<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><transcript><text start="0" dur="3.28">today we&amp;#39;ll be speed testing windows 10</text><text start="1.68" dur="3.28">and windows 11. what impact does</text><text start="3.28" dur="3.599">upgrading have on performance while</text><text start="4.96" dur="3.28">we&amp;#39;re about to find out so starting</text><text start="6.879" dur="2.881">things off with the startup test i</text><text start="8.24" dur="2.96">wanted to take this time to explain what</text><text start="9.76" dur="3.2">hardware we&amp;#39;re working with because it</text><text start="11.2" dur="4.12">has changed from my previous videos</text><text start="12.96" dur="5.12">we&amp;#39;re using a dell latitude 7390 with an</text><text start="15.32" dur="4.36">i58350u cpu with integrated graphics 8</text><text start="18.08" dur="3.92">gigs of ram and this time we&amp;#39;re using</text><text start="19.68" dur="4">128 gigs of ssd storage this was all</text><text start="22" dur="3.199">mainly done to supplement windows 11</text><text start="23.68" dur="3.359">system requirements so we&amp;#39;re making this</text><text start="25.199" dur="3.92">as fair as possible anyways back to the</text><text start="27.039" dur="4.08">comparison windows 10 does take the win</text><text start="29.119" dur="3.761">here however windows 11 was not too far</text><text start="31.119" dur="3.521">behind as always startup doesn&amp;#39;t</text><text start="32.88" dur="3.44">determine everything but it can give us</text><text start="34.64" dur="3.2">a rough idea of what to expect and</text><text start="36.32" dur="3.2">here&amp;#39;s a quick look at how much storage</text><text start="37.84" dur="3.52">both operating systems take up with the</text><text start="39.52" dur="3.84">same pre-installed programs windows 10</text><text start="41.36" dur="4.56">takes up exactly 40 gigabytes of storage</text><text start="43.36" dur="4.24">while windows 11 takes up 41.1 gigabytes</text><text start="45.92" dur="3.92">giving windows 10 to win here by a mere</text><text start="47.6" dur="4.16">1.1 gigabytes moving on to memory</text><text start="49.84" dur="3.44">management i tested this in two ways</text><text start="51.76" dur="2.88">first i measured the amount of ram being</text><text start="53.28" dur="3.279">used while nothing was open in the</text><text start="54.64" dur="3.759">background windows 10 took up 2.6</text><text start="56.559" dur="4.401">gigabytes of ram while windows 11 took</text><text start="58.399" dur="4">up 3.1 gigabytes that&amp;#39;s a 500 megabyte</text><text start="60.96" dur="2.96">difference and this can be especially</text><text start="62.399" dur="3.361">significant if you don&amp;#39;t have that much</text><text start="63.92" dur="3.44">ram in the first place next i wanted to</text><text start="65.76" dur="2.96">do a chrome test where i tried to open</text><text start="67.36" dur="3.28">as many tabs as possible in google</text><text start="68.72" dur="3.6">chrome until we hit 5 gigabytes in task</text><text start="70.64" dur="3.519">manager and we can see the consequences</text><text start="72.32" dur="4.159">of windows 11 taking up more system ram</text><text start="74.159" dur="4.481">windows 10 got to 24 tabs and windows 11</text><text start="76.479" dur="4.32">got to 20 tabs another one for windows</text><text start="78.64" dur="3.6">10. next up is the battery test here i</text><text start="80.799" dur="2.721">just ran a bunch of programs in the</text><text start="82.24" dur="3.12">background that would drain the battery</text><text start="83.52" dur="3.44">as quickly as possible speeding things</text><text start="85.36" dur="3.6">up here remember both were unplugged at</text><text start="86.96" dur="3.92">almost the exact same time windows 10</text><text start="88.96" dur="3.28">takes the win here once again windows 11</text><text start="90.88" dur="2.8">falling short by just a minute and a</text><text start="92.24" dur="2.96">half if you&amp;#39;re curious i&amp;#39;ve also</text><text start="93.68" dur="3.119">provided the total amount of time it</text><text start="95.2" dur="3.44">took for both machines to die remember</text><text start="96.799" dur="3.36">this was a highly intensive battery test</text><text start="98.64" dur="3.519">so i&amp;#39;d imagine in the real world the</text><text start="100.159" dur="4.081">skill would be even larger up next is</text><text start="102.159" dur="4">audio editing here i loaded in audacity</text><text start="104.24" dur="3.44">projects with a few mp3 files and an</text><text start="106.159" dur="3.441">audio effect and exported everything</text><text start="107.68" dur="3.84">into one wav file after running the</text><text start="109.6" dur="3.199">export windows 11 comes out on top for</text><text start="111.52" dur="3.12">the first time in this video with</text><text start="112.799" dur="3.6">windows 10 coming in just milliseconds</text><text start="114.64" dur="3.2">behind i wanted to add these lightweight</text><text start="116.399" dur="3.281">tests just in case the difference in</text><text start="117.84" dur="3.52">speed was that large but in this case</text><text start="119.68" dur="3.2">that didn&amp;#39;t really happen but now let&amp;#39;s</text><text start="121.36" dur="3.2">move on to something a bit heavier and</text><text start="122.88" dur="3.12">that&amp;#39;s video editing so things have</text><text start="124.56" dur="3.04">changed in this department as well</text><text start="126" dur="3.2">instead of using some random video</text><text start="127.6" dur="3.359">editor we&amp;#39;re using something a bit more</text><text start="129.2" dur="4">well-known and that is davinci resolve</text><text start="130.959" dur="3.681">17. this is a pretty simple project a</text><text start="133.2" dur="4">video with some audio in the background</text><text start="134.64" dur="4.319">at 1080p 30fps but it suffices for this</text><text start="137.2" dur="3.2">hardware and our purposes so speeding</text><text start="138.959" dur="3.121">things up here because it does take</text><text start="140.4" dur="3.52">quite a while windows 10 renders the</text><text start="142.08" dur="4.08">entire project first with windows 11</text><text start="143.92" dur="3.6">coming in about 43 seconds later and</text><text start="146.16" dur="2.88">just like the battery test here&amp;#39;s the</text><text start="147.52" dur="3.04">total amount of time it took for both</text><text start="149.04" dur="3.12">operating systems to render the file if</text><text start="150.56" dur="3.36">you&amp;#39;re curious moving forward to</text><text start="152.16" dur="3.28">application opening i wanted to do a</text><text start="153.92" dur="3.28">variety of different applications for</text><text start="155.44" dur="3.519">this section starting off with a classic</text><text start="157.2" dur="3.36">windows application control panel</text><text start="158.959" dur="3.681">windows 10 does come in first and</text><text start="160.56" dur="4">windows 11 comes in about a half second</text><text start="162.64" dur="3.679">later let&amp;#39;s also try windows settings</text><text start="164.56" dur="3.52">which is a modern windows application</text><text start="166.319" dur="3.521">and once again windows 10 comes out on</text><text start="168.08" dur="3.28">top with windows 11 having a similar</text><text start="169.84" dur="3.28">delay to control panel let&amp;#39;s do</text><text start="171.36" dur="4.32">something a bit heavier microsoft word</text><text start="173.12" dur="4.16">2019 this application has very long</text><text start="175.68" dur="3.52">loading times but nevertheless windows</text><text start="177.28" dur="3.76">10 loads up the entire application first</text><text start="179.2" dur="3.679">but windows 11 wasn&amp;#39;t too far behind</text><text start="181.04" dur="3.68">considering how long it usually takes to</text><text start="182.879" dur="3.601">load word let&amp;#39;s move away from microsoft</text><text start="184.72" dur="3.439">for a little bit and try opening a pdf</text><text start="186.48" dur="3.6">file with adobe reader and similar</text><text start="188.159" dur="3.841">results windows 10 comes in first with a</text><text start="190.08" dur="4.32">small gap in windows 11. finally let&amp;#39;s</text><text start="192" dur="4.56">try opening a video file via vlc media</text><text start="194.4" dur="3.919">player and surprise surprise windows 10</text><text start="196.56" dur="3.28">opens before windows 11 with a small</text><text start="198.319" dur="3.2">delay that&amp;#39;s kind of funny actually</text><text start="199.84" dur="3.679">windows 10 opened every single</text><text start="201.519" dur="3.921">application before windows 11 and the</text><text start="203.519" dur="4.321">small gap between both was almost the</text><text start="205.44" dur="4.4">exact same for every application</text><text start="207.84" dur="3.92">what a coincidence and i know this isn&amp;#39;t</text><text start="209.84" dur="3.759">entirely os dependent but i wanted to</text><text start="211.76" dur="4.08">quickly do a web page loading test with</text><text start="213.599" dur="3.92">three websites first was youtube.com and</text><text start="215.84" dur="3.52">windows 11 fully loads the entire</text><text start="217.519" dur="3.36">website first with about a half second</text><text start="219.36" dur="3.519">delay on windows 10. this was then</text><text start="220.879" dur="3.841">followed by apple.com where windows 11</text><text start="222.879" dur="3.92">takes the win here as well again windows</text><text start="224.72" dur="3.599">10 having this half second delay finally</text><text start="226.799" dur="3.36">was google.com and they pretty much</text><text start="228.319" dur="3.28">loaded them at almost the exact same</text><text start="230.159" dur="3.28">time maybe windows 10 came in a</text><text start="231.599" dur="3.521">millisecond or two earlier okay well</text><text start="233.439" dur="4">let&amp;#39;s try something else something like</text><text start="235.12" dur="4">file transfer i loaded a usb flash drive</text><text start="237.439" dur="3.36">with about a four gigabyte file and</text><text start="239.12" dur="3.44">tried copying it over to the desktop of</text><text start="240.799" dur="3.601">both oss speeding things along here</text><text start="242.56" dur="3.92">windows 11 finishes copying everything</text><text start="244.4" dur="3.759">over first then around 10 seconds later</text><text start="246.48" dur="3.28">windows 10 finishes up doing the same</text><text start="248.159" dur="3.041">thing just like before here&amp;#39;s the total</text><text start="249.76" dur="3.28">amount of copying time for both</text><text start="251.2" dur="3.52">operating systems if you&amp;#39;re interested</text><text start="253.04" dur="3.599">finally before we get to the benchmarks</text><text start="254.72" dur="3.519">we&amp;#39;ve got a virus scanning test i&amp;#39;ll</text><text start="256.639" dur="3.361">admit i did run into some issues with</text><text start="258.239" dur="3.28">this test in particular and i had to do</text><text start="260" dur="3.28">some reinstallations of malwarebytes</text><text start="261.519" dur="3.281">which is the software we&amp;#39;re using so</text><text start="263.28" dur="3.28">just keep that in mind it won&amp;#39;t be as</text><text start="264.8" dur="3.36">accurate as the other tests nevertheless</text><text start="266.56" dur="3.44">after the scan was run at the same time</text><text start="268.16" dur="3.759">in both operating systems windows 11</text><text start="270" dur="3.84">completes the entire thing first windows</text><text start="271.919" dur="4.161">10 needing around 21 more seconds to</text><text start="273.84" dur="3.76">complete the test so there you go now</text><text start="276.08" dur="3.04">it&amp;#39;s time for the benchmarks this time</text><text start="277.6" dur="2.96">we&amp;#39;ve got a lot more software we&amp;#39;re</text><text start="279.12" dur="3.519">going to work with unlike previous</text><text start="280.56" dur="3.68">videos starting off with geekbench 5. in</text><text start="282.639" dur="4.081">single core performance windows 10</text><text start="284.24" dur="5.2">scored a 471 while windows 11 scored a</text><text start="286.72" dur="4.32">472 a one point difference between both</text><text start="289.44" dur="3.52">operating systems same goes with</text><text start="291.04" dur="5.2">multi-core performance windows 10 scores</text><text start="292.96" dur="4.959">in 1905 while windows 11 scores in 1906</text><text start="296.24" dur="4.08">a one point difference once again</text><text start="297.919" dur="4.161">technically speaking windows 11 does win</text><text start="300.32" dur="3.599">in geekbench but practically speaking</text><text start="302.08" dur="3.839">they&amp;#39;re basically the same thing moving</text><text start="303.919" dur="3.761">on to our next benchmark cpu-z in</text><text start="305.919" dur="4.84">single-standard performance windows 10</text><text start="307.68" dur="5.76">scores a 195.1 and windows 11 scores a</text><text start="310.759" dur="4.361">195.7 less than a one point lead for</text><text start="313.44" dur="3.28">windows 11. multi-threaded scores are a</text><text start="315.12" dur="3.44">bit more interesting windows 10 takes</text><text start="316.72" dur="3.68">the edge here by scoring a one thousand</text><text start="318.56" dur="3.919">three point one while windows 11 scores</text><text start="320.4" dur="4.16">a one thousand one point seven almost a</text><text start="322.479" dur="3.841">one and a half point gap again just like</text><text start="324.56" dur="3.199">the geekbench scores these one point</text><text start="326.32" dur="3.439">gaps don&amp;#39;t really make that much of a</text><text start="327.759" dur="3.841">difference next benchmark i tried was</text><text start="329.759" dur="3.201">crystal disk mark this one specifically</text><text start="331.6" dur="3.68">measured the performance of your hard</text><text start="332.96" dur="3.84">drive or in this case your ssd and will</text><text start="335.28" dur="3.04">appear the results there are too many</text><text start="336.8" dur="3.28">categories to cover here but here&amp;#39;s a</text><text start="338.32" dur="3.2">general overview of what i found and if</text><text start="340.08" dur="3.36">you want to look at specific results you</text><text start="341.52" dur="3.519">can pause the video here so in terms of</text><text start="343.44" dur="3.52">reading windows 11 generally performs</text><text start="345.039" dur="3.761">either slightly better than or just as</text><text start="346.96" dur="3.76">good as windows 10 however looking at</text><text start="348.8" dur="3.92">the other side of things windows 11 had</text><text start="350.72" dur="3.44">a significant deficiency in writing</text><text start="352.72" dur="2.88">compared to windows 10. if you were</text><text start="354.16" dur="3.52">waiting for something interesting to</text><text start="355.6" dur="3.92">happen then well you got what you wanted</text><text start="357.68" dur="3.84">i also wanted to conduct a wi-fi speed</text><text start="359.52" dur="3.76">test using speedtest.net instead of</text><text start="361.52" dur="3.6">taking the best of 10 tests which is</text><text start="363.28" dur="3.919">what i did in my previous comparisons i</text><text start="365.12" dur="3.6">tested each operating system five times</text><text start="367.199" dur="3.521">and averaged out the upload and download</text><text start="368.72" dur="4.8">speed on both in terms of download speed</text><text start="370.72" dur="5">windows 10 averaged to 88.078 megabits</text><text start="373.52" dur="4.399">per second and windows 11 averaged to</text><text start="375.72" dur="4.199">93.692 megabits per second giving</text><text start="377.919" dur="3.441">windows 11 the win here however testing</text><text start="379.919" dur="4.481">the upload speed was a completely</text><text start="381.36" dur="4.72">different story windows 10 scored 88.784</text><text start="384.4" dur="4.56">megabits per second while windows 11</text><text start="386.08" dur="4.8">performs worse at 80.438 megabits per</text><text start="388.96" dur="3.519">second pretty strange all right now</text><text start="390.88" dur="3.599">let&amp;#39;s move on to something more graphics</text><text start="392.479" dur="3.84">intensive starting with cinebench a very</text><text start="394.479" dur="3.521">heavy benchmark especially for this</text><text start="396.319" dur="3.361">hardware after running the single core</text><text start="398" dur="3.6">benchmark on both operating systems</text><text start="399.68" dur="4.239">windows 10 loses out here by scoring a</text><text start="401.6" dur="4.319">439 compared to the higher 450 that</text><text start="403.919" dur="3.761">windows 11 scores however multi-core</text><text start="405.919" dur="3.361">score was a different story windows 10</text><text start="407.68" dur="6.4">receives a 230</text><text start="409.28" dur="6.72">not 233 2033 versus 2003 on windows 11 a</text><text start="414.08" dur="3.2">30 point difference last benchmark</text><text start="416" dur="3.199">before we get to conclusions is</text><text start="417.28" dur="3.44">superposition this benchmark was offered</text><text start="419.199" dur="3.28">in multiple different resolutions and</text><text start="420.72" dur="3.759">graphical effects so first let&amp;#39;s cover</text><text start="422.479" dur="4.481">it when it&amp;#39;s run at 720p low graphics</text><text start="424.479" dur="4.641">windows 10 scores in 1892 and windows 11</text><text start="426.96" dur="4">beats it out with a 1943. i also</text><text start="429.12" dur="3.68">repeated the same benchmark with 1080p</text><text start="430.96" dur="4.48">medium settings and windows 10 loses</text><text start="432.8" dur="4.799">again with a 675 versus the 694 on</text><text start="435.44" dur="3.36">windows 11 and that&amp;#39;s all the benchmarks</text><text start="437.599" dur="3.201">so let&amp;#39;s try and make a reasonable</text><text start="438.8" dur="4">conclusion out of this just note mine is</text><text start="440.8" dur="3.6">not the end all be all of conclusions</text><text start="442.8" dur="3.44">you can draw your own if you want but i</text><text start="444.4" dur="4">just want to give my own input based on</text><text start="446.24" dur="4.079">what i call the real world test which is</text><text start="448.4" dur="4.32">everything but the benchmarks windows 10</text><text start="450.319" dur="4.481">won almost every single one startup</text><text start="452.72" dur="3.759">storage memory battery video editing</text><text start="454.8" dur="3.36">opening applications like a ton of them</text><text start="456.479" dur="3.601">there were just very few exceptions</text><text start="458.16" dur="3.92">however i wouldn&amp;#39;t say that windows 10</text><text start="460.08" dur="3.28">like completely destroyed windows 11 or</text><text start="462.08" dur="3.36">anything like that they were still</text><text start="463.36" dur="3.519">actually very very close in performance</text><text start="465.44" dur="3.36">except for memory if you&amp;#39;re running</text><text start="466.879" dur="3.841">windows 11 on hardware with very low</text><text start="468.8" dur="3.92">memory or if you care a lot about memory</text><text start="470.72" dur="3.919">in general i would be cautious around</text><text start="472.72" dur="4">windows 11. it does take up quite a bit</text><text start="474.639" dur="3.68">more ram than its predecessor now if we</text><text start="476.72" dur="3.199">move to the more technical stuff which</text><text start="478.319" dur="3.6">are the benchmarks and the numbers this</text><text start="479.919" dur="3.601">is where things get a bit more confusing</text><text start="481.919" dur="3.201">windows 11 did some things better than</text><text start="483.52" dur="3.359">windows 10 and windows 10 did some</text><text start="485.12" dur="3.68">things better than windows 11. there</text><text start="486.879" dur="3.121">really isn&amp;#39;t any consistency here i</text><text start="488.8" dur="2.56">guess the best thing i can say in</text><text start="490" dur="3.44">regards to the benchmarks is that if</text><text start="491.36" dur="3.76">you&amp;#39;re doing low level single core tasks</text><text start="493.44" dur="3.84">windows 11 does a slightly better job</text><text start="495.12" dur="3.519">doing that on the other hand windows 10</text><text start="497.28" dur="3.599">does a slightly better job doing</text><text start="498.639" dur="3.521">multi-core related tasks however again</text><text start="500.879" dur="3.04">the difference in performance is</text><text start="502.16" dur="3.36">minuscule overall though if i had to</text><text start="503.919" dur="3.521">choose one winner it would have to be</text><text start="505.52" dur="3.519">windows 10. it either outperforms or</text><text start="507.44" dur="3.52">does just as well as windows 11 in the</text><text start="509.039" dur="3.841">majority of my tests but i&amp;#39;m sticking to</text><text start="510.96" dur="3.439">my same old statement don&amp;#39;t choose an</text><text start="512.88" dur="3.36">operating system solely for its</text><text start="514.399" dur="3.601">performance first priority should be its</text><text start="516.24" dur="3.679">features and reliability speed should</text><text start="518" dur="3.44">come afterwards so hopefully this video</text><text start="519.919" dur="4">gives a better idea on how performance</text><text start="521.44" dur="6.24">compares on both windows 10 and 11. like</text><text start="523.919" dur="3.761">subscribe and thanks for watching</text></transcript>