<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><transcript><text start="0" dur="2.879">[Music]</text><text start="0.12" dur="6.44">ladies and gentlemen introducing</text><text start="2.879" dur="7.621">Microsoft your go-to company for Unix</text><text start="6.56" dur="7.119">forget those silly single tasking single</text><text start="10.5" dur="6.24">user operating systems like CPM and</text><text start="13.679" dur="5.221">basic forget Bonkers graphical user</text><text start="16.74" dur="5.76">interfaces that cost bazillions of</text><text start="18.9" dur="7.1">dollars like the Xerox star wait just a</text><text start="22.5" dur="7.26">minute well we show you its power of Ls</text><text start="26" dur="7.18">pipelines Man pages and more but not</text><text start="29.76" dur="6.66">less how much would you pay for a Unix</text><text start="33.18" dur="6.059">based multitasking operating system that</text><text start="36.42" dur="6.06">will Pioneer the way that we work on</text><text start="39.239" dur="7.441">Intel microcomputers five thousand</text><text start="42.48" dur="5.12">dollars ten thousand dollars no it&amp;#39;s</text><text start="46.68" dur="5.28">just</text><text start="47.6" dur="5.799">995 dollars it&amp;#39;s zenix order today from</text><text start="51.96" dur="4.98">Microsoft</text><text start="53.399" dur="6.18">yep you heard me right Microsoft made a</text><text start="56.94" dur="4.139">version of Unix that was available for</text><text start="59.579" dur="4.281">personal computers</text><text start="61.079" dur="6.601">and they made it before they even made</text><text start="63.86" dur="7.119">MS-DOS and windows what&amp;#39;s more for a</text><text start="67.68" dur="6.96">while Microsoft was the world&amp;#39;s largest</text><text start="70.979" dur="6.421">reseller of Unix in the world</text><text start="74.64" dur="5.1">strap n because today you&amp;#39;re going to</text><text start="77.4" dur="4.2">find out how close we got to a world</text><text start="79.74" dur="5.879">where Unix could have been on everyone&amp;#39;s</text><text start="81.6" dur="5.879">desktop instead of Windows or Mac OS in</text><text start="85.619" dur="5.221">this video we&amp;#39;ll take a look at the</text><text start="87.479" dur="5.64">origins of xenix its features and how</text><text start="90.84" dur="6.239">and why it was sold to the Santa Cruz</text><text start="93.119" dur="6.901">operation as well as xenix&amp;#39;s demise I&amp;#39;ll</text><text start="97.079" dur="5.101">also wax lyrical for a while about what</text><text start="100.02" dur="4.88">could have been in a world where xenix</text><text start="102.18" dur="2.72">succeeded</text><text start="108.5" dur="5.68">back in 1969 a couple of computer</text><text start="111.72" dur="4.14">scientists here at Bell Labs started to</text><text start="114.18" dur="3.6">develop some programs they needed for</text><text start="115.86" dur="4.32">their own use</text><text start="117.78" dur="4.379">what Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie</text><text start="120.18" dur="4.079">started developing then has evolved into</text><text start="122.159" dur="5.78">the Unix operating system which by now</text><text start="124.259" dur="3.68">is widely used around the world</text><text start="128.039" dur="6.06">at T is no newcomer to computers</text><text start="131.22" dur="4.2">although at T previously was barred from</text><text start="134.099" dur="4.14">selling computers in the Open</text><text start="135.42" dur="6.3">Marketplace its research and development</text><text start="138.239" dur="5.281">arm at T Bell Laboratories has always</text><text start="141.72" dur="4.86">been at the Leading Edge of computer</text><text start="143.52" dur="6.12">technology as computers have grown in</text><text start="146.58" dur="5.4">power and complexity at T has developed</text><text start="149.64" dur="4.26">new computer software to make the</text><text start="151.98" dur="4.32">machines more productive</text><text start="153.9" dur="6.24">The Versatile Unix operating system</text><text start="156.3" dur="5.76">developed at Bell labs in 1969 now is</text><text start="160.14" dur="4.14">fast becoming the computer industry</text><text start="162.06" dur="3.899">standard of the 1980s</text><text start="164.28" dur="5.34">with its entry into the computer</text><text start="165.959" dur="6.721">business a t the company that largely</text><text start="169.62" dur="6.66">created today&amp;#39;s computer technology has</text><text start="172.68" dur="6.96">become a major Force shaping its future</text><text start="176.28" dur="6.12">in the late 1970s the Unix operating</text><text start="179.64" dur="5.52">system was gaining popularity in</text><text start="182.4" dur="4.86">academic and research circles at the</text><text start="185.16" dur="4.32">same time Microsoft was bought a</text><text start="187.26" dur="4.5">fledgling company of about four years</text><text start="189.48" dur="5.64">old with the dockiest of docks at the</text><text start="191.76" dur="5.64">helm Bill Gates and Paul Allen despite</text><text start="195.12" dur="4.38">their nerdy nature Microsoft had</text><text start="197.4" dur="4.14">recently become successful selling their</text><text start="199.5" dur="5.04">versions of programming languages such</text><text start="201.54" dur="4.68">as basic and Fortran although some could</text><text start="204.54" dur="3.66">argue that you could do simple operating</text><text start="206.22" dur="4.86">system type functions with basic and</text><text start="208.2" dur="5.58">Fortran Microsoft had not yet developed</text><text start="211.08" dur="5.4">any operating system software at that</text><text start="213.78" dur="5.94">time Unix was a very popular operating</text><text start="216.48" dur="6.179">system but was expensive and ran only on</text><text start="219.72" dur="5.46">Mainframe or mini computers recognizing</text><text start="222.659" dur="4.561">the potential demand for a unix-like</text><text start="225.18" dur="4.919">operating system on the emerging world</text><text start="227.22" dur="6.06">of personal computers Microsoft decided</text><text start="230.099" dur="5.7">to create its own version of Unix</text><text start="233.28" dur="5.039">with Microsoft being a relatively small</text><text start="235.799" dur="4.8">player in the Computing industry they</text><text start="238.319" dur="4.801">believe that developing a Unix based</text><text start="240.599" dur="5.161">operating system allowed the company to</text><text start="243.12" dur="6.179">establish itself as a credible and</text><text start="245.76" dur="5.94">Innovative software vendor so in 1978</text><text start="249.299" dur="5.281">Microsoft entered into a joint venture</text><text start="251.7" dur="4.98">relationship with atnt to create a</text><text start="254.58" dur="5.159">version of Unix that would run on 8-bit</text><text start="256.68" dur="6">and 16-bit microprocessors used in early</text><text start="259.739" dur="5.881">personal computers by acquiring the</text><text start="262.68" dur="4.92">rights to Unix from atnt Microsoft was</text><text start="265.62" dur="5.46">able to leverage the existing code base</text><text start="267.6" dur="5.64">and development efforts of atnt and its</text><text start="271.08" dur="4.679">Partners which helped to accelerate the</text><text start="273.24" dur="6.019">development of the operating system many</text><text start="275.759" dur="5.641">years later at the 1996 Unix Expo</text><text start="279.259" dur="4.781">Microsoft&amp;#39;s chairman Bill Gates said</text><text start="281.4" dur="6.359">Microsoft had for a long time the</text><text start="284.04" dur="6.36">world&amp;#39;s highest volume at T Unix license</text><text start="287.759" dur="5.341">this new operating system was to be</text><text start="290.4" dur="4.68">called zenix and so it was Microsoft&amp;#39;s</text><text start="293.1" dur="4.86">version of Unix would become popular</text><text start="295.08" dur="4.32">with businesses particularly those who</text><text start="297.96" dur="3.9">couldn&amp;#39;t afford to buy expensive</text><text start="299.4" dur="4.14">Mainframe or mini computers the project</text><text start="301.86" dur="4.02">was challenging as the hardware</text><text start="303.54" dur="4.68">available at a time was not as powerful</text><text start="305.88" dur="4.98">as its larger contemporary computers</text><text start="308.22" dur="4.38">especially as there were limitations on</text><text start="310.86" dur="2.88">the amount of memory and storage that</text><text start="312.6" dur="3">could be used</text><text start="313.74" dur="4.38">despite the challenges involved</text><text start="315.6" dur="5.159">Microsoft was able to develop xenix for</text><text start="318.12" dur="4.919">microcomputers building the system in a</text><text start="320.759" dur="4.921">tiny memory and storage footprint try</text><text start="323.039" dur="5.461">asking Microsoft to do that today</text><text start="325.68" dur="5.519">cenix was able to offer a powerful Unix</text><text start="328.5" dur="5.34">derivative to businesses at a fraction</text><text start="331.199" dur="4.44">of the cost of Mainframe equivalents it</text><text start="333.84" dur="4.139">featured proper multi-user and</text><text start="335.639" dur="4.921">multitasking capabilities at a time</text><text start="337.979" dur="6.06">before its single tasking single user</text><text start="340.56" dur="6.38">brother MS-DOS wasn&amp;#39;t even a twinkle in</text><text start="344.039" dur="5.281">Bill Gates eye on the 25th of August</text><text start="346.94" dur="4.9">Microsoft announced xenix to the world</text><text start="349.32" dur="6.06">and shipped its first version to Central</text><text start="351.84" dur="5.88">data Corporation in 1981. in the years</text><text start="355.38" dur="5.46">that followed later versions such as</text><text start="357.72" dur="6">xenix 286 and the imaginatively titled</text><text start="360.84" dur="5.699">xenix 386 ran on more powerful</text><text start="363.72" dur="5.64">processors and offered more features and</text><text start="366.539" dur="5.22">better performance very quickly xenix</text><text start="369.36" dur="4.619">became popular with businesses but</text><text start="371.759" dur="4.261">particularly those in the financial and</text><text start="373.979" dur="4.261">banking Industries</text><text start="376.02" dur="4.019">Phoenix was a multi-user operating</text><text start="378.24" dur="4.44">system that could run on personal</text><text start="380.039" dur="4.921">computers with Intel processors as well</text><text start="382.68" dur="4.32">as some other processors especially in</text><text start="384.96" dur="4.679">the early days before Intel processors</text><text start="387" dur="5.28">were the star of the show as you can see</text><text start="389.639" dur="6.721">in this graphic zenix was on platforms</text><text start="392.28" dur="7.38">such as the pdp-11 the Apple Lisa the</text><text start="396.36" dur="7.44">sun 2 system Intel system 86 machines</text><text start="399.66" dur="6.599">the Altos 8600 Acorn systems running the</text><text start="403.8" dur="5.339">national semiconductor ns16032</text><text start="406.259" dur="6">processors as well as tandy&amp;#39;s model 16</text><text start="409.139" dur="5.821">which was on the Motorola 6 to 8000 CPU</text><text start="412.259" dur="5.041">with TRS xenix</text><text start="414.96" dur="6.42">xenix supported many of the same</text><text start="417.3" dur="6.48">features as its core at T Unix base such</text><text start="421.38" dur="4.5">as command line interface file</text><text start="423.78" dur="4.32">management and the ability to run</text><text start="425.88" dur="5.099">multiple programs at the same time</text><text start="428.1" dur="5.34">however zenix had some unique features</text><text start="430.979" dur="4.5">as well for example it had a virtual</text><text start="433.44" dur="3.96">memory system that allowed programs to</text><text start="435.479" dur="4.381">use more memory than was physically</text><text start="437.4" dur="4.32">available in the computer this made it</text><text start="439.86" dur="4.679">easier for businesses to run multiple</text><text start="441.72" dur="4.979">programs at the same time later on in</text><text start="444.539" dur="5.22">its life zenix Incorporated elements</text><text start="446.699" dur="6.78">from version 4.2 of the Berkeley systems</text><text start="449.759" dur="6.72">distribution of Unix BSD notably the vi</text><text start="453.479" dur="5.761">or VI text editor and is supporting</text><text start="456.479" dur="4.801">libraries term cap and curses its kernel</text><text start="459.24" dur="4.62">featured some original Extensions by</text><text start="461.28" dur="5.039">Microsoft themselves notably file</text><text start="463.86" dur="4.679">walking and semi-force as well as a</text><text start="466.319" dur="5.1">visual shell for menu driven operation</text><text start="468.539" dur="5.28">instead of the traditional Unix shell it</text><text start="471.419" dur="5.461">also included a limited form of local</text><text start="473.819" dur="5.701">networking overseas video lines rs232</text><text start="476.88" dur="4.74">ports it was possible through the mecnet</text><text start="479.52" dur="4.56">software which supported file transfer</text><text start="481.62" dur="5.4">and electronic mail although Unix to</text><text start="484.08" dur="5.58">Unix copy protocol uucp was still used</text><text start="487.02" dur="4.38">for networking via modems the cost of</text><text start="489.66" dur="3.84">xenix varied depending on the version</text><text start="491.4" dur="4.5">and Licensing options that were selected</text><text start="493.5" dur="4.319">in the early days of zenix Microsoft</text><text start="495.9" dur="3.96">offered several different versions of</text><text start="497.819" dur="4.56">the operating system each with different</text><text start="499.86" dur="5.399">pricing and Licensing options for</text><text start="502.379" dur="6.621">example xenix 3.0 which was released in</text><text start="505.259" dur="6.96">1983 was priced at a fairly reasonable</text><text start="509" dur="5.74">995 dollars per copy for a single user</text><text start="512.219" dur="6.421">license whilst the 5 user license would</text><text start="514.74" dur="6.84">cost 2 495 that was a highly competitive</text><text start="518.64" dur="4.56">offering compared to at T&amp;#39;s Unix which</text><text start="521.58" dur="4.259">was selling for at least ten thousand</text><text start="523.2" dur="4.92">dollars at the time as xenix evolved and</text><text start="525.839" dur="4.62">was rebranded somewhat as Microsoft&amp;#39;s</text><text start="528.12" dur="4.98">Unix operating system pricing and</text><text start="530.459" dur="6.241">Licensing options changed Microsoft</text><text start="533.1" dur="8.52">system v386 released 2.2 which was</text><text start="536.7" dur="7.68">released in 1989 was priced at 1995 for</text><text start="541.62" dur="4.64">a single user license whilst the 10 user</text><text start="544.38" dur="5.459">license cost</text><text start="546.26" dur="6.639">9995. for larger organizations Microsoft</text><text start="549.839" dur="5.521">also offered site licensing options for</text><text start="552.899" dur="4.44">xenix which allowed for an unlimited</text><text start="555.36" dur="4.26">number of users to access the operating</text><text start="557.339" dur="5.101">system for a flat fee these site</text><text start="559.62" dur="4.5">licensing options could be customized to</text><text start="562.44" dur="3.959">meet the specific needs of the</text><text start="564.12" dur="5.04">organization and were priced accordingly</text><text start="566.399" dur="4.981">in reality though back in those days at</text><text start="569.16" dur="4.98">Microsoft they very rarely had a</text><text start="571.38" dur="4.62">stringent price book and were known to</text><text start="574.14" dur="4.139">just make up their pricing</text><text start="576" dur="3.899">the main thing is though that it was</text><text start="578.279" dur="3.421">generally considered to be an affordable</text><text start="579.899" dur="3.181">option for small and medium-sized</text><text start="581.7" dur="4.68">businesses compared with the</text><text start="583.08" dur="6.48">contemporaries such as at T Unix as an</text><text start="586.38" dur="6.06">example Unix system V or 5 which was</text><text start="589.56" dur="4.92">released in 1983 the license was twenty</text><text start="592.44" dur="4.44">five thousand dollars plus royalties of</text><text start="594.48" dur="5.72">one thousand dollars per system and that</text><text start="596.88" dur="3.32">was on the OEM license</text><text start="601.76" dur="5.56">it hurts me a little bit to see but</text><text start="604.32" dur="5.94">Microsoft actually made a robust and</text><text start="607.32" dur="4.62">reliable operating system in xenix and</text><text start="610.26" dur="3.48">it was well suited for the needs of the</text><text start="611.94" dur="3.66">small and medium-sized businesses at the</text><text start="613.74" dur="3.96">time however compared to other</text><text start="615.6" dur="5.52">contemporary operating systems of the</text><text start="617.7" dur="5.1">time it had a few shortcomings one of</text><text start="621.12" dur="3.899">the main limitations of xenix was the</text><text start="622.8" dur="4.32">lack of compatibility with other Unix</text><text start="625.019" dur="5.041">based operating systems unlike other</text><text start="627.12" dur="5.04">Unix V8s for most of its life zenix did</text><text start="630.06" dur="4.62">not adhere to standard Unix</text><text start="632.16" dur="4.14">specifications which could make it a bit</text><text start="634.68" dur="3.779">difficult to Port applications between</text><text start="636.3" dur="4.44">different Unix systems this lack of</text><text start="638.459" dur="4.32">compatibility made it challenging for</text><text start="640.74" dur="4.8">businesses to integrate zenix based</text><text start="642.779" dur="5.521">systems with other Unix based systems</text><text start="645.54" dur="4.979">another limitation of xenix was the lack</text><text start="648.3" dur="4.92">of support for graphical user interfaces</text><text start="650.519" dur="5.041">at the time the use of gui&amp;#39;s or</text><text start="653.22" dur="4.26">graphical user interfaces was becoming</text><text start="655.56" dur="3.24">more popular and many contemporary</text><text start="657.48" dur="4.14">operating systems such as the Apple</text><text start="658.8" dur="4.44">Macintosh the leesa and later Microsoft</text><text start="661.62" dur="4.02">Windows were designed to be more</text><text start="663.24" dur="4.92">user-friendly by incorporating gui&amp;#39;s</text><text start="665.64" dur="4.74">xenix on the other hand was a text-based</text><text start="668.16" dur="5.16">system making it appear less accessible</text><text start="670.38" dur="5.579">to those non-technical users as the 80s</text><text start="673.32" dur="4.5">wore on xenix did eventually support the</text><text start="675.959" dur="3.901">X windowing system which was the de</text><text start="677.82" dur="4.8">facto Unix graphical windowing system</text><text start="679.86" dur="5.76">commonly known as X11 which had been</text><text start="682.62" dur="5.88">developed in about June of 1984 however</text><text start="685.62" dur="5.159">X11 support was not available in early</text><text start="688.5" dur="5.82">versions of zenix and was only adopted</text><text start="690.779" dur="7.381">later with xenix system v386 released</text><text start="694.32" dur="6.48">2.2 which was released in 1989. in fact</text><text start="698.16" dur="4.98">by the time X11 support had been added</text><text start="700.8" dur="5.58">to ZX other operating systems such as</text><text start="703.14" dur="5.34">Sonos BSD and later Linux had already</text><text start="706.38" dur="4.38">gained significant market share in the</text><text start="708.48" dur="5.039">Unix World which limited the impact the</text><text start="710.76" dur="4.079">X11 support had on xenix&amp;#39;s overall</text><text start="713.519" dur="4.021">success</text><text start="714.839" dur="4.801">however arguably the biggest shortcoming</text><text start="717.54" dur="3.96">with the development of xenix was that</text><text start="719.64" dur="3.96">it was largely focused on supporting the</text><text start="721.5" dur="3.779">needs of businesses which meant that it</text><text start="723.6" dur="4.62">did not have the same level of support</text><text start="725.279" dur="5.221">for Consumer orientated applications and</text><text start="728.22" dur="5.1">yes games that other operating systems</text><text start="730.5" dur="4.68">such as dos and later Windows had this</text><text start="733.32" dur="4.5">made it less attractive to home users</text><text start="735.18" dur="4.8">and limited its potential Market beyond</text><text start="737.82" dur="4.519">the business sector it&amp;#39;s all about the</text><text start="739.98" dur="2.359">apps</text><text start="744.36" dur="5.52">so now you&amp;#39;ve heard a bit about what</text><text start="746.76" dur="5.4">zenix was it&amp;#39;s interesting to let the</text><text start="749.88" dur="4.26">mind wander and ask what would the world</text><text start="752.16" dur="4.619">have looked like if Microsoft had</text><text start="754.14" dur="6.36">continued to develop xenix instead of</text><text start="756.779" dur="5.881">going down that Dawson Windows route one</text><text start="760.5" dur="4.74">possible outcome is that xenix could</text><text start="762.66" dur="4.38">have continued to grow in popularity and</text><text start="765.24" dur="4.2">become the dominant operating system for</text><text start="767.04" dur="5.039">personal computers instead of Dawson</text><text start="769.44" dur="4.86">later Windows it was only with the</text><text start="772.079" dur="3.721">Advent of Windows 95 that Microsoft</text><text start="774.3" dur="3.839">really start getting close to</text><text start="775.8" dur="4.44">multitasking and even then a fully</text><text start="778.139" dur="5.461">preemptive multitasking multi-user</text><text start="780.24" dur="5.52">operating system kind of like Unix well</text><text start="783.6" dur="4.62">that wasn&amp;#39;t available until Windows NT</text><text start="785.76" dur="4.56">came along both doors and windows had</text><text start="788.22" dur="5.52">some level of networking support fairly</text><text start="790.32" dur="5.78">earlier on but it almost always was a</text><text start="793.74" dur="5.279">via shim and it was pretty archaic</text><text start="796.1" dur="4.78">multiple users wasn&amp;#39;t really a thing at</text><text start="799.019" dur="4.44">all in MS-DOS and again it wasn&amp;#39;t</text><text start="800.88" dur="5.399">properly implemented in Windows until</text><text start="803.459" dur="4.68">about Windows and T but almost from the</text><text start="806.279" dur="4.081">start xenix could be described as a</text><text start="808.139" dur="5.281">multitasking multi-user operating system</text><text start="810.36" dur="5.76">and very early it supported networking</text><text start="813.42" dur="4.859">of sorts if xenix had become the</text><text start="816.12" dur="4.26">dominant operating system it might have</text><text start="818.279" dur="4.5">led to a different set of applications</text><text start="820.38" dur="4.019">and services being developed with a</text><text start="822.779" dur="4.141">greater emphasis on distributed</text><text start="824.399" dur="4.62">computing and networking way ahead of</text><text start="826.92" dur="4.859">when it became the norm every household</text><text start="829.019" dur="5.341">has a multi-user multitasking networking</text><text start="831.779" dur="4.68">operating system in it today even in</text><text start="834.36" dur="4.08">your pocket with your smartphone but it</text><text start="836.459" dur="4.081">really took until probably around the</text><text start="838.44" dur="4.8">late 90s before that sort of thing was</text><text start="840.54" dur="6.299">becoming commonplace imagine if you had</text><text start="843.24" dur="6.779">all that power on your own PC back in</text><text start="846.839" dur="5.221">the 80s the fact is that was a reality</text><text start="850.019" dur="4.861">it just didn&amp;#39;t filter down to the home</text><text start="852.06" dur="4.8">or the small PC market we all had dos</text><text start="854.88" dur="4.32">and windows and often didn&amp;#39;t think to</text><text start="856.86" dur="5.34">look outside of what came pre-installed</text><text start="859.2" dur="4.98">with our PC if xenix had become the de</text><text start="862.2" dur="4.5">facto operating system for the PC mark</text><text start="864.18" dur="4.98">Market it is likely that IBM wouldn&amp;#39;t</text><text start="866.7" dur="4.68">have asked Microsoft to make OS 2 with</text><text start="869.16" dur="5.34">them and so would have gone somewhere</text><text start="871.38" dur="5.579">else maybe IBM would have had even less</text><text start="874.5" dur="4.56">Success With os2 Or maybe it would have</text><text start="876.959" dur="5.041">triumphed I guess we&amp;#39;ll never know about</text><text start="879.06" dur="5.519">that it&amp;#39;s also possible that Linux might</text><text start="882" dur="5.579">have not made as much of a foothold as</text><text start="884.579" dur="5.94">it did after all Linux was built out of</text><text start="887.579" dur="5.521">the frustration lennis&amp;#39;s new 386</text><text start="890.519" dur="5.101">computer came with MS-DOS pre-installed</text><text start="893.1" dur="6.06">and he wasn&amp;#39;t satisfied at how little</text><text start="895.62" dur="5.7">dos utilized to power off the 386 if his</text><text start="899.16" dur="4.32">3d6 had come with zenix pre-installed</text><text start="901.32" dur="4.8">would he even have had the thought to</text><text start="903.48" dur="4.62">write his own Unix the mind boggles with</text><text start="906.12" dur="4.519">the alternative universe that we might</text><text start="908.1" dur="2.539">have lived in</text><text start="912.06" dur="5.279">the Santa Cruz operation usually known</text><text start="914.639" dur="5.94">as school was coincidentally established</text><text start="917.339" dur="5.341">in 1979. it was a software company that</text><text start="920.579" dur="4.26">was focused on creating unix-based</text><text start="922.68" dur="5.279">operating systems for businesses as</text><text start="924.839" dur="6.06">early as 1982 Microsoft who at the time</text><text start="927.959" dur="4.981">had between 25 and 50 employees and</text><text start="930.899" dur="4.321">scope who had a roughly about the same</text><text start="932.94" dur="4.259">number of employees forged a joint</text><text start="935.22" dur="4.08">agreement for development and Technology</text><text start="937.199" dur="4.14">exchange with the two companies</text><text start="939.3" dur="4.68">Engineers working together on</text><text start="941.339" dur="4.8">improvements to zenix indeed score&amp;#39;s</text><text start="943.98" dur="4.799">first shrink wrapped product was a copy</text><text start="946.139" dur="6.601">of xenix that operated on Apple&amp;#39;s new</text><text start="948.779" dur="6.721">Lisa computer in 1984 Microsoft and</text><text start="952.74" dur="5.039">school jointly announced that score had</text><text start="955.5" dur="5.22">been provided right to distribute xenix</text><text start="957.779" dur="5.581">within the United States branded as goes</text><text start="960.72" dur="6.96">Enix the first release of scozenix</text><text start="963.36" dur="6.96">system 5 was in 1985 for the IBM PC XT</text><text start="967.68" dur="6.48">and compatibles as well as an enhanced</text><text start="970.32" dur="6.959">version for the then u286 based IBM pc80</text><text start="974.16" dur="6.06">the skull branded version had some major</text><text start="977.279" dur="5.161">enhancements over the zenix core systems</text><text start="980.22" dur="5.22">such as local area networking and</text><text start="982.44" dur="6.12">multi-user support despite a deal to buy</text><text start="985.44" dur="6.54">between 11 and 16 percent of school by</text><text start="988.56" dur="5.82">Microsoft in February of 1989 industry</text><text start="991.98" dur="5.159">Skeptics viewed Microsoft&amp;#39;s level of</text><text start="994.38" dur="6.78">commitment to xenix with some suspicion</text><text start="997.139" dur="6.781">from as early as the mid-1980s it later</text><text start="1001.16" dur="4.799">became clear that Microsoft was losing</text><text start="1003.92" dur="4.26">interest in xenix from their own</text><text start="1005.959" dur="4.021">business perspective there were a number</text><text start="1008.18" dur="4.14">of reasons for Microsoft&amp;#39;s waning</text><text start="1009.98" dur="4.2">interest the first reason was due in</text><text start="1012.32" dur="6">part to the breakup of the Bell System</text><text start="1014.18" dur="6.5">in 1982 prior to this atnt had not been</text><text start="1018.32" dur="4.8">able to sell Unix in a traditional sense</text><text start="1020.68" dur="4.659">according to the Wikipedia article on</text><text start="1023.12" dur="4.679">xenix Microsoft believed that it could</text><text start="1025.339" dur="4.561">no longer compete with unix&amp;#39;s developers</text><text start="1027.799" dur="5.341">as Microsoft were having to pay</text><text start="1029.9" dur="4.799">royalties to ATT and Licensing this was</text><text start="1033.14" dur="3.419">perhaps not something that they thought</text><text start="1034.699" dur="4.321">the future of Microsoft was for</text><text start="1036.559" dur="4.681">licensing their own products was far</text><text start="1039.02" dur="5.039">more lucrative than re-licensing someone</text><text start="1041.24" dur="5.76">else&amp;#39;s after all secondly before the</text><text start="1044.059" dur="4.981">mid-1980s MS-DOS was rapidly taking off</text><text start="1047" dur="4.08">as a product due in part to the fact</text><text start="1049.04" dur="5.34">that it shipped with almost every single</text><text start="1051.08" dur="5.76">PC despite dos not being nearly as</text><text start="1054.38" dur="4.34">powerful as xenix dos was good enough</text><text start="1056.84" dur="4.38">for most businesses of the time</text><text start="1058.72" dur="4.3">Microsoft was also investing much of</text><text start="1061.22" dur="4.56">their time in a new graphical operating</text><text start="1063.02" dur="5.94">system Windows which was launched in</text><text start="1065.78" dur="4.8">late 1985. Bill Gates believed that the</text><text start="1068.96" dur="3.839">graphical user interface for a personal</text><text start="1070.58" dur="4.14">computer was the future</text><text start="1072.799" dur="4.62">and evidence could be found in this</text><text start="1074.72" dur="5.16">statement as early as 1981 when Bill</text><text start="1077.419" dur="4.741">Gates ordered the creation of interface</text><text start="1079.88" dur="6.6">manager which eventually became the</text><text start="1082.16" dur="6.899">MS-DOS executive part of Windows 1.0 by</text><text start="1086.48" dur="5.88">the early 1990s windows by then version</text><text start="1089.059" dur="6.12">3.1 was out and had become Microsoft&amp;#39;s</text><text start="1092.36" dur="5.04">Flagship product the third factor that</text><text start="1095.179" dur="4.561">contributed Microsoft&amp;#39;s decision to sell</text><text start="1097.4" dur="4.56">xenix was that the Unix market was</text><text start="1099.74" dur="4.2">becoming increasingly crowded the</text><text start="1101.96" dur="5.219">emergence of other Unix based operating</text><text start="1103.94" dur="5.58">systems such as Sun Solaris had gained</text><text start="1107.179" dur="4.38">popularity amongst businesses and</text><text start="1109.52" dur="2.94">Microsoft found it harder to compete</text><text start="1111.559" dur="3.421">with them</text><text start="1112.46" dur="4.86">finally the legal challenges that school</text><text start="1114.98" dur="4.8">faced over the ownership of the Unix</text><text start="1117.32" dur="5.16">operating system also played a role in</text><text start="1119.78" dur="5.04">Microsoft&amp;#39;s decision to sell xenix</text><text start="1122.48" dur="4.86">school had decided to buy the rights to</text><text start="1124.82" dur="4.56">Unix from Novell who in turn had bought</text><text start="1127.34" dur="5.579">the original rights from the Unix system</text><text start="1129.38" dur="5.58">Laboratories in 1993. this became a</text><text start="1132.919" dur="4.5">three-way deal with HP being in the mix</text><text start="1134.96" dur="5.7">too information Week Magazine said in</text><text start="1137.419" dur="5.161">1995 that the computer industry was not</text><text start="1140.66" dur="4.74">so sure that skull could handle being</text><text start="1142.58" dur="6.06">the primary Unix Shepherd and that the</text><text start="1145.4" dur="6.12">deal was a complicated plan and that was</text><text start="1148.64" dur="5.82">confusing from the start some of these</text><text start="1151.52" dur="4.62">issues were LED well into the 2000s with</text><text start="1154.46" dur="4.92">the legal battles between the newly</text><text start="1156.14" dur="5.279">formed School group and Novell the</text><text start="1159.38" dur="4.32">uncertainty and controversy surrounding</text><text start="1161.419" dur="4.5">Unix ownership may have made it less</text><text start="1163.7" dur="5.04">attractive to Microsoft to continue</text><text start="1165.919" dur="5.521">investing in zenix despite all of these</text><text start="1168.74" dur="5.059">aspects staff at Microsoft were said to</text><text start="1171.44" dur="5.58">be using xenix internally as late as</text><text start="1173.799" dur="5.74">1988 and their internal email system was</text><text start="1177.02" dur="5.279">running on a 68 000 based zenix server</text><text start="1179.539" dur="4.561">well into the mid-1990s there were</text><text start="1182.299" dur="4.921">obviously still a few folks that were</text><text start="1184.1" dur="6.36">loyal to xenix Until the End however in</text><text start="1187.22" dur="5.52">1995 Microsoft decided to sell the</text><text start="1190.46" dur="5.219">rights of xenix to score exclusively</text><text start="1192.74" dur="4.679">after acquiring xenix School continue to</text><text start="1195.679" dur="4.021">develop and improve the operating system</text><text start="1197.419" dur="7.101">releasing several versions including</text><text start="1199.7" dur="7.82">score zenix 386 and score open server</text><text start="1204.52" dur="3">foreign</text><text start="1208.78" dur="5.74">School eventually sold its business to</text><text start="1211.64" dur="6.419">Linux company Caldera in the year 2000</text><text start="1214.52" dur="6.42">due to earnings shortfalls in 2002</text><text start="1218.059" dur="5.701">confusingly Caldera renamed themselves</text><text start="1220.94" dur="5.4">the score group the school group created</text><text start="1223.76" dur="5.039">some legal challenges in the early 2000s</text><text start="1226.34" dur="5.28">over ownership of the Unix operating</text><text start="1228.799" dur="5.281">system in a strange twist of fate School</text><text start="1231.62" dur="5.46">group claimed that Linux a popular open</text><text start="1234.08" dur="5.82">source operating system had infringed on</text><text start="1237.08" dur="5.4">its Unix copyrights this led to a series</text><text start="1239.9" dur="5.88">of lawsuits between school and several</text><text start="1242.48" dur="6.079">companies including IBM and Novell with</text><text start="1245.78" dur="5.639">legal disputes going on over 18 years</text><text start="1248.559" dur="5.201">that topic is worth a whole video on its</text><text start="1251.419" dur="4.321">own so I won&amp;#39;t dwell on it suffice it to</text><text start="1253.76" dur="4.86">say it didn&amp;#39;t end that well for school</text><text start="1255.74" dur="5.34">in 2007 School group filed for</text><text start="1258.62" dur="4.679">bankruptcy and its Unix related assets</text><text start="1261.08" dur="4.68">were sold to another company as a result</text><text start="1263.299" dur="5.361">the zenix operating system is no longer</text><text start="1265.76" dur="2.9">produced today</text><text start="1269.919" dur="5.801">so in conclusion xenix was a significant</text><text start="1273.44" dur="3.9">operating system that paved the way for</text><text start="1275.72" dur="3.78">the development of modern operating</text><text start="1277.34" dur="5.219">systems despite it hardly being known</text><text start="1279.5" dur="6.179">about today Microsoft&amp;#39;s acquisition of</text><text start="1282.559" dur="4.921">the license for xenix from at T helped</text><text start="1285.679" dur="4.201">make it more widely available to</text><text start="1287.48" dur="4.98">businesses although zinix is no longer</text><text start="1289.88" dur="4.799">in use today its Legacy continues to</text><text start="1292.46" dur="4.26">live on as many of the features that</text><text start="1294.679" dur="4.081">were first introduced in xenix can be</text><text start="1296.72" dur="4.26">found in modern operating systems such</text><text start="1298.76" dur="4.74">as Linux and Mac OS</text><text start="1300.98" dur="4.5">that almost wraps up this video I&amp;#39;d just</text><text start="1303.5" dur="3.84">like to say a huge thanks to my lovely</text><text start="1305.48" dur="4.199">Patron sponsors and you can see their</text><text start="1307.34" dur="3.839">names running up the screen now if you&amp;#39;d</text><text start="1309.679" dur="3.541">like to help out this channel make more</text><text start="1311.179" dur="4.921">original content then please head over</text><text start="1313.22" dur="5.1">to patreon.com forward slash ask geek</text><text start="1316.1" dur="4.8">lab or just press the join button here</text><text start="1318.32" dur="4.739">on YouTube if you&amp;#39;d like to be reminded</text><text start="1320.9" dur="3.96">of more of my videos then press the</text><text start="1323.059" dur="4.261">Subscribe button and change the</text><text start="1324.86" dur="4.38">notification Bell to all thank you very</text><text start="1327.32" dur="4.14">much for watching this video and I&amp;#39;ll</text><text start="1329.24" dur="5.96">see you in the next one until next time</text><text start="1331.46" dur="3.74">be excellent to each other</text></transcript>