="4.64">video description</text><text start="66.799" dur="5.841">one of amd&amp;#39;s top marketing points is</text><text start="69.28" dur="7.36">that the 16 threads in their ryzen 7</text><text start="72.64" dur="6.88">cpus allow gamers to dedicate ample cpu</text><text start="76.64" dur="5.36">resources to both gaming and video</text><text start="79.52" dur="6.4">streaming coding without impacting the</text><text start="82" dur="7.36">performance of either since games won&amp;#39;t</text><text start="85.92" dur="6.72">make use of all 16 threads and neither</text><text start="89.36" dur="5.759">will an encoder meanwhile one of intel</text><text start="92.64" dur="5.2">selling points for their consumer level</text><text start="95.119" dur="6.401">chips is their integrated graphics</text><text start="97.84" dur="6.72">processor and its ability to use quick</text><text start="101.52" dur="5.919">sync video technology to encode a video</text><text start="104.56" dur="5.28">stream without impacting the performance</text><text start="107.439" dur="4.801">of their cpu</text><text start="109.84" dur="5.04">well that all sounds great</text><text start="112.24" dur="5.68">but with both of them claiming to</text><text start="114.88" dur="4.32">achieve the same objective by very</text><text start="117.92" dur="3.28">different means</text><text start="119.2" dur="3.199">well surely one of them&amp;#39;s got to be</text><text start="121.2" dur="4.879">better right</text><text start="122.399" dur="7.121">well predictably enough amd says that</text><text start="126.079" dur="6.481">their way software encoding is superior</text><text start="129.52" dur="5.84">and the traditional wisdom would back</text><text start="132.56" dur="6.48">them up on this one the software-based</text><text start="135.36" dur="5.92">x264 encoder is well known to offer</text><text start="139.04" dur="4.88">higher image quality and</text><text start="141.28" dur="4.88">more flexibility in its setup compared</text><text start="143.92" dur="5.28">to other solutions but</text><text start="146.16" dur="5.6">until now if you cared about performance</text><text start="149.2" dur="4.24">you&amp;#39;d almost never use it while gaming</text><text start="151.76" dur="4.24">because its consumption of system</text><text start="153.44" dur="4.64">resources was pretty much guaranteed to</text><text start="156" dur="4.4">impact your gameplay unless you were</text><text start="158.08" dur="5.12">running an extreme edition or something</text><text start="160.4" dur="5.839">like that but with more processing cores</text><text start="163.2" dur="5.64">at ryzen 7&amp;#39;s disposal it could be</text><text start="166.239" dur="5.201">that amd&amp;#39;s onto something</text><text start="168.84" dur="3.88">meanwhile what are the other guys doing</text><text start="171.44" dur="3.76">different here</text><text start="172.72" dur="6.64">intel&amp;#39;s quick sync video and for that</text><text start="175.2" dur="6.56">matter nvidia&amp;#39;s nvenc and rtg&amp;#39;s radeon</text><text start="179.36" dur="5.2">video codec engine are all what are</text><text start="181.76" dur="5.6">known as dedicated hardware based</text><text start="184.56" dur="4">encoders which present an interesting</text><text start="187.36" dur="4.64">conundrum</text><text start="188.56" dur="7.599">in theory you actually stand to lose</text><text start="192" dur="6.48">virtually no performance which is cool</text><text start="196.159" dur="4.961">but you&amp;#39;re forced to use the</text><text start="198.48" dur="4.56">optimized settings that are baked into</text><text start="201.12" dur="2.72">the hardware meaning that you can&amp;#39;t</text><text start="203.04" dur="3.6">really</text><text start="203.84" dur="5.6">tune anything beyond their presets</text><text start="206.64" dur="6.239">besides simply increasing the raw bit</text><text start="209.44" dur="6.159">rate to improve quality so finally back</text><text start="212.879" dur="5.28">to the big questions how much does the</text><text start="215.599" dur="4.881">encoder matter for quality is twitch&amp;#39;s</text><text start="218.159" dur="4">new maximum of six megabits per second</text><text start="220.48" dur="4.8">enough that it won&amp;#39;t really matter</text><text start="222.159" dur="5.601">anymore are any of these solutions</text><text start="225.28" dur="5.28">really able to untether you from the</text><text start="227.76" dur="4.88">second pc and let you stream without</text><text start="230.56" dur="4.319">impacting performance</text><text start="232.64" dur="5.12">well we touched on this from amd&amp;#39;s</text><text start="234.879" dur="5.041">perspective in our ryzen 7 review which</text><text start="237.76" dur="3.759">you can check out here and we asked you</text><text start="239.92" dur="4.08">guys at that time if you wanted</text><text start="241.519" dur="4.72">something more in depth and since you</text><text start="244" dur="4.4">did ask so nicely</text><text start="246.239" dur="3.841">your wish is our command</text><text start="248.4" dur="3.52">we&amp;#39;re going to focus on two games for</text><text start="250.08" dur="4.719">our testing first ashes of the</text><text start="251.92" dur="5.839">singularities cpu benchmark not because</text><text start="254.799" dur="5.361">it&amp;#39;s a hot game on twitch right now but</text><text start="257.759" dur="5.361">for technical reasons it stresses the</text><text start="260.16" dur="5.92">cpu and has a good mix of slow-moving</text><text start="263.12" dur="4.56">terrain with lots of small fast-moving</text><text start="266.08" dur="4.16">projectiles that are great at</text><text start="267.68" dur="3.68">introducing blocky artifacts during</text><text start="270.24" dur="3.28">encoding</text><text start="271.36" dur="5.36">the second will be the forerunner</text><text start="273.52" dur="7.36">benchmark with its sweeping cameras and</text><text start="276.72" dur="6.72">loads of special effects we know again</text><text start="280.88" dur="4.48">most people aren&amp;#39;t streaming these games</text><text start="283.44" dur="4.56">but canned benches are much more</text><text start="285.36" dur="4.88">repeatable across our platforms and both</text><text start="288" dur="5.199">of these titles represent a realistic</text><text start="290.24" dur="6.16">gaming load that is more demanding than</text><text start="293.199" dur="5.361">today&amp;#39;s popular esports titles for our</text><text start="296.4" dur="4.72">encoders we&amp;#39;ve used common twitch</text><text start="298.56" dur="4.32">streaming bitrates and resolutions for</text><text start="301.12" dur="6">all of our comparisons</text><text start="302.88" dur="6.72">you&amp;#39;ll note that 1080p 30 is technically</text><text start="307.12" dur="6.56">more data to cram into our lower bit</text><text start="309.6" dur="7.2">rates than 720p 60 but the higher frame</text><text start="313.68" dur="6.16">rate of 720p 60 should better highlight</text><text start="316.8" dur="5.92">motion artifacts in our encoders</text><text start="319.84" dur="4.56">so any cpu even one with onboard</text><text start="322.72" dur="3.84">graphics can</text><text start="324.4" dur="5.04">use x264 encoding</text><text start="326.56" dur="5.84">but we observed in our testing that not</text><text start="329.44" dur="7.52">all are created equal in this regard we</text><text start="332.4" dur="6.4">found at amd&amp;#39;s ryzen seven manage two</text><text start="336.96" dur="3.76">all right just stuck up on me</text><text start="338.8" dur="4.239">managed to avoid dropping frames</text><text start="340.72" dur="5.68">throughout our testing at a higher</text><text start="343.039" dur="6.481">quality preset than either of team blues</text><text start="346.4" dur="5.92">solutions in some cases even some of our</text><text start="349.52" dur="5.44">hardware encoders needed lower presets</text><text start="352.32" dur="5.04">so to find out how these differences in</text><text start="354.96" dur="3.679">encoding settings affect real world</text><text start="357.36" dur="3.839">image quality</text><text start="358.639" dur="4.961">we captured a lossless reference</text><text start="361.199" dur="5.521">recording with our blackmagic intensity</text><text start="363.6" dur="5.36">pro and used it for comparison</text><text start="366.72" dur="3.12">so we can see some subtle differences</text><text start="368.96" dur="4.16">here</text><text start="369.84" dur="6.16">ryzen manages to retain smaller details</text><text start="373.12" dur="6">that get smeared out on team blue at</text><text start="376" dur="6.56">their very fast and super fast settings</text><text start="379.12" dur="5.6">compared to ryzen&amp;#39;s faster this not only</text><text start="382.56" dur="4.96">translates into better picture quality</text><text start="384.72" dur="6.24">overall but also contributes to better</text><text start="387.52" dur="6.239">quality when twitch then re-encodes it</text><text start="390.96" dur="5.76">for its various quality options moving</text><text start="393.759" dur="7.121">on here we see our hardware encoders at</text><text start="396.72" dur="8.08">1080 30p at 2500 kilobit per second</text><text start="400.88" dur="6.8">alongside our ryzen x264 footage</text><text start="404.8" dur="5.36">of the four x264 on ryzen appears to be</text><text start="407.68" dur="5.44">the least likely to lose small</text><text start="410.16" dur="6.72">projectiles in ashes of the benchmark</text><text start="413.12" dur="6.479">nvnc and quicksync don&amp;#39;t seem half bad</text><text start="416.88" dur="5.36">here to be clear but they do block up</text><text start="419.599" dur="4.561">more often and lose finer details when a</text><text start="422.24" dur="5.359">lot&amp;#39;s going on at once</text><text start="424.16" dur="6.879">rtg&amp;#39;s amf encoder on the other hand</text><text start="427.599" dur="3.44">sorry radeon fans but</text><text start="432.08" dur="7.2">things get more interesting again at</text><text start="434.08" dur="7.04">720p 60. x264 holds up best once more</text><text start="439.28" dur="4.08">although the shimmering of compression</text><text start="441.12" dur="5.04">artifacts on the cobblestones as the</text><text start="443.36" dur="4.88">camera flies by is pretty noticeable</text><text start="446.16" dur="4.24">but not nearly as noticeable as it is</text><text start="448.24" dur="4.64">with the rest of our contestants</text><text start="450.4" dur="5.6">nvnc is again at the head of the</text><text start="452.88" dur="5.92">hardware pack looking decent but our</text><text start="456" dur="6.4">quick sync and amf footage are both</text><text start="458.8" dur="4.959">abysmal at times blocking up so badly as</text><text start="462.4" dur="3.6">to appear as though they&amp;#39;ve been</text><text start="463.759" dur="4.801">recorded at 240p</text><text start="466" dur="4.319">instead of 720p</text><text start="468.56" dur="4.639">we&amp;#39;ll keep our visual comparisons</text><text start="470.319" dur="6.32">rolling while we move on to performance</text><text start="473.199" dur="7.12">with x264 we see a respectable showing</text><text start="476.639" dur="6.56">from our ryzen 7 1800x averaging about a</text><text start="480.319" dur="6.32">5 to 10 percent performance penalty on</text><text start="483.199" dur="5.201">the faster and very fast presets over</text><text start="486.639" dur="5.12">our baseline reading</text><text start="488.4" dur="7.919">on the 6900k meanwhile we get an average</text><text start="491.759" dur="8.081">of a roughly 3 to 23 percent performance</text><text start="496.319" dur="6.88">drop clearly a much more varied result</text><text start="499.84" dur="7.039">while our 7 700 k could get as high as a</text><text start="503.199" dur="5.68">36 percent hit both of these ones on the</text><text start="506.879" dur="4.32">super fast preset</text><text start="508.879" dur="5.28">amd&amp;#39;s high speed infinity fabric</text><text start="511.199" dur="6.001">interconnect secret sauce for ryzen&amp;#39;s</text><text start="514.159" dur="6.24">video encoding while gaming performance</text><text start="517.2" dur="5.839">looks like it&amp;#39;s working so far</text><text start="520.399" dur="5.601">our hardware tests meanwhile show ryzen</text><text start="523.039" dur="5.041">actually taking a wider hit with nvenc</text><text start="526" dur="5.36">at roughly five to fifteen percent on</text><text start="528.08" dur="6.319">average while our 6900k managed a three</text><text start="531.36" dur="6.159">to ten percent variance and our 7 700 k</text><text start="534.399" dur="6.401">ranged from 2 to 18</text><text start="537.519" dur="6.641">rtg&amp;#39;s amf encoder seemed to hit all of</text><text start="540.8" dur="6">our chips less with ryzen taking our</text><text start="544.16" dur="5.92">roughly 7 to 8 performance hit and</text><text start="546.8" dur="4.24">sitting in between the other two</text><text start="550.08" dur="3.52">though</text><text start="551.04" dur="4.88">as we&amp;#39;ve seen the amf encoder is also</text><text start="553.6" dur="3.679">far from the highest quality for</text><text start="555.92" dur="4.56">streaming</text><text start="557.279" dur="6.24">but we have one final encoder one that</text><text start="560.48" dur="6.88">we can&amp;#39;t directly compare with any other</text><text start="563.519" dur="7.281">cpu and that&amp;#39;s intel&amp;#39;s quick sync video</text><text start="567.36" dur="5.2">compared to the 7700k baseline it caused</text><text start="570.8" dur="4">a three to twelve percent performance</text><text start="572.56" dur="3.839">drop about in line with the rest of our</text><text start="574.8" dur="3.44">hardware encoders</text><text start="576.399" dur="4.241">so finally then</text><text start="578.24" dur="3.2">lining all our encoders up next to each</text><text start="580.64" dur="2.72">other</text><text start="581.44" dur="3.519">we can see that</text><text start="583.36" dur="4.4">actually</text><text start="584.959" dur="6.32">ryzen running x264</text><text start="587.76" dur="5.6">blows the doors off every other cpu</text><text start="591.279" dur="4.321">encoder combination</text><text start="593.36" dur="4.24">it has a tight variation in its</text><text start="595.6" dur="4.96">performance impact over our baseline</text><text start="597.6" dur="5.52">numbers and it handles a higher quality</text><text start="600.56" dur="6.48">cpu preset meaning that when twitch</text><text start="603.12" dur="7.2">re-encodes you lose less detail overall</text><text start="607.04" dur="6.08">so taken together it looks like amd&amp;#39;s</text><text start="610.32" dur="5.28">marketing department wasn&amp;#39;t asleep at</text><text start="613.12" dur="5.52">the wheel on this one</text><text start="615.6" dur="5.84">squarespace takes the hassle of building</text><text start="618.64" dur="5.52">a website for your small business for</text><text start="621.44" dur="5.28">your portfolio for the for the sports</text><text start="624.16" dur="4.56">team that you help run and it throws it</text><text start="626.72" dur="3.28">all in the garbage because squarespace</text><text start="628.72" dur="4.64">is super</text><text start="630" dur="5.04">easy to use it&amp;#39;s only 12 bucks a month</text><text start="633.36" dur="4.479">to start you get a free domain if you</text><text start="635.04" dur="6.08">buy squarespace for a year they offer 24</text><text start="637.839" dur="5.041">7 support via live chat and email and</text><text start="641.12" dur="4">all you pretty much got to do you might</text><text start="642.88" dur="4.8">not even need it is pick one of their</text><text start="645.12" dur="5.92">gorgeous templates put in all your own</text><text start="647.68" dur="5.839">text copy and all your own images and</text><text start="651.04" dur="4.799">boom you&amp;#39;ve got a beautiful functional</text><text start="653.519" dur="4.801">website that you can spend your time</text><text start="655.839" dur="5.361">updating rather than spending your time</text><text start="658.32" dur="4.8">fighting with compatibility of so check</text><text start="661.2" dur="3.84">it out at the link in the video</text><text start="663.12" dur="4.08">description and start a free trial with</text><text start="665.04" dur="6.4">no credit card required then use offer</text><text start="667.2" dur="5.759">code ltt to save 10 percent</text><text start="671.44" dur="3.36">so thanks for watching guys dislike if</text><text start="672.959" dur="4">you disliked leave a like though if you</text><text start="674.8" dur="3.84">liked it and get subscribed and maybe</text><text start="676.959" dur="3.681">check out where to buy the stuff we</text><text start="678.64" dur="3.84">featured at the link in the video</text><text start="680.64" dur="3.92">description also down there is our merch</text><text start="682.48" dur="7">tour as well as our community forum</text><text start="684.56" dur="4.92">which you should totally join</text></transcript>